IT Governance Committee on Research Technology December 9, 2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SteeringCoordinating Data / Research Logistics Community Engagement Community Health Planning Committee Structure Austin / Travis County CHA CHIP.
Advertisements

Program Management Office (PMO) Design
Ad Hoc Committee Meeting June 17, Meeting Topics State WIB Examples Brookings Update WIA Reauthorization.
Overview of Priorities and Activities: Shared Services Canada Presentation to the Information Technology Infrastructure Roundtable June 17, 2013 Liseanne.
IT Governance Committee on Research Technology January 11, 2011.
It’s Time to Talk About Risk and Control
August 2013 School of Medicine Strategic Planning Community Engagement Committee.
5 Year Outlook – Strategic Planning for IT Investment Project Prioritization Strategic Project Roadmap for Chancellor and ITGC James Hong ITS/ISU July.
Financial Systems Needs Assessment Project Update Monthly Research Administrators Meeting March 11, 2010.
SEM Planning Model.
IT Strategic Planning Project – Hamilton Campus FY2005.
IT Governance and Management
University Council Shared Leadership for Integrated Planning and Consultative Decision-Making.
Harvard University IT Integration Program – Administrative IT Workgroup Kickoff January 7, 2011.
Alliance for Strategic Technology (AST) SUNY Business Intelligence Initiative January 8, 2009.
By Saurabh Sardesai October 2014.
Alabama GIS Executive Council November 17, Alabama GIS Executive Council Governor Bob Riley signs Executive Order No. 38 on November 27 th, 2007.
The topics addressed in this briefing include:
From the IT Assessment to the IT Roadmap ( )
11 A presentation on A-16 Themes for The FGDC Steering Committee June 5, by Wendy Blake-Coleman US EPA Lifecycle Management Work Group.
N “If you bring the appropriate people together in constructive ways with good information, they will create authentic visions and sustainable responses.
IT Governance Steering Committee December 2, 2010.
Enterprise IT Decision Making
Live Healthy Napa County Creating and Sustaining a Common Agenda.
Re-organizing Information Technology University at Buffalo.
University Strategic Resource Planning Council Budget.
Strengthening Our Collective Impact: Developing A Strategic Plan for CMHA National Conference Workshop Materials Kelowna, British Columbia September, 2011.
Report to Professional Council June 4, 2009 By Carla Boone Planning Council: A New Way of Doing Business at COM.
Information Technology Alignment, Strategy & Governance, and Efficiency CSG Winter 2011.
UCSF IT Update November 2013 Presenter: Joe Bengfort.
IT Governance Committee on Education Technology December 9, 2010.
UCSF HUMAN RESOURCES SERVING THE ACADEMIC AND STAFF COMMUNITY School of Medicine Faculty Council, June 21, 2012.
Institutional Change and Sustainability: Lessons Learned from MSPs Nancy Shapiro & Jennifer Frank CASHÉ KMD Project University System of Maryland January.
DRAFT – For Discussion Only HHSC IT Governance Executive Briefing Materials DRAFT April 2013.
Milking the Model: Getting the most out of integration and centralisation Janice Rickards Pro Vice Chancellor, Information Services Geoffrey Dengate Director,
CONTEXT FOR ACADEMIC STRATEGIC PLANNING AT UM Foundation for upcoming Accreditation process Identify key issues and opportunities to address over the next.
Seminars on Academic Computing Addressing Organizational Development at Collab State University August 5, 2007.
THE TEACHING & LEARNING CENTER- AN OVERVIEW MOHAMMED EL-AFFENDI AUGUST 2014.
Administrative Review & Restructuring. 1 The President’s Charge Review administrative organization and delivery of administrative services at all levels.
PRELIMINARY DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY Harvard University IT Integration Program – Security Workgroup Kickoff January 5, 2011.
IT Governance Committee on Education Technology January 13, 2011.
IT Governance Steering Committee January 7, 2011.
CWRU Strategic Planning Process Steering Committee Kick-Off Meeting.
Notes by Ben Boerkoel, Kent ISD, based on a training by Beth Steenwyk.
Committees. Executive Committee Terms of Reference Committee Type – standing Purpose -. Manage the business and technical affairs of Open Health Tools.
Chapter 3 Strategic Information Systems Planning.
IT Governance Committee on Business Technology December 9, 2010.
Deloitte Consulting LLP Commonwealth of Massachusetts IT Consolidation Initiative IT Governance Target State Update Briefing for Statewide Working Group.
Module V: Writing Your Sustainability Plan Cheri Hayes Consultant to Nebraska Lifespan Respite Statewide Sustainability Workshop June 23-24, 2015 © 2011.
EGovOS Panel Discussion CIO Council Architecture & Infrastructure Committee Subcommittee Co-Chairs March 15, 2004.
UPDATE TO THE IT GOVERNANCE STEERING COMMITTEE BY THE COMMITTEE ON BUSINESS TECHNOLOGY (CBT) NOVEMBER 1, 2012.
1 Roles and Responsibilities of The Learning Evidence Team at CCRI Presented at CCRI Peggy Maki
DEVELOPMENT COOPERATION FRAMEWORK Presentation by Ministry of Finance 10 December 2013.
New Frameworks for Strategic Enrollment Management Planning
Target State High-level IT Governance Model
Report of the Technical Subcommittee Mario Bergeron, Technical Subcommittee Chair/NGEC Vice Chair.
Helping Teachers Help All Students: The Imperative for High-Quality Professional Development Report of the Maryland Teacher Professional Development Advisory.
Indiana University Kokomo Strategic Enrollment Management Consultation Final Report Bob Bontrager December 8, 2007.
American Public University System: Building a Culture of Collaboration Dr. Gwen Hall, Associate Provost of Academic Effectiveness and Student Success,
PLYMOUTH STEM STRATEGY DRAFT Vision To unify and monitor the positive momentum in STEM to ensure its leadership across Plymouth is aligned to.
1 Introduction Overview This annotated PowerPoint is designed to help communicate about your instructional priorities. Note: The facts and data here are.
Shared Governance A More Inclusive Governmental Structure for CSU.
IT Governance and Management Structure
Strategic Planning Council (SPC)Update
COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING GEORGIA TECH Academic Year
Ken Matthews Chair, Partnership Working Group 31 July 2013
Project Charter General Information Project Title Date
Achieving an Operational Office of Water Enterprise Architecture: FY Roadmap November 23, 2005 Achieving an Operational Office of Water Enterprise.
Finance & Planning Committee of the San Francisco Health Commission
MAC Input on Section 4.9 Review
Presentation transcript:

IT Governance Committee on Research Technology December 9, 2010

Meeting Objectives  Introductions  Review overall IT Governance structure  Discuss roles of Steering Committee and Subcommittee  Charge of Committee  Review of membership  Review of subgroups  Discuss priorities, expectations and critical success factors 2

Components of IT Governance  Effective governance is critical to the cohesive management of enterprise information technology.  IT governance is needed to monitor and adjust strategies, establish annual priorities, lead efforts to change culture and practice in concert with technology change, and to support continuous exploration of new developments in technology.  Organizes who has decision making rights and coordination responsibility.  As illustrated on the following page, there are three major components to IT Governance for the campus:  IT Governance Steering Committee  Committees on Research, Education and Business Applications and Technology and Architecture  Technology/application specific advisory groups 3

Components of IT Governance Steering Committee Committee on Research Technology Advisory Groups (e.g., Informatics) Committee on Education Technology Advisory Groups (e.g., Support) Committee on Business Technology Advisory Groups (e.g., Financial) Project Committees Committee on Technology and Architecture Advisory Groups (e.g., Identity Mgmt) Project Committees Committee on Clinical Technology 4 GovernanceAdvisory Align IT with Institutional Priorities Coordinate IT & Process Change Input Evaluate and recommend IT strategies

Core IT Governance Committees – Proposed Roles  IT governance will be carried out by five standing committees. Proposed roles for the IT Governance Steering Committee and the Committee on Technology and Architecture are included on the following pages. 5 IT Governance Steering Committee (ITGSC) Chaired by Clay Johnston Meets monthly Focus on all significant areas of information technology; Guide and advise senior-level IT decision-making for UCSF; Recommend annual investment priorities, policies and changes to IT services to Senior Executives (Jeff Bluestone and John Plotts); With sub-committees, solicit and prioritize project proposals for new innovations or uses of technology; Identify points of integration and potential collision between the subcommittees.

Proposed Roles: Committee on Research Technology 6 Committee on Research Technology (CRT) Chaired by Tom Ferrin Meets monthly Develop and align vision and strategy for research technology with faculty interests; Focus on technology related to research, (e.g. cyber infrastructure, informatics, data and curation, etc); Identify emerging needs or potential research applications of new technology that are shared across UCSF; Form advisory groups, as needed; Evaluate input and advice received from IT advisory groups; Recommend priorities for investment to the ITGSC; Advisory Groups Specific advisory groups have been suggested to support each of the subcommittees (CRT, CET, CAT and CAS); The role of each committee will be to confirm the chair, membership of the group, and to clarify and set expectations for their roles and responsibilities.

Committee on Research Technology Tom Ferrin, Chair Julie AugerSteven FinkbeinerLarry Lotenero David AvrinDaniel FriedChristine Miaskowski Opinder BawaDeborah GradySorena Nadaf-Rahrov Michael BlumElazar HarelAndrej Sali Karen ButterMini KahlonMark Segal Russ CucinaPui-Yan KwokIda Sim Bill YoungLewis LanierSusanne Hilderbrand-Zanki Others (TBD) Chair: TBD Informatics Chair: TBD Research Data and Curation Chair: TBD Research and Cyberinfra- structure Chair: TBD Membership: Committee on Research Technology

Discussion  What are the key issues/priorities that must be addressed by this committee?  How will we collectively ensure the success of the Committee and IT Governance at UCSF?  What are your expectations for the types of issues and decisions that will be discussed by the ITSC vs. the CRT?  What are expectations for individual contribution and participation of the Committee members? 8

Next Steps  Develop monthly meeting schedule  Establish website and communications strategy for overall IT Governance;  Next meeting January (date TBD). 9

Appendix: Roles of Other Committees 10

Proposed Roles: Committee on Education Technology Committee on Educational Technology (CET) Chaired by Joseph Castro Meets monthly Focus on technology related to teaching, and learning; Develop and align educational technology vision and strategy with effective pedagogy, faculty interests and student expectations; Monitor and recommend strategies to sustain the technology in classroom and non-classroom based learning spaces; Advise on changes to technologies or services that impact teaching, learning and research; Form advisory groups, as needed; Evaluate input and advice received from IT advisory groups (e.g., Student Support, Classroom and online learning); Recommend annual technology investment priorities to the ITGSC; Sponsor initiatives to expand the use of technology in education. 11

Proposed Roles: Committee on Business Technology Committee on Business Technology (CBT) Chaired by Anja Paardekooper Meets monthly Focus on technology related to administrative services, campus operations and the effective use of data to support decision-making; Develop a consolidated vision and strategy for enterprise administrative applications; Recommend policy changes that impact the use of administrative technologies to the ITGSC. Identify emerging needs or potential administrative applications of new technology that are shared across UCSF; Form advisory groups, as needed; Evaluate input and advice received from IT advisory groups (e.g., HR, Finance, Research Admin, Student, Data Warehouse, Portals and CMS, Projects); Recommend priorities for investment to the ITGSC; Sponsor initiatives to improve administrative efficiency and effectiveness through the use of technology. 12

Proposed Roles: Committee on Technology and Architecture Committee on Technology and Architecture (CTA) Chaired by Opinder Bawa Meets monthly Focus on technology related to underlying IT architecture, support, security and policy; Develop a vision and strategy for architecture for full breadth of IT - applications, middleware and infrastructure; Provide technology support to the four other IT Governance Sub Groups – Education, Research, Clinical and Business Applications Evaluate and recommend changes to IT policies. Recommend and Sponsor initiatives to improve efficiency, effectiveness and security of the UCSF IT architecture; Form advisory groups as needed; Evaluate input and advice received from advisory groups; Recommend priorities for investment and identify opportunities for collaboration for campus IT to the ITGSC; 13

Proposed Roles: Advisory Groups 14 Advisory Groups Specific advisory groups have been suggested to support each of the subcommittees (CRT, CET, CAT and CAS); The role of each committee will be to confirm the chair, membership of the group, and to clarify and set expectations for their roles and responsibilities.