Ulster.ac.uk Evaluation and Revalidation 2015/16 Briefing Seminar Catherine Avery Academic Office 7 October 2015.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Student Involvement Madrid October 2006 Norman Sharp, Director, QAA Scotland Duncan Cockburn, Senior Development Officer, sparqs.
Advertisements

Enhancing Learning: The Aberdeen Approach The Final Report of the Curriculum Commission Bryan MacGregor.
Quality assurance considerations in work- based learning provision
Development of HEAR at Ulster Background to HEAR Content of HEAR Challenges in development Academic performance (4.3) Additional information (6.1) Roll.
View of an Internal Panel Member Evaluation and Re-Validation Panel Member Carol Reid Ulster Business School Wednesday 2 October 2013.
St Peter the Apostle High School Parent Council Meeting Curriculum for Excellence Tuesday 19 th February 2013.
Accreditation and its relationship to quality assurance Sarah Butler Assistant Director, Development and Enhancement Group Quality Assurance Agency for.
LEEDS BECKETT UNIVERSITY Board of Examiners and Examination Committee Training Quality Assurance Services.
Developing Successful Articulation Programmes Neil Slater International Office Northumbria University.
Recent Changes to HDR Policy and Procedures Felicity Roddick Associate Dean Research and Innovation.
Handbook for Internal Subject Review Team Members 2013/14 1.
ACADEMIC INFRASTRUCTURE Framework for Higher Education Qualifications Subject Benchmark Statements Programme Specifications Code of Practice (for the assurance.
Briefing Sessions for Annual Monitoring of Delivery of Taught Pathways in 2009/10 Autumn 2010 WELCOME
University of Dublin Trinity College University of Dublin Trinity College Centre for Academic Practice & Student Learning University of Dublin Trinity.
Management of the quality assurance system at the University of East London Ruth Carter Head of Quality Assurance and Enhancement EUROPOS SĄJUNGA Europos.
UEL Guidelines for External Examiners Philip Brimson Quality Manager (Validation & Review)
Evaluation and Revalidation 2014/15 Catherine Avery ACADEMIC OFFICE BRIEFING SEMINAR 1 OCTOBER 2014.
Annual Monitoring and Review & Mutual Review Quality Assurance Services.
A MEMBER OF THE RUSSELL GROUP PGR PERIODIC REVIEW Sara Crowley
UK Quality Framework OU and ARCs
External Examiners’ Briefing Day Assessment Policy Tuesday 6 th January 2015.
Susan Patrick Christine Fountain Peter Lycett The Lecturers’ Lair HEA/SEEC Flexible Learning conference July 2013.
Practical Placements & the QAA and ASET Guidelines By Ian Sunley & Lorna Uden Faculty of Computing, Engineering & Technology, Staffordshire University,
Evaluation and revalidation briefing seminar 1 October 2014.
Validation, Annual Review and Periodic Subject Review at the University of Northampton Dr Anne Craven, Head of Quality and Academic Partnerships 25 April.
Welcome The changing face of quality assurance Hilary Placito (Director of Quality and Academic Support) January 2013.
Summary of the Undergraduate and Postgraduate Standard Assessment Regulations Academic Year 2012/13.
Institutional Overview of Quality Frameworks, Quality Assurance and Enhancement Dr Anne Craven, Head of Quality and Academic Partnerships 25/04/2014.
Foundation Degrees Foundation Degree Forward Lichfield Centre The Friary Lichfield Staffs WS13 6QG — Tel: Fax: —
Collaborative Programmes Annual and Periodic Quality Assurance Arrangements Rebecca Broome Quality Management Division November 2007.
Basic Workshop For Reviewers NQAAC Recognize the developmental engagements Ensure that they operate smoothly and effectively” Ensure that all team members.
UEL Guidelines for External Examiners Philip Brimson Quality Manager (Validation & Review)
March 26-28, 2013 SINGAPORE CDIO Asian Regional Meeting and Workshop on Engineering Education and Policies for Regional Leaders Programme Evaluation (CDIO.
A MEMBER OF THE RUSSELL GROUP PGR PERIODIC REVIEW Sara Crowley
Rhona Sharpe, Head of OCSLD Liz Turner, Head of APQO 11 th April 2013 CHAIRING VALIDATION PANELS.
Information for External Examiners involved in Academic Collaborative Provision - 12 Nov 2014.
Peer reviewer Basic Workshop Prof. Dr. Gamalat M. Ali Director of Tanta Quality Assurance Center, Tanta University.
On-line briefing for Program Directors and Staff 1.
National Concerns What was the problem?
External examiner induction Alison Coates QA Manager (Validation & Review)
GUIDE FOR APPLICANTS 2005 What’s new in Tempus ? Tempus.
Ulster.ac.uk A Revalidation Unit Co-ordinator’s Perspective Dr V. Naughton School of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Life & Health Sciences (October 2015)
Teaching at the University of Luxembourg: Organization, quality assurance and evaluation of student achievements
Academic Registry External Examining at Northumbria Alan J Gregg Academic Development Officer Quality & Student Learning Academic Registry.
Accreditation Update and Institutional Student Learning Outcomes Deborah Moeckel, SUNY Assistant Provost SCoA Drive in Workshops Fall 2015
Workshop For Reviewers Operating the Developmental Engagements Prof. Dr. Hala SalahProf. Dr. Hoda ELTalawy.
Academic Registry External Examiner Seminar 24 January 2011 Summary of 2009/10 External Examiner Reports Ian Shell, Sally Iles, Liz Morrow Quality Support.
Expanding quality distance provision in an integrated post- schooling system Kethamonie Naidoo NADEOSA Conference - 24 June 2014 University of Pretoria.
February, MansourahProf. Nadia Badrawi Implementation of National Academic Reference Standards Prof. Nadia Badrawi Senior Member and former chairperson.
AIUA STRATEGI PLAN GUIDELINES : Quality Assurance Prepared by Kolej Universiti Islam Sultan Azlan Shah (KUISAS), Perak, Malaysia.
Making reading lists work Alison Randall and Sandra Celada Guest speakers: Ralph Denny, Steven Howlett, Magnus Lehn L&T Conference 20 th April 2016.
STAGE 2: ENHANCE practice Contact: Heather Gibson, QAA Scotland Four dimensions of curriculum flexibility Key areas of focus Engaging.
QAA COLLABORATIVE PROVISION AUDIT DRAFT REPORT. QAA CPA Process Submission by the University of Self Evaluation Document (SED) (December 2005) Selection.
Forum for New External Examiners. Enid Ashdown, Principal Administrator, Academic Quality Alan Gregg, Academic Coordinator, Academic Quality Vashti Hutton,
Academic excellence for business and the professions CASE The accreditation event: roles and expectations Gill Harrison 1st September 2014.
Evaluation and Revalidation 2016/17 Briefing Seminar
Taught Postgraduate Program Review
UEL Guidelines for External Examiners
‘Preparing for Periodic Review’
‘Preparing for Periodic Review’
The University of the Future: Preparing for Curriculum Refresh
European TRAINING FOUNDATION
Roles and Responsibilities of an External Examiner
Accreditation and its relationship to quality assurance
Periodic Developmental Reviews (PDR)
Periodic Review Departmental Review.
External Examiner Reports
Taught Postgraduate Program Review
Validation and Periodic Programme Review Chairs and Panel Members
Validation Programme Developers
Presentation transcript:

ulster.ac.uk Evaluation and Revalidation 2015/16 Briefing Seminar Catherine Avery Academic Office 7 October 2015

Programme Approval  Aims of evaluation and revalidation  Curriculum Management System (CMS)  Overview of revalidation process  Panel membership  The Meeting  Documentation  Issues raised by Panels (2014/15)  Issues raised by students (2014/15)  Key changes for 2015/16  Programme Review and Development (PRD) (Pilot 2015/16)

Purpose EVALUATION:  accords with the University’s purpose and core strategic aims;  academic structure and content appropriate;  accords with the University’s scheme of qualifications; modular structure; credit framework and general regulations for the award;  standard and student workload comparable to those of other programmes nationally;  resources sufficient to meet aims and objectives;  evidence of reasonable employment and progression opportunities. REVALIDATION:  re-affirmation of standards  continuing currency and relevance of curriculum to University’s Aims

Revalidation Process CA6 Faculty Revalidation Unit Coordinator Document prepared Revalidation meeting CASC LTC Faculty response

Panel membership  Chair  Dean (or nominee) (collaborative provision only)  One internal member  One student representative (revalidation only)  Two external members (subject experts)  Industry/employer representative (optional except for Fdn degrees)  PSRB representatives (joint events only)  In Attendance: Secretary (Academic Office) Subject Partnership Manager (collaborative provision)

The Meeting  Introductions and tour of facilities  specialist teaching facilities  may only involve external Panel members  Private Meeting of Panel  to exchange opinions on the provision  to plan the conduct of the meeting  Meeting with Faculty Senior Team  to discuss higher level strategic issues

The Meeting contd.  Meeting with Students (revalidation only)  students’ opinions – what’s good and what’s not so good  Meeting with Course Team(s)  to consider the provision in detail  Private Meeting of Panel  to reach a decision on the provision  Meeting with Senior Faculty Team  to feedback conclusions and recommendations

Papers for the Meeting  Guidelines for panels  Agenda and programme  Contextual information e.g. benchmark standards, external reports  Course/subject documentation  Aide Memoire  Preliminary comments - CA7 (panel members)

Curriculum Management System (CMS) System to support production and approval of curriculum documentation for internal University courses (Phase 1) Resource for:  Modules – creation and revision  Programme Specification  Courses/Subjects – preparation of validation documentation  Approval processes – course revisions, course withdrawals, validation documents, credit-bearing short course modules

Key Benefits  Online documentation and approval process  Automatic creation of PDFs of programme specifications and module descriptions  Facility to update reading lists and teaching teams  Online accessible, single repository of full module and course information  Information can be used for other curriculum-related documents  HEAR - programme-level learning outcomes  KIS – teaching, learning and assessment methods  Online prospectus

Documentation  Section A: Introduction  Brief summary of rationale, origins, demand, relationship with other courses  Projected intakes for next 5 years  Section B: Course/Subject Provision  B1 Programme Specification(s)

B2 Commentaries: Recent and proposed changes (revalidation only) Academic progression, internal coherence, choice Structure diagram(s) Transfer to and from course, progression opportunities Work-based learning/placement/study abroad Learning, teaching and assessment Research and/or scholarship-informed curriculum and teaching Creativity, innovation and good practice Standards Relations with PSRBs Employability Graduate Qualities and Student Experience Principles

 B3 - Regulations (standard templates on AO web-site)  B4 - Module Descriptions Section C: Resources  C1 - Physical resources  C2 - Staff resources

Examples of Issues Raised by Panels in 2014/15  Market: distinctiveness of provision, modes, employer engagement, cohort sizes  Content and Standards: title of programme/modules to reflect more clearly aims and content, course structure, specialist pathways, internal coherence and the progressive nature of the curriculum, full-time and part-time modes, learning outcomes (final and exit awards) and mappings, work-based learning, reading lists, internationalisation, study skills, professional accreditation, articulation arrangements  Learning and Teaching: elaboration of strategy, fully online delivery, use of interactive multi- media technologies, ‘block teaching’, research and scholarship informed  Assessment and Feedback: embedding of Principles of Assessment and Feedback for Learning, assessment schedule, ‘bunching’ of assignments, group work, feedback arrangements  Support for Students; induction, academic study and writing skills, cohort identity, staff/student consultative arrangements  Resources: library resources, physical resources available at different sites, cohort sizes

Examples of Issues Raised by Students in 2014/15  Organisation and Delivery: timing of Library induction, refresher to BBL, quality of BBL materials, block delivery, large class sizes, cohort identity, staff/student consultation, practical work, PB exemption information  Assessment and Feedback: changes to assessment, Pass/Fail, ‘bunching’, imbalance in assessment requirements, amount and quality of feedback, group work  Resources: e-books, facilities at Magee, specialist equipment, apprehension about re-location to Belfast campus

Key Changes for 2015/16  Adoption of Principles underpinning the Ulster Student Experience  Guiding Principles – Work Experience  Requirement for project/dissertation in Honours degrees, including Integrated Masters  Revised minimum standard for DPP and DIAS awards (Pass mark 40%)  Pass with Commendation introduced for PG programmes  Panels to receive a report from ADDL on readiness of staff and material for fully online proposals  New Digital Learning Strategy  CMS – New course proposals (CA1) and online prospectus

Proposed Programme Review and Development Process: Key Features  Internal, outcentre and franchised provision  School/subject based units (approx. 40)  Documentation to include course handbooks  Panel engagement starts 16 weeks in advance  Panel composition  Programme (2 - 3 days)  Documentation (electronic)

PRD Pilot 2015/16  School of the Built Environment  April 2016 (Prov)  18 courses (approx)  Report to Learning and Teaching Committee (June 2016)

Academic Office Web-site:  Assessment Handbook  Committees (Learning and Teaching Committee/Course Approval Sub-Committee)  Course and Subject Management  Documents and forms  External Examiners  Policies (A – Z)  Programme Approval & Revision  Regulations templates  Regulatory Framework  Staff  Standards