AQUAINT Scenario Breakout -- Group 2, Team 6 12 June 2002.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Also known as The Scientific Method
Advertisements

Top Secret.
Evaluation / Peer Marking Write your comments at the end of the work. Take each section in turn What has been done well – what could be done to improve.
Research and Sources Developing a workable system.
Minnesota State Community and Technical College Critical Thinking Assignment Example and Assessment.
Mr. White’s History Class
Scenario Wrapup “Shangri-la” – QA Support in 7-10 Year Dr. John D. Prange AQUAINT Program Manager
Lecture 4 Class Responsibility Collaboration Cards
Historical Thinking Skills
Thinking, reasoning and working mathematically
Science Inquiry Minds-on Hands-on.
Easy-to-Understand Tables RIT Standards Key Ideas and Details #1 KindergartenGrade 1Grade 2 With prompting and support, ask and answer questions about.
Big Idea 1: The Practice of Science Description A: Scientific inquiry is a multifaceted activity; the processes of science include the formulation of scientifically.
Historical Thinking Skills
Building Teamwork Skills Into Instructional Teams.
LEVEL 3 I can identify differences and similarities or changes in different scientific ideas. I can suggest solutions to problems and build models to.
PROCESS STANDARDS FOR MATHEMATICS. PROBLEM SOLVING The Purpose of the Problem Solving Approach The problem solving approach fosters the development of.
Historical Thinking Skills
Literacy I can recall main info, know where to look for it, make inferences linked to evidence, show awareness of characters’ intentions, adapt speech.
Jamestown Timed Reading Plus
Biology EOC Benchmarks Write the benchmark coding in the upper right hand corner of the first page of your composition book. SC.912.N.1.1 Define a problem.
AQUAINT Scenario Breakout -- Group 2, Team 1 12 June 2002.
Kim Moore, Program Manager Dr. Tonya Jeffery, Co-PI.
AQUAINT Scenario Breakout -- Group 2, Team 3 12 June 2002.
Process & Inquiry Skills: Scientists in EC Classrooms CDAEYC Annual Meeting May 19, 2015 Albany, New York.
Lesson Overview Lesson Overview What Is Science? Lesson Overview 1.1 What Is Science?
Please sit in the same seat as yesterday, so that you can continue your lab.
Historical Thinking Skills A.P. World History Mr. Schabo Crestwood High School All info care of College Board:
DESIGNING AN EXPERIMENT.  Scientific Inquiry – the process of gathering evidence about the natural world and giving explanations based on evidence. DESIGNING.
Bringing the Past to Life
Clarity about Learning. Assessment For Learning Archway of Teaching Capabilities Clarity about what is to be learnt Learning Intentions success criteria.
What is Science? Science is  A way of learning about the natural world through observations and logical reasoning.  This information can grow and change.
7 Themes. Chronological Reasoning 1. Historical Causation: relationships among multiple historical causes and effects, distinguishing between those that.
Physical Science Pitsco Science The focus of this stage will be the recognition, development, and revision of valid hypotheses. A hypothesis (plural:
Users and Data Models CMPT 455/826 - Week 3, Day 2 (Various sources) Sept-Dec 2009 – w3d21.
ELA What is an essay? An essay is an extended piece of writing in which an author explores a subject in some detail. Skilled essayists do the following:
Environmental Systems and Society Internal Assessment.
Unit 6 Understanding and Implementing Crew Resource Management.
PBL Instructional Design. PBL Instructional Design Name: Name of PBL: Grade Level: Content Area:
Questioning Without strong questioning you are just a passenger on someone else ’ s tour bus. You may be on the highway but someone else is doing the driveway.
Perception. is the process by which we filter 1 2 and interpret 3 what our senses tell us, 4 so we can create a 5 meaningful picture of the world
The Scientific Method. 1. pose questions about the natural world, 2. conduct systematic observations, 3. examine books and other sources of information.
A tool that allows chronological, logical representation of events Can show relationships or cause and effect between events Time and increments measured.
Fostering Autonomy in Language Learning. Developing Learner Autonomy in a School Context  The development of learner autonomy is a move from a teacher-directed.
My level of thinking and learning is… TASK: Prestructural I’m not sure about … Unistructural I have one relevant idea about … Multistructural I have several.
APUSH Historical Thinking Skills
Paragraph Unity Paragraph Unity  Coherence and Cohesion.
Intro to Instructions Instructions unit/Auto Time Applied Communication.
The People Of Utah A WebQuest for UEN Created by Kim Colton December, 2006.
Note taking in the research process how to make sense of what your exploring by Ms. Barnhart.
Digital Citizenship Jennifer Meyer, Ed. S. Bedford County Schools ©2015/2016.
The Future for Assessment? Assessing Pupil Progress (APP) as a tool for effective Teacher Assessment in Primary Science.
Academic Writing Fatima AlShaikh. A duty that you are assigned to perform or a task that is assigned or undertaken. For example: Research papers (most.
AF1: Thinking Scientifically
Copyright Pearson Prentice Hall
Medical Record as a Semantic Graph
CASE STUDY BY: JESSICA PATRON.
Reading Strategies English 9 Honors.
Introduction to Scientific Investigations
Historical thinking skills
Chapter 1 Section 1 What is Science?
Six Patterns of Organization
Six Patterns of Organization
Scientific Thinking and Processes Notes
Inquiry in Science.
The Thematic Essay Questions set will require coverage of the whole period, which will be of at least 100 years. The whole period will not need to be covered.
Historical Thinking Skills
Project Name TEAM MEMBER 1 NAME TEAM MEMBER 2 NAME TEAM MEMBER 3 NAME
Scientific Method as an Ongoing Process
List of your team members Member 1 Member 2 Member 3
Presentation transcript:

AQUAINT Scenario Breakout -- Group 2, Team 6 12 June 2002

AQUAINT QE Task l Forms? (top down) l SAMs? Stingers? Manportables? — Can they be brought in? — Procured in the US? –Stolen? –Vulnerabilities? — Built in the US? –Parts? Dates? (bottom up) l How many Ops remain in America, and what forms of terror do they have in mind?

AQUAINT Results l Questions that would be answered by returning evidence here l Further questions generated by given evidence, like obsolete manports l What are their capabilities? l Major task l Create coherent picture from evidence — Is this more NIMD?

AQUAINT KB posed QA l Given the data here l Can we conclude an answer to the question about Al-Qeada? l Subtask l Can system — Create all the chronologies from the given data? — Formation further questions about interconnections between people involved? — Visualize relationship between connected people? l What do you know about capabilities of the stolen manpads? l People lose track? — Who was this person already? — This is where a system could help. l (L. Quirk) — “Arnold C” in 12 is the same as “Arnold H” in 7

AQUAINT Needs l Need tool to: l Visualize l Justify l Explain l (Many of our contractors have recognized this.) l Note: l Need to filter explanation for: — Relevance — Common sense — Etc…

AQUAINT Needs l Can Q & A help recognize that a single event was the source of apparently disparate reports? (Role of probabilities) l Evaluation problem acc of 70% is reported l Where (when) are these critical 30% missed? l Importance of transparency of system to analyst? l Analyst may accept erroneous data all the time l Contingency planning

AQUAINT Major Hypotheses l What are the elements that support it? l What does a Q & A system do? l What kind of data transactions? What kind of data would you like to have? l Travel reports? l Credit cards? l Various analysts may have the same global task but the sources may lead to different questions.

AQUAINT Goals l In 7-10 years, how can AQUAINT tools help? l Complete — Timelines? — Relationships? — Connections? l Can these visualizations lead to further questions like: l Profile of person A? l Capabilities of item X? — Manpads can shoot airliners. What else can they shoot? l Assist in developing & culling additional evidence l Could reason effectively with known evidence l Identify — Missing data — Further data (of Jerry’s dialogue)

AQUAINT Goals l Assist in developing & culling additional evidence l Could reason effectively with known evidence l Identify — Missing data — Further data (of Jerry’s dialogue) — e.g. –Capabilities of stolen weapons? –What other pieces of equipment could lead to more damaging capabilities? –Further info this US org »Where live? »Criminal record? »Other people involved? »Past transactions, communications? »Other interpretations (6 members interpreted as date)? l Danger: Likely hypotheses that are not logical or common sense.

AQUAINT Comments l Need to look at patterns l Over time l Machines help where it would take too long to humans. l Bringing back 40K answers is no help. l DM could help. l Short term l The user has to learn to use the tool. l Longer term l Sophistication of system implies a more “natural” tool.

AQUAINT Conclusion l 7-10 Years l Ability to: — Say, “Here is the data” — Come up with hypotheses — Find additional evidence