The MIT-Bates Compton Polarimeter South Hall Ring Compton Polarimeter Collaboration T. Akdogan, D. Dutta, M. Farkhondeh, W.A. Franklin, M. Hurwitz, J.L.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Fast and Precise Beam Energy Measurement at the International Linear Collider Michele Viti.
Advertisements

Compton polarimetry for EIC Jefferson Lab Compton Polarimeters.
1 Run 9 PHENIX Goals and Performance John Haggerty Brookhaven National Laboratory June 4, 2009.
1 Electron Beam Polarimetry for EIC/eRHIC W. Lorenzon (Michigan) Introduction Polarimetry at HERA Lessons learned from HERA Polarimetry at EIC.
Upcoming Review of the Hall D Photon Beam and Tagger Richard Jones, University of Connecticut, for the GlueX collaboration GlueX Collaboration Meeting.
NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project  IR background issues and plans for Snowmass Jeff Gronberg/LLNL Linear Collider Workshop October 25, 2000.
The Tagger Microscope Richard Jones, University of Connecticut Hall D Tagger - Photon Beamline ReviewJan , 2005, Newport News presented by GlueX.
Photon Source and Tagger Richard Jones, University of Connecticut GlueX Detector ReviewOctober 20-22, 2004, Newport News presented by GlueX Tagged Beam.
K. Moffeit 6 Jan 2005 WORKSHOP Machine-Detector Interface at the International Linear Collider SLAC January 6-8, 2005 Polarimetry at the ILC Design issues.
ALPHA Storage Ring Indiana University Xiaoying Pang.
M. Woods (SLAC) Beam Diagnostics for test facilities of i)  ii) polarized e+ source January 9 –11, 2002.
AESOP: Accurate Electron Spin Optical Polarimeter Marcy L. Stutzman, Matt Poelker; Jefferson Lab Timothy J. Gay; University of Nebraska.
The PEPPo e - & e + polarization measurements E. Fanchini On behalf of the PEPPo collaboration POSIPOL 2012 Zeuthen 4-6 September E. Fanchini -Posipol.
August 2005Snowmass Workshop IP Instrumentation Wolfgang Lohmann, DESY Measurement of: Luminosity (precise and fast) Energy Polarisation.
Beijing, Feb 3 rd, 2007 LEPOL 1 Low Energy Positron Polarimetry for the ILC Sabine Riemann (DESY) On behalf of the LEPOL Collaboration.
Status of the Beamline Simulation A.Somov Jefferson Lab Collaboration Meeting, May 11, 2010.
Polarimetry of Proton Beams at RHIC A.Bazilevsky Summer Students Lectures June 17, 2010.
Ion Polarization Control in MEIC Rings Using Small Magnetic Fields Integrals. PSTP 13 V.S. Morozov et al., Ion Polarization Control in MEIC Rings Using.
A study of systematic uncertainties of Compton e-detector at JLab, Hall C and its cross calibration against Moller polarimeter APS April Meeting 2014 Amrendra.
COMPTON POLARIMETRY Collected data Cavity power Status on counting methods Systematic errors and hardware issues.
Polarimetry at the LC Source Which type of polarimetry, at which energies for LC ? Sabine Riemann (DESY), LEPOL Group International Workshop on Linear.
Thomas Roser Snowmass 2001 June 30 - July 21, 2001 Polarized Proton Acceleration and Collisions Spin dynamics and Siberian Snakes Polarized proton acceleration.
1 Polarimeter for dEDM experiment G. Venanzoni Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati for the dEDM collaboration Workshop on Flavour in the era of LHC – Cern.
Compton polarimetry for EIC Jefferson Lab Compton Polarimeters.
Energy calibration at LHC J. Wenninger. Motivation In general there is not much interest for accurate knowledge of the momentum in hadron machines. 
Beam Polarimetry Matthew Musgrave NPDGamma Collaboration Meeting Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oct. 15, 2010.
CASA Collider Design Review Retreat HERA The Only Lepton-Hadron Collider Ever Been Built Worldwide Yuhong Zhang February 24, 2010.
1 The Longitudinal Polarimeter at HERA Electron Polarization at HERA Laser System & Calorimeter Statistical and Systematic Precision Laser Cavity Project.
Relative Polarization Measurements of Proton Beams Using Thin Carbon Targets at RHIC Grant Webb Brookhaven National Laboratory Sept 14, 2015PSTP20151 for.
10/14/2004SPIN2004 Meeting1 The MIT-Bates Compton Polarimeter for the South Hall Ring W.A. Franklin for the BLAST Collaboration SPIN2004 Conference Trieste,
M. Dugger, February Triplet polarimeter study Michael Dugger* Arizona State University *Work at ASU is supported by the U.S. National Science Foundation.
May 17, 2006Sebastian Baunack, PAVI06 The Parity Violation A4 Experiment at forward and backward angles Strange Form Factors The Mainz A4 Experiment Result.
1 Overview of Polarimetry Outline of Talk Polarized Physics Machine-Detector Interface Issues Upstream Polarimeter Downstream Polarimeter Ken Moffeit,
Nucleon Form Factors and the BLAST Experiment at MIT-Bates
BES-III Workshop Oct.2001,Beijing The BESIII Luminosity Monitor High Energy Physics Group Dept. of Modern Physics,USTC P.O.Box 4 Hefei,
ERHIC with Self-Polarizing Electron Ring V.Ptitsyn, J.Kewisch, B.Parker, S.Peggs, D.Trbojevic, BNL, USA D.E.Berkaev, I.A.Koop, A.V.Otboev, Yu.M.Shatunov,
Overview of Booster PIP II upgrades and plans C.Y. Tan for Proton Source group PIP II Collaboration Meeting 03 June 2014.
Polarimetry Report Sabine Riemann on behalf of the DESY/HUB group January 24, 2008 EUROTeV Annual Meeting, Frascati.
Calorimetry for Deeply Virtual Compton Scattering in Hall A Alexandre Camsonne Hall A Jefferson Laboratory Workshop on General Purpose High Resolution.
A. Zelenski a, G. Atoian a *, A. Bogdanov b, D.Raparia a, M.Runtso b, D. Steski a, V. Zajic a a Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY, 11973, USA b.
Review of τ -mass measurements at e + e - - colliders Yury Tikhonov (Budker INP) Contents  Introduction  Current status of τ-mass measurements and μτ.
Compton polarimetry for EIC. Outline Polarized electron beam Compton process Compton polarimeters at Jefferson Laboratory – Parity experiments at Jlab.
Photon Source and Tagger Richard Jones, University of Connecticut GlueX Detector ReviewOctober 20-22, 2004, Newport News presented by GlueX Tagged Beam.
J-PARC Spin Physics Workshop1 Polarized Proton Acceleration in J-PARC M. Bai Brookhaven National Laboratory.
Y. R. Roblin Hall A beamline and accelerator status.
00 Cooler CSB Direct or Extra Photons in d+d  0 Andrew Bacher for the CSB Cooler Collaboration ECT Trento, June 2005.
Analysis of d(e,e’p)n in BLAST Aaron Maschinot Massachusetts Institute of Technology Spin 2004 Conference Trieste, Italy.
Thomas Roser Snowmass 2001 June 30 - July 21, 2001 Proton Polarimetry Proton polarimeter reactions RHIC polarimeters.
Calibration of energies at the photon collider Valery Telnov Budker INP, Novosibirsk TILC09, Tsukuba April 18, 2009.
Inclusive cross section and single transverse-spin asymmetry of very forward neutron production at PHENIX Spin2012 in Dubna September 17 th, 2012 Yuji.
Mott Electron Polarization Results Riad Suleiman July 10, 2013.
Thomas Roser SPIN 2006 October 3, 2006 A Study of Polarized Proton Acceleration in J-PARC A.U.Luccio, M.Bai, T.Roser Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton,
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Depart. Of Energy The Department.
October 14, 2004SPIN20041 The Bates South Hall Ring: A Unique Instrument for Studying Polarization D. Cheever, K.Dow, M. Farkhondeh, W. Franklin, D. Hasell,
ESLS Workshop Nov 2015 MAX IV 3 GeV Ring Commissioning Pedro F. Tavares & Åke Andersson, on behalf of the whole MAX IV team.
Polarized Injector Update
The Interaction Region
Deuteron Polarization in MEIC
Energy calibration issues for FCC-ee I. Koop, BINP, Novosibirsk
Large Booster and Collider Ring
Coupling Correction at the Australian Synchrotron
Electron Polarization In MEIC
eRHIC with Self-Polarizing Electron Ring
Polarized Positrons at Jefferson Lab
A Precision Measurement of GEp/GMp with BLAST
Linac Diagnostics Commissioning Experience
Recent results from BLAST detector
Update on MEIC Ion Polarization Work
Yu.N. Filatov, A.M. Kondratenko, M.A. Kondratenko
IR/MDI requirements for the EIC
Presentation transcript:

The MIT-Bates Compton Polarimeter South Hall Ring Compton Polarimeter Collaboration T. Akdogan, D. Dutta, M. Farkhondeh, W.A. Franklin, M. Hurwitz, J.L. Matthews, E. Tsentalovich, W. Turchinetz, T. Zwart, MIT-Bates Linear Accelerator Center E. Booth, Boston University W. Lorenzon, University of Michigan Presented at Workshop on EIC Polarimetry Brookhaven National Laboratory November 8, 2002

OUTLINE 1. Laser Backscattering Below 1 GeV 2. Description of Bates Compton Polarimeter Bates Electron Beam Laser and Laser Transport Calorimeter Data Acquisition and Electronics Data Analysis 3. Recent Results 4. Relevant Considerations for EIC Polarimeters

Compton Polarimeters For Storage Rings Below 1 GeV Analyzing powers a few percent or less Interaction mechanism varies with gamma energy Wide kinematic cone for scattered photons Lots of background in low energy photon region Beam lifetime less than 1 hour Difficult conditions for polarimeter operation, but backscattering remains best method for nondestructive measurement of beam Low energy polarimeters address some issues which higher energy devices do not face

Compton Polarimeter Analyzing Power Compton polarimetry is well established as a method of measuring electron polarization at high energy accelerators New efforts underway at MIT-Bates and Mainz. Bates seeks absolute polarization measurement good to 2-3% for experiments with BLAST. As electron energy falls, Compton scattering analyzing power diminishes New challenges exist in applying laser backscattering technique for polarimeters at energies below 1 GeV Pioneering work at NIKHEF for this energy regime Bates EIC HERA 532 nm laser light

MIT-Bates Linear Accelerator Center Polarized electrons obtained from photoemission source Beams up to 1 GeV achievable with Bates Linac and Recirculator South Hall Ring stores beam for CW operation 300 MeV  E e  1 GeV, 0.40  P e  0.80, 1 mA  I m  200 mA, 5 min    50 min SHR Typical Parameters

Bates Large Acceptance Spectrometer Toroid New spectrometer for studying light nuclei with stored beams and internal targets

Polarization in Bates South Hall Ring South Hall Ring COMPTON POLARIMETER Spin Flipper Electrons injected with longitudinal polarization (controlled by Wien filter) Internal target inside BLAST Spectrometer Full Siberian Snake used to preserve polarization in Ring Compton polarimeter, separated from internal target by 22.5 o bend, measures longitudinal projection of beam polarization Commissioning RF dipole to allow spin reversal with beam stored in Ring

CsI detector Laser hut Remotely controlled mirrors Electron beam Interaction Region Scattered photons Injection Line Ring Dipole Target Laser exit Laser line Design based on AmPS polarimeter Compton polarimeter located upstream of BLAST target to reduce background from bremsstrahlung Laser resides in shielded hut with 20 m flight path to Int. Region (IR) IR is a 4 m long straight section Laser trajectory varied remotely to optimize overlap with electron beam Dipole chambers modified to allow laser to enter and exit IR Photons detected with pure CsI MIT-Bates Compton Polarimeter

Compton Polarimeter Laser Laser Parameters Power Range: 10 mW- 5 W Duty Cycle: Continuous wave Wavelength: 532 nm Divergence: < 0.5 mrad Diameter: 2.25 mm Linear Polarization: ~ 0.99 Coherent Verdi Laser employs vanadate crystal with lithium triborate crystal for frequency doubling in compact formation Laser is diode-pumped and requires little input power Internal feedback stabilizes output Single mode cavity allows possibility of efficient frequency doubling Purchased May 1999, significant improvements in peak power since

Laser Optics Set of 3 lenses provide focusing over 20 m flight path to IR Laser chopped by rotating slotted wheel at 10 Hz allowing background measurements (duty cycle adjustable) Circular polarization imparted by Helicity Pockels Cell (HPC) allowing for rapid helicity reversal 4 mirrors downstream of HPC arranged in phase-compensated manner to preserve polarization Final mirror inside vacuum system Laser scanned by 2 rotary mounts with 2 axes of rotation (controlled through EPICS) Laser position monitored by cameras at entrance and exit windows to vacuum enclosure Circular polarization measured periodically Considering options for feedback system

Interaction Region IR contains steering coils and triplet of quadrupole magnets Beam Position Monitors run continuously Tune electron beam first to remove steering from quads, especially vertically Most background from rest gas in beam pipe Laser spatially constrained to intercept electron beam at angle < 2 mrad Backscattered gamma trajectory defined largely by electron trajectory Energy versus angle correlation of gamma rays dependent on electron energy

Scattered Gamma Ray Line Calorimeter located 10 m from exit window to reduce background Movable collimators used to eliminate background from beam pipe Thin windows minimize attenuation of backscattered flux Variable thickness stainless steel absorbers used to regulate rate Permanent sweep magnet eliminates most charged particles Veto scintillator rejects remaining charged particles Scintillator hodoscope provides some position information Pure CsI detector offers combination of resolution and speed

Calorimeter Max. gamma energy changes rapidly over electron energy range in SHR (3-35 MeV) Asymmetry is a strong function of energy Need versatile calorimeter with high stopping power and rapid response Pure CsI crystal (4”x4”x10”) backed by 3” phototube with UV window chosen Base contains transistors allowing rates up to ~ 300 kHz with very stable gain Unsegmented calorimeter eliminates gain matching, analog summing Calorimeter modeled using GEANT Data taken with up to 30 mA stored without absorbers, up to 90 mA so far with absorbers

Compton Polarimeter Data Acquisition Criteria Rapid digitization and high readout speed for high event rates External triggering, single event mode Energy resolution of ADC Rapid spin sorting capability Insensitivity to electronic crosstalk Need synchronized ADC and scaler data Integration with analysis package and BLAST event stream Ability to include EPICS (slow controls) information Possibility of pulse-shape discrimination/ pile-up rejection Fast and reliable data acquisition system is very important

Data Acquisition Overview VME-based system Use VTR10012 Flash ADC for digitization Encode logic information in second ADC channel Issue interrupt to read ADC, scalers at helicity state change DMA allows rapid transfer to MVME177for sorting into histograms Data transferred over network every 10 sec to Linux work station Oscilloscope mode to set ADC parameters and test signal processing 500 kHz 20 Hz 0.1 Hz Read at HPC change 20 Hz

Analysis entails subtraction of background from signal as function of gamma ray energy Normalization of background obtained from scalers or from bremsstrahlung tail of energy spectrum Polarization Calculation Asymmetries formed as function of energy from subtracted yields Fit asymmetry data with function representing polarimeter analyzing power

Systematic Error Investigation Small analyzing power makes systematic error reduction crucial Potential false asymmetries from many sources including helicity-related laser steering, electronic crosstalk, luminosity asymmetry, kinks in electron trajectory, etc. Need accurate modeling of shape and magnitude of analyzing power and good energy calibration for calorimeter Monitor laser circular polarization Example: Helicity-related laser steering plus tight collimation produces false asymmetry 1” Collimator AmPS Systematic Errors 0.5” Collimator I. Passchier et al, NIM A414, 446 (2000)

Calorimeter Energy Calibration Techniqes Energy calibration largest systematic uncertainty at AmPS Document position of Compton edge and asymmetry zero crossing Monitor stability continuously with pedestal and pulser High circular polarization of backscattered photons can be used in conjunction with absorption magnet to yield enhanced asymmetry with well-defined zero crossing for energy cal. purposes

Consistency Checks Measure asymmetries with unpolarized beam Check for sign reversal in asymmetry when polarization direction changed at source Change laser helicity with half-wave plate Quality of fit to asymmetry data Verify polarimeter calibration versus independently standard (e.g. polarized e-p elastic scattering asymmetries) Monitor stability of energy calibration with LED pulser in calorimeter light guide

Advantage of Spin Reversal Crucial advantage: Factors associated purely with the spin-state of the laser or with the spin state of the beam, but not with both will cancel exactly (e.g. luminosity difference due to PITA) Accuracy of polarization extraction significantly enhanced by changing direction of electron polarization Leads naturally to the cross-ratio method for calculating the average asymmetry

Spin Flipping in Bates South Hall Ring Adiabatic spin flip possible through application of rf magnetic field Prototype rf dipole successfully tested in South Hall Ring Spin-flip efficiency greater than 90% achieved Improved ferrite dipole for higher spin flip efficiency designed and built at Universityof Michigan Efficient dipole could permit spin flip with period of order 1 minute V.S. Morozov et al, PRST AB 4, (2001)

SHR Polarimeter Commissioning Timeline History Polarimeter installed in Bates South Hall Ring (2000) First polarization asymmetries measured in South Hall Ring and prototype spin flipper tested (Winter, 2001) BLAST Spectrometer commissioning initiated (June, 2002) Polarization measurements at 850 MeV (August, 2002) Study of polarization versus stored current, time, and tune (Oct, 2002) Upcoming Plans Testing of spin flipping rf dipole (November, 2002) First asymmetry measurements with polarized internal target (Late 2002) Spin dynamics tests (2003)

Preliminary Polarization Measurements at 850 MeV First polarization data for SHR with strained GaAs photocathode in source Expected sinusoidal dependence observed on injection orientation, but Magnitude low compared with Mott and Transmission Pol. Measurements Lower than expected polarization lifetime Significant sensitivity of polarization to injected beam current, betatron tune

SHR Polarization Study at 7 mA Plot shows predicted betatron and spin resonance lines Study polarization close to expected spin resonance Take multiple runs at each tune point with different polarization from source Polarization in SHR averages to /- 0.01, matching well with 0.75 from transmission polarimeter

Summary of Low Current Results Injection Tests at 7 mA Compton polarimeter delivers reproducible results under reproducible beam conditions Full polarization transport has been observed from source to South Hall Ring Polarization stable as beam circulates in Ring No evidence of polarization loss clearly observed during tune scan

SHR Polarization Study at 70 mA Vary tune using SHR quads Avoid suspected resonances, but tune much more spread out Polarization results vary much more than at low currents Large polarization loss for low values of vertical betatron tune

Polarization as function of storage time For nominally good tune, get reasonably high initial polarization For large injection currents, polarization reduction observed over course of storage time Betatron tune also changes with storage time for large currents, but extent of correlation unclear Polarization decay time varies somewhat for different fills Polarization reduction seems to be in a discrete step (crossing resonance line), rather than continuous loss

Summary of High Current Results Compton polarimeter functions at currents up to 85 mA with aid of absorbers, higher currents possible. Full polarization has been observed over initial 10 minutes. Asymmetries are often reduced. The degree of reduction is correlated with betatron tune at injection. Asymmetry reduction not instrumental. Polarization is reduced over time as beam circulates in Ring. This reduction is correlated with shifting of the tune. More data and improved analysis are needed to quantify accurately the dependence of polarization on storage time and beam current.

Implications for Experiments Polarization can’t be assumed constant in SHR! Polarimeter data must be monitored continuously. Best solution is to minimize polarization changes by optimizing tune, keeping fills short, beam lifetime long. Polarization may need to be characterized as function of beam current, storage time, and betatron tune. Polarimeter data stream should be synchronized with BLAST data stream. Qualitatively similar polarization results observed at NIKHEF. Significant dilution of beam polarization for large stored currents limited accuracy of experiments I. Passchier, Ph.D. Thesis, 2000.

Observations for EIC Polarimetry A laser backscattering polarimeter for EIC will have substantially higher analyzing power than Bates. Asymmetry measurements at high precision appear possible. Need fast DAQ and segmented calorimeter to cope with 1A currents. Lack of electron spin flipping with radiative polarization design makes systematic error reduction crucial. Minimization of false asymmetries and modeling of detector must be done carefully. Need as many consistency checks as possible. Multiple polarimeters suggested for EIC, especially if no independent check from low energy polarimeter possible. Beam tuning will require feedback from polarimeter, especially for self-polarizing ring design. Collider experiments will need a polarimeter capable of investigating polarization profile of beam.

Considerations for EIC design Location of polarimeters and proximity to Interaction Point Length of polarimeter interaction region Laser trajectory and crossing angle Calorimeter position Electron beam optics for polarimeter interaction region Electron beam tuning and diagnostics for interaction region Detection of electron from Compton scattering? Can spin flipping of electrons be included in machine design?

Other EIC Polarimeter Considerations Calorimeter Stopping power Response time Segmentation Resolution Cost Laser Frequency Pulse Structure Power Optics Cost Many other considerations in polarimeter design including : Should have good Monte Carlo. Early start helps. DAQ System Rates Signal Process Analysis Synchronization Cost

Conclusions MIT-Bates has commissioned a laser backscattering polarimeter for high current operation during internal target experiments with BLAST at energies below 1 GeV. Polarimeter provides precise results for a typical Ring fill. Systematic error control and calibration uncertainty at level needed for initial BLAST experiments. Polarimeter has performed important measurements demonstrating sensitivity of polarization to beam tune. This fast feedback capability is crucial for experiments. Polarimeter for Electron-Ion Collider will confront many of issues addressed at Bates. Designing polarimeter in conjunction with electron ring is highly advantageous.