Support the spread of “good practice” in generating, managing, analysing and communicating spatial information Evaluating and Reflecting on the Map-making.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Effective Self Evaluation – writing a good SEF

Advertisements

Il Project Cycle Management :A Technical Guide The Logical Framework Approach 1 1.

1 UN Coherence: High level monitoring and evaluation approach.

Results Based Monitoring (RBM)

Introduction to Impact Assessment

Introduction to Monitoring and Evaluation

The Aged Care Standards and Accreditation Agency Ltd Continuous Improvement in Residential Aged Care.

MODULE 8: PROJECT TRACKING AND EVALUATION

OUTCOME INVESTING (OI) Results-based approach to designing and managing investments Strategy, Measurement & Evaluation © Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

The Darwin Initiative Setting (& Testing) Objectives.

Project Monitoring Evaluation and Assessment

Decision Making Tools for Strategic Planning 2014 Nonprofit Capacity Conference Margo Bailey, PhD April 21, 2014 Clarify your strategic plan hierarchy.

Program Evaluation. Lecture Overview  Program evaluation and program development  Logic of program evaluation (Program theory)  Four-Step Model  Comprehensive.

Results-Based Management: Logical Framework Approach

INSTITUTO DE ESTUDIOS POLÍTICOS PARA ÁMERICA LATINA Y ÁFRICA LOGICAL FRAMEWORK APPROACH HUMANA.

Project Cycle Management (PCM)

Katherine Smithson Policy and public affairs officer Charity Finance Group.

Monitoring, Review and Reporting Project Cycle Management A short training course in project cycle management for subdivisions of MFAR in Sri Lanka.

Higher Physical Education

Appreciative Participatory Planning and Action

Effectively applying ISO9001:2000 clauses 5 and 8

CASE STUDIES IN PROJECT MANAGEMENT

Monitoring Evaluation Impact Assessment Objectives Be able to n explain basic monitoring and evaluation theory in relation to accountability n Identify.

LOGICAL FRAMEWORK Jürgen Carls University for Peace

1 CASE STUDIES IN PROJECT MANAGEMENT Lecture 3 Project management methodologies.

ISTEP: Technology Field Research in Developing Communities Instructor: M. Bernardine Dias CAs: Sarah Belousov and Ermine Teves Spring 2009.

CONCEPT PAPER RESULT BASED PLANNING. RESULT-ORIENTED PLANNING Overall Objective/ Goal Specific Objective/ Purposes Expected Result/ Output Activities.

The County Health Rankings & Roadmaps Take Action Cycle.

Investors in People Champions. Interpretation of the Standard Purpose To give a brief overview with the necessary background information on the Investors.

V4 Expert Group V4 Expert Group Result Orientation Challenges – 17 June 2014 Budapest.

Rwanda MCC Threshold Program CIVIL SOCIETY STRENGTHENING PROJECT Cross-Cutting Advocacy Issues Data Collection Monitoring and Evaluation.

EVALUATION APPROACHES Heather Aquilina 24 March 2015.

Purposes of Evaluation Why evaluate? Accountability: Justify trust of stakeholders (funders, parents, citizens) by showing program results (Summative)

1 CORAT AFRICA MANAGEMENT WORKSHOP FOR IMBISA/AMECEA COMMUNICATION COORDINATORS, MAPUTO, MOZAMBIQUE.

Promising Ideas and Issues to Consider in Reaching Reading and Literacy Goals Logistics of supervision, training, support to teachers Sakil Malik Director.

Monitoring & Evaluation: The concepts and meaning Day 9 Session 1.

University of Palestine Dept. of Urban Planning Introduction to Planning ( EAGD 3304 ) M.A. Architect: Tayseer Mushtaha Mob.:

SUB-MODULE 5. MEANS OF VERIFICATION RESULTS BASED LOGICAL FRAMEWORK TRAINING Quality Assurance and Results Department (ORQR.2)

21/4/2008 Evaluation of control measures 1. 21/4/2008 Evaluation of control measures 2 Family and Community Medicine Department.

Support the spread of “good practice” in generating, managing, analysing and communicating spatial information Processing and Packaging Information for.

Screen 1 of 22 Food Security Policies – Formulation and Implementation Policy Monitoring and Evaluation LEARNING OBJECTIVES Define the purpose of a monitoring.

Monitoring and Evaluation

Monitoring and Evaluating in the PHEA Educational Technology Initiative Patrick Spaven.

111 CINDI PMER Workshop March, 2007 By Simon Opolot © 2007 Office of the Premier, KwaZulu-Natal Province, Private Bag X9037 Telecom House, 2nd Floor,

SJI Impact Assessment 2014 Based on Impact Assessment for Development Agencies – Learning to Value Change (Chris Roche, Oxfam, digital file 2010)

1 The project is financed from the European Union funds within the framework of Erasmus+, Key Action 2: Cooperation for innovation and the exchange of.

What is Social Accountability? “Social Accountability is an approach initiated by the community for collective responsibility of all stakeholders in ensuring.

Monitoring Afghanistan, 2015 Food Security and Agriculture Working Group – 9 December 2015.

The School Effectiveness Framework

27/04/2017 Strengthening of the Monitoring and Evaluation system for FTPP/FTTP in FAO /SEC December 2015 FTPP/FTFP Workshop, Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan.

EVALUATION OF THE SEE SARMa Project. Content Project management structure Internal evaluation External evaluation Evaluation report.

Town Centre Healthchecks. Page 1 Introduction “A Health check is the appropriate monitoring tool to measure the strengths and weaknesses of a town centre.

Logical Framework Approach 1. Approaches to Activity Design Logical Framework Approach (LFA) – Originally developed in the 1970s, this planning process.

Evaluation Framework Phase 1 - EFRG update to Council 5 December 2007 Annex A – Evaluation Framework Phase 1.

Curriculum Futures Looking after learners, today and tomorrow To develop a modern world-class curriculum that will inspire and challenge all learners and.

Session 2: Developing a Comprehensive M&E Work Plan.

Results Oriented Monitoring & Evaluation Model (ROMEM) Presented by Shawn Grey Ministry of Transport and Works Jamaica. Model developed by MTW and DPMI.

Evaluation What is evaluation?

Reporting, Monitoring and Evaluation Giovanni Rum, Chao Xing GEO Secretariat GEO Work Programme Symposium Geneva, 2-4 May 2016.

Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS organizations in Papua New Guinea Day 4. Session 10. Evaluation.

Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS Organisations in Papua New Guinea Day 3. Session 9. Periodic data collection methods.

Strategic Planning for Learning Organizations

Session 9 Recap on LFM and IL.

Monitoring & Reporting 2019

Thinking through PROGRAMME Theory

OGB Partner Advocacy Workshop 18th & 19th March 2010

Monitoring and evaluation

How is an M & E framework derived from the logframe?

Presentation transcript:

Support the spread of “good practice” in generating, managing, analysing and communicating spatial information Evaluating and Reflecting on the Map-making Process Tools for Success By: Nigel Crawhall Unit: M15U01

Adopting a methodology There are different methodologies for planning, monitoring and evaluating projects. Adopting a particular method helps to be consistent and check key points in the planning and assessment tool kit. Logical Framework (ZOPP) and Appreciative Inquiry are examples.

Scale of results Development goal: This is the overall positive, long-term result the community seeks. Project purpose: This is the immediate outcome of implementing this project and should contribute to the development goal. Results/objectives: A project purpose is made up of smaller steps and outputs which together assure that the project purpose is achieved.

Planning, monitoring & evaluation Planning, monitoring and evaluation are all part of one process. Planning sets the objectives. Monitoring helps check that the objectives are on track. Evaluation measures whether the overall project purpose has been met. Evaluation also provides a chance to reflect on the overall process and empowerment.

Planning Adopt a methodology appropriate to the context. Develop an analysis of the negative situation that should be solved. Specify the target group (i.e. those in the community who will do the actions). Identify levels of desired results: development goal, project purpose, results leading to the project purpose

Monitoring Every result in the project needs an indicator to help determine whether you are achieving the result as planned. Indicators should at least give quantity, quality, time and location for the result. Monitoring involves collecting data as events happen. Objectively verifiable indicators (OVIs) make your work transparent to donors, the whole community and others.

REFLECTION Monitoring -> Evaluation PLANNING / RE- PLANNING ACTION Planning, monitoring and evaluating cycles

Evaluation Evaluation can be summative (i.e. what happened?) or formative (i.e. what does this tell you for the future?). Projects are evaluated against their project purpose and result indicators. Evaluation can look at the impact caused by the project (which may sometimes be unintentional). Evaluation can look at processes, including human dynamics and empowerment.