U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Finalization of Phase 6 Land Use Database, version 2 Peter Claggett, Fred Irani, Quentin Stubbs,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Siskiyou County Land Development Manual 2006 Update Planning Commission Hearing Land Development Manual Update.
Advertisements

All parcels in Howard County Vacant parcels and infill parcels (improvement value of $5,000)
1 Site Capacity and Natural Resource Protection Relationships in Subdivision Design.
September 5, 2013 Tyler Jones Research Assistant Dept. of Geology & Geography Auburn University.
VEGETATION MAPPING FOR LANDFIRE National Implementation.
Northeast Landscape Planning Committee Meeting #7 – Ecological Policy Framework (cont’d) Resource review Landcover data Watershed data FIA data.
Historic Record of Practice Implementation Jeff Sweeney Environmental Protection Agency Chesapeake Bay Program Office
Lancaster County GIS Projects 2012 Aerial Photos Cooperative project with NGA and USGS leveraged about $70,000 of Federal Funds Lancaster County provided.
The Planner’s Role in Urban Water Conservation Philip Stoker Robin Rothfeder PhD students, City and Metropolitan Planning University of Utah Stephanie.
CURRENT AGRICULTURAL USE VALUATION (CAUV) 1. LARRY R. GEARHARDT FIELD SPECIALIST, TAXATION OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY EXTENSION 810 FAIR ROAD SIDNEY, OHIO.
Agricultural Land Use Historical Data and the 2004 Rural/Urban Definition Alison Wray: Farming Statistics Team, Defra York. Julian Groom: Rural Statistics.
AGRICULTURAL LAND PRICES TABLE 1 Land values 2005/2006 TABLE 1 Land values 2005/2006 TABLE 2 Land values 2008/2009 TABLE 2 Land values 2008/2009.
Equity of Green Infrastructure Arlington, VA Source: Arlington, VA County Website.
FUNDING FOR DEVELOPMENT OF STATEWIDE LAND COVER DATA Jennifer Tribo, Senior Water Resources Planner Hampton Roads Planning District Commission VGIN Advisory.
Simulating Future Suburban Development in Connecticut Jason Parent, Daniel Civco, and James Hurd Center for Land Use Education and.
Agricultural Land Use Patterns Butler-Cunningham Conference on Agriculture And the Environment November 3, 2003.
Luci2 Urban Simulation Model John R. Ottensmann Center for Urban Policy and the Environment Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis.
The Planner’s Role in Urban Water Conservation Philip Stoker Robin Rothfeder PhD students, City and Metropolitan Planning University of Utah Stephanie.
Economics of Riparian Restoration on Western Washington Farms June 29, 2004 American Water Resource Association Olympic Valley, CA Carolyn J. Henri, PhD.
Ten State Mid-Atlantic Cropland Data Layer Project Rick Mueller Program Manager USDA/National Agricultural Statistics Service Remote Sensing Across the.
Chesapeake Bay Program Incorporation of Lag Times into the Decision Process Gary Shenk 10/16/12 1.
IMPACT AID - SECTION 8002 Payments Relating to Federal Acquisitions of Real Property.
Proposed Modification to Method for Determining Reasonable In-Season Demand for the Surface Water Coalition: Use of the USDA Crop Data Layer Presented.
8th Mid-Atlantic Regional Planning Roundtable Arlington, VA March 30, 2012 PlanMaryland Maryland Department of Planning.
Update on Forest Goals and Progress in the Chesapeake Bay Partnership Citizens Advisory Committee Meeting, 8/23/13 Sally Claggett & Julie Mawhorter, US.
Comparison of Soil Organic Carbon Stocks Between
Urban Land-Cover Classification for Mesoscale Atmospheric Modeling Alexandre Leroux.
Forestry-related Ordinances in Florida What are the potential influences of county and municipal ordinances on forest land retention and sustainability?
Center for Watershed Protection USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Area, State and Private Forestry How to estimate future forest cover in a watershed.
Comparison of Agricultural Water Use Estimates Available for the CFWI Region For the HAT.
Saving the Chesapeake’s Great Rivers and Special Places High Resolution Land Cover Data in the Chesapeake Bay Chesapeake Conservancy.
The Chesapeake Bay Program’s Scenario Builder Gary Shenk CCMP workshop 5/11/2010.
Karl Berger Dept. of Environmental Programs Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments Chesapeake Bay Program Modeling Developments April 28, 2015.
Senegal Change Assessment Ugo Leonardi GLCN Land Cover/Remote Rensing Expert
U.S. Department of the Interior Chesapeake Bay Watershed Land Cover Data Series 1984, 1992, 2001, and 2006 U.S. Geological SurveyThe Chesapeake Bay Program.
Notice: The views expressed here are those of the individual authors and may not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the United States Environmental.
Updated Estimates of Impervious Area, Equivalent Residential Units, IA Rate, and Customer Bill Impacts AOBA October 27, 2008.
2009 DELAWARE ENVIROTHON “Biodiversity in a Changing World” Presenter Scott C. Blaier, P.G.
1 Chesapeake Bay Program Management Board Meeting March 6, 2012 Discussion for the Final Evaluation of Milestones.
San Luis Obispo County Planning and Building Department Jeff Legato Mapping and Graphics Specialist
Characterizing, measuring and visualizing forest resources An inadequate treatment by an unqualified presenter.
Phase 6 Land Use Co-Chairs: Karl Berger, Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments Jennifer Tribo, Hampton Roads Planning District Commission Coordinator:
District of Columbia Watershed Implementation Plan (WIP) Blue Plains Regional Committee 1 District Department of the Environment Watershed Protection Divsion.
Status and Effect of Impervious Area Estimates in the TMDL Presented to the Potomac Watershed Roundtable by Michael S. Rolband P.E., P.W.S., P.W.D., LEED.
Chesapeake Bay Program Decision Support System Management Actions Watershed Model Bay Model Criteria Assessment Procedures Effects Allocations Airshed.
Modeling and Forecasting Household and Person Level Control Input Data for Advance Travel Demand Modeling Presentation at 14 th TRB Planning Applications.
2004 Tributary Strategies: Assessment of Implementation Options Steve Bieber Water Resources Program Presented at: COG Chesapeake Bay Policy Committee.
The Noninsured Crop Disaster Assistance Program (NAP) Presentation Developed by: Joe Parcell, Assistant Professor and Extension Economist, University of.
Bay Guidance Programs. The Bay Program partnership includes: 19 federal agencies Nearly 40 state agencies and programs in DE, MD, NY, PA, VA,
RVCOG Advisory Committee Meeting Discussion on Draft Interpretation of The Urban Reserve Rule Location Factors And Analysis of RPS Growth Areas February.
USDA / National Agricultural Statistics Service, New England Field Office USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service New England Field Office 53 Pleasant.
Steps to Complete Site Capacity Calculations 1. Base Site Area 2. Net Site Area 3. Density Residential = Dwelling Units Nonresidential = Impervious Surface.
Waterbody Classification Project A project of the Lakes and Watershed Commission, Dane County Department of Planning and Development, and the Dane County.
Land Cover Classification and Monitoring Case Studies: Twin Cities Metropolitan Area –Multi-temporal Landsat Image Classification and Change Analysis –Impervious.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Ensuring Full Access to Federal Cost Shared Conservation Practices W. Dean Hively, Ph.D. U.S. Geological.
Assessing the Tree Canopy in Jefferson County, WV Jarlath O’Neil-Dunne University of Vermont Spatial Analysis Laboratory.
Agricultural Land Use as it Relates to Land Slope James Plourde, Dr. Bryan Pijanowski Human-Environment Modeling & Analysis Laboratory Purdue University.
Maryland Agricultural Land Preservation Foundation Carol S. West Executive Director Saturday, April 2, 2016.
Capstone Project GI Analysis C Team. Leadership Forum Local/State GIS planners Planning/ZoningUtilities Citizen Groups USACoE Local Developers Parks &
Indian Wells Valley Groundwater Basin
Michigan Association of County Drain Commissioners
Department of Environmental Quality
WIP Regional Meetings Jason Keppler
Department of Environmental Quality
Urban Tree Canopy: Assessing the Community Forest
West Virginia University
Agriculture WIP Phase III Development Update
Davie County Comprehensive Land Development Plan
Exploratory Land Use Change Assessment
Presentation transcript:

U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Finalization of Phase 6 Land Use Database, version 2 Peter Claggett, Fred Irani, Quentin Stubbs, Renee Thompson, and Howard Weinberg October 22, 2015 Scientific and Technical Advisory Committee Quarterly Meeting and Retreat Rose Haven, Maryland

Phase 6 Land Use v2 (pre-Ag Census)

Steps 1.Merge local and regional land use datasets for Implement hierarchical rules to reconcile datasets. 3.Summarize land uses within Federal Macro-agency parcels and Non- federal portions of LRSEGs. 4.Estimate rural residential impervious and turf grass acres. 5.Incorporate Maryland data. 6.Mass balance LRSEG acres. 7.Backcast to 1984, Forecast to Proportionally allocate land uses to regulated areas. 9.Fit the Census of Agriculture

Reconcile percentages of land uses at pixel level 1.Combine 10m rasters of counties, federal lands, CSOs, MS4s, and 15 “land uses”: > 20 million records IR (impervious roads) INR (impervious non-roads) TCIR (tree canopy over roads) TCINR (tree canopy over other impervious) TCH (tree canopy over herbaceous) TG (turf grass) OSP (open space) FOR (forest) WTT (tidal wetland) WTF (non-tidal floodplain wetland) WTO (non-tidal other wetland) WAT (open water) DEV (developed areas) CROP (cropland) PAST (pasture)

1.Impervious Surfaces IR – TCIR = IR_adj INR – TCINR = INR_adj If (IR_adj + TCIR + INR_adj + TCINR) > 100, reduce INR_adj and TCINR values proportionally in new fields INR_adj2 and TCINR_adj so that the sum of these land uses <= Water If (IR_adj + TCIR + INR_adj2 + TCINR_adj + WAT) > 100, reduce WAT in new field WAT_adj so that the sum of these land uses <= Wetlands If (WTF + WTO + WTT) > 100, reduce WTT in new field WTT_adj so that the sum of these land uses <= 100. If (IR_adj + TCIR + INR_adj2 + TCINR_adj + WAT_adj + WTF + WTO+ WTT_adj) > 100, reduce WTF, WTO, and WTT_adj proportionally in new fields WTF_adj, WTO_adj, and WTT_adj2. 4.Forests If (IR_adj + TCIR + INR_adj2 + TCINR_adj + WAT_adj + WTF_adj + WTO_adj + WTT_adj2 + FOR) > 100, reduce FOR in new field FOR_adj so that the sum of these land uses <= 100. Implement Hierarchical Rules (coded in SQL and FORTRAN)

5.Turf Grass For all pixels where DEV = 1, Add CROP and PAST fractions to TG in new field TG_adj. Add TCH fractions to new field TCT If (IR_adj + TCIR + INR_adj2 + TCINR_adj + WAT_adj + WTF_adj + WTO_adj + WTT_adj2 + FOR + TCT + TG_adj) > 100, reduce TCT and TG_adj proportionally in new fields TCT_adj and TG_adj2 so that the sum of these land uses <= 100. For all pixels where DEV = 0, Add TG fractions proportionally to CROPLAND and PASTURE in new fields Crop_adj and Past_adj. Add TCH fractions to new field TCS If (IR_adj + TCIR + INR_adj2 + TCINR_adj + WAT_adj + WTF_adj + WTO_adj + WTO_adj2 + FOR + TCS + CROP_adj + PAST_adj) > 100, reduce just TCS in new field TCS_adj. 6.Open Space If the sum of all adjusted fields including OS 0 including OS, saved as new field OS_adj.

Estimate Rural Residential Impervious and Turf 1.Calculate the total number of housing units outside areas classified as “developed” = THU10_unDEV 2.THU10_unDEV * (Average impervious acres per rural residential lot) = Rural residential impervious. 3.(THU10_unDEV * (Average rural residential lot size 1 ) * (LRSEG proportion of herbaceous vegetation within 100m of roads)) – (Rural residential impervious) = Rural residential turf grass. 1 Avg. rural lot size in MD = 2.24 acres MedianSuburbanRural DC DE MD NY PA VA WV All States Impervious Acres per Lot

Incorporate Maryland P6 Land Use Data MDE and MDP provided 2011 land use acreage estimates for federal and non-federal portions of LRSEGs for all counties in Maryland except: Somerset, St. Mary’s, Worcester, Washington, and Garrett. Data were provided for the following land uses. IR INR TCI TCT TCS TG FOR WTF WTO WTT (not used) CBPO supplemented these data with information on: OSP WAT WTT CROP PAST

Mass Balance Total Acres per LRSEG 1.If sum of all land uses > LRSEG area, reduce Open Space and Forest proportionally. 2.Add Maryland land use data. If sum of all land uses > LRSEG area, reduce all land uses proportionally. 3.Outside Maryland, add rural residential turf grass and impervious. If sum of all land uses > LRSEG area, reduce rural residential turf grass and impervious fractions using proportions of original turf grass and impervious non-road acreages. 4.Agricultural area = LRSEG area – (sum of all adjusted land uses + tidal wetlands)

Backcast Land Uses to 2006, 2001, 1992, and Estimate absolute change in Total Housing Units 2.Estimate proportion of Total Housing Units that are single detached 3.Estimate average residential lot size for single-detached houses 4.Calculate percent change in: Residential land use Forest/tree canopy cover Agricultural land cover 5.Adjust land use acreages to reflect historic conditions: IR_06 = IR_11 + (IR_11 * (% Δ Residential) * (Proportion of IR associated with INR) INR_06 = INR_11 + (IR_11 * (% Δ Residential)) TG_06 = TG_11 + (TG_11 * (% Δ Residential))

Backcast Land Uses to 2006, 2001, 1992, and 1984 TCIR_06 = TCIR_11 + (TCIR_11 * (% Δ Residential) * (Proportion of IR associated with INR) TCINR_06 = TCINR_11 + (TCIR_11 * (% Δ Residential)) TCT_06 = TCT_11 + (TCT_11 * (% Δ Residential)) TCS_06, OSP_06, AG_06 = TCS_11 + (TCS_11 * (% Δ Agriculture) * (Proportion of TCS_11 to sum of TCS, OSP and AG)) FOR_06 = FOR_11 + (FOR_11 * (% Δ Forest)) + (Δ Tree Canopy Classes 2011 – 2006) WTF, WTO, and WAT held constant through time. If sum of all 2006 land uses > LRSEG area, reduce TCT, TCS, OSP, FOR, and AG proportionally.

Steps 1.Merge local and regional land use datasets for Implement hierarchical rules to reconcile datasets. 3.Summarize land uses within Federal macro-agency parcels and non- federal portions of LRSEGs. 4.Estimate rural residential impervious and turf grass acres. 5.Incorporate Maryland data. 6.Mass balance LRSEG acres. 7.Backcast to 1984, Forecast to Proportionally allocate developed land uses to regulated areas (e.g., CSS and MS4s) keeping CSS acreages constant through time by adjusting open space fraction. 9.Fit the Census of Agriculture

Fit the Census of Agriculture 1. Interpolate land use acreages to Census years: 1982, 1987, 1992, 1997, 2002, 2007, Distribute all crops reported in the Census from counties to LRSEGs based on the proportion of a County’s agricultural area within each LRSEG. 3. If land use acres + Census of Agriculture > LRSEG acres Subtract acres sequentially (if needed) from: open space, non- regulated tree canopy, forest, non-CSS developed land uses, and agriculture (non-animal feeding space).