UTILIZING CONSTRUCTION MANAGER AT RISK IN GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CM/CG Contracting Tom Ravn, Mn/DOT Director, Office of Construction and Innovative Contracting.
Advertisements

Organization of Primary Entities
Lessons Learned: CM at Risk & Design Build
Project Delivery Approaches for Wastewater Utilities in Minnesota June 24, 2008 Metropolitan Council Environment Committee.
CMGC Contracting at UDOT Program, Projects & Lessons Learned
November 19, 2013 Preparing a Successful RFP to get Desired Results.
Your Presenters Lisa Dal Gallo Dave Kirn Regional Executive/Justice Market Leader Partner, LEED AP
A PROJECT MANAGEMENT OVERVIEW Maritime Place PMI EMERALD COAST FLORIDA CHAPTER JANUARY 21, 2014.
Airport Owner’s Guide to Project Delivery Systems Prepared by: The Joint Committee of ACI-NA, ACC and AGC.
4 th ANNUAL JOINT CSU/UC PSSOA CONFERENCE March 25-26, 2003 “Emerging Construction Methodologies in CSU – What Public Works Contract Specialists Should.
1. A project delivery method describes the process of how a project will be designed and constructed. A project delivery method can be characterized in.
A Match made in Heaven? Connecting you with a builder.
Utah’s Use of CMGC & Project Delivery
Alternative Project Delivery Mechanisms The J. K. Spruce Experience Katherine Yates Assistant General Counsel.
Alternative Project Delivery
Job Order Contracting ( JOC) Chicago Department of Aviation Capital Improvement Program Panel member: Joseph S. Dote, Sr. Vice President R.M. Chin & Associates,
Facilities Institute July , 2012 Houston, Texas Click to edit Master title style
Legal Perspective on NDOT Alternative Procurements Geoffrey S. Petrov, Nossaman LLP.
Measure L Program Implementation Management Considerations Report to the Board of Trustees San Joaquin Delta Community College District July 13, 2004.
Alderman Road Residences Phase II Design Build. Extensive master planning preceded this phase 2003 – Dagit Saylor Master Plan Hanbury Evans Update.
Project Management Process Project Description Team Mission/ Assignment Major Milestones Boundaries Team Identification Measures of Success Roles & Responsibilities.
PROJECT DELIVERY SYSTEMS
Delivery Methods  The Players from Handbook of Architectural Practice, Chapter 9.1 by Phillip Bernstein FAIA  Variables from Handbook of Architectural.
Managing Risk to Reduce Construction Claims (And Improve Project Success) Presented by Laurie Dennis, PE, CVS-Life, FSAVE.
Prof Awad S. Hanna C HANGING P ROJECT D ELIVERY S YSTEMS by Awad S. Hanna, Ph. D., P. E. The University of Wisconsin, Madison Department of Civil and Environmental.
Planning & Delivery Systems Construction Engineering 380 Engineering Law.
Process Engineer’s Role in Project Management Dr Abdullah Malik.
Honoraria for Design Build Projects Methodology Assessment Matrix.
PM/CAM Training H. Jeff Moore May 11, AGENDA Overview CM at Risk Design (Completion) / Build Lunch Break / Discussion – 11:30 AM – 12:30 PM CM Agency.
Initiating and Planning Systems Development projects
© 2006 ITT Educational Services Inc. SE350 System Analysis for Software Engineers: Unit 6 Slide 1 Chapter 5 Initiating and Planning Systems Development.
IT Project Management Cheng Li, Ph.D. August 2003.
This Presentation is a Copyrighted Property of Waller S. Poage, AIA, CSI, MAI, CVS – All Rights are Reserved Session CDT 01 – Fundamentals Lesson CDT 1.3.
JOB ORDER CONTRACTING CONSTRUCTION SERVICES FOR FACILITIES MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS April 26, 2014 Presentation for Presented by Troy Alexander Project.
Design–Build Contracts G. Hardy Acree Director of Airports Sacramento County Airport System Advantages of of During Turbulent Times.
Project Delivery Options in the California Construction Market CSI Fresno Chapter - February 16, 2010 PROJECT DELIVERY OPTIONS in the CALIFORNIA CONSTRUCTION.
TOPIC-9- PROJECT ORGANIZATION
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING & MANAGEMENT DEPT
ENCE 667 Project Performance Measurement Patuxent Water Treatment Plant Upgrade schedule analysis Presented by: Luis Rubio Isobo Tariah.
January 31, …a delivery method in which the construction team is known as the design-builder…and is responsible for taking a concept developed by.
Presented By: Jeffrey T. Folden, P.E. Assistant Chief, Innovative Contracting Division.
Project Delivery Methods Part I. What is A Project Delivery Method? The owner’s selection of the organizational structure of the project. Three popular.
TOPIC-9- PROJECT ORGANIZATION
Construction Management Association of America CSU’s C OLLABORATIVE D ESIGN- B UILD P ROCESS September 30, 2015.
Project Delivery Methods CM CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS Kevin A. Delorey 11 Feb 2010.
Kurt Krause. Topics of Discussion 1.Project Delivery Method Definition 2.Brief History 3.Alternative Project Delivery Trends 4.Key Drivers of APDM 5.Risk.
LACCD Building the Future THOMAS HALL Director Facilities Planning and Development.
Richland Creek Water Supply Program Contract for WTP and Pump Stations CMAR Services and Program Update Paulding County, Georgia Board of Commission Work.
The Design/Build Contract. What Is A Design/Build Contract? Contract that combines design & construction into one agreement The design/build team provides.
CAPITAL PROJECT DELIVERY METHODS APRIL 20, 2015 – SACUBO Annual Conference By Al Stoverink, AVC for Facilities Arkansas State University.
Construction Management At Risk Process
1 EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT Temecula Valley Regional Water Reclamation Facility 23-MGD Expansion Project Joe Mouawad, P.E. Senior Director.
PRE-PLANNING FOR CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS. OVERVIEW ASSESSING OWNER CAPABILITIES ANALYSIS OF RESOURCES REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEWING.
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AT RISK Prepared by: Nancy Fouad Carey Attorney AGC Alabama Birmingham Section Meeting November 5, 2012.
Progressive Design-Build: Examining the Structure, Procurement and Contracting Principles Michael C. Loulakis, Esq., DBIA Capital Project Strategies, LLC.
© 2014 HDR Architecture, Inc., all rights reserved. © 2014 HDR, Inc., all rights reserved. © 2014 HDR, all rights reserved.
CHANGING PROJECT DELIVERY SYSTEMS
by Awad S. Hanna, Ph. D., P. E. The University of Wisconsin, Madison
2016 SAME Small Business Conference - Atlanta
What Small and Emerging Contractors Need to Know Introduction to Project Delivery Methods © Copyright 2017 NASBP.
AWWA IMS Leadership Forum Project Delivery Systems
CM at Risk v. Design-Bid-Build
PROJECT DELIVERY METHODS
CHANGING PROJECT DELIVERY SYSTEMS
Designers’ Manual Overview and Chapter Contents
Design-Bid-Build (Ch. 149) vs. Construction Manager at Risk (Ch. 149A)
PROJECT DELIVERY METHODS
Controlling Project Cost and Schedule
Richland Creek Water Supply Program Program Update
Honoraria for Design Build Projects Methodology Assessment Matrix
Presentation transcript:

UTILIZING CONSTRUCTION MANAGER AT RISK IN GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA

INTRODUCTION Team Team  City of Greensboro  HDR Constructors  Garney Capital Improvement Needs Capital Improvement Needs  Townsend WTP  TZO WRF CMAR vs. Alternate Delivery Methods CMAR vs. Alternate Delivery Methods

PROJECT BACKGROUND Construction Manager at Risk (CMAR) in Greensboro Construction Manager at Risk (CMAR) in Greensboro  Owner Objectives / Goals  RFQ Process  CM Selection  Design and Partnering  Designer and CM  Pre-Construction Timeline

DESIGN-BID-BUILD DESIGN-BID-BUILD  Traditional Baseline for Project Delivery  Proven Procurement Solution DIFFERING DELIVERY METHODS PRELIMINARYDESIGN FINAL DESIGN BIDCONSTRUCTIONPROCESS

Design-Bid-Build ADVANTAGES Design-Bid-Build ADVANTAGES  Competitively Bid  Separate Contracts  Self-Performance Capabilities  Time-Tested Process / Used in All States  Maximizes Owner Input DIFFERING DELIVERY METHODS

Design-Bid-Build DISADVANTAGES Design-Bid-Build DISADVANTAGES  Limited Collaboration / Teamwork  Eliminates Qualifications-Based Selection  No Contractual Relationship  Adversarial Approach  Low Bid  Value Engineering  Design DIFFERING DELIVERY METHODS

DESIGN-BUILD DESIGN-BUILD  Design and Construction Fixed Price  Based on Concept Design and/or Description from Procurement Documents DIFFERING DELIVERY METHODS CONSTRUCTION PROCESS

Design-Build ADVANTAGES Design-Build ADVANTAGES  Team Qualifications-Based Selection  Accelerated Schedule  Public Acceptance for Lump-Sum Contract  Self-Performing Contractor Controls Schedule  Known Performance Criteria  Final GMP DIFFERING DELIVERY METHODS

Design-Build DISADVANTAGES Design-Build DISADVANTAGES  Longer Procurement Process  Eliminates or Reduces Participation in Procurement Process  Inefficient Use of Municipal Funds and Staff Time  Bidding Process DIFFERING DELIVERY METHODS

CMAR CMAR  Qualifications-Based Selection  Contractor Engaged Early in Design Phase  Two-Contract Relationship DIFFERING DELIVERY METHODS CONSTRUCTABILITY REVIEW CONSTRUCTION PROCESS

CMAR ADVANTAGES CMAR ADVANTAGES  Owner Control of Project Goals  Provides for Value Engineering (VE) and Constructability Reviews  Contractor-Led Estimates  Reduces Overall Risk  Schedule Acceleration  Competitive Selection DIFFERING DELIVERY METHODS

CMAR DISADVANTAGES CMAR DISADVANTAGES  Engineer’s Estimate for Initial Project Costs  Potential Cost Increase with VE and Constructability Review  Preconstruction Services Cost  Double-Bonding  Separate Contracts  Increased Design Duration DIFFERING DELIVERY METHODS

TZO WATER RECLAMATION FACILITY Retrofitting Existing Anthracite Media Filters with new Aqua-Aerobic Systems Diamond Cloth Filter Equipment Retrofitting Existing Anthracite Media Filters with new Aqua-Aerobic Systems Diamond Cloth Filter Equipment New Chlorine Contact Tank New Chlorine Contact Tank Chemical System Upgrades Chemical System Upgrades Site-Wide Stormwater Improvements Site-Wide Stormwater Improvements Electrical Improvements Electrical Improvements

PRECONSTRUCTION AT TZO Estimates at 90% Document Phase Estimates at 90% Document Phase Development of CPM Schedule Development of CPM Schedule Executed Mentor / Protégé Program with Local MBE, SRS Executed Mentor / Protégé Program with Local MBE, SRS M/WBE Work Packages M/WBE Work Packages

TZO CHALLENGES AND BENEFITS Challenges & Benefits Challenges & Benefits Dividing Competitive Work Packages Dividing Competitive Work Packages Flexibility with NCDEQ Flexibility with NCDEQ  Filter Construction Sequencing - Eliminating Option to Bypass Filters Increasing Minority Participation Increasing Minority Participation Constructability / Cost Review at 90% Constructability / Cost Review at 90%

TZO SCHEDULE Work Packages Work Packages Constraints of Existing Plant Operations Constraints of Existing Plant Operations  Minimal Shutdowns / Uninterrupted Access Effluent Filter Modifications Effluent Filter Modifications  One Bank of Filters Off-Line Per Time

TOWNSEND WATER TREATMENT PLANT Lime / PAC Facility Lime / PAC Facility Flocculation & Sedimentation Basins Flocculation & Sedimentation Basins Filter Upgrades Filter Upgrades Backwash Process Upgrades Backwash Process Upgrades MAY 16 – DEC 17 JAN 15 – DEC 15 PRECONSTRUCTION CONSTRUCTION

TOWNSEND PRECON METHODOLOGY Cost Models Cost Models  60% Documents  VE Early Project Schedule Development Early Project Schedule Development  Input from O&M Staff, Engineer and Subcontractors  Determines General Conditions Duration Subcontracting Packages Subcontracting Packages  Facilitate Area Market  Clear Scope Delineation

TOWNSEND CHALLENGES/BENEFITS - GMP Open Book Environment Open Book Environment Collaborative Preconstruction Workshops Collaborative Preconstruction Workshops Proactive Project Execution Planning - Plant Production Restrictions Proactive Project Execution Planning - Plant Production Restrictions Constructability and Value Analysis Constructability and Value Analysis Procurement (Buy-Out) Plan Procurement (Buy-Out) Plan Start-Up and Commissioning Plan Start-Up and Commissioning Plan

TOWNSEND CHALLENGES/BENEFITS – M/WBE Aspirational Goals Aspirational Goals Commitment to M/WBE Program Commitment to M/WBE Program Outreach and Communication with Interested Individuals Outreach and Communication with Interested Individuals Provide Guidance during Bidding, Contracting and Construction Phases Provide Guidance during Bidding, Contracting and Construction Phases Ensure Parties Follow City’s Guidelines for Implementation Ensure Parties Follow City’s Guidelines for Implementation

CMAR AT TOWNSEND WTP Qualifications-Based Selection Qualifications-Based Selection Better Control of Construction Better Control of Construction Implementation of M/WBE Program Implementation of M/WBE Program Collaborative and Team-Oriented Project Delivery Collaborative and Team-Oriented Project Delivery Less Adversarial Construction Environment Less Adversarial Construction Environment

TOWNSEND – ENGAGING THE CMAR EARLY 60% Design Documents 60% Design Documents Understand Project Budget Understand Project Budget Ability to Value Engineer Project Ability to Value Engineer Project Early Development of CPM Early Development of CPM

TOWNSEND – CHALLENGES/BENEFITS - MOPO Maintenance of Plant Operations (MOPO) Maintenance of Plant Operations (MOPO) Ability to Redesign Ability to Redesign Identify Schedule Constraints Identify Schedule Constraints Minimize Timeframe for Outages Minimize Timeframe for Outages Ability to Understand Construction Sequencing Ability to Understand Construction Sequencing

TOWNSEND PROJECT SCHEDULE Early Development of CPM Schedule Early Development of CPM Schedule Identified Sequencing Identified Sequencing Incorporated Peak Times Incorporated Peak Times Sequenced MOPOs Sequenced MOPOs

OWNER CHALLENGES - LEGAL Contract Vehicle Contract Vehicle  State Standard Contract vs. CMAA vs. AIA Prequalification Process Prequalification Process  State Statute Requirements  Criteria to Prequalify  Target Audience for the Process

OWNER CHALLENGES – M/WBE Disparity Study Disparity Study  Hispanic Participation - Goal Achievement Setting of Goals Setting of Goals  GMP Estimate or Trade Packages Bid Responsiveness Bid Responsiveness  Prequalification vs. Bids HUB Understanding of Formal Bid Process HUB Understanding of Formal Bid Process

OWNER CHALLENGES – M/WBE (CONT.) Mentor – Protégé Mentor – Protégé  City Procedure  Goal Achievement New Process for Evaluating Good Faith New Process for Evaluating Good Faith  CM Level and Sub-Tier Level Mandatory Prequalification Mandatory Prequalification  Participation Responsiveness  Education

OWNER CHALLENGES - DESIGN Design Completion Level Design Completion Level  60% Townsend vs. 90% TZO Self-Performance Self-Performance  State Statute Team Cohesiveness Team Cohesiveness  Experience  Receptiveness to Feedback Design Review Process Design Review Process  Constructability and VE

GMP Finalization / Sub-Contract Execution GMP Finalization / Sub-Contract Execution  Budgeting Value Engineering Construction Phase Construction Phase  NTP and Duration NEXT STEPS

M/WBE Understanding M/WBE Understanding Budgeting / Value Engineering Budgeting / Value Engineering Prequalification Process Prequalification Process Staff Understanding of CMAR Process Staff Understanding of CMAR Process  Educate Key Departments / Staff  Develop Procedures to Support Delivery Method KEY TAKEAWAYS

QUESTIONS?