M. Omang, S. Børve, and J. Trulsen

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Bayesian Belief Propagation
Advertisements

Dominic Hudson, Simon Lewis, Stephen Turnock
Master’s Dissertation Defense Carlos M. Teixeira Supervisors: Prof. José Carlos Lopes Eng. Matthieu Rolland Direct Numerical Simulation of Fixed-Bed Reactors:
WORKSHOP 2010 ON CONSTITUTIVE MODELING IN APPLICATIONS FOR INDUSTRIAL PROCESSES KRAKÓW, 1-3 September, 2010 Poznan University of Technology ASSESSMENT.
DEBRIS FLOWS & MUD SLIDES: A Lagrangian method for two- phase flow simulation Matthias Preisig and Thomas Zimmermann, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology.
RANS predictions of a cavitating tip vortex 8th International Symposium on Cavitation Tuomas Sipilä*, Timo Siikonen** *VTT Technical Research Centre of.
MUTAC Review April 6-7, 2009, FNAL, Batavia, IL Mercury Jet Target Simulations Roman Samulyak, Wurigen Bo Applied Mathematics Department, Stony Brook University.
DIMENSIONAL ANALYSIS – Is that all there is? W. J. Wilson Department of Physics and Engineering University of Central Oklahoma Edmond, Oklahoma
MABS21 Israel 2010 Julius Mezaros Lecture 53 Years of Blast Wave Research A Personal History by John M. Dewey Dewey McMillin & Associates Professor Emeritus,
Coupling Continuum Model and Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics Methods for Reactive Transport Yilin Fang, Timothy D Scheibe and Alexandre M Tartakovsky Pacific.
Nonlinear Evolution of Whistler Turbulence W.A. Scales, J.J. Wang, and O. Chang Center of Space Science and Engineering Research Virginia Tech L. Rudakov,
Novae and Mixing John ZuHone ASCI/Alliances Center for Thermonuclear Flashes University of Chicago.
University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill Fluid & Rigid Body Interaction Comp Physical Modeling Craig Bennetts April 25, 2006 Comp Physical.
Preliminary Assessment of Porous Gas-Cooled and Thin- Liquid-Protected Divertors S. I. Abdel-Khalik, S. Shin, and M. Yoda ARIES Meeting, UCSD (March 2004)
September 19, 2011 Simulation of High Power Mercury Jet Targets using Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics Roman Samulyak, Tongfei Guo AMS Department, Stony.
Chamber Dynamic Response Modeling Zoran Dragojlovic.
Vulcanian fountain collapse mechanisms revealed by multiphase numerical simulations: Influence of volatile leakage on eruptive style and particle-size.
Modeling Fluid Phenomena -Vinay Bondhugula (25 th & 27 th April 2006)
Particle-Based non-Newtonian Fluid Animation for Melting Objects Afonso Paiva Fabiano P. do Carmo Thomas Lewiner Geovan Tavares Matmidia - Departament.
Measurement of Kinematics Viscosity Purpose Design of the Experiment Measurement Systems Measurement Procedures Uncertainty Analysis – Density – Viscosity.
Photochemical and aerosol pollution of the environment in the regional and global scales accounting for kinetic processes of transformation A.E.Aloyan.
Isothermal Reactor Design – Part 2
Slug flow and fluid-structure interaction in industrial pipe systems
1 U N C L A S S I F I E D Modeling of Buoyant Plumes of Flammable Natural Gas John Hargreaves Analyst Safety Basis Technical Services Group LA-UR
1 - 12/09/2015 Department of Chemical Engineering Lecture 6 Kjemisk reaksjonsteknikk Chemical Reaction Engineering  Review of previous lectures  Pressure.
ICHS4, San Francisco, September E. Papanikolaou, D. Baraldi Joint Research Centre - Institute for Energy and Transport
Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics
A Hybrid Particle-Mesh Method for Viscous, Incompressible, Multiphase Flows Jie LIU, Seiichi KOSHIZUKA Yoshiaki OKA The University of Tokyo,
Animation of Fluids.
Improved Near Wall Treatment for CI Engine CFD Simulations Mika Nuutinen Helsinki University of Technology, Internal Combustion Engine Technology.
A particle-gridless hybrid methods for incompressible flows
Modelling Tsunami Waves using Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics (SPH) R.A. DALRYMPLE and B.D. ROGERS Department of Civil Engineering, Johns Hopkins University.
Neutrino Factory / Muon Collider Target Meeting Numerical Simulations for Jet-Proton Interaction Wurigen Bo, Roman Samulyak Department of Applied Mathematics.
Software for the Games Industry 9 November 2004 Fluid Gaming: Particle Methods for Fluid Mechanics and Visualisation Graham Wynn James Gray Richard West.
1 Numerical study of the thermal behavior of an Nb 3 Sn high field magnet in He II Slawomir PIETROWICZ, Bertrand BAUDOUY CEA Saclay Irfu, SACM Gif-sur-Yvette.
Cavitation Models Roman Samulyak, Yarema Prykarpatskyy Center for Data Intensive Computing Brookhaven National Laboratory U.S. Department of Energy
PDE simulations with adaptive grid refinement for negative streamers in nitrogen Carolynne Montijn Work done in cooperation with: U. Ebert W. Hundsdorfer.
Simplified Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics for Interactive Applications Zakiya Tamimi Richard McDaniel Based on work done at Siemens Corporate.
Estimating The Viscosity Bio-fluids Bien 301 Jasma Batham.
Detail-Preserving Fluid Control N. Th ű rey R. Keiser M. Pauly U. R ű de SCA 2006.
Geometry Group Summer 08 Series Toon Lenaerts, Bart Adams, and Philip Dutre Presented by Michael Su May
PREPARED BY NORI. NANAMI, TEXAS A & M UNIVERSITY
Lecture Objectives Unsteady State Simulation Example Modeling of PM.
Relativistic Hydrodynamics T. Csörgő (KFKI RMKI Budapest) new solutions with ellipsoidal symmetry Fireball hydrodynamics: Simple models work well at SPS.
University of Wisconsin Chambers Work John Santarius, Greg Moses, and Milad Fatenajed HAPL Team Meeting Georgia Institute of Technology February 5-6, 2004.
Simulating complex surface flow by Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics & Moving Particle Semi-implicit methods Benlong Wang Kai Gong Hua Liu
Page 1© Crown copyright 2006 Ice hydrometeor microphysical parameterisations in NWP Amy Doherty T. R. Sreerekha, Una O’Keeffe, Stephen English October.
Challenges related to Particle Regularization in SPH S. Børve (University of Oslo/Norwegian Defence Research Establishment) R. Speith (University of Tübingen)
FlowFixer: Using BFECC for Fluid Simulation ByungMoon Kim Yingjie Liu Ignacio Llamas Jarek Rossignac Georgia Institute of Technology.
Self-consistent non-stationary theory of multipactor in DLA structures O. V. Sinitsyn, G. S. Nusinovich, T. M. Antonsen, Jr. and R. Kishek 13 th Advanced.
Extreme Value Prediction in Sloshing Response Analysis
A Non-iterative Hyperbolic, First-order Conservation Law Approach to Divergence-free Solutions to Maxwell’s Equations Richard J. Thompson 1 and Trevor.
Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics Matthew Zhu CSCI 5551 — Fall 2015.
Targetry Simulation with Front Tracking And Embedded Boundary Method Jian Du SUNY at Stony Brook Neutrino Factory and Muon Collider Collaboration UCLA.
Particle-based Viscoelastic Fluid Simulation Simon Clavet Philippe Beaudoin Pierre Poulin LIGUM, Université de Montréal.
© GexCon AS JIP Meeting, May 2011, Bergen, Norway 1 Ichard M. 1, Hansen O.R. 1, Middha P. 1 and Willoughby D. 2 1 GexCon AS 2 HSL.
Simulation of High-Power Mercury Jet Targets for Neutrino Factory and Muon Collider R. Samulyak, 1,2 H.C. Chen, 1 H.G. Kirk, 2 K.T. McDonald 3 1 Stony.
A Massively Parallel Incompressible Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics Simulator for Oilfield Applications Paul Dickenson 1,2, William N Dawes 1 1 CFD Laboratory,
Simulation of the acoustics of coupled rooms by numerical resolution of a diffusion equation V. Valeau a, J. Picaut b, A. Sakout a, A. Billon a a LEPTAB,
Application of smooth particle hydrodynamics on biomass burning
33 (6 outlines) -> 27.
Extreme Value Prediction in Sloshing Response Analysis
Modeling and experimental study of coupled porous/channel flow
TRANSVERSE RESISTIVE-WALL IMPEDANCE FROM ZOTTER2005’S THEORY
Mechanical Separation
E. Papanikolaou, D. Baraldi
TRANSVERSE RESISTIVE-WALL IMPEDANCE FROM ZOTTER2005’S THEORY
CFD computations of liquid hydrogen releases
DIMENSIONAL ANALYSIS – Is that all there is?
Development of a new approach for modelling wave energy converters
Presentation transcript:

M. Omang, S. Børve, and J. Trulsen Numerical simulations of blast wave propagation in underground facilities M. Omang, S. Børve, and J. Trulsen

Outline Numerical method HE modeling Free-field explosion Detonation in underground facility Conclusions Future work

Numerical method Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics; SPH A Lagrangian particle method, where particles are used to simulate gas flow Regularized Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics (RSPH)- extension to SPH Step-wise variable resolution Particle redistribution Symmetry assumptions

SPH Interpolation theory Kernel function

HE source model The High Explosive model is based on a Constant Volume Model Complete explosion; no after-burning of rest products. Constant gamma reaction Symmetry assumptions: Axis-symmetry: 3D computed in 2D. Spherical symmetry: 3Dcomputed in 1D.

HE data Data Free-field test Chamber-tunnel test Density [kg/m3] 1630 Charge weight [kg] 1.0 157.08 Loading density - 25

Free field 1kg of TNT

Accidental explosions in underground facilities Data Free-field test Chamber length [m] 2.0 Chamber diameter [m] Tunnel diameter [m] 1.0 Tunnel length [m] 5.0

Density and pressure

Density animation

Pressure and velocity sensors measurements

Maximum pressure Maximum pressure is recorded for each pressure sensor The plot illustrate the overall maximum pressure for the exterior tunnel area.

Tunnel exit pressure -comparison to empirical data Skjeltorp Helseth Results from Exit pressure, kPa Skjeltorp et al 4886 Helseth 5144 RSPH 4730

Empirical formulas Skjeltorp et al. Helseth Kingery and Gion

Exterior pressure distribution

Conclusions The constant volume model has been used to simulate free-field detonation of 1kg of TNT. The agreement is good, when results are compared against empirical data. Simulations of complex underground facilities is a challenge, since high resolution combined with large computational domains are required. In RSPH the problem is solved by stepwise increasing the computational domain. When exterior pressure results from RSPH is compared to results from empirical formulas, fairly good agreement is achieved. The discrepancy observed may indicate that the description of the exterior pressure as a linear relation in a log-log scale may be incorrect. Similar results have been observed previously for empirical data plotted against the given formulas.

Future work After-burning of rest products are not taken into account in the current simulations, work is however, in progress to implement a relative simple after-burning model. In the current simulations a single phase simulation was used. Plans are maid to implement and upgrade the code to handle multiphase flow.