The Crucible Bo and Maggie Straw Man Fallacy. A straw man fallacy misrepresents a position to make it weaker than It actually is and claims that the real.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Straw Man Allison & Summer.
Advertisements

Straw Man Definition The Straw Man logical fallacy is defined as one character creating a twisted, distorted version of another character’s argument, then.
Straw Man Fallacy By: Will And Courtney.
Ad Hominem Fallacy By: Lucas Cook and Sydney Hyatt.
Ad Hominem- Poisoning the Well Sydney Collier and Shelby Wood.
Ad Hominem Poisoning The Well Nathan Anderson Kaylie Young Emily Walker.
Ad Hominem The Crucible
Study Guide Questions Act II
DA STRAW MAN The straw man fallacy occurs when person B takes
Poisoning the Well Fallacy By : Katie Emmitt, Corey Faller, Chelsee Wooten.
Kenzie Garrett Amber Jewell
Katilyn Wyatt and DeAnna Mabe. Definition Using a biased, suspicious, or incredible source to defend a conclusion. X is true because Y says so. Therefore,
Appeal to Ridicule Andrea Wallace & Alexis Crews Argument from Authority or Argument from False Authority.
By Madison Kerley and Rachel Haynes.  Presenting the argument in such a way that makes the argument look ridiculous, usually by misrepresenting the argument.
Characterization Judge Hathorne: “This is contempt, sir, contempt!” (182) Deputy Governor Danforth: “And do you know that near to four hundred are in the.
The Crucible Act III.
Logical Fallacy Brett Willis Kaylee Britt. Appeal to Ridicule Definition: a fallacy in which ridicule or mockery is substituted for evidence in an “argument”.
Ad Populum Appeal to Popularity Bandwagon
Poisoning the Well Fallacy
Appeal to Ridicule Emma Doyle, Kelly Moss and Jake Beakes.
Straw Man Logical Fallacy
By: Sammi Jo Johnson and Melissa Shirley
Persuasion Deductive reasoning works from the more general to the more specific. Sometimes this is informally called a "top-down" approach. Inductive reasoning.
Circular Reasoning By: Logan Witty and Kacie Martin.
Appeal to Ridicule Appeal to Ridicule is a logical fallacy that presents the opponent’s argument in a way that appears ridiculous, often to the extent.
By: Haley Ford Appeal To Ignorance.
Ad Hominem Abusive and Circumstantial Fallacies Week3.
False Dilemma/ Either-Or/ False Dichotomy: is a fallacy in which a person uses the following pattern of reasoning. 1. Either Claim X is true or claim Y.
APPEAL TO RIDICULE By: Whitney Miles.
Post Hoc First period. Definition A fallacy in which one event is said to be the cause of a later event simply because it occurred earlier. A fallacy.
Appeal to Ridicule Mattie Bruton Hannah Weedman. Definition of Fallacy AKA: Appeal to Mockery, The Horse Laugh. Appeal to Ridicule is a fallacy in which.
Da Straw Man! Dalton Stephens Nick Cairo. What is Straw Man? The Straw Man fallacy is committed when a person simply ignores a person's actual position.
Post Hoc Billy Estes. Post Hoc Explained Event A happened immediately prior to event B. Therefore, A caused B. Post Hoc occurs when a faulty assumption.
Appeal to Ridicule By: Heather Johnson, Emily Gaines, & Josh Butler.
Ad Hominem Brandon Sneed and Tesia Bailey AP English III L. Hughes- 7 th Period.
FALSE DILEMMA/EITHER-OR Logical Fallacy Power-point. By: Shelby Caudel.
Person A has position X. Person B presents position Y (which is a distorted version of X). Person B attacks position Y. Therefore X is false/incorrect/flawed.
The Crucible Act III.
Ad Populum/ Appeal to Popularity/ Bandwagon Krystal Sims & Makayla Glass.
Appeal to Ridicule By: Dakota Hunt. Definition Ridicule or mockery is substituted for evidence in an argument, or it presents the opponent's argument.
The Straw Man Whitney Phillips 7 th Period. Definition: Straw Man Fallacy- when a character misrepresents another character’s position and then proceeds.
Appeal to Ridicule ASHLEY STEPHENS. Appeal to Ridicule is…  A fallacy in which ridicule or mockery is substituted for evidence in an “argument.”
1. How much time has passed since Act I? 8 Days.
The Crucible logical fallacy project
By: Kennedy Logsdon. Definition of Appeal to Ignorance Appeal to Ignorance is the assumption of a conclusion or fact based primarily on lack of ridicule.
Arguments from Authority/False Authority Kelsay Manion & Sean Belding Example: In some cases, the expertise may be just for show -"I'm not a doctor, but.
The Crucible Jeopardy. 2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5pt 1 pt 2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt 2pt 3 pt 4pt 5 pt 1pt 2pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt 2 pt 3 pt 4pt 5 pt 1pt Characters.
Ad Hominem BY: MADDIE COSTLOW. Definition  Ad hominem means “against the man”. As the name suggests, it is a literary term that involves commenting on.
Straw Man Fallacy in The Crucible
Straw Man GRAYSON HYATT. A straw man fallacy misrepresents a position to make it weaker than it actually is and claims that the real position has been.
Straw Man BY: MEGAN BRASHER. Straw Man definition:  The Straw Man fallacy misrepresents and replaces the weakest argument of the opponents by belittling.
“I'll find her! Let me fly! Mama! No!”. “A person is either with this court or he must be counted against it, there be no road between."
The Crucible Act III. Martha Corey is on trial It is clear they don’t believe Martha is not a witch – they think everyone accused is guilty Giles disrupts.
GOOD VS EVIL STUDENTS WILL UNDERSTAND HOW TO EXPLAIN THE NATURE OF GOOD AND EVIL IN ‘THE CRUCIBLE’
Ad Hominem LUCAS ENGLAND & ZACH ZACCARI A.P. LANGUAGE ROSEMARIE GRICE 7 TH PERIOD.
Logical Fallacies. Slippery Slope The argument that some event must inevitably follow from another without any rational claim. If we allow A to happen.
Appeal to Ridicule By:Cassidy Patriarca.
Appeal to Ignorance Justus, John, Nick.
Logical Fallacies Unit 2.
Errors in Reasoning.
DA STRAW MAN The straw man fallacy occurs when person B takes
Appeal to Ignorance Paige Davis.
Makayle Botts and Kaitlin Graves
The Cruicble Red Herring fallacies
By: Skyla Robbins & Caitlin Ramsey
Never make these Debate Mistakes II.
Debate Mistakes II: Strawman
Appeal to Ignorance A fallacy based on the assumption that a statement must be true if it cannot be proved false.
Ad Hominem directed against a person’s characteristics or reputation rather than against his arguments appealing to one's prejudices, emotions, or special.
Presentation transcript:

The Crucible Bo and Maggie Straw Man Fallacy

A straw man fallacy misrepresents a position to make it weaker than It actually is and claims that the real position has been refuted after attacking the misrepresentation.

Straw Man Fallacy simplified Person A has position X. Person B presents position Y as a distorted version of X. Person B attacks position Y. Therefore X is incorrect.

Universal Example #1 A: Sunny days are good. B: If all days were sunny, we’d never have rain and without rain, we’d have famine and death. B falsely accuses A's claim to imply that A believes only sunny days are good, and B argues against that statement. A actually states that sunny days are good and says nothing about rainy days.

Universal Example #2 A: “We should give children ice cream after every school day.” B: “That would be rather bad for their health.” A: “Do you want our children to starve?” Person A says that children should be given ice cream after every school day. Person B replies to that statement assuming that children would be getting this as regular meals, and says that this would be unhealthy. Person A replies with the unreasonable suggestion that if children were not given ice cream, they would starve. Person A does this because it is harder for Person B to argue that children should starve than to argue that children should not be unhealthy.

The Crucible Example #1 Page 211 Procter: “I have no love for Mr. Parris. It is no secret. But God I surely love.” Cheever: “He plow on Sunday, sir. Danforth: “Plow on Sunday!” Cheever: “I think it be evidence, John. I am an official of the court, I cannot keep it.” Procter: “I-I have once or twice plowed on Sunday. I have 3 children, sir, and until last year my land give little.”

The Crucible Example #1 Proctor and Cheever are in court and Cheever brings up the argument that Proctor plows on Sunday. By Cheever doing so he makes the argument an even bigger deal because he relates it to Church. By relating it to Church, the argument becomes an even bigger conflict than it already is.

The Crucible Example #2 Page- 201 Parris- “I am not used to this poverty… why am I persecuted here?” Mr. Putnam- “Mr. Parris, you are the first minister ever to demand the deed to this house.”

The Crucible Example #2 In this part, Putnam tries to ignore Parris’ question and changes the subject to something unrelated to his question. The point he brings up still worsens Parris’ argument without it answering his question.

Citations FloresAPENG. “Strawman Fallacy.wmv” YouTube. Web. 14 April Fallacy. Digital image. N.p., n.d. Web.