Regional Enhancement of the Mean Dynamic Topography using GOCE Gravity Gradients Matija Herceg 1 and Per Knudsen 1 1 DTU Space, National Space Institute,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The OCTAS Project, the geoid, the mean sea surface and and the mean dynamic topography By Dag Solheim Norwegian Mapping Authority Co-authors A. Hunegnaw,
Advertisements

The DNSC08BAT Bathymetry developed from satellite altimetry
A Comparison of topographic effect by Newton’s integral and high degree spherical harmonic expansion – Preliminary Results YM Wang, S. Holmes, J Saleh,
Ocean circulation estimations using GOCE gravity field models M.H. Rio 1, S. Mulet 1, P. Knudsen 2, O.B. Andersen 2, S.L. Bruinsma 3, J.C. Marty 3, Ch.
Large scale sea level variation in the Arctic Ocean from Cryosat-2 SAR altimetry (and ERS1/ERS2/ENVISAT). Ole Baltazar Andersen Per Knudsen Lars Stenseng.
Increasing the accuracy of Arctic gravity field modelling using Cryosat-2 SAR altimetry. Ole B. Andersen, L. Stenseng and J. Maulik.
ARCGICE WP 4.3 Recommendations for inclusion of GOCE data C.C.Tscherning & S.Laxon C.C.Tscherning, UCPH, S.Laxon, UCLA,
From TOPEX-POSEIDON to JASON Science Working Team Meeting GRACE Mission Status Arles, France November 18-21, 2003 Byron D. Tapley (Principal Investigator)
The Four Candidate Earth Explorer Core Missions Consultative Workshop October 1999, Granada, Spain, Revised by CCT GOCE S 43 Science and.
COMBINED MODELING OF THE EARTH’S GRAVITY FIELD FROM GOCE AND GRACE SATELLITE OBSERVATIONS Robert Tenzer 1, Pavel Ditmar 2, Xianglin Liu 2, Philip Moore.
The Four Candidate Earth Explorer Core Missions consultative Workshop October 1999, Granada, Spain, Revised by CCT GOCE S 23 The gravity.
Gravity: Gravity anomalies. Earth gravitational field. Isostasy. Moment density dipole. Practical issues.
ARCGICE WP 5.2 Plan for development of Atctic geoid using GOCE C.C.Tscherning, University of Copenhagen,
Improving modelling of GOCE data using reduced point mass or multipole base functions sdfsdfdsf Matija Herceg 1, Carl Christian Tscherning 2, Per Knudsen.
ARCGICE WP 5.1 Leader: UCL Synthesis report on benefit of combining data C.C.Tscherning, University of Copenhagen,
Use of G99SSS to evaluate the static gravity geopotential derived from the GRACE, CHAMP, and GOCE missions Daniel R. Roman and Dru A. Smith Session: GP52A-02Decade.
Geoid improvement over Alaska/Yukon area by GRACE and GOCE models X Li 1, JL Huang 2, YM Wang 3, M Véronneau 2, D Roman 3 1 ERT Inc USA 2 Geodetic Survey.
Multi-Processing Least Squares Collocation: Applications to Gravity Field Analysis. Kaas. E., B. Sørensen, C. C. Tscherning, M. Veicherts.
Calibration in the MBW of simulated GOCE gradients aided by ground data M. Veicherts, C. C. Tscherning, Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen,
1 Assessment of Geoid Models off Western Australia Using In-Situ Measurements X. Deng School of Engineering, The University of Newcastle, Australia R.
M-H Rio 1, F.Hernandez 2, J-M Lemoine 3, R. Schmidt 4, Ch. Reigber 4 AN IMPROVED MEAN DYNAMIC TOPOGRAPHY COMPUTED GLOBALLY COMBINING GRACE DATA, ALTIMETRY.
“ New Ocean Circulation Patterns from Combined Drifter and Satellite Data ” Peter Niiler Scripps Institution of Oceanography with original material from.
A spherical Fourier approach to estimate the Moho from GOCE data Mirko Reguzzoni 1, Daniele Sampietro 2 2 POLITECNICO DI MILANO, POLO REGIONALE DI COMO.
“ Combining Ocean Velocity Observations and Altimeter Data for OGCM Verification ” Peter Niiler Scripps Institution of Oceanography with original material.
Outline  Construction of gravity and magnetic models  Principle of superposition (mentioned on week 1 )  Anomalies  Reference models  Geoid  Figure.
EGU General Assembly 2013, 7 – 12 April 2013, Vienna, Austria This study: is pioneer in modeling the upper atmosphere, using space geodetic techniques,
GOCE ITALY scientific tasks and first results Fernando Sansò and the GOCE Italy group.
GOCE OBSERVATIONS FOR DETECTING UNKNOWN TECTONIC FEATURES BRAITENBERG C. (1), MARIANI P. (1), REGUZZONI M. (2), USSAMI N. (3) (1)Department of Geosciences,
Lecture 7 – More Gravity and GPS Processing GISC February 2009.
Agency, version?, Date 2012 Coordination Group for Meteorological Satellites - CGMS Add CGMS agency logo here (in the slide master) Coordination Group.
IMPROVEMENT OF GLOBAL OCEAN TIDE MODELS IN SHALLOW WATER REGIONS Altimetry for Oceans and Hydrology OST-ST Meeting Poster Number: SV Yongcun Cheng,
Resolution (degree) and RMSE (cm) Resolution (degree) and RMSE (cm)
C.C.Tscherning, University of Copenhagen, Denmark. Developments in the implementation and use of Least-Squares Collocation. IAG Scientific Assembly, Potsdam,
GEOSCIENCES UASCIENCE T HE U NIVERSITY OF Arizona ® C. G. Chase Department of Geosciences University of Arizona, David Coblentz & Aviva Sussman LANL Geoid.
EGU General Assembly 2011, 3 rd – 8 th April 2011, Vienna, Austria EGU EIGEN-6 A new combined global gravity field model including GOCE data from.
M. Herceg and C.C.Tscherning, University of Copenhagen Evaluation of Least-Squares Collocation and the Reduced Point Mass method using the International.
OSTST March, Hobart, Tasmania Ocean Mean Dynamic Topography from altimetry and GRACE: Toward a realistic estimation of the error field Marie-Helene.
“Why Ocean Circulation Observations are Important for Climate Studies” Peter Niiler Scripps Institution of Oceanography.
Gravity IV: Dipole moment of density anomaly: the ambiguity
International Symposium on Gravity, Geoid and Height Systems GGHS 2012, Venice, Italy 1 GOCE data for local geoid enhancement Matija Herceg Per Knudsen.
Full Resolution Geoid from GOCE Gradients for Ocean Modeling Matija Herceg & Per Knudsen Department of Geodesy DTU Space living planet symposium 28 June.
C.C.Tscherning, Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen. Improvement of Least-Squares Collocation error estimates using local GOCE Tzz signal standard.
Catherine LeCocq SLAC USPAS, Cornell University Large Scale Metrology of Accelerators June 27 - July 1, 2005 Height Systems 1 Summary of Last Presentation.
SIO 226: Introduction to Marine Geophysics Gravity
Investigation of the use of deflections of vertical measured by DIADEM camera in the GSVS11 Survey YM Wang 1, X Li 2, S Holmes 3, DR Roman 1, DA Smith.
ESA living planet symposium Bergen Combination of GRACE and GOCE in situ data for high resolution regional gravity field modeling M. Schmeer 1,
Mayer-Gürr et al.ESA Living Planet, Bergen Torsten Mayer-Gürr, Annette Eicker, Judith Schall Institute of Geodesy and Geoinformation University.
ESA Living Planet Symposium 28 June - 2 July 2010, Bergen, Norway A. Albertella, R. Rummel, R. Savcenko, W. Bosch, T. Janjic, J.Schroeter, T. Gruber, J.
Why ocean bathymetry?. How do we measure bathymetry? Why is ocean bathymetry important? Questions:
4.Results (1)Potential coefficients comparisons Fig.3 FIR filtering(Passband:0.005~0.1HZ) Fig.4 Comparison with ESA’s models (filter passband:0.015~0.1HZ)
The OC in GOCE: A review The Gravity field and Steady-state Ocean Circulation Experiment Marie-Hélène RIO.
An oceanographic assessment of the GOCE geoid models accuracy S. Mulet 1, M-H. Rio 1, P. Knudsen 2, F. Siegesmund 3, R. Bingham 4, O. Andersen 2, D. Stammer.
How Do we Estimate Gravity Field? Terrestrial data –Measurements of surface gravity –Fit spherical harmonic coefficients Satellite data –Integrate equations.
D.N. Arabelos, M. Reguzzoni and C.C.Tscherning HPF Progress Meeting # 26, München, Feb , Global grids of gravity anomalies and vertical gravity.
GOCE geoids and derived Mean Dynamic Topography in the Arctic Ocean Ole B. Andersen & Per Knudsen. DTU Space – Copenhagen, Denmark.
ESA Living Planet Symposium, 29 June 2010, Bergen (Norway) GOCE data analysis: the space-wise approach and the space-wise approach and the first space-wise.
1 UPWARD CONTINUATION OF DOME-C AIRBORNE GRAVITY AND COMPARISON TO GOCE GRADIENTS AT ORBIT ALTITUDE IN ANTARCTICA Hasan Yildiz (1), Rene Forsberg (2),
GG450 Lecture 3 Gravity -2: Gravity Potential Jan 13, 2006.
Uncertainties of MDT and geostrophic currents estimated from GOCE and satellite altimetry: A case study in China's Marginal Seas Shuanggen Jin 1,2, Guiping.
Analyzing Sea Level Rise Due to Melting of Antarctic Ice
Vertical datum unification on Iberia and Macaronesian islands with a local gravimetric geoid. First results J. Catalão(1), M. Sevilla(2) 1) University.
Satellite Altimetry for Gravity, geoid and marine applications (MSS + LAT) Dr Ole B. Andersen, DTU Space, Denmark,
Per Knudsen & Ole Andersen, DTU Space, Jerome Benveniste, ESA/ESRIN,
Per Knudsen, DTU Space Powered by
Chairs: H. Sünkel, P. Visser
GOCE in Ocean Modelling and the GOCINO project.
D. Rieser *, R. Pail, A. I. Sharov
Daniel Rieser, Christian Pock, Torsten Mayer-Guerr
Geoid Enhancement in the Gulf Coast Region
The DNSC08ERR Interpolatsion Error
Presentation transcript:

Regional Enhancement of the Mean Dynamic Topography using GOCE Gravity Gradients Matija Herceg 1 and Per Knudsen 1 1 DTU Space, National Space Institute, Department of Geodesy, Copenhagen, Denmark Introduction The main objective of this study is to study how gradients can be used to extract more short wavelength information of the gravity field and to use this enhancement to improve modelling of ocean circulation, i.e. MDT in regional area. This is done by development of a method for regional gravity field recovery by using GOCE gradients in addition to the global models. The Least Squares Collocation method requires the solution of as many linear equations as the number of data, so GOCE gradient data needs to be thinned prior to applying the method. To overcome this thinning, a Reduced Point Mass (RPM) method is developed as a part of this study. The RPM is based on the reduced point mass response. The results presented in this study are based on all available GOCE gradient data in the GOCINA region, i.e. 18 months of observations. Poster number: EGU (XL148) References O. B. Andersen: The DTU10 Global Gravity field and Mean Sea Surface - improvements in the Arctic P. Knudsen: GOCINA: Geoid and Ocean Circulation in the North Atlantic. Technical report, N. Maximenko, P. Niiler, M. H. Rio, O. Melnichenko, L. Centurioni, D. Chambers, V. Zlotnicki, and B. Galperin: Mean dynamic topography of the ocean derived from satellite and drifting buoy data using three different techniques. J. Atmos. Oceanic Tech., 26(9):1910–1919, M. Herceg: GOCE data for Ocean Modelling, PhD thesis, 2012 European Geosciences Union, General Assembly 2012, Vienna, Austria, 22 – 27 April 2012 Discussion A comparison of the GOCE Direct MDT and the GOCE Direct enhanced MDT doesn’t show significant difference. Thus, even though GOCE data provides a better estimation of the MDT in the GOCINA region than any previously obtained using only satellite observations, it could not be concluded whether the regionally enhanced geoid model estimated using GOCE gradients contribute to a further improvement of the determination of the MDT in the GOCINA area. The surface geostrophic currents calculated from the GOCE Direct MDT current speeds reveal that all of the gross features of the general circulation in the region are clear. However, the MDT calculated in the GOCINA project shows the smallest scale details, which makes it the best ocean circulation representation in this region. RPM method Point-mass functions or multipole base-functions are harmonic functions, which may be used to represent the (anomalous) gravity potential T either globally or locally. The functions may be expressed by closed expressions or as sums of Legendre series. In both cases at least the two first terms must be removed since they are not present in T. For local applications the effect of a global gravity model is generally removed. This is later on restored. Then, more terms need to be removed or substituted by terms similar to the error-degree variances. The Earth anomalous gravity field at one point is modeled by a set of base functions, each obtained as the anomalous gravity potential from each point. Results Power spectrum of the geoid height anomaly prediction when EGM2008 up to harmonic degree and order 100 is subtracted. The prediction is done by the LSC and the RPM methods with different datasets Closed expressions for gravity gradients when using point masses Expressions for gravity gradients when using reduced point masses Geoid [m] predicted using the LSC method Geoid [m] predicted using the RPM method Difference between prediciton GOCINA geoid (contribution from the EGM2008 up to harmonic degree and order 100 is subtracted) Figures are showing geoid height anomaly predicted by the LSC and the RPM methods, when the EGM2008 up to harmonic degree and order 100 is subtracted. Power spectrum of the geoid height anomaly prediction when EGM2008 up to harmonic degree and order 240 is subtracted. The prediction is done by the LSC and the RPM methods with different datasets Power spectrum of the difference between geoid height anomaly prediction (when EGM2008 up to harmonic degree and order 100 is subtracted) and EGM2008 based geoid height anomaly GOCINA project MDT Maximenko MDT DTU10 MDT GOCE Direct MDT GOCE Direct enhanced MDT DTU10 MDT 2: difference between DTU10 MSS and EGM2008 Power spectra of different MDT estimates GOCINA project MDT current speed Maximenko MDT current speed DTU10 MDT current speed GOCE Direct MDT current speed GOCE Direct enhanced MDT current speed DTU10 MDT 2 current speed The GOCE Direct MDT current speeds reveal all of the gross features of the general circulation in the region are clear. However, the GOCE Direct enhanced MDT does not show improve- ment over the GOCE Direct MDT.