ArXiv:1109.4144v1 Shuichi KUNORI Bayram TALI UPDATE MonoJet Weekly Meeting 23/06/2013 Inelastic Dark Matter Analysis.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Hadron production in hard scattering Event GeneratorGEANT.
Advertisements

FAWP Fast Analysis With Pythia These notes will be updated as FAWP evolves Current version:
1 ttbar events with Atlantis   A lot of jets in this event !   Bjets (1 and 2) close in phi   Muon from semilep decay of b-jet1   Tau jet   Pb.
1 Preliminary stuff Summer09 ppMuMuX sample with CMSSW_3_3_2 –it requires opposite charge generated dimuons from heavy processes or K, pi, K0 L decays.
PDCMSSW - Luca Perrozzi1 Looking for… Punch throughs… Looking for… Punch throughs…
Reconstruction neutral decay modes (E391) Doroshenko M.(KEK) E391 collaboration Outlines: Data summary Analysis strategy Reconstruction K3p,K2p,Kgg decays.
Anne Dabrowski Northwestern University Collaboration Meeting 22 nd February 2005 Update Kmu3 Branching Ratio measurement A. Dabrowski, February
22/5/2011 Particle-ID and Tracking performance in CLIC_ILD1/27 CLIC_ILD particle identification and tracking performance J. Nardulli This talk in 2 parts:
August 12, 2000DPF Search for B +  K + l + l - and B 0  K* 0 l + l - Theoretical predictions and experimental status Analysis methods Signal.
Measuring the bb cross- section using B  D o X   decays Liming Zhang & Sheldon Stone Syracuse University.
Simulation of Z->jets in CMS Outline –Introduction –Technique –Results –Conclusion.
1 Annual Report Zongru Wan Rutgers  Proton/antiproton collisions at Fermilab  CDF detector  Tau’s - physics, decay and reconstruction  Exercise: tau.
MC Study of B°  S Jianchun Wang Syracuse University BTeV meeting 06/27/01.
MC Study on B°  S (Status Report) Jianchun Wang Syracuse University BTeV meeting 05/25/01.
All Low Energy Events with MuDst Rosi Reed UC Davis March Events Events with at least 1 primary track Vx = Primary Vertex x position.
Final state study Jaewon Park University of Rochester MINERvA/Jupiter Group Meeting, Jan 31, 2007.
Cross-sections (  barn)   ot (    ) PYTHIA (*) DPMJET (*) Minimum bias (  only) Minimum bias (  only) Single  (all) (  only) (all) (  only)
Status of  b Scan Jianchun Wang Syracuse University Representing L b scanners CLEO Meeting 05/11/02.
16 April 2005 APS 2005 Search for exclusive two body decays of B→D s * h at Belle Luminda Kulasiri University of Cincinnati Outline Motivation Results.
A Method to measure  + /   detection efficiency asymmetry at LHCb Liming Zhang 08/15/07.
1 Physics Impact of Detector Performance Tim Barklow SLAC March 18, 2005.
MC Study on B°  J/  ° With J/      °     Jianchun Wang Syracuse University BTeV meeting 03/04/01.
Anne Dabrowski Northwestern University NA48/2 Semileptonics Meeting 22 nd February 2005 Update Kmu3 Branching Ratio measurement A. Dabrowski, February.
1 TEV PA Meeting July 2009 Preliminary Fermi-LAT Limits on High Energy Gamma Lines from WIMP Annihilation Yvonne Edmonds representing the Fermi-LAT Collaboration.
Status of the OPERA experiment Yoshiaki Nonoyama Nagoya Univ.
1 Sparsh Navin – University of Birmingham for the ALICE collaboration Trigger Efficiencies in ALICE and Diffraction in PYTHIA Diffractive and electromagnetic.
1 The Study of D and B Meson Semi- leptonic Decay Contributions to the Non-photonic Electrons Xiaoyan Lin CCNU, China/UCLA for the STAR Collaboration 22.
LCWS 2004, ParisSonja Hillert, University of Oxfordp. 1 Flavour tagging performance analysis for vertex detectors LCWS 2004, Paris Sonja Hillert (Oxford)
Lepton efficiency & fake rate Yousuke Kataoka University of Tokyo Content definitions of leptons p2 efficiency and fake rate for SU3 ( ) p3, p4.
Kinematics of  + n   p   0  p reaction Susumu Oda 2007/04/10-19.
N  for 2012 Zhiyong Wang May, 12,2015 Charmonium group meeting 1.
Preliminary analysis of p-Pb data update n. 6 Lorenzo Bonechi LHCf Catania meeting – 19 December 2013.
Hadronic Interaction Studies for LHCb Nigel Watson/Birmingham [Thanks to Silvia M., Jeroen v T.]
Event Reconstruction in SiD02 with a Dual Readout Calorimeter Detector Geometry EM Calibration Cerenkov/Scintillator Correction Jet Reconstruction Performance.
E. De LuciaNeutral and Charged Kaon Meeting – 7 May 2007 Updates on BR(K +  π + π 0 ) E. De Lucia.
Particle Production at 3 GeV (update) X. Ding, UCLA Target Studies Sept. 23, /23/13.
Studying Very Light Gravitino at ILC Ryo Katayama (Tokyo) Collaborators: Shigeki Matsumoto (IPMU), T. Moroi (Tokyo), K. Fujii (KEK), T. Suehara (ICEPP),T.
Beam MC activity A.K.Ichikawa for beam group For more details,
UC Davis June st Rosi Reed Low Energy Test Run Results Rosi Reed University of California at Davis.
8/13/101 Updates on the simulation. 8/13/102 Some news I finally have the event generator working, for which the ‘physics’ event has 5 D D 0 bar,
Outline Detectors and Methods –Spectrometer layout –Segmented target, OOT cut effectiveness –CITADL Kaonicity pion ID effect on K-pi reflection –Target.
C. Milsténe Charm Jet Identification Using Flavor Tagging C. Milstene- Fermilab- July/07/06 In collaboration with: A. Freitas( Zurich U.), A. Sopczak (Lancaster.
Aug 2003 Craig Ogilvie 1 Progress High pt D=>Kpi, need  rates  S/B vs DCA cut and S/  B vs DCA cut strategy reminder  B=0  Fit Si hits with a line,
Drell-Yan study in CMS at 10 TeV, with 100 pb -1 Monika Jindal K.Mazumdar, D. Bourilkov, J.B. Singh 1LHC Physcis meeting.
Study of hadron interactions in OPERA-like bricks Aim: background study of   h, hhh decays 4 th September 2012 H. Shibuya, H. Ishida, T. Matsuo, T. Fukuda,
Muons from  /K CSC samples vs generator predictions: preliminary comparisons.
Current estimation of the background level Ken Sakashita ( Osaka University ) for the E391a collaboration 1.Overview/Motivation 2.4  data analysis 3.2.
Status of vertex efficiency evaluation Fabio Ambrosino, Patrizia de Simone, Paolo Massarotti, Vincenzo Patera the idea is to look for events where the.
Study of muon pairs production process at PANDA and its backgrounds A.N.Skachkova (JINR, Dubna) Obninsk 2010.
Search for High-Mass Resonances in e + e - Jia Liu Madelyne Greene, Lana Muniz, Jane Nachtman Goal for the summer Searching for new particle Z’ --- a massive.
NCC simulation update DC meeting Oct 3, 2007 BNL.
1 NCC Task Force Richard Seto NCC Task Force Meeting Jan 8, 2007 BNL.
Electron physics object tutorial C. Charlot / LLR Automn08 tutorials, 14 oct
Feb 24, Abnormal Events in HF: TB04, Simulation, and Feb.08 Fermi Testbeam Anthony Moeller (U. Iowa) Shuichi Kunori (U. Maryland) Taylan Yetkin (U.
Charged Particle Multiplicity, Michele Rosin U. WisconsinQCD Meeting May 13, M. Rosin, D. Kçira, and A. Savin University of Wisconsin L. Shcheglova.
NEEP 541 Using Kalypso Fall 2002 Jake Blanchard. Outline Using the Kalypso code Run file Model file Impact file Inelastic file Output file Winnow.
Signatures of lepton-jet production at the LHC Eva Halkiadakis (Rutgers University) with Adam Falkowski, Yuri Gershtein (Rutgers University) Josh Ruderman.
Tomas Hreus, Pascal Vanlaer Overview: K0s correction stability tests Jet-pt correction closure test Study of Strangeness Production in Underlying Event.
Study of B s         Supreet Pal Singh Prof. Kajari Mazumdar Prof. J.B.Singh 1India-CMS Meeting 27th-28th.
Belle General meeting Measurement of spectral function in the decay 1. Motivation 2. Event selection 3. mass spectrum (unfolding) 4. Evaluation.
1 Exotic States 2005 E.C. Aschenauer The search for Pentaquarks at on behalf of the HERMES Collaboration E.C. Aschenauer DESY.
Km3 v4r5 OPA update C.W.James, AWG meeting 17 th Dec 2012.
LCFI physics studies meeting, 7 th December 04Sonja Hillertp. 1 Charge efficiency and leakage rates  purity vs efficiency plots give only part of the.
Status of GMSB photons analysis Shilei Zang Bernadette Heyburn, Uriel Nauenberg University of Colorado, Boulder SUSYBSM WG3/WG4.
Jet variables Presented by Kaifu Lam Mar 1, 2017.
psi(2S) Measument with CMS 10 TeV Data
Status of 20 GeV Au+Au Analysis
Update on LHCb Level-1 trigger
Muons from light meson decays
Physics event timing Use Pythia to generate hadronic decays at 125 GeV
Presentation transcript:

arXiv: v1 Shuichi KUNORI Bayram TALI UPDATE MonoJet Weekly Meeting 23/06/2013 Inelastic Dark Matter Analysis

Motivation 2 24/06/2013

Analysis Strategy  Plans:  (1) analysis of decay pions and decay vertex  We are working on Opeartor #4.  For delatM= 200, 500, 1000 MeV  - pt(pi+), pt(pi-), pt(pi+pi-), pt(pi+)/pt(pi-)  - opening angle of pi+ and pi-  - decay vertex R=sqrt(x*x+y*y), z, 2Dplot(R vs z)  - pt(chi+chi*) at IP (interaction point)  - pt(chichi) ?  (2) test pythia for deltaM=3GeV (and 2Gev).  Mass(chi*) GeV M(chi) = 500 GeV chi* -> chi + u + ubar  Does Pythia produce hadrons for those u and ubar?  If hadronization is done in pythia, check the following.  - multiplicity of hadrons  - pt of each hadrons  - decay points. TO DO 3 24/06/2013

Use MadGraph5_v1_3_33 for MC signal production / Analysis  Modifications:  (1) new partcilce codes --- DECAY e-18 # Wchie # BR NDA ID1 ID2 ID E # BR(chi~ -> chi pi+ pi-) --- New particle codes: gravitino for stable (chi) for chi*, which decays to chi pi+ pi-  (2) in py file, for pythia 'MSTJ(22)=3 ! mode of cut-off on decay length, 1=default, 3=max decay lengh', 'PARJ(72)= ! maximum decay length'),  Created LHE Files Chi MASS Delta MASS 0.2No 0.3Yes 0.4 Yes 0.5Yes /06/2013

Some Info. From Pythia  Unit of vertex point in Pythia: (Pythia manuel page 62) x position of production vertex, in mm. y position of production vertex, in mm. z position of production vertex, in mm. Output of Pytia; 15 ~Gravitino (difined as chi) Since then x = mm, y = mm and z = mm 5 24/06/2013

Some Info. From Pythia  Output of Pytia; sN (id) =========== 15 ~Gravitino =========== 98 (u) A (ubar) V =========== 252 (string) (eta) (rho+) pi =========== 456 gamma gamma pi (pi0) =========== 557 gamma gamma

Some Info. From CMSSW Sequence Number of Particle id : 15 Mother ID of Particle id : Mother Status of Particle id : 3 VX of Particle id : VY of Particle id : VZ of Particle id : Sequence Number of Particles with the same vertexes : 15 Particle ID with the same vertexes : Particle Status with the same vertexes : 1 VX of Particulare Particle : VY of Particulare Particle : VZ of Particulare Particle : Sequence Number of Particles with the same vertexes : 98 Particle ID with the same vertexes : 2 Particle Status with the same vertexes : 2 VX of Particulare Particle : VY of Particulare Particle : VZ of Particulare Particle : Sequence Number of Particles with the same vertexes : 99 Particle ID with the same vertexes : -2 Particle Status with the same vertexes : 2 VX of Particulare Particle : VY of Particulare Particle : VZ of Particulare Particle : Sequence Number of Particles with the same vertexes : 252 Particle ID with the same vertexes : 92 Particle Status with the same vertexes : 2 VX of Particulare Particle : VY of Particulare Particle : VZ of Particulare Particle : Sequence Number of Particles with the same vertexes : 253 Particle ID with the same vertexes : 221 Particle Status with the same vertexes : 2 VX of Particulare Particle : VY of Particulare Particle : VZ of Particulare Particle : Sequence Number of Particles with the same vertexes : 254 Particle ID with the same vertexes : 213 Particle Status with the same vertexes : 2 VX of Particulare Particle : VY of Particulare Particle : VZ of Particulare Particle : Sequence Number of Particles with the same vertexes : 255 Particle ID with the same vertexes : -211 Particle Status with the same vertexes : 1 VX of Particulare Particle : VY of Particulare Particle : VZ of Particulare Particle : Sequence Number of Particles with the same vertexes : 456 Particle ID with the same vertexes : 22 Particle Status with the same vertexes : 1 VX of Particulare Particle : VY of Particulare Particle : VZ of Particulare Particle : Sequence Number of Particles with the same vertexes : 457 Particle ID with the same vertexes : 22 Particle Status with the same vertexes : 1 VX of Particulare Particle : VY of Particulare Particle : VZ of Particulare Particle : Sequence Number of Particles with the same vertexes : 458 Particle ID with the same vertexes : 211 Particle Status with the same vertexes : 1 VX of Particulare Particle : VY of Particulare Particle : VZ of Particulare Particle : Sequence Number of Particles with the same vertexes : 459 Particle ID with the same vertexes : 111 Particle Status with the same vertexes : 2 VX of Particulare Particle : VY of Particulare Particle : VZ of Particulare Particle : Sequence Number of Particles with the same vertexes : 557 Particle ID with the same vertexes : 22 Particle Status with the same vertexes : 1 VX of Particulare Particle : VY of Particulare Particle : VZ of Particulare Particle : Sequence Number of Particles with the same vertexes : 558 Particle ID with the same vertexes : 22 Particle Status with the same vertexes : 1 VX of Particulare Particle : VY of Particulare Particle : VZ of Particulare Particle :

Some Info. From Pythia and CMSSW  Output of CMSSW; Sequence Number of Particle id : 15 Mother ID of Particle id : Mother Status of Particle id : 3 VX of Particle id : VY of Particle id : VZ of Particle id : Unlike Pythia CMSSW results are in cm so, x = cm, y = cm and z = cm On the other hand x, y and z are not exactly the same there is a difference between those Pythia: x = mm, y = mm z = mm CMSSW: x = cm, y = cm z = cm  Output of Pytia; 15 ~Gravitino (difined as chi) Since then x = mm, y = mm and z = mm 8 24/06/2013

 Plans: These Results Just From Generated Particle Level. We want to see some basic information.  (1) analysis of decay pions and decay vertex  We are working on Opeartor #3 and #4 of first page.  For diff. delatM= 0.3, 0.5, 1 GeV and diff. chiM =100, 300 and 500 GeV  - pt(pi+), pt(pi-), pt(pi+pi-), pt(pi+)/pt(pi-)  - opening angle of pi+ and pi-  - decay vertex R=sqrt(x 2 +y 2 ), z, 2Dplot(R vs z)  - pt(chi+chi*) at IP (interaction point)  - pt(chichi) 9 24/06/2013

(1) pt(pi + )  Plots from DELTA MASS 0.3, 0.5, 1 GeV and CHI MASS 100, 300, 500 GeV with status code /06/2013

(1)pt(pi - )  Plots from DELTA MASS 0.3, 0.5, 1 GeV and CHI MASS 100, 300, 500 GeV with status code /06/2013

(1) pt(pi + pi - )  Plots from DELTA MASS 0.3, 0.5, 1 GeV and CHI MASS 100, 300, 500 GeV with status code /06/2013

(1) pt(pi + )/pt(pi - ) Value Divide  Plots from DELTA MASS 0.3, 0.5, 1 GeV and CHI MASS 100, 300, 500 GeV with status code /06/2013

(1) pt(pi + )/pt(pi - ) Histograms Divide  Plots from DELTA MASS 0.3, 0.5, 1 GeV and CHI MASS 100, 300, 500 GeV with status code /06/2013

(1) opening angle of pi + and pi -  Plots from DELTA MASS 0.3, 0.5, 1 GeV and CHI MASS 100, 300, 500 GeV with status code /06/2013

Theoretical Decay Lenght 16 24/06/2013

(1) decay vertex R=sqrt(x 2 +y 2 ), z, 2Dplot(R vs z)  Plots from DELTA MASS 0.3, 0.5, 1 GeV and CHI MASS 100, 300, 500 GeV with status code 1

(1) pt(chi+chi*) at IP  Plots from DELTA MASS 0.3, 0.5, 1 GeV and CHI MASS 100, 300, 500 GeV with status code /06/2013

(1) pt(chi+chi)  Plots from DELTA MASS 0.3, 0.5, 1 GeV and CHI MASS 100, 300, 500 GeV with status code /06/2013

 Plans:  (2) test pythia for deltaM=3GeV (and 2Gev).  Chi Mass 100, 300 and 500 GeV chi* -> chi + u + ubar  Does Pythia produce hadrons for those u and ubar?  If hadronization is done in pythia, check the following.  - multiplicity of hadrons  - pt of each hadrons  - decay points. These Results Just From Generated Particle Level with status code /06/2013

(2) multiplicity of hadrons 21 24/06/2013

(2) pt of each hadrons Bayram Tali 22 20/06/2013

(2) decay points 23 24/06/2013