1 Project Coordinators’ meeting 15-16 March 2010 TEMPUS MONITORING POLICY.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Examples of good practice. Examples of Good Practice Use of external UK and/or international external organisations as non-funded partners (target country.
Advertisements

The Managing Authority –Keystone of the Control System
ROM reviews Saskia Van Crugten
Centre for Strategy & Evaluation Services Evaluation of the SME Funding Schemes - summary European Agency for Safety and Health at Work.
EuropeAid PARTICIPATORY SESSION 2: Managing contract/Managing project… Question 1 : What do you think are the expectations and concerns of the EC task.
European Union Cohesion Policy
Head teacher Performance Management
Communities First Mike Durke. Key Lessons 2002: Early days 2003: Deputy Minister Review 2006: Interim Evaluation 2008: ‘Communities Next’ 2009: Wales.
1 Final Report Results of the on-line Public Consultation of the Conclusions of the 5th Cohesion Report Peter Berkowitz Head of Unit Conception, forward.
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE MANAGING AUTHORITIES AND THE PAYING AGENCIES IN THE MANAGEMENT OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMMES Felix Lozano, Head of.
Project Monitoring Evaluation and Assessment
Duties of a Trustee Chris Smail - Langer & Co /02/2011.
S3 Project aim The main goal, thus expected result, of the S3 project would be to strengthen tools used for Structural Fund policies (SF), through the.
Results-Oriented Monitoring (ROM)
INTERACT ENPI is a project funded by the European Union Summary of the Workshops
Education and Culture LESSONS LEARNED FROM THE FORMER GENERATION OF HIGHER EDUCATION PROGRAMMES IN RUSSIAN FEDERATION José Gutierrez Erasmus+ : Higher.
EuropeAid’s today’s quality framework and the Results agenda
Guidance Note 12 – Monitoring, Reporting and Evaluation Information for Lead Partners 21 September 2011 Sarah Reid Managing Authority.
Project Implementation Monika Balode Joint Technical Secretariat Lead Partner Seminar 16 October 2009, Šiauliai.
Financial management Management and control systems Training for Programme Operators March 2012.
Project implementation under DIS PRESENTATIONby Mr. Gábor Rónaszéki CFCU Hungary 30 November 2006.
Workshop on Implementing Audit Quality Practices March 2006 Building Quality into the Financial Audit Process The NAO’s experience Gareth Caller.
ODA and EU recent financing initiatives Biodiversity Unit, DG Environment, European Commission CBD Dialogue Seminar on Scaling up biodiversity financing,
TEMPUS INFORMATION DAY Ashgabat - 27 November 2010 Alba Chiara Tiberi Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency.
Regulatory requirements in the current programming period Funchal, 18 November 2010.
Leonardo da Vinci Partnerships: an opportunity to work together Italian National Agency for LLP - Leonardo da Vinci Sectoral Programme.
TEMPUS INFORMATION DAY Ashgabat – 27 November 2010 Alba Chiara Tiberi Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency.
EU Funding opportunities : Rights, Equality and Citizenship Programme Justice Programme Jose Ortega European Commission DG Justice.
Evaluation of EU Structural Funds information and publicity activities in Lithuania in Implementing recommendations for Dr. Klaudijus.
Erasmus+ information day for Brussels-based Missions and EU Delegations Why and how can EU delegations (EUDs) promote Erasmus+? Nicola SCARAMUZZO, EU Moscow.
Regional Training/Consultations on Capacity Development for Sustainable Growth and Human Development in Europe and CIS Application of Capacity Development.
Financial reporting Linda Wormö, MA Per Dahlström, MA 1st October,2015 Kuopio, Finland.
The Douala Action Plan – A preliminary assessment Regional project implementation workshop in Western and Central Africa Accra, Ghana December 1-4, 2009.
ACP S&T Programme - Stakeholder conference October Implemented by the ACP Secretariat Funded by the European Union EDULINK - ACP Science and.
Tracking national portfolios and assessing results Sub-regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points in West and Central Africa June 2008, Douala, Cameroon.
Governors Introduction Part Three WELCOME Accountability.
Application procedure From theory to practice Dieter H. Henzler, Steinbeis-Transfercenter Cultural Resources Management, Berlin.
Management of Tempus projects Kick-off meetings of 2011 projects.
Public Investment Verification Unit (UVER). Department for Development and Cohesion Policies (DPS)
Grant Application Form (Annex A) Grant Application Form (Annex A) 2nd Call for Proposals.
PUBLIC FINANCIAL ACCOUNTABILITY – MULTI STAKEHOLDER APPROACHES
TEN-T Executive Agency and Project Management Anna LIVIERATOU-TOLL TEN-T Executive Agency Senior Programme and Policy Coordinator European Economic and.
Information Overview SF: Planning & Programming Workshops for EC Delegation Patrick Colgan & Ján Krištín PROGRAMMING PROCEDURES in Support of Regional.
ACTED AME Appraisal, Monitoring and Evaluation. Summary 1/ ACTED AME department 2/ AME Responsibilities 3/ AME throughout project cycle 4/ Involvement.
1 Project Coordinators’ meeting March 2010 NATIONAL TEMPUS OFFICES (NTOs) & HIGHER EDUCATION REFORMS.
1. TEMPUS PROGRAMME PROJECT REPRESENTATIVES’ MEETING Brussels, March 2010 Management of the Grant Agreement.
DG Justice and Consumers Project Management Some points of attention JUST/2014/JCOO/AG/CRIM and JUST/2014/JCOO/AG/CIVI Kick-off meeting 26 January2016.
New approach in EU Accession Negotiations: Rule of Law Brussels, May 2013 Sandra Pernar Government of the Republic of Croatia Office for Cooperation.
European Union COMMUNICATION AND VISIBILITY. Importance of Visibility EU taxpayer money Need for awareness, accountability and transparency EU should.
Ministry of Finance Compliance assessment of the management and control systems of the managing authorities under the Operational programmes. Conclusions.
> 1 ACP S&T Grant Contract N° FED/2009/ Introducing WP6 Monitoring & Quality control Objectives, actions, procedures Dr Sarah Bracking.
FUSE TEMPUS Project Coordination Meeting Belgrade University, 27 and 28 November, 2014 INTERMEDIATE REPORT (IR) PREPARATION (+ Statement of the Costs Incurred.
Exploitation means to use and benefit from something. For Erasmus+ this means maximising the potential of the funded activities, so that the results are.
Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS organizations in Papua New Guinea Day 4. Session 10. Evaluation.
TEMPUS INFORMATION DAY NEDAL JAYOUSI/Ph.d. NTO PALESITNE TEMPUS IV- FIFTH CALL FOR PROPOSALS.
Eligibility and evaluation
  EXPERIENCE OF SLOVENIAN AUDIT AUTHORITY WITH FRAUD SUSPICON CASES Nataša Prah Prague, 3. November 2016.
Chisinau, Republic of Moldova 2017
Tempus Monitoring Policy
4.4 Procurement by grant beneficiaries
EQAVET Annual Network Meeting
Preparations for post-2020 Impact Assessment European Commission Directorate General for Regional and Urban Policy Unit DGA Policy.
Role of external contractors - Assistance, monitoring and evaluation
Control framework and Audit of European Structural and Investment Funds Visit of the Finance and Constitution Committee of the Scottish Parliament Brussels,
SME Initiative Malta TAIEX-Regio Workshop Bucharest 11th July 2017.
Helene Skikos DG Education and Culture
EVALUATIONS in the EU External Aid
ESF EVALUATION PARTNERSHIP
Field monitoring Project (number and title)
Presentation transcript:

1 Project Coordinators’ meeting March 2010 TEMPUS MONITORING POLICY

WHY Monitoring  Management instrument, both for projects that might be encountering problems & for projects which are enjoying particular success  Benefits extend beyond a given project: lessons can be learnt - best practice can be disseminated  General objectives: - To maximise the impact of the Tempus programme - To maximise the return on investment of EU funds - To ensure proper use of tax-payer money - To control and assess the beneficiaries’ performances

DESK Monitoring (Brussels HQ) -Written reports by Coordinators -Minutes of beneficiaries’ meetings -Exchange of mails with coordinators/beneficiaries -Publications; websites of the projects / of the beneficiaries Monitoring activity

Monitoring activity FIELD Monitoring (on the spot)  Actors: EACEA staff, NTOs, EU Delegations, External consultants  Locations: Any place concerned by the project  Wish/request:As much concerned partners involved

Monitoring activity FIELD Monitoring (on the spot) - To monitor the progress and achievements in their real context - To judge whether the project is progressing according to plan - To assess whether the project is producing the expected benefits - To scrutinise the context in which the programme is operating - To highlight the added value for modernising HE policy - To assess the visibility and the potential for sustainability of the project - To be informed about financial management / accounting system put in place FEEDBACK TO COORDINATORS

Monitoring activity Financial AUDIT (on the spot)  By sample  Upon request by EACEA project officer, EU Delegation, EACEA financial unit, EC DGs  At any time, usually after the end of the project (within 5 years)  EACEA Staff, Independent auditor, OLAF

Three functions for Field Monitoring  Preventative  information on the rules & procedures  review of the objectives, priorities, methodology, activities planned  further recommendations  3-12 months after the beginning of the eligibility period  Recommendations  results should appear in the interim report

Three functions for Field Monitoring  Advisory  advice to accompany the project implementation  check content and financial aspects (based primarily on the content of the interim report)  In the last 6-12 months of the eligibility period  Links between the interim report and the situation on the ground  Recommendations for the continuation of the project

Three functions for Field Monitoring  Control  check and assessment of the results  assessment of impact, sustainability, tender procedures, accounts  After the completion of the project: 3-15 months after the end of the eligibility period  Financial management & accounting relating to the use of the grant

FIELD Monitoring Our Objectives To know the projects To know the beneficiaries, to support them To improve further the functioning of the Tempus programme Our Targets Two thirds (2/3) of the projects are visited annually Each project financed, on average, is visited twice during its lifetime and beyond