1 Children First Intensive 2008 Grade 5 Social Studies Analyzing Outcomes for ESO Network 14 March 25, 2009 Social Studies Conference, PS/MS 3 Deena Abu-Lughod,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Assessing Student Performance
Advertisements

A+nywhere 3.0 Student Training Revised 0510 Enter your log-on name here. Enter your password here. Click here or hit enter.
Mark Troy – Data and Research Services –
Benchmark Assessment Item Bank Test Chairpersons Orientation Meeting October 8, 2007 Miami-Dade County Public Schools Best Practices When Constructing.
The Effects of Achievement Priming on Expectations and Performance Kathryn Raso Team 14 PSY 321.
Fall 2014 MAP NWEA Score Comparison Alliance Dr. Olga Mohan High School October 22, 2014.
 Presented by: Jackie Gantzer EdPower  Match the classroom strategy with the famous person on the next page – be able to support your answer with.
STAR Basics.
Writing Program Assessment Report Fall 2002 through Spring 2004 Laurence Musgrove Writing Program Director Department of English and Foreign Languages.
Elementary Report Card Revisions
Data Analysis Protocol Identify – Strengths – Weaknesses – Trends – Outliers Focus on 3 – Strengths – Weaknesses.
Grade 3-8 Mathematics Test Results. 2 The Bottom Line This is the first year in which students took State tests in Grades 3,4,5,6,7, and 8. With.
WHAT IS MAP? AMES Lunch and Learn.
Tools for Instruction and Assessment for the Maryland College- and Career-Ready Standards Time to Revisit Tools that will Inform Instruction.
NEXT GENERATION BALANCED ASSESSMENT SYSTEMS ALIGNED TO THE CCSS Stanley Rabinowitz, Ph.D. WestEd CORE Summer Design Institute June 19,
Children First Intensive
PLC-Data Disaggregation Week of September Before the meeting Make sure each person has signed in. Review the group norms Todays goals are to disaggregate.
Closing the Loop From Analysis to Use of Results SLO Winter 2011 Workshop.
KCCT Kentucky’s Commonwealth Accountability Testing System Overview of 2008 Regional KPR.
Elementary Assessment Data Update Edmonds School District January 2013.
Out with the Old, In with the New: NYS Assessments “Primer” Basics to Keep in Mind & Strategies to Enhance Student Achievement Maria Fallacaro, MORIC
1 Determination of Power Indicators James Frakes & Associates, LLC.
Deena Abu-Lughod 1 Children First Intensive Building Leadership, Network Data Celebration, ARIS Parent Link ESO Network 14 Eastwood Manor, May 21, 2009.
Benchmark Data. World History Average Score: 56% Alliance: 96%
BOARD ENDS POLICY REVIEW E-2 Students will demonstrate a strong foundation in academic skills by working toward the Kansas Standards of Excellence in reading,
Tran Keys, Ph.D. Research & Evaluation, Santa Ana USD
Jasmine Carey CDE Psychometrician Interpreting Science and Social Studies Assessment Results September 2014.
 Closing the loop: Providing test developers with performance level descriptors so standard setters can do their job Amanda A. Wolkowitz Alpine Testing.
How to analyze assessment data using Limelight Revised
Assessing assessment: the role of student effort in comparative studies Ray Adams Jayne Butler.
1 Using Data to Improve Student Achievement & to Close the Achievement Gap Tips & Tools for Data Analysis Spring 2007.
Diagnostics Mathematics Assessments: Main Ideas  Now typically assess the knowledge and skill on the subsets of the 10 standards specified by the National.
Understanding the TerraNova Test Testing Dates: May Kindergarten to Grade 2.
HOW DO I USE THINKGATE? Presented By: Mercy Aycart From: South Miami Senior High Data have no meaning…meaning is imposed.
Student Growth Measures in Teacher Evaluation Using Data to Inform Growth Targets and Submitting Your SLO 1.
Formal Assessment Week 6 & 7. Formal Assessment Formal assessment is typical in the form of paper-pencil assessment or computer based. These tests are.
Assessment Literacy Interim Assessment Kansas State Department of Education ASSESSMENT LITERACY PROJECT1.
PREPARING [DISTRICT NAME] STUDENTS FOR COLLEGE & CAREER Setting a New Baseline for Success.
SETRC network guide for assessment of programs.  Assessing quality of district program and practice in areas of literacy  Determining priority need.
Children First Intensive ELA Best Practices: Aligning Assessment and Instruction A Collaboration of ESA CFN 6 & ESO Network 19 Eastwood Manor, Bx October.
Attainment Peter Gorrie, QIO September 2014.
Grade 3-8 Math. 2 Regents: Raising Standards, with Extra Help to Achieve Them The Regents approved new, higher math standards in March A.
Attainment Peter Gorrie, QIO September 2014.
December 2, 2013 Facilitator: Tanya Rosado-Barringer, Mid-State RBERN Coordinator ELL Considerations for Evaluators.
1 AMP Results Overview for Educators October 30, 2015.
Race to the Top Assessment Program: Public Hearing on Common Assessments January 20, 2010 Washington, DC Presenter: Lauress L. Wise, HumRRO Aab-sad-nov08item09.
Life without Levels Assessing children without levels.
DATA ANALYSIS Looking at Student Work November 2013.
1 Children First Intensive ESO NETWORK 14 CFI INQUIRY TEAM MEETING September 18, 2008 Bob Cohen, Network Leader; Deena Abu-Lughod, SAF Alan Godlewicz,
Response to Intervention Problem Solving Process –Florida’s Model Evaluate Did the plan work? Problem Analysis Why is it occurring?
Berry Middle School/Spain Park High School Hoover City Schools Testing- Spring 2014 Results / Analysis- Fall 2014.
1 Oregon Standards Evaluation Project, Contract Amendment Phase: Summary of Preliminary Findings Dr. Stanley Rabinowitz WestEd December 6, 2007.
1 Changes to NYS Grades 3 – 8 Assessments. In 2010, NYS Raised the Bar for Proficiency ELA Level 2Level 3 Grade
Examining Student Work Middle School Math Teachers District SIP Day January 27, 2016.
[School Name]’s Student Perception Survey Results This presentation is a template and should be customized to reflect the needs and context of your school.
White Pages Team Grey Pages Facilitator Team & Facilitator Guide for School-wide Reading Leadership Team Meetings Elementary.
Aligning Student Learning outcomes to Evaluation 1 Applied Technologies - ICRDCE Conference Day
Cynthia B. Schmeiser More than Elementary: A Summit on Literacy Instruction in Ohio’s Secondary Schools March 2007 Impact of Literacy on College Readiness.
MAP Assessment, Standards Based Report Card, and PSSA
Evaluating Student-Teachers Using Student Outcomes
TEKS-Based Instruction
Looking at Student Work November 2013
ARDHIAN SUSENO CHOIRUL RISA PRADANA P.
Create a Strong Start ACT® Aspire ®.
2015 PARCC Results for R.I: Work to do, focus on teaching and learning
Interpreting Science and Social Studies Assessment Results
Greg Miller Iowa State University
Curriculum 2.0: Standards-Based Grading and reporting
Why We Should be Skeptical about the Common Core
EDUC 2130 Quiz #10 W. Huitt.
Presentation transcript:

1 Children First Intensive 2008 Grade 5 Social Studies Analyzing Outcomes for ESO Network 14 March 25, 2009 Social Studies Conference, PS/MS 3 Deena Abu-Lughod, Senior Achievement Facilitator Network Leader: Bob Cohen Brandon Alvarez, Joann Benoit, Deirdre Burke, Freddie Capshaw, Alan Godlewicz, Dr. Pamela McCarthy

2 Learning Intentions  Understand the construction of the Grade 5 Social Studies test  Understand Network 14 performance and improvement trends  How to use benchmark comparisons to reflect on curriculum  Understand how Social Studies outcomes relate to the ELA outcomes

3 Obtaining Information from the State Copies of old state tests are available through NYSED: The Core Curriculum and Standards are available through these links. The last page of the rating guide provides the “specifications grid” that shows the distribution of multiple choice questions by Unit and Standard. The grid shows that questions appear sequentially by grade. In 2008, items 1-11 related to Grade 3 content, items related to Grade 4 content, items to Grade 4-5 content, and the last four items were cross-topical and skills-based.

4 Screen shot of a Specifications Grid

5 State Social Studies Toolkit:

6 Performance Highlights Most schools have improved the percent of students passing the social studies exam by several points each year, notably x3, x20, x24, x86 and x360. x20 has improved the most. What are they doing that has made the difference?

7 Avg. Grade 5 Social Studies Scores,

8 Comparing 2007 and 2008 Results The following two stacked bar graphs show the percent of students in each performance level on the Fall 2007 and Fall 2008 Social Studies exams. Finally, there is a bar chart disaggregating the data by gender. Consistent with the tendency in literacy, girls outscored boys at all schools except x3, x81, and x360.

9

10

11

12 Comparing the Network to all Level 4 students Your annotated copy of the Grade 5 Fall 2008 Social Studies exam indicates the Grade Level, Unit and Standard for each item and the percent of students in Networks 14 and 19 who answered correctly. The percent of students who answered an item correctly is referred to as an “item analysis”. However, there is a better way to use the item response data to evaluate curriculum. That is to compare the percent of students answering correctly to the percent of all level 4 students (or all level 3 students) who answered correctly. This helps you distinguish which kinds of questions separate the 2s from the 3s and the 3s from the 4s. This is called a “benchmark” comparison.

13 Small gap Large gap

14 “Small” gap questions

15 A large gap question

16 Another large gap question

17 Using benchmarks to review curriculum Examine the data comparing the percent of your students who answered each item correctly to the Level 3 or Level 4 benchmarks. Items where the gap was the smallest indicate the types of skill and knowledge that your students were most successful at mastering. Items where the gaps were large provide clues as to the types of skills and knowledge your students were less successful in mastering. For those skills and knowledge, review where in the curriculum they were taught and how they were assessed.

18 Are ELA and Social Studies scores related? The correlation coefficient of the Grade 4 ELA with the Grade 5 social studies is.718. This is very high, and slightly higher than the correlation between these same students’ Grade 4 ELA and Math scores (.694). However, it is not as high as the correlation between the Grade 3 and Grade 4 ELA exams (.777). This means that content-area instruction DOES matter. Note in particular how the correlation between the ELA and Social Studies scores are actually much higher at the middle schools that begin in Grade 5 (.766). That means content area instruction had less of an impact, or independent effect, on student outcomes.

19

20 Is correlation a good thing? Since the social studies exam requires strong literacy skills, it is not surprising to see a high correlation. The fact that the correlation is higher in middle schools with initial 5 th grades suggests a relative weakness in specific social studies skills. A lower correlation is actually a measure of the greater independence of the social studies score, and therefore of the quality of social studies instruction. What do the data tell us about what might be happening in different schools and classes?

21 Feedback and debrief; Evaluation Please complete the Feedback Form now. Did we achieve our intentions?  Better understand the construction of the Grade 5 Social Studies test  Understand what the performance and improvement trends across Network 14 schools have been  How to use benchmark comparisons to revise curriculum  Understand how the results of the social studies exam relate to outcomes on the Grade 4 ELA  How to use old tests to construct reliable measures of mastery in earlier grades