Solar Probe Plus A NASA Mission to Touch the Sun 16-19 March 2015 Instrument Suite Name Presenter's Name.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Leicester SRC, 3-5 Dec 2007 Systems engineering at detector level Tim Stevenson.
Advertisements

USING NASA QUALITY STANDARDS NASA Academy of Aerospace (AAQ) Quality Mini-Workshop Ken Crane Quality Engineering Technical Discipline Team Lead NASA SAFETY.
Protocol & Test Review Spaceport America Student Launch University/Institution Team Members Date.
Data Test Review Spaceport America Student Launch University/Institution Team Members Date.
Flight Readiness Review New Mexico Space Grant Consortium University/Institution Team Members Date.
GLAST LAT ProjectLAT I&T Subsystem CDR, March 28, 2003 Document: LAT-PR Section 4 - Page 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope: I & T Peer Review Performance.
GLAST LAT ProjectLAT Engineering Meeting, April 1, 2003 GLAST Large Area Telescope: Performance & Safety Assurance Darren S. Marsh Stanford Linear Accelerator.
Team Name Conceptual Design Review University/Institution Team Members Date.
GLAST LAT ProjectDOE/NASA Review of the GLAST/LAT Project, Aug. 14, 2001 Scott Williams 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope: Instrument Operations Center Scott.
WBS & AO Controls Jason Chin, Don Gavel, Erik Johansson, Mark Reinig Design Meeting (Team meeting #10) Sept 17 th, 2007.
GLAST LAT ProjectSLAC Pre - Baseline Review, April 16, 2002 ` 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope: I&T Overview WBS: Elliott D. Bloom Stanford Linear Accelerator.
LSU 01/18/2005Project Life Cycle1 The Project Life Cycle Project Management Unit, Lecture 2.
LSU 07/07/2004Communication1 Communication & Documentation Project Management Unit – Lecture 8.
Effective Methods for Software and Systems Integration
Chapter 2: Overview of Essentials ISE 443 / ETM 543 Fall 2013.
FIELDS iCDR Solar Probe Plus FIELDS Instrument CDR Introduction 1Peter Harvey.
9 March 2004 GIFTS Blackbody Subsystem Critical Design Review Project Plan Status Fred Best & Evan Richards 9 March 2004.
SPP FIELDS DFB Quarterly June 2014 Solar Probe Plus FIELDS Instrument Quarterly Digital Fields Board 1.
NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center LRO Integration and Test Joanne Baker GSFC Code 568 August 16-17, 2005.
From Research Prototype to Production
Common PDR Problems ACES Presentation T. Gregory Guzik March 6, 2003.
NCSX Management Overview Hutch Neilson, NCSX Project Manager NCSX Conceptual Design Review Princeton, NJ May 23, 2002.
VST: dome THE LIFE CYCLE OF MODERN TECHNOLOGICAL PROJECTS Ing. Davide Fierro THE LIFE CYCLE OF MODERN TECHNOLOGICAL PROJECTS.
NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center Systems Engineering Mike Pryzby Swales Aerospace August 16-17, 2005.
THEMIS SRR Requirement Overview - 1 UCB, 07/08/2003 REQUIREMENT DEVELOPMENT OVERVIEW Ellen R. Taylor Mission Systems Engineer Space Science Laboratory.
THEMIS Instrument CDR(1) UCB, April 19 & 20, 2004 Mission Assurance Critical Design Review Ron Jackson University of California - Berkeley.
GLAST LAT ProjectI&T&C Pre PDR Presentation– Oct. 2, I&T&C Organization Chart I&T&C Manager Elliott Bloom WBS I&T Engineer B. Grist WBS
GLAST LAT ProjectCDR/CD3 Review May 12-16, 2003 Document: LAT-PR-01967Section XX 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope: LAT System Engineering WBS Dick Horn.
Request for Proposal (RFP)
THE PROJECT LIFE CYCLE PROJECT MANAGEMENT LIFE CYCLE LSU 01/18/2005 PROJECT LIFE CYCLE 1.
1 Mission Discussion & Project Reviews 祝飛鴻 10/14/93.
RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes ADD LOGO HERE RBSP-instrument name CDR yyyy-mm-dd1 RBSP Instrument/Suite Name Critical.
RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes RBSP/EFW I-PER 21 January EFW Overview and Status Keith Goetz University of Minnesota.
Critical Design Review (CDR)
24b - 1 NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center LRO Safety Dave Bogart Code 302 August 16-17, 2005.
RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes 12/25/20151 Flight Software Template for Instrument Critical Design Review Gary M. Heiligman.
BSBPMG501A Manage Application of Project Integrative Processes Manage Project Integrative Processes Unit Guide Diploma of Project Management Qualification.
FIELDS iCDR – RFS Analog Dennis Seitz 1 Solar Probe Plus FIELDS Instrument CDR RFS Analog Dennis N. Seitz UC Berkeley SSL
RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes RBSP-EFW SMA I-CDR RBSP EFW SMA Safety and Mission Assurance Instrument -
Solar Probe Plus A NASA Mission to Touch the Sun Mission Operations Review News Elena Adams 7/16/2015.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Space Launch System Phase I Safety Review Preparation for GT #2 Topic: Phase I Safety Review.
Preparation Examples ACD has provided a website of their CDR preparation status I encourage everyone to view posted material, including the CDR Dry Run.
SRR and PDR Charter & Review Team Linda Pacini (GSFC) Review Chair.
Status Update Instructions (Required by NASA/Wallops) These completed slides are due to no later than Wednesday, March 6 th, 2013,
GLAST LAT ProjectCDR/CD-3 Review May 12-16, 2003 Document: LAT-PR Section 5 IOC Subsystem 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope: IOC Subsystems WBS: 4.1.B.
GLAST LAT ProjectI&T&C Pre PDR Presentation– Oct 2, 2001 Darren Marsh1 I&T&C Organization Chart I&T&C Manager Elliott Bloom WBS I&T Engineer B. Grist.
FIELDS iPDR – RFS Analog Dennis N. Seitz 1 Solar Probe Plus FIELDS Instrument PDR Radio Frequency Spectrometer Analog Dennis N. Seitz UC Berkeley SSL
SwCDR (Peer) Review 1 UCB MAVEN Particles and Fields Flight Software Critical Design Review Peter R. Harvey.
Solar Probe Plus FIELDS Team Meeting Management 7/07/2015.
RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes RBSP/EFW CDR /30-10/1 9 EFW Overview and Status Keith Goetz University of Minnesota.
RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes RBSP/EFW I-PER 21 January EFW Systems Engineering Michael Ludlam Space Sciences.
GLAST LAT ProjectPeer Review & CDR Preparation Document: LAT-PR Preparation Schedule Subsystems Peer Reviews –ACD January 7-8, 2003 –CALMarch.
Collaborating for Quality Quality Assurance (QA) & Quality Control (QC) in the Accelerator Project (ACCSYS) Matthew Conlon ACCSYS QA/QC
Tethered Aerostat Program Concept Design Review Team Name Conceptual Design Review University/College Team Members Date.
Camera PDR/CD1 Planning 19 September 2008
I&T&C Organization Chart
CINEMA System Engineering
GLAST Large Area Telescope:
0.0 Instrument Suite Name Presenter’s name
2K CB FDR Overview:  Agenda, Charge, Review Process
Instrument Preliminary Design Review (I-PDR) September 28th, 2005
Peer Review Agenda (Suggested).
GLAST Large Area Telescope:
Lockheed Martin Canada’s SMB Mentoring Program
Integration and Test Organization Chart
Instrument PDR Summary of Objectives
GLAST Large Area Telescope
Introduction and Overview
PSS verification and validation
Integration & Test Instrument Operations Coordination
Presentation transcript:

Solar Probe Plus A NASA Mission to Touch the Sun March 2015 Instrument Suite Name Presenter's Name

2 Solar Probe Plus Mission CDR Instrument/Suite Name Science Overview  1 page  Introduce instrument and science contribution to the mission March 2015 General note to teams: The # of slides per topics may vary per team and these can be adjusted as necessary

3 Solar Probe Plus Mission CDR Instrument/Suite Name Team  1 page  Organization chart of the instrument/suite team members  Include team member roles  Include any key partners, subcontractors or major suppliers  If appropriate, list suite chart and then chart for each team in each team section March 2015 General note to teams: The # of slides per topics may vary per team and these can be adjusted as necessary

4 Solar Probe Plus Mission CDR Instrument/Suite Name Instrument Overview  1 page  General description of the instrument to the level of the major subsystems.  Block diagram of the total instrument  Serves as an introduction to the detailed presentations to follow March 2015 General note to teams: The # of slides per topics may vary per team and these can be adjusted as necessary

5 Solar Probe Plus Mission CDR Instrument/Suite Name Technical Changes since PDR  1 page  Give each change (recommend table below).  Give reason for change and provide impact, as appropriate, on resources of mass, power, size, telemetry, cost and schedule.  Include any science requirement changes or add statement at bottom that there were no science requirement changes. Change since PDRReason for ChangeImpact on Resources March 2015 General note to teams: The # of slides per topics may vary per team and these can be adjusted as necessary

6 Solar Probe Plus Mission CDR Instrument/Suite Name Summary of Engineering Design  5 pages  Design description  Electrical and thermal instrument and components performance requirements  Software architecture and design  Mechanical design and analyses  Descriptions of any engineering or technology developments  Summarize resource requirements  Table of mass and power for the components, including maturity of the estimates (EM measurement, Pro/E estimate, etc)  Commanding and housekeeping telemetry requirements  Power services required  Margins  Other  Summarize drawing status (with definition of that status)  Instrument Performance  Describe any known shortcomings in instrument performance relative to known science requirements  Identify any Long-Lead Time procurements March 2015 General note to teams: The # of slides per topics may vary per team and these can be adjusted as necessary

7 Solar Probe Plus Mission CDR Instrument/Suite Name CDR Summary  1 page  Summarize I-CDR results  Review board membership, dates  Action item summary  Liens (if any) March 2015 General note to teams: The # of slides per topics may vary per team and these can be adjusted as necessary

8 Solar Probe Plus Mission CDR Instrument/Suite Name Engineering Model  2-3 pages  List items completed since I-CDR  Link any new progress to action items where possible  Include any peer reviews help between I-CDR and Mission CDR  If Lien at CDR was established and work not completed, address detailed schedule to complete lien  Fidelity of EM design (differences to FM)  EM Test plan  EM Test results  Remaining work to FM build (example: remaining testing, drawing updates) March 2015 General note to teams: The # of slides per topics may vary per team and these can be adjusted as necessary

9 Solar Probe Plus Mission CDR Instrument/Suite Name Verification and Validation Plans  3-4 pages  Describe the process for verifying all instrument interfaces (hardware & software), resources, form factor, performance and operations, environmental worthiness, and science performance requirements  List documentation (V&V plans, TE-001, requirements verification matrix)  Show a portion of your V&V matrix  Explain how tools are used (DOORS, etc)  Walkthrough an example flow from requirement to verification March 2015 General note to teams: The # of slides per topics may vary per team and these can be adjusted as necessary

10 Solar Probe Plus Mission CDR Instrument/Suite Name Assembly, I&T Description  3-4 pages  Assembly, I&T description, including  Flow chart(s) showing plans for the assembly, integration, functional and environmental testing (EMI, sniff, vibration, thermal balance, thermal vacuum, etc.), and calibration  Major milestones in the I&T flow with dates  Description of any cleanliness requirements imposed on the mission by the instrument as well as any special facilities needed  Instrument alignment requirements and plans for verification of alignment  Purge requirements and plans for maintaining purge  Expected number of operating hours on the instrument at launch  Identify any special facilities  Discuss any risks including mitigation plans  Test-as-you-fly exceptions (i.e., what does not get tested)  Address Refurbishment plan if applicable March 2015 General note to teams: The # of slides per topics may vary per team and these can be adjusted as necessary

11 Solar Probe Plus Mission CDR Instrument/Suite Name Calibration  2 pages  Detailed discussion of plans for instrument calibration  facilities planned for calibration  range of parameters over which the instrument will be calibrated  any shortcomings to the calibration that bring into question the ability of the instrument to meet its mission science requirements March 2015 General note to teams: The # of slides per topics may vary per team and these can be adjusted as necessary

12 Solar Probe Plus Mission CDR Instrument/Suite Name Systems Assurance  1-2 pages  Describe Performance Assurance Matrix Status  Identify any exceptions and status of exceptions  Identify any submitted waiver requests and status of approval (could be in back-up)  Identify any expected waivers that will be submitted (could be in back-up)  System Safety  Discuss status of inputs to the Missile System Prelaunch Safety Package (MSPSP)  Identify any safety hazards along with methods for controlling them March 2015 General note to teams: The # of slides per topics may vary per team and these can be adjusted as necessary

13 Solar Probe Plus Mission CDR Instrument/Suite Name Science Operations Center  1 page  Top-level Science Operations Center description including:  SOC/SDC driving requirements  SOC/SDC design description  SOC/SDC operating approach  Changes since PDR  Review date for the SOC CDR March 2015 General note to teams: The # of slides per topics may vary per team and these can be adjusted as necessary

14 Solar Probe Plus Mission CDR Instrument/Suite Name Flight Operations Description  2 pages  Status of Command and Telemetry definitions  Describe the flight operations including  key elements of the instrument ground system that allows the operation of the instrument  command definitions and critical housekeeping telemetry definitions  commanding path and telemetry data  concept of operations for command and data handling of your instrument during the commissioning phase of the mission as well as normal operations shall be presented March 2015 General note to teams: The # of slides per topics may vary per team and these can be adjusted as necessary

15 Solar Probe Plus Mission CDR Instrument/Suite Name Risk Status  1 page  Describe risk status, including  5x5 risk matrix  Top 10 summary stop light chart showing instrument risks, consequences and likelihood March 2015 General note to teams: The # of slides per topics may vary per team and these can be adjusted as necessary

16 Solar Probe Plus Mission CDR Instrument/Suite Name Development Status  1 page  Describe development status, including  Project schedule showing critical path, schedule reserves and margins  List of threats to the schedule and schedule risk mitigation plans  Trends in the schedule performance of the team such as the gain or loss of float along the critical path March 2015 General note to teams: The # of slides per topics may vary per team and these can be adjusted as necessary Include a take-away statement that describes the Instrument Suite’s readiness to move onto flight build. Example: “Instrument Name is ready to move to flight build”

17 Solar Probe Plus Mission CDR Instrument/Suite Name March 2015 Backup

18 Solar Probe Plus Mission CDR Instrument/Suite Name Phase C Peer Reviews Review# A/I# Open# Close# Concurred I-PDR Peer Review A Peer Review B I-CDR March 2015

19 Solar Probe Plus Mission CDR Instrument/Suite Name Summary of Documentation Status  1 page  Give a list of your documents and their release status  Include requirements docs  Specs  Limited life item list  Other matrix required documents  CDRL status March 2015

20 Solar Probe Plus Mission CDR Instrument/Suite Name Parts and Materials Status  Summarize MIL and PIL approval status and procurement status March 2015

21 Solar Probe Plus Mission CDR Instrument/Suite Name Red and Green Tag Items  List red and green tag items March 2015

22 Solar Probe Plus Mission CDR Instrument/Suite Name GSE  1 page - top-level summary only  GSE design description, including  EGSE and MGSE requirements and implementation associated with the GSE  EGSE software including requirements, design and verification of EGSE software  Instrument purge equipment  Instrument shipping container  Slings or other special fixtures needed to mount and align the instrument March 2015