1 PS Days - Evian 24-26.1.2001 / MV The SPL : a High-Power Superconducting H – Linac at CERN  Motivations  Applications  Design features  Improvements.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ISS meeting, (1) R. Garoby (for the SPL study group) SPL-based Proton Driver for Facilities SPL-based Proton Driver for Facilities at CERN:
Advertisements

Proton / Muon Bunch Numbers, Repetition Rate, RF and Kicker Systems and Inductive Wall Fields for the Rings of a Neutrino Factory G H Rees, RAL.
H. Haseroth July 26 – August 1, 2004 NuFact04, Osaka 1 The 3 MeV H - Test Stand at CERN - The first part of the SPL - H. Haseroth on behalf of the SPL.
Experience with Bunch Shape Monitors at SNS A. Aleksandrov Spallation Neutron Source, Oak Ridge, USA.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES NSLS-II ASAC-2007, April. 23, 2007 Injection System with a Booster in Separate Tunnel T. Shaftan for the NSLS-II team.
Part2: Cavities and Structures Modes in resonant cavity From a cavity to an accelerator Examples of structures JUAS 2015 Linacs-JB.Lallement - JUAS
PS Seminar – 27/06/2002 SPL status & plans 1 Status & plans of the SPL* study  Why upgrade the proton beams at CERN ? Approved physics programme Potential.
Muon Collider 2011 Workshop Jun 27-July 1 in Telluride, CO Gollwitzer & Nagaitsev presented Attending: Ankenbrandt, Lebedev, Pasquinelli, Popovic, and.
Catalina Island Meeting May, Proton Drivers for Neutrino Factories: The CERN Approach Presented by B. Autin, CERN.
Thomas Roser Snowmass 2001 June 30 - July 21, MW AGS proton driver (M.J. Brennan, I. Marneris, T. Roser, A.G. Ruggiero, D. Trbojevic, N. Tsoupas,
Cell-Coupled Drift Tube Linac M. Pasini, CERN AB-RF LINAC4 Machine Advisory Committee 1 st meeting CERN January 29-30, 2008.
Thomas Roser RHIC Open Planning Meeting December 3-4, 2003 RHIC II machine plans Electron cooling at RHIC Luminosity upgrade parameters.
Linac4 Status C. Carli presenting (a slightly adopted selection of) slides prepared by and on behalf of M. Vretenar Looking from this point and with a.
R.G. – 17/03/2003 MORIOND Workshop The SPL* at CERN OUTLINE  Why ?  How ?  Roadmap  Summary * SPL = Superconducting Proton Linac A concept for.
LINAC4 STATUS Alessandra M. Lombardi for the LINAC4 team 1.Motivation and goals 2.Status of Linac4 2 years after official start of the project ( )
Chopping Simulations Results M. Garcia Tudela, JB. Lallement, PA. Posocco, A. Lombardi, G.Bellodi, M. Eshraqi, E. Sargsyan, L. Hein 1 17/06/2010.
Storage Ring : Status, Issues and Plans C Johnstone, FNAL and G H Rees, RAL.
August 27, 2006R. Garoby Introduction 5 GeV version of the SPL Scenarios for accumulation and compression Conclusion SPL-BASED 5 GeV PROTON DRIVER.
3 GeV,1.2 MW, Booster for Proton Driver G H Rees, RAL.
Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy AGS Upgrade and Super Neutrino Beam DOE Annual HEP Program Review April 27-28, 2005 Derek I. Lowenstein.
Preliminary design of SPPC RF system Jianping DAI 2015/09/11 The CEPC-SppC Study Group Meeting, Sept. 11~12, IHEP.
Parameters of 2 nd SPL feasibility study A.M.Lombardi (reporting for the working group)
LLRF Cavity Simulation for SPL
DTL: Basic Considerations M. Comunian & F. Grespan Thanks to J. Stovall, for the help!
Proton Driver: Status and Plans C.R. Prior ASTeC Intense Beams Group, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory.
EDM2001 Workshop May 14-15, 2001 AGS Intensity Upgrade (J.M. Brennan, I. Marneris, T. Roser, A.G. Ruggiero, D. Trbojevic, N. Tsoupas, S.Y. Zhang) Proton.
1 Linac4 Overview M. Vretenar, SLHC Meeting, Motivations 2.Layout 3.Main parameters 4.Schedule 5.Status.
Secondary Particle Production and Capture for Muon Accelerator Applications S.J. Brooks, RAL, Oxfordshire, UK Abstract Intense pulsed.
June 23, 2005R. Garoby Introduction SPL+PDAC example Elements of comparison Linacs / Synchrotrons LINAC-BASED PROTON DRIVER.
Development of the Room Temperature CH-DTL in the frame of the HIPPI-CARE Project Gianluigi Clemente,
PROTON LINAC FOR INDIAN SNS Vinod Bharadwaj, SLAC (reporting for the Indian SNS Design Team)
Proton Beam for PRISM Keith Gollwitzer Accelerator Division Fermilab 5 th Workshop Project X Physics – Muons November 8, 2010.
Beam Dynamics and Linac Simulation Petr Ostroumov Fermilab Accelerator Advisory Committee May 10 th – 12 th, 2006.
Linac4 Status 1 M. Vretenar sLHC public event
Proton Source & Site Layout Keith Gollwitzer Accelerator Division Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory Muon Accelerator Program Review Fermilab, August.
MP - HIPPI General meeting, Abingdon October 28-30, Side Coupled Linac Design at CERN Side Coupled Linac Design at CERN M. Pasini, Abingdon September.
Module 5 A quick overview of beam dynamics in linear accelerators
Fermilab and Muons Proton Driver (for ν-Factory, μ + -μ - Collider, …) David Neuffer Fermilab.
LINAC4 and the Upgrade of the LHC Injector Complex R. Garoby 26 February, 2013.
The Introduction to CSNS Accelerators Oct. 5, 2010 Sheng Wang AP group, Accelerator Centre,IHEP, CAS.
H. Haseroth Friday, August 31, 2001 MUG Meeting 1 Overview of the CERN Neutrino Factory Machine Studies H. Haseroth for the Neutrino Factory Working Group.
Lecture17(Course Summary).PPT - E. Wilson - 3/3/ Slide 1 COURSE SUMMARY A Design Study of a Compressor ring for A Neutrino Factory MT 2009 E. J.
Status of Project X Keith Gollwitzer Accelerator Division Fermilab MAP Winter Meeting - March 1, 2011.
FFAG’ J. Pasternak, IC London/RAL Proton acceleration using FFAGs J. Pasternak, Imperial College, London / RAL.
ESGARD – OMIA 10 & 11/09/2007 JRA on Sc cavities and Cryomodule for a Pulsed proton Linac Motivation Work Packages Partners & resources R. Garoby for S.
NuFACT06 Muon Source at Fermilab David Neuffer Fermilab.
THE LINAC4 RFQ – Experience with Design, Fabrication and Tuning C. Rossi and the RFQ Project Team GSI Review – 20 November 2013.
Proton Driver Keith Gollwitzer Accelerator Division Fermilab MAP Collaboration Meeting June 20, 2013.
Neutrino Factory by Zunbeltz, Davide, Margarita, Wolfgang IDS proposal.
DTL: Basic Considerations M. Comunian & F. Grespan Thanks to J. Stovall, for the help!
Linac4 & SPL Status of preparation and Opportunities M. Vretenar (R
The CERN Linac4 history, performance, perspectives
Present and possible future schemes for hadron therapy linacs Alberto Degiovanni for the ADAM team HG2017 Workshop , Valencia.
Plans for a Superconducting Proton Linac at CERN
Abstract EuSPARC and EuPRAXIA projects
Linac4 M. Vretenar for the Linac4 design team
Linac4 Beam Characteristics
Plans for a Superconducting Proton Linac at CERN
Part2: Cavities and Structures
Superbeams with SPL at CERN
Report from the 1st meeting of Linac4 Machine Review Committee
Progress towards Pulsed Multi-MW CERN Proton Drivers
Collective Effects and Beam Measurements in Particle Accelerators
Part2: Cavities and Structures
A Design Study of a Compressor ring for
SLHC-PP kick-off meeting, CERN 9 April 2008
Explanation of the Basic Principles and Goals
Physics Design on Injector I
The SPL-based Proton Driver at CERN
RF system for MEIC Ion Linac: SRF and Warm Options
Presentation transcript:

1 PS Days - Evian / MV The SPL : a High-Power Superconducting H – Linac at CERN  Motivations  Applications  Design features  Improvements  Conclusions M. Vretenar for the SPL Study Group: B. Autin, K. Bongardt, R. Cappi, F. Caspers, E. Chiaveri, R. Garoby, F. Gerigk, H. Haseroth, C. Hill, A. Krusche, D. Kuchler, M. Lindroos, A. Lombardi, R. Losito, M. Poehler, H. Ravn, M. Sanmarti, H. Schönauer, M. Silari, J. Tückmantel, M. Vretenar SPL SPL = Superconducting Proton Linac

2 PS Days - Evian / MV The SPL - Motivations   to improve the quantity and quality of the proton beams provided by the PS Complex  advantages for the LHC  production of intense secondary beams for the Neutrino Factory and other users   to modernise the injectors with standard equipment   to use the LEP Superconducting RF system The LEP SC-RF system: 288 SC cavities in 72 cryostats (812 meters!), 44 klystrons

3 PS Days - Evian / MV The SPL - Applications  High-brightness injector for the PS (factor 3 in beam brightness, higher intensity for all users)  Proton driver for a Neutrino Factory (with accumulator / compressor rings in the ISR, 4 MW beam power)  Driver for a second generation radioactive beam facility (SuperISOLDE)

4 PS Days - Evian / MV The SPL - Main parameters (1) All details in the SPL Yellow Report (Conceptual Design of the SPL) CERN m

5 PS Days - Evian / MV Main parameters (2) 2.2 GeV:  LEP cavities (  =1) are efficient for W>1GeV  Reduced space charge tune shift in the PS for injection energies > 1.4 GeV (present PSB)  Efficient pion production for the Neutrino Factory for W > 2 GeV 75 Hz : for intense beams, a high rep. rate reduces charge per pulse (possible only with linacs!), limit given by power efficiency LEP cavities TTF 11 mA : optimum distribution of klystrons, same current as LEP2

6 PS Days - Evian / MV The SPL - Main Design Features H- source, 25 mA 16.5% duty Fast chopper (2ns) Cell-Coupled DTL, 352 MHz new SC cavities at  =0.52, 0.7, 0.8 RF system: all at 352 MHz, combination of tetrodes and LEP klystrons Careful beam dynamics design, large apertures to avoid halo formation and beam losses (50M particles + mismatch  OK)

7 PS Days - Evian / MV The Chopper accumulator bucket  Travelling wave electrostatic deflector, meander line to match beam and wave velocity  Used to create gaps in the linac bunch distribution between accumulator buckets  Needs very short rise/fall times (2 ns !) to avoid partially deflected bunches  Development of pulser

8 PS Days - Evian / MV The Drift Tube Linac  MeV: “classic” Alvarez linac  MeV: Cell Coupled DTL concept The quadrupoles are taken out of the drift tubes Short (2-gaps) DTL cavities are connected by off- axis coupling cavities. Advantages of the CCDTL:  Higher shunt impedance (less power)  Simple access and alignment for the quadrupoles  Relaxed mechanical tolerancies (lower cost)  One klystron per string of cavities  FODO focusing is maintained

9 PS Days - Evian / MV The Superconducting Linac To standardise construction, * 3 families of cavities optimised for different betas * cavities are grouped in cryostats *  =0.8 cavities in LEP cryostats

10 PS Days - Evian / MV The SC cavities for  < 1 The  =0.7 4-cell prototype  CERN technique of Nb/Cu sputtering for  =0.7,  =0.8 cavities (352 MHz): excellent thermal and mechanical stability (very important for pulsed systems) lower material cost, large apertures, released tolerances, 4.5  K operation with Q = 10 9  Bulk Nb or mixed technique for  =0.52 (one 100 kW tetrode per cavity)

11 PS Days - Evian / MV Pulsing of the SC cavities  The LEP RF is CW, pulsing (75 Hz, 2.2 ms) a SC system is an additional complication. Problems: low power efficiency due to long cavity filling times high sensitivity to vibrations: “small” mechanical vibrations (external, or Lorentz force) large detuning (high Q!) large V and  errors solutions (under study): appropriate feedback loops, reduce number of cavities per RF unit, debunching to minimise  W at ring injection.

12 PS Days - Evian / MV SPL Design - Beam Dynamics Goal: beam loss below 1 W/m to avoid activation of components (0.5 2 GeV) Beam size evolution in the SC linac (aperture  200 mm) matched case strongly mismatched case 100% rms 100%  Careful beam dynamics design to avoid halo formation:  minimise effects of mismatched beam  eliminate sources of mismatch  simulations with 50M particles (1/6 of bunch !)  Conclusion: no loss or halo seen in the simulations

13 PS Days - Evian / MV Layout on the CERN site Linac + klystron gallery parallel to the fence of Meyrin site (Route Gregory)  Economic trench excavation  Geological advantages (tunnel on“molasse”, no underground water)  Minimum impact on the environment (empty field)  Simple connection to PS & ISR via existing tunnels  Use some of the old ISR infrastructure (electricity, cooling)

14 PS Days - Evian / MV SPL Layout - Tunnels * “Cut and cover” technique * >8 meters of earth for shielding * tunnel on the molasse * linac slope 1.4%

15 PS Days - Evian / MV SPL Layout - connections to PS, ISR * 2 bunching/debunching sections and 230m drift to increase beam length to 180 ps and to reduce energy jitter coming from SC cavity vibrations * only 100m of line before connecting to the existing tunnel network * easy connection to ISOLDE (old and new)

16 PS Days - Evian / MV Improvements to the present design with respect to the present reference design (Yellow Report), some points can be improved, with the aim of: - reducing the power consumption (40 MW for 4 MW beam power, i.e. 10% conversion efficiency) - reducing the cost of the machine DESIGN IMPROVEMENTS  New design with repetition frequency down to 50 Hz, increased current and/or pulse length  Re-optimised layout of SC section  Dare to reduce the apertures to reduce cost of the machine ?  Design a room-temperature alternative structure for the expensive  =0.52 SC section HARDWARE TEST IN 2001  Test of LEP klystrons in pulsed mode  Test of SC cavities in pulsed mode  Construction and tests of a chopper pulser prototype  High Power test of a CW DTL model, collaboration with CEA/Saclay

17 PS Days - Evian / MV Conclusions  43% of the cavities, 60% of the cryostats and all the klystrons of LEP can be used for a 2.2 GeV pulsed H – Linac.  A 2.2 GeV, 4 MW beam power linac at CERN would allow the PS to produce beams of high intensity and quality, and makes possible the production of muons for a Neutrino Factory and of other secondary beams.  The design of the linac has been outlined  This machine fits nicely on the CERN site

18 PS Days - Evian / MV