1 EvtGen and  b Spin Studies in ATLAS First North American ATLAS Physics Workshop December 19-21, 2004 Michela Biglietti, Jacob Bourjaily, Homer A. Neal,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EvtGen in ATLAS/LHC Roger W.L. Jones James R. Catmore Maria Smizanska Lancaster University, UK.
Advertisements

CBM Calorimeter System CBM collaboration meeting, October 2008 I.Korolko(ITEP, Moscow)
Freiburg Seminar, Sept Sascha Caron Finding the Higgs or something else ideas to improve the discovery ideas to improve the discovery potential at.
HARP Anselmo Cervera Villanueva University of Geneva (Switzerland) K2K Neutrino CH Meeting Neuchâtel, June 21-22, 2004.
0 25. Sept 2006 M.Smizanska, Lancaster University, UK LHC preparations for precise measurements of muonic very rare B-decays 25. Sept 2006 M.Smizanska,
The ATLAS B physics trigger
Prospects for Studying Heavy Quarkonia with ATLAS at the LHC Prospects for Studying Heavy Quarkonia with ATLAS at the LHC Armin NAIRZ CERN on behalf of.
25/03/2003Simulation Application for the LHCb Experiment CHEP March 2003 Presented by: W. Pokorski / CERN Authors: I. Belyaev, Ph. Charpentier,
1 B s  J/  update Lifetime Difference & Mixing phase Avdhesh Chandra for the CDF and DØ collaborations Beauty 2006 University of Oxford, UK.
R.W.L.Jones High Precision Measurements of B s Parameters in B s  J/  1/19 High Precision Measurements of B s Parameters in B s  J/ψ  Roger Jones.
1 Benchmarking the SiD Tim Barklow SLAC Sep 27, 2005.
1 BaBar Collaboration Randall Sobie Institute for Particle Physics University of Victoria.
Chris Barnes, Imperial CollegeWIN 2005 B mixing at DØ B mixing at DØ WIN 2005 Delphi, Greece Chris Barnes, Imperial College.
Study of two pion channel from photoproduction on the deuteron Lewis Graham Proposal Phys 745 Class May 6, 2009.
Measurement of the Branching fraction B( B  D* l ) C. Borean, G. Della Ricca G. De Nardo, D. Monorchio M. Rotondo Riunione Gruppo I – Napoli 19 Dicembre.
Introduction to the workshop LHCb Generators Tuning Mini Workshop Bucharest 22 nd & 23 rd November 2012 LHCb Generators Tuning Mini Workshop Bucharest.
1 Track reconstruction and physics analysis in LHCb Outline Introduction to the LHCb experiment Track reconstruction → finding and fitting Physics analysis.
EvtGen in ATLAS James R Catmore, University of Lancaster, UK Mária Smižanská, University of Lancaster, UK Malte Muller, now at University College London,
W properties AT CDF J. E. Garcia INFN Pisa. Outline Corfu Summer Institute Corfu Summer Institute September 10 th 2 1.CDF detector 2.W cross section measurements.
Irakli Chakaberia Final Examination April 28, 2014.
Motivation. Why study ground state hyperon electroproduction? CLAS detector and analysis. Analysis results. Current status and future work. M. Gabrielyan.
 Production at forward Rapidity in d+Au Collisions at 200 GeV The STAR Forward TPCs Lambda Reconstruction Lambda Spectra & Yields Centrality Dependence.
HADES coll. meeting, Oct. 31, 2007 Charged pion production in C+C at 1 and 2 A GeV results of data analysis from experiments NOV02 and AUG04 Jehad Mousa.
CP violation measurements with the ATLAS detector E. Kneringer – University of Innsbruck on behalf of the ATLAS collaboration BEACH2012, Wichita, USA “Determination.
The calibration and alignment of the LHCb RICH system Antonis Papanestis STFC - RAL for the LHCb Collaboration.
 b Polarization Measurement at ATLAS Michela Biglietti 1 on behalf of the ATLAS  b working group: Eduard De La Cruz Burelo 2, Claudio Ferretti 2, Homer.
V. Chiochia DIS 2003 Workshop Production of beauty quarks in deep inelastic scattering at HERA XI International Workshop on Deep Inelastic Scattering St.
Branching Ratios and Angular Distribution of B  D*  Decays István Dankó Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (CLEO Collaboration) July 17, 2003 EPS Int.
Radiative penguins at hadron machines Kevin Stenson University of Colorado.
High precision and new CP violation measurements with LHCb Michael Koratzinos, CERN EPS HEP 99 Tampere,15 July 1999.
Study of exclusive radiative B decays with LHCb Galina Pakhlova, (ITEP, Moscow) for LHCb collaboration Advanced Study Institute “Physics at LHC”, LHC Praha-2003,
Prospects for B  hh at LHCb Eduardo Rodrigues On behalf of the LHCb Collaboration CKM2008 Workshop, Rome, 9-13 September 2008 LHCb.
A New Tool For Measuring Detector Performance in ATLAS ● Arno Straessner – TU Dresden Matthias Schott – CERN on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration Computing.
ATLAS B-Physics Reach M.Smizanska, Lancaster University, UK
Lukens - 1 Fermilab Seminar – July, 2011 Observation of the  b 0 Patrick T. Lukens Fermilab for the CDF Collaboration July 2011.
Recent Open Heavy Flavor Results from ATLAS and CMS Experiment at LHC
CBM Simulation Walter F.J. Müller, GSI CBM Simulation Week, May 10-14, 2004 Tasks and Concepts.
Muon detection in NA60  Experiment setup and operation principle  Coping with background R.Shahoyan, IST (Lisbon)
Fast Simulation and the Higgs: Parameterisations of photon reconstruction efficiency in H  events Fast Simulation and the Higgs: Parameterisations of.
22.July.2003 M.Smizanska: EvtGen in ATLAS EvtGen in ATLAS Outline: ATLAS EvtGen users: General requirements ATLAS EvtGen B-physics group requirements ATLAS.
1 OO Muon Reconstruction in ATLAS Michela Biglietti Univ. of Naples INFN/Naples Atlas offline software MuonSpectrometer reconstruction (Moore) Atlas combined.
1 Measurement of the Mass of the Top Quark in Dilepton Channels at DØ Jeff Temple University of Arizona for the DØ collaboration DPF 2006.
Status of Analysis Software Kanglin He For Analysis Software Group.
J-PARC でのシグマ陽子 散乱実験の提案 Koji Miwa Tohoku Univ.. Contents Physics Motivation of YN scattering Understanding Baryon-Baryon interaction SU(3) framework Nature.
Kalanand Mishra June 29, Branching Ratio Measurements of Decays D 0  π - π + π 0, D 0  K - K + π 0 Relative to D 0  K - π + π 0 Giampiero Mancinelli,
A study of J/ψ decay using the BES-II detector (J/ψ→ΛΛ 過程の研究 ) Masakazu Kurata University of Tokyo (The BES collaboration)
P.F.Ermolov SVD-2 status and experimental program VHMP 16 April 2005 SVD-2 status and experimental program 1.SVD history 2.SVD-2 setup 3.Experiment characteristics.
Feb. 3, 2007IFC meeting1 Beam test report Ph. Bruel on behalf of the beam test working group Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope.
07/05/20041 Pentaquark search at HERA-B A. Sbrizzi - NIKHEF Motivation Pentaquark:  + (1540)  pK 0 Conclusion.
Taikan Suehara, 15 th general meeting of ILC physics (Asia) wg., 2010/05/15 page 1 Model 500 GeV Taikan Suehara ICEPP, The Univ. of Tokyo.
Tau31 Tracking Efficiency at BaBar Ian Nugent UNIVERSITY OF VICTORIA Sept 2005 Outline Introduction  Decays Efficiency Charge Asymmetry Pt Dependence.
Introduction to FCC Software FCC Istanbul 11 March, 2016 Alice Robson (CERN/UNIGE) on behalf of / with thanks to the FCC software group.
Exotic Quarkonium Spectroscopy & Production Jane Nachtman on behalf of the CMS Collaboration University of Iowa, USA Charm 2013, 31 August – 4 Sept, 2013,
Quark Matter 2002, July 18-24, Nantes, France Dimuon Production from Au-Au Collisions at Ming Xiong Liu Los Alamos National Laboratory (for the PHENIX.
David Lange Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
ATLAS UK physics meeting, 10/01/08 1 Triggers for B physics Julie Kirk RAL Overview of B trigger strategy Algorithms – current status and plans Menus Efficiencies.
The MiniBooNE Little Muon Counter Detector
Measurement of track length and time-of-flight hypothesis
EvtGen Miniworkshop, Patrick Robbe LAL Orsay, 21 Jan 2005
THE SIMULATION OF POLARIZED BARYONS
The Silicon Track Trigger (STT) at DØ
GEANT Simulations and Track Reconstruction
Prospects for quarkonium studies at LHCb
B Physics at the LHC Neville Harnew University of Oxford.
Geant4 in HARP V.Ivanchenko For the HARP Collaboration
Search for Narrow Resonance Decaying to Muon Pairs in 2.3 fb-1
Low pt muon identification
Reconstruction and calibration strategies for the LHCb RICH detector
Observation of non-BBar decays of (4S)p+p- (1S, 2S)
Presentation transcript:

1 EvtGen and  b Spin Studies in ATLAS First North American ATLAS Physics Workshop December 19-21, 2004 Michela Biglietti, Jacob Bourjaily, Homer A. Neal, Natalia Panikashvili, Maria Smizanska, Shlomit Tarem

2 Outline EvtGen overview  b Polarization and decay model in EvtGen Validation of Generators Acceptance studies Data processing First look to reconstruction Plans

3 EvtGen Overview Decay model package Originated in BaBar; authors Anders Ryd, David Lange et al Tuned against new data from BaBar, Belle, CLEO Large collaboration of experiments has accepted EvtGen as their principal B-decay package – LHCb, ATLAS, CMS, CDF, D0, BaBar, Belle Features works with helicity amplitudes uses spinor algebra Polarization Handles with sequential decay decays are independent each decay is described by a model the model is a class providing the decay amplitude users can easily write their models calculation of probabilities and spin density matrices are done by the framework

4 EvtGen in ATLAS External software interfaced with Generators package receives the un-decayed top particle from PythiaB Event written in HepMC format and saved in POOL, ready for simulation generates the decay chain according to the user input card PYTHIA Conversion to HepMC B-mesons HepMC B-mesons PDG Decay files HepMC Event Record HepMC decay products User input EvtGen

5 Probability Function   As a first step the probability function has been implemented in EvtGen and in a dedicated Monte Carlo generator (as a cross-check) Angular distribution  b  J/  (  )  (  p) depends on 5 angles + 6 parameters of 4 complex helicity amplitudes and polarization P b. Helicity amplitudes and P b have to be simultaneously determined (Maximum likelihood method). No software tools for implementing polarization models available in Pythia. Pythia uses a probabilistic approach to produce baryons and spin information is not used

6 Polarization in EvtGen Get unpolarized baryons from Pythia EvtGen uses spinor algebra and helicity amplitudes it’s possible to set the polarization of the particle before the particle is decayed.. and obtain the correct angular distributions PythiaB HepMC EvtGen 1. Set polarization 2. Decay with helicity amplitudes b-Baryons B hadrons can be only polarized perpendicular to the production plane Calculate the polarization vector Calculate the spin density matrix Associate the density matrix to the particle Adopt EvtGen class “HELAMP” to introduce a theoretical model for Λ b decay

7 Results 5 angular distributions are generated using both the probability function and EvtGen   cos(   ) Slope~  0 cos(   ) Probes J/    HelAmp Prob cos(  ) Slope~  b ∙P From PQCD model (*): a + = i a - = i b + = i b - = i  b =-.457, P=-40% Blue squares are events generated according to probability function (in EvtGen) Red circles are events generated with helicity amplitudes in EvtGen *  b =|a + | 2 -|a - | 2 +|b + | 2 -|b - | 2

8 Input/Output Parameters Comparison cos(  1 ) and cos(  2 ) do not depend on Polarization

9 Acceptance Corrections Kinematics do not depend on the input model Proton p T Pion p T It’s possible to correct distorted angular distributions with weight factors original distributions after cuts after corrections MeV   cos(   )cos(   ) cos(  ) Generator Level: p T (p,  )>0.5 GeV p T (  )>2.5, 4 GeV |  |<2.7 To calculate the corrections, phase space events (without any model or cuts) are used

10 DC2/Rome Workshop Processing Production using Michigan processor clusters Pacman installation of patches for Generators and Muon Digitization 100k of events generated for EvtGen tests Helicity amplitudes and probabilty function with different polarization values acceptance and phase space studies. 300k of events generated for full simulation and reconstruction Different input models 30K of them simulated and digitizated with DC2 software (preproduction) shipped to CERN for reconstruction/analysis test Waiting for Rome software validation to start a massive simulation

11 First look to Reconstruction and Analysis J/ψ  μ + μ - reconstruction Dedicated low p T muon identification algorithm Λ  π - p reconstruction π and proton reconstruction in Inner Tracker Vertexing algorithms Analysis within AOD/Physics Analysis Tool Preliminary!

12 Mass Distributions J/   bb Mass (MeV)

13 Decay Length Resolution bb J/      p  bb mm

14 The need for identifying low p T muons Muons from J/ψ are rather soft (a few GeV) The lower the threshold for a second muon - the better our efficiency MOORE/MuId are inefficient for low p T muons Di-muon efficiency is too low 30% J/ψ  μ2.5 μ4 are identified, with purity 52% The algorithm The purpose is to identify low p T muons and increase the efficiency of J/ψ identification by improving the reconstruction of muons with low p T in events where one muon had sufficient momentum to trigger the event. The principle: Start with ID tracks and match muon digits to them 1.If we select for maximum efficiency, accepting each candidate that either has precision chamber digits or has η and  trigger chambers digits, the resulting efficiency is 80% with the purity ~ 32%. 2.If we require each candidate to have both precision chamber hits and trigger chamber hits, 60% of J/ψ particles are identified with purity 69%. Low p T Muon Identification Pt(MeV) Mass(MeV)

15 Plans Continue generation of events with different models and start a large scale simulation and digitization as soon as possible Understand which will be the good release for physics simulation Pacman installation of ATLAS release 9.0.X Reconstruction and analysis for polarization extraction Within the Physics Analysis Tools Inner detector particle candidates Muon particles candidates Interface to vertexing algorithms Calculation of the 5 angular distributions Production of histograms for data quality Produce ntuples for maximum likelihood studies Maximum likelihood studies Acceptance corrections in 5-D Background channels studies Understand the dangerous channels with fast simulations Full simulation of the dangerous channels Target : ATLAS Physics Workshop in Rome

16 Backup

17 Background studies Λ0 channels: Can’t find this channels after LVL1 trigger The trigger for this is a μ from b  J/ψ, with the Σ in coincidence. That means we don't produce it separately but search in b  J/ψ Λ0 production from Σ baryons: Σ*-/ Σ*bar  Λ0+π- Σ0/ Σbar0  Λ0+gamma Σ*0/ Σ*bar0  Λ0+π0 Σ*+/ Σ*bar-  Λ0+π+ Λ0 production from Ξ baryons: Ξ- / Ξbar+  Λ0+π - Λ0+νebar+e- Λ0+νμbar+μ- Generate using EvtGen (PHSP) Ξb-  Λ0+J/ψ+π – Λ0+J/ψ+νebar+e Λ0+J/ψ+νμbar+μ-

18 Background studies Λ0 channels: Λ0 production from Ξ baryons: Ξ0 / Ξbar0  Λ0+π0 Λ0+gamma Generate using EvtGen (PHSP) Ξb0  Λ0+J/ψ+π0 Λ0+J/ψ+gamma Λ0 and J/ψ production from bottom baryons: Λb0 / Λb bar0  Λ0+eta_c Λ0+J/ψ Λ0+chi_1c (Only in Pythia) chi_1c  J/ψ + gamma Generate using Pythia (PHSP) Λb0 / Λb bar0  Λ0+J/ψ+gamma