Program Evaluation - Reunification of Foster Children with their Families: NYS Office of Children and Family Services, Division of Child Care Evelyn Jones,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Using Data to Plan Waiver Strategies and Drive Improvements: Key Indicators and Trends April 11, 2012.
Advertisements

"A Call to Action: Investigating Systematic, Social, and Emotional Predictors of Higher Educational Attainment Among Foster Care Youths"
Community Based Care in Florida and the IV-E Waiver.
Foster Care Reentry after Reunification – Reentry in One or Two years – what’s the difference? Terry V. Shaw, MSW Daniel Webster, PhD University of California,
Race Matters: Synthesis of Research Findings Robert B. Hill, Ph. D. Disproportionality Teleconference May 24, 2005.
California Department of Social Services Children’s Services Operations and Evaluation PRESENTED TO THE CHILD WELFARE COUNCIL ON DECEMBER 12, 2012 REVISED.
Demographics of Foster Care: Comparative Perspectives and Implications Fred Wulczyn, Ph.D Chapin Hall Center for Children University of Chicago International.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Title I, Part D—Prevention and Intervention Programs for Children.
The Social Consequences of Economic Inequality for Canadian Children: A Review of the Canadian Literature.
How do Macon County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? Macon/Piatt Counties Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total Law enforcement14833%
Economic Incentives and Foster Child Adoptions Economic Incentives and Foster Child Adoptions Laura Argys and Brian Duncan Department of Economics University.
How do LaSalle County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? LaSalle County Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total Law enforcement20755%
How do McLean County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? McLean County Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total Law enforcement23350%
How do Peoria County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? Peoria County Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total Law enforcement19235%
How do Champaign County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? Champaign County Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total Law enforcement22548%
How do Sangamon County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? Sangamon County Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total Law enforcement21638%
CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley CFSR2 Data Indicators: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly Center for Social Services.
Foster Care Reentry Going Beyond 12 Months of Follow-up Terry V. Shaw, MSW, PhD Daniel Webster, MSW, PhD University of California, Berkeley School of Social.
1 Child and Family Services Review Program Improvement Plan Kick-Off Division/Staff Name Date (7/30/07)
Concurrent Permanency Planning. Contents n Definitions n Goals n Target Populations n Categories n Activities.
Reunification – Old and New Information Diana J. English PhD Child Welfare League of America May 30, 2007.
1 CFSR STATEWIDE ASSESSMENT LESSONS LEARNED (State) CFSR Kick Off (Date)
Reducing Child Welfare Involvement: The Promise and Limitations of Early Intervention Deborah Daro.
Permanency Enhancement Project Peoria, Illinois Jennifer La Fever Elizabeth Morgan Amy Roman
Risks of Reentry into the Foster Care System for Children who Reunified Terry V. Shaw, MSW University of California, Berkeley School of Social Welfare.
Taking Research to Practice: Rethinking Outcomes and Performance Measures for the Child and Family Service Reviews John D. Fluke, Child Protection Research.
AN EDUCATIONAL SUPPORT GROUP PROGRAM FOR FOSTER PARENTS DESIGNED TO PREVENT PLACEMENT DISRUPTION: A GRANT PROPOSAL Miriam Vitela California State University,
1 Transitions to Adulthood: Comparing TANF and Foster care Youth Pamela C. Ovwigho, PhD Valerie Head, MPP Catherine E. Born, PhD Paper presented at the.
 Department of Family and Children Services, Santa Clara County  San Jose State University School of Social Work  Santa Clara County Children’s Issue.
Rogers, A.N. (2010), Human Behavior in Social Environment, 2 nd Ed., New York, Routledge/Taylor and Francis,.
1 NSCAW I and II Updates and New Field Work for a Child Welfare Landmark Study John Landsverk, Ph.D. Child & Adolescent Services Research Center Rady Children’s.
A Case Study of the Intersection Between the Child Welfare and Criminal Justice Systems Charlene Wear Simmons, Ph.D. Parental Incarceration, Termination.
A follow up on a cohort of maltreated children treated in the community and in out-of-home placements: Background and outcomes Edna Shimoni – Central Bureau.
Measuring a Collaborative Effort a Child Welfare – Drug & Alcohol Family Preservation example Family Design Resources, Inc.  Fawn Davies  Deborah W.
AB 636 Mental Health/CWS Partnership Sacramento, CA 3/17/06 Barbara Needell, MSW, PhD Center for Social Services Research University of California at Berkeley.
Claire Brindis, Dr. P.H. University of California, San Francisco American Public Health Association- Annual Meeting November 10, 2004 Adolescent Health:
1 A B C’s of Performance Based Contracting A Presentation for the Georgia Child Welfare Private Providers Provider Summit Held at the Wyndam Hotel September.
1 Data Revolution: National Survey of Child and Adolescent Well-Being (NSCAW) John Landsverk, Ph.D. Child & Adolescent Services Research Center Children’s.
Assessment with Children Chapter 1. Overview of Assessment with Children Multiple Informants – Child, parents, other family, teachers – Necessary for.
A New Narrative for Child Welfare February 16, 2011 Bryan Samuels, Commissioner Administration on Children, Youth & Families.
Creating Racial Equity in Child Welfare: What Do We Know? Judith Meltzer, CSSP Jim Casey Youth Opportunities Initiative Fall Convening November 16, 2010.
Performance and Progress 2005/2006. Introduction  Data collected during 2005/2006 fiscal year.  Who did our programs serve?  Did programs reach the.
+ Jennifer Miller, ChildFocus Melissa Devlin, FFTA Brian Lynch, Children’s Community Programs Sue Miklos, The Bair Foundation Child Welfare Peer Kinship.
Gavin Hamilton, MSc Connie Cheung, PhD.  Introduction  Objective  Methods  Results  Discussion  Conclusion.
CHMDA/CWDA Partnership Series Child Welfare Services “It Takes a Village” Danna Fabella, Interim Director Contra County Employment and Human Services Department.
Coordinating Council on Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Quarterly Meeting – October 21, 2011 Bryan Samuels, Commissioner Administration on.
Approaches to Parenting Chapter 3. What Influences Parenting?
1 Quality Counts: Helping Improve Outcomes for Pennsylvania’s Children & Families September 22, 2008.
Foster Care Re-entry Study A Hennepin County Project conducted in collaboration with the Minnesota Department of Human Services and the University of Minnesota.
C hildren and F amily Research Center University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign School of Social Work TM Return to Care: What are the Factors Involved.
Child and Family Service Review CFSR 101. Child and Family Service Review CFSR stands for the Child and Family Service Review. It is the federal government’s.
Children grow up in a safe and supportive environment Families are stronger and healthier, leading to greater success and personal development for children.
Project KEEP: San Diego 1. Evidenced Based Practice  Best Research Evidence  Best Clinical Experience  Consistent with Family/Client Values  “The.
BY SOPHIA STEWART. Foster Care in the Beginning The government developed foster care with the intent of providing a safe environment for children who.
Race and Child Welfare: Exits from the Child Welfare System Brenda Jones Harden, Ph.D. University of Maryland College Park Research Synthesis on Child.
SAFE AND THRIVING FOREVER FAMILIES SOONER Division of Family & Children Services G-Force Meeting June 25, 2009.
Permanency Outcomes for Children in Erie County Department of Social Services Brett Loschiavo, Public Administration · Project Advisor – Dr. Suparna Soni.
The Child and Family Services Review (CFSR) February 2008 Update.
AB 636 presented at the joint hearing between the ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON HUMAN SERVICES and the ASSEMBLY SELECT COMMITTEE ON FOSTER CARE Sacramento, CA.
1 DHS Board Meeting Promoting Safe and Stable Families Program Overview Mark Washington Division of Family and Children Services August 18, 2010.
Background Objectives Methods Study Design A program evaluation of WIHD AfterCare families utilizing data collected from self-report measures and demographic.
BackgroundBackground ObjectivesObjectives MethodsMethods Study Design 1E-06 One of the biggest challenges for the Child Welfare System is sustaining successful.
Delaware's children in foster care – health service utilization May 4, 2016 Presented by: Catherine Zorc, MD, MPH, Nemours Katie Gifford, MS, Center for.
Performance and Progress 2012/2013. Why We Do an Annual Data Presentation To assess the Levy’s performance in various categories against goals. To highlight.
Placement Stability & Permanence. What is Permanence 'a sense of security, continuity, commitment and identity a secure, stable and loving family.
Kinship care for the safety, permanency, and well-being of children removed from the home for maltreatment: A Summary of a Systematic Review Erin Geary.
Adding an evidence-based family strengthening program
GOT PERMANENCE? DIVISION OF FAMILY & CHILDREN SERVICES G-FORCE MEETING
Texas Department of Family and Protective Services December 19, 2014
Examining Homeless Outcomes Among Foster Care Youth in Wisconsin
Presentation transcript:

Program Evaluation - Reunification of Foster Children with their Families: NYS Office of Children and Family Services, Division of Child Care Evelyn Jones, Public Administration· Suparna Soni, Project Advisor Literature Review When children reunify with families, a risk for reentry to care or recurrence of maltreatment exists (Kimberlin, 2009). Several key correlates have been identified in an effort to conduct research that will assist in the identification of factors that contribute to failed reunification outcomes: race/ethnicity, family income, age, gender, and placement type. African American children are overrepresented in the foster care system compared to their numbers in the population. Jones (1998) found that minority and low income children continue to be poorly served by the child welfare system and are more likely to re-enter care. Financial instability often forces parents to rely on public assistance programs. In 1996, the federal government passed the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act in an effort to promote self-sufficiency among the poor. Possible negative consequences include decreases in total family income, increases in reports of child maltreatment, increases in numbers of children entering the public child welfare system and foster care, and for those in foster care, slower rates at which Introduction The Adoption and Safe Families Act of 1997 (AFSA) was enacted in an attempt to correct problems that stemming from The Adoption Assistance and Child Welfare Act of 1980 (AACWA). AFSA shifted emphasis towards children's health and safety concerns and away from a policy of reuniting children with their birth parents. Family Reunification continues to be the desired outcome of social service agencies when a child is removed from the home due to safety concerns. Unfortunately, a substantial number of family reunification efforts fail and children are forced to re- enter care. The purpose of this study is to identify and examine the factors that contribute to, and explain failed reunification outcomes in the State of New York. Jones, L. (1998). The social and family correlates of successful reunification of children in foster care. Children and Youth Services Review, 20(4), Kimberlin, S. E., Anthony, E. K., & Austin, M. J. (2009). Re-entering foster care: Trends, evidence, and implications. Children and Youth Services Review, (31), 471–481. (2009). Re-entering foster care: Trends, evidence, and implications. Children and Youth Services Review, 471–481. Landsverk, J., Davis, I., Ganger, W., Newton, R., & Johnson, I. (1996). Impact of child psychosocial functioning on reunification from out-of- home placement. Children and Youth Services Review, 18(4-5), Wells, K., & Guo, S. (1999). Reunification and reentry of foster children. Children and Youth Services Review, 21(4), Works Cited Research Design This study will use a quantitative design utilizing data sets from The NYS Office of Children and Family Services and The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services ( Descriptive Statistics will be calculated to describe the study’s independent variables (race/ethnicity, age, gender, family income, treatment for behavioral health concerns, length of time in care, and placement type) in terms of centrality and variability. Inferential statistics will utilize both Pearson’s r (association and prediction) and multiple regression (the extent to which the explanatory variables can explain the outcome (rentry or reunification). Literature Review (Cont.) children return home and faster rates at which reunified children reenter care (Wells & Guo, 1999). Age was positively correlated with reentry. While infant reunification rates tend to be higher than other age groups, re-enter Infant reunification rates also tend to be higher than other age groups. Kimberlin (2009) found that youths exiting foster care are at a high level of risk for reentry into care experiencing multiple placements within the Child Welfare System (CWS) and are at risk for developmental problems such as delinquency, behavioral problems and academic failure. Landsverk, Davis, Ganger, Newton, and Johnson (1996), found that children with emotional and behavioral problems were only half as likely to be reunited with their families. Sample Selection Sample Selection All cases in the NYS database. Data Collection and Instruments