Budget Update FY 12 Mid Year Revenue Analysis and FY 13 Budget Planning Janet Parker, Associate Vice President, Financial Affairs Mary Simon, Senior Director,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
3   What is the role of the Committee?   Review details of the tuition and fee proposal resulting in a recommendation to the President and Board.
Advertisements

TUITION & FEE PROPOSAL (Revised) Recommendation to The University of Texas Board of Regents (Revised) Recommendation to The University of Texas.
Portland State University Budget Update As presented to the Faculty Senate January 7, 2013 by: Monica Rimai Vice President, Finance & Administration.
STATUS UPDATE 3/12/2010 Proposed Changes to RCM. Goals Align RCM incentives with institutional goals Identify source of central strategic funds Simplify.
BUDGET 2015 AND LEGISLATIVE APPROPRIATIONS REQUEST MARY SIMON, SR. DIRECTOR BUDGET PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT MAY 6, 2014.
2 Biennial process for setting deregulated tuition and mandatory fees initiated by the Board of Regents Rates are set for a two year period covering Academic.
BUDGET UPDATE: MID-YEAR REVIEW AND BUDGET CALENDAR MARY SIMON, SR. DIRECTOR BUDGET PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT FEBRUARY 18, 2015.
1 Tuition Policy Advisory Committee September 16, 2004.
Overview of UTSA’s Discretionary Budget Presented by: Mary Simon Sr. Director Budget and Planning Development.
Tuition & Fee Proposal and FY 2009 Budget Tuition & Fee Proposal and FY 2009 Budget Presentation to UTSA Staff Council June 26, 2008 Janet Parker, Associate.
1. TABLE 1 GOVERNOR'S BUDGET PROPOSAL Projected State Deficit Rebuild State Reserve Total Resolutions Needed Budget Reduction Initiatives: e.g., Budget.
1 Tuition and Fees Background Current economic conditions have resulted in significant reductions in State appropriations UTEP’s appropriation.
Planning, Budget and Forecast Presented to Financial Area Reps by Mary Simon, Sr. Director Budget and Planning April 25, 2013 Presented to Financial Area.
Overview of UTSA’s Discretionary Budget
Tuition-Designated Fees University of Texas at San Antonio.
Budget Update Presented to Financial Area Representatives by Mary Simon, Sr. Director Budget and Planning January 18,2012 Presented to Financial Area Representatives.
BUDGET UPDATE: MID-YEAR REVIEW AND BUDGET CALENDAR MARY SIMON, SR. DIRECTOR BUDGET PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT MARCH 4, 2014.
Campus Budget Update October 12, Tuition Proposed Tuition Rates: + 2.5% Fall 2010 Fall 2011 Fall 2012 Undergraduate Resident $ $
Fiscal Year Operating Budget Board of Trustees Meeting June 7,
Montana University System 2009 Biennium Present Law Budget Projections Board of Regents November 16, 2005.
TUITION & FEE PROCESS GUIDELINE Draft Policy Review Draft Policy Review Financial Area Representatives April 21, 2008 Draft Policy Review Draft Policy.
Revenue Projections and Budget 2014 Mary Simon Senior Director, Budget Development & Planning PRESENTATION TO THE UNIVERSITY STRATEGIC RESOURCE PLANNING.
Budget Update Budget Update Elva Martinez, Assistant Director Budget Planning and Development February 19, 2013 Elva Martinez, Assistant Director Budget.
Operating Budget Process January 20, 2010 Budget Planning and Development.
Budget Process February 24, 2009 Budget Planning and Development.
Employee Educational Benefit (EEB) Program. EEB Background Staff Council has been requesting enhanced benefitsStaff Council has been requesting enhanced.
1 November 20 th - Agenda Review Agenda, Explanation of Fee Types, Fee Reviews & Process, Review of Proposed Fee Changes - Janet Parker Mandatory Fee Presentations:
2   Lab fees must be collected as E&G revenue per Texas Education Code.   Lab fee accounts must be reconciled for each semester’s activity to adjust.
Budget Presentation December 7, Why Talk about the Budget? 1. Demystify the process 2. Engage and get the participation of others in the budget.
The University of Texas at San Antonio, One UTSA Circle, San Antonio, TX /11/111 UTSA Tuition & Fee Proposal.
The University of Texas at San Antonio, One UTSA Circle, San Antonio, TX /11/111 Graduate Education Costs The cost of graduate education is higher.
3   What is the role of the Committee?   Review details of the tuition and fee proposal resulting in a recommendation to the President and Board.
Overview of State Budget FOR THE 2012–13 BIENNIUM JANUARY 2011 HOUSE VERSION   LBB baseline appropriations for state government ops total $156.4 billion.
FY12 Tuition Projections Tuition charged by Texas public universities is a combination of two charges: –Statutory Tuition –Designated Tuition 1.
Update on 5% Reduction Plans On February 12 th UT System advised that the proposal to mitigate the 5% reduction with TRB appropriations (debt savings)
FY10 Statutory Tuition Revenue Projections Different Rates for UG and GR; Resident and Non-resident Undergraduate, Resident $50 / Semester Credit Hour.
Operating Budget Funding Sources State Appropriations - General Revenue Formula Funding, Special Items, Benefit Cost Sharing THECB Transfers TX Grant,
Budget Process Overview Mary Simon Budget Planning and Development.
2   Flat Rate (Pay the Same) Tuition if you enroll in 12 Semester Credit Hours (SCH) or more   Designated Tuition increases by 5% if you enroll in.
1 Budget Overview Budget Information Committee February 26, 2007.
University Budget Committee FEBRUARY 5, 2016 CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, CHICO.
2   Total Academic Cost increases capped at 3.95% or $280 per year for a student taking 30 SCH, whichever is greater   Cap is net of mandatory fees.
Budget Update Document – BUD (previously BDL) Overview and Preparation Process FY Anita Polendo, Budget Analyst III Eva Burnett, Associate Director.
1 Tuition Policy Advisory Committee September 23, 2004.
THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS OF THE PERMIAN BASIN Presenter Mark McGurk, VPBA Funding & Finance Informational May 17, 2016.
Budget Calendar and Mid-Year review Mary Simon, Senior Budget Director March 23, 2016.
Spring 2016 Budget Update April Agenda Closing Balance Projections Budget Forecast Model Impact of Enrollment Changes Spring 2016 Enrollment FY16.
Strategic Resource Planning Council June 26, 2013 Merit Policy.
Open Budget Meeting April 21, Budget Calendar & Timeline CSU’s Internal Budget Process Governor’s Proposal January General Assembly Winter Finalized.
Setting Tuition for April 27, 2012 Pullman.
HIGHER EDUCATION FINANCE AND BUDGETING May 2017
Board of Trustees Retreat Budget Overview
Office of Financial Affairs
Agenda Faculty Fringe Summer Reallocation Salary Encumbrances
FY2017 Mid-Year Review FY2018 Budget Planning
UTSA Tuition & Fee Proposal
Tuition and Fee Proposal
Tuition and Fee Structure
Fiscal Management.
Budget Overview February 3, 2017.
President’s Leadership Council Budget Update
Total Academic Cost Financial Affairs Tuition and Fee Committee
FY 2018 Hyperion Operating Budget Timeline
FY14 Designated Tuition Offset
Budget Update 11/11/ Budget Update 11/11/2018.
FY13 Budget Planning Janet Parker, Associate Vice President, Financial Affairs PRESENTATION TO THE UNIVERSITY STRATEGIC RESOURCE PLANNING COUNCIL March.
2017 Budget Planning Calendar
Spring 2014 Budget Update March 2014.
Budget Presentation December 7, 2006.
Presentation transcript:

Budget Update FY 12 Mid Year Revenue Analysis and FY 13 Budget Planning Janet Parker, Associate Vice President, Financial Affairs Mary Simon, Senior Director, Budget Development & Planning PRESENTATION TO THE UNIVERSITY STRATEGIC RESOURCE PLANNING COUNCIL JANUARY 26, 2012 Janet Parker, Associate Vice President, Financial Affairs Mary Simon, Senior Director, Budget Development & Planning PRESENTATION TO THE UNIVERSITY STRATEGIC RESOURCE PLANNING COUNCIL JANUARY 26,

UT System Office of Strategic Initiatives Report   Undergraduate Fall Tuition & Fee Price & Operational Revenue – January 12, 2012   Posted at Financial Affairs /Budget Website: /pdf/uts-undergradFallTuition.pdf /pdf/uts-undergradFallTuition.pdf   Undergraduate Fall Tuition & Fee Price & Operational Revenue – January 12, 2012   Posted at Financial Affairs /Budget Website: /pdf/uts-undergradFallTuition.pdf /pdf/uts-undergradFallTuition.pdf 2

Cumulative Rate Increase since Fall 03 UT Dallas 110% UTSA 98.2% UT Arlington 96.4% UTEP 89.4% UT Austin 79.9% 3

Amounts above adjusted for inflation Cumulative Change since UT Arlington -33.7% UTEP -17.4% UT Dallas -16.8% UT Austin -12.3% UTSA - 5.6% 4

Above amounts adjusted for inflation 5

Mid Year Tuition & Fee Revenue Projections 6

Tuition and Student Fee Revenue Projections TOTAL Tuition Statutory Tuition Designated Tuition Lab & Supplemental Fees TOTAL Mandatory Student Fees Designated - Mandatory Fees Auxiliary - Mandatory Fees TOTAL Incidental Student Fees Designated Program, Course Fees Auxiliary Student Parking TUITION AND STUDENT FEES (before set asides for Tuition) Budget FY2012 $143,906 44,695 99, $68,077 41,577 26,500 $22,361 18,976 3,385 $234,605 Forecast FY2012 * $149,863 47, , $70,397 43,030 27,367 $23,287 19,887 3,400 $243,828 % Increase over Budget 4.1% 6.5% 3.1% 7.7% 3.4% 3.5% 3.3% 4.1% 4.8% 0.4% 3.9 % ($000) * Preliminary forecast pending Spring Census review 7

Revenue Generating Semester Credit Hours (in thousands) SCH (in thousands) 81.5% of exemptions due to Hazelwood-a 3 fold increase over 3 yrs 8

HC % ChgSCH % Chg Total Revenue Exempted % Chg FY ESTIMATE 2,22128%23,43436%7,431,00040% FY ,740113%17,170165%$5,317,039162% FY % 6,48823% 2,025,97829% FY ,263 1,566,792 FY , ,616,761-- Hazelwood Exemption Trend Total revenue exempted includes all tuition & fees, except Student Service fees. Hazelwood exemptions comprise 84% of total exemptions (FY12 est. = $8.9 Mil) 9 We expect Hazelwood exemptions to continue to grow at a higher rate as more veterans exit the military.

10 Revenue Projections  Estimated revenue generating SCH (non-exempted) or headcount depending on how fee is assessed TERM FY 11 Actual SCH FY 12 Budgeted SCH Revised Projection SCH Chg over PY Actual Chg over CY Budget “Pending” Mid Yr Adjstmt FALL334,735327, ,6597, % 14, % 342,659 SPR309,483301,150309,48308, % 315,673 SUM70,12166,110 64,220-5,901 -1,890 59,600 TOTAL714,339695,000716,3622, % 21, % 717, % increase over budget Will be adjusted based on Spring Census review

Actual FY Certified “Paying” SCH and Headcount Fall HCFall 10 Spring HCSpring 11 Sum HCSum 11 Total HC % HC Total SCH % SCH UG - Res24,462299,94222,593274,6228,91157,83455, % 632, % UG - NR5136, , ,7411, % 15, % G - Res3,45621,5803,35321,4681,7568,5228, % 51, % G - NR2291, , % 3, % Doctoral Res6304, , ,5571, % 10, % Doctoral NR % % Total FY 1129,304334,73527,325309,48311,45670,12168, % 714, % Frcst FY1229,840342,65927,325309,48310,74664,21967, ,

1.2% 2.8% 1.7% 5.0%5.5% 12.4% 1.3% 18.6%17.8% 19.4% 14.0%61.6%.9% TOTAL 5.4% incr. 26.0% incr. 50.6% incr. 1.3% 23.3% 3.1%0.3% 60.0% incr. 8.1% incr. 12 Cumulative Change

Biggest % growth increase due to non-resident students UG students account for 91% of SCH & 90% of Tuition & Fee revenue FALL 2011 Semester 13

14 Mid Year Budget Adjustments Current Year FY12 Mid Year Budget adjustments will be made to all revenue accounts using Fall 11 Actual, Spring Census & 85% of prior year Summer SCH/Headcounts Summer 12 enrollment unpredictable due to lack of Pell awards Financial Aid suggests Summer 12 enrollment will be closer to FY09 – which is roughly 85% of what we budgeted Adjustments will be completed by end of February

15 Tuition & Fee Proposal  Graduation Rate Improvement Plan was very well received by UT System but required changes to draft proposal:  Eliminate Energy fee and change designated tuition rates to reflect exactly 2.600% increase in T&F net of Athletics increase for undergraduate total academic costs. Resulted in:  New designated tuition rates:  Increased designated tuition set asides for financial aid  Less total revenue to replace the lost funding to the utility budget

16 Tuition & Fee Proposal Undergraduate Designated Tuition FY 2012 FY 2013 FY2014 New Rate$142.75$150.25$ Proposed Rate$148.75$ Revised Per Semester Total Academic Cost (TAC) 15 SCH $4,541.25$4,671 Proposed TAC$4542$4674 Change to DT Set Aside$185,455 Budget Planning Impact Utilities Summer Session

17 Tuition & Fee Proposal Graduate Designated Tuition FY 2012 FY 2013FY2014 New Rate$142.75$159.50$ Proposed Rate$156.00$ Revised Per Semester Total Academic Cost (TAC) 9 SCH $3,566.80$3, Proposed TACNAV Change to DT Set Aside$30,793$6,592 Revised proposal found at: TuitionandFeesProposalF12-F14.pdf

18 FY13 Budget Planning  SCH basis for revenue projections will continue to be conservative  All new tuition revenue due to rate increases if approved, must be allocated towards the Graduation Rate Improvement Plan and graduate education as detailed in the Tuition & Fee proposal  Limits flexibility for other new funding awards, e.g. merit  Possible reductions to state appropriations in the next biennium beginning FY 14, including changes to formula could have a significant impact to UTSA  FY 13 “Resources & Requirements” will be developed for CMO to review in February

FY 13 Budget Planning Calendar Feb 1Census Date Spring 2012 Semester Feb 8Board of Regents Budget Policies and Guidelines Feb 24Revenue Projections and Debt Service Budgets to Fee Funded areas Mar 6FY13 Status Quo Budget Preparation Begins by Departments MarchBudget Planning by CMO & Strategic Resource Planning Council March 30FY13 Budget Documents are due to Budget Office April 2 - 9Preparation for UT System Budget Goals & Priorities Hearing May 7 -10Draft FY13 Operating Budget due to UT System August 22FY13 Operating Budgets approved by Board of Regents 19