Challenges using Safety Monitoring Systems A review of Integrating Incident Data from Five Reporting Systems to Assess Patient Safety: Making Sense of.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ROLE OF A PHARMACIST IN IMPROVING THE QUALITY OF TREATMENT IN INPATIENTS Sabina Farooq* Dr Shobarani R H, Dr Venugopal Reddy, Geetha pradeep, Soumya k.L.
Advertisements

1 Bridging Terminology and Classification Gaps among Patient Safety Information Systems Andrew Chang, JD, MPH, Laurie Griesinger, MPH, Peter Pronovost,
Introduction to Patient Safety Research Presentation 7 - Understanding Causes: Ethnographic Study.
Methods Results Purpose Background Results
AHRQ Annual Meeting Perinatal Safety Intervention Program (PSIP): Design and Development AHRQ Annual Meeting September 10, 2012 Nancy Lenfestey, MHA, 1.
PwC and Medical Necessity Issues and Concerns Emerging OIG scrutiny on medical necessity; nearly 500 hospitals on national target list for Medicare compliance.
CLINICAL GOVERNANCE A Framework for High Quality Care Marian Balm Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital.
Improving care transitions at Harborview Medical Center Frederick M. Chen, MD, MPH Chief of Family Medicine Associate Professor, University of Washington.
Growing a New Culture: Patient Safety Nancy Brumley Gessling, MSN, CIC Infection Prevention Copper Basin Medical Center.
Spotlight Case Treatment Challenges After Discharge.
Management of Communication and Information Chapter -MCI
[Hospital Name | Presenter name and title | Date of presentation]
Strategies to Reduce Medication Errors in Hospital Settings Suzanne Smith BSN, RN Critical Care Staff Nurse Community Hospital.
An Acute Care World without Registered Nurses Kathleen Gallo, PhD, MBA, RN, FAAN Senior Vice President & Chief Learning Officer.
Evidence-Based Research Group Project Marcie Chenette Dulcebelle Pearson Melanie Underwoood Marcie Chenette Dulcebelle Pearson Melanie Underwoood.
Care Coordination What is it? How Do We Get Started?
© 2008 The Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois Collaborative Learning From Patient Safety: Presentation From PSOs and International Patient.
1 Evaluating the impact of information technology on clinician workload using time-motion methodologies Lisa P. Newmark, Carol Keohane, RN, Eric G. Poon,
Presented By Sheila Lucas Ferris State University NURS 511
Revised for 2013 Shannon Hein RN, CPN(C).  published in the Canadian Medical Association Journal in May 2004  Found an overall incidence rate of adverse.
August 19 th Webex.  Review article and discuss strategies for application of learning  Round table discussion/question list.
Spring 2015 ETM 568 Callier, Demers, Drabek, & Hutchison Carter, E. J., Pouch, S. M., & Larson, E. L. (2014). The relationship between emergency department.
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Advancing Excellence in Health Care HCAHPS: Update for Trustees Mary Therriault RN MS Senior Director,
Presented to [Date] By [Insert Name] The Application of FMEA to a Medication Reconciliation Process.
Maria Jessing, Clinical Improvement Manager SESLHD Trish Wills, Southern Sector Manger Clinical Practice Improvement Unit Sandra Grove A/Clinical Quality.
Care Management Going Forward Connie Sixta, RN, PhD, MBA.
Tracy Tidwell, RN, MSN, CPNP
PSO Participation for the Leadership Team (Presenter) (Date) 1 **For internal use by Center for Patient Safety PSO Participants. May not otherwise be photocopied,
Experience feed back committee (EFBC) in radiotherapy M. Delgaudine, N. Jansen, P. Coucke Department of Radiotherapy, CHU-Liège, Belgium
OPERATING ROOM DASHBOARD Virginia Chard, RN, BSN, CNOR
Topic 6 Understanding and managing clinical risk.
Question Are Medical Emergency Team calls effective in reducing cardiopulmonary arrest rates in the general medical surgical setting? Problem The degree.
Using Simulation to teach leadership competencies in delivering safe patient care Claudia Grobbel DNP RN Michelle Costlow MSN RN, Jean Ann Dean MSN RN.
SSM Health Care Category 3: Focus on Patients, Other Customers and Markets Karen Smit, MN, BSN, RN Clinical Quality Administrator.
Reduced resident work hours in the SICU: The nurses’ perspective Zara Cooper, MD, MSc Ian Shempp, BS Selwyn O. Rogers, MD,MPH Department of Surgery Brigham.
HIT can be incorporated into simulation scenarios and used for usability testing, training, and evaluation. A multidisciplinary team, dedicated simulation.
The Comprehensive Unit-based Safety Program (CUSP)
Unit 5a: Care Coordination HIT Design for Teamwork and Communication This material was developed by Johns Hopkins University, funded by the Department.
Cleveland Clinic Science Internship Program How Fast Are We? Throughput Times for Admissions from the Emergency Department Brian Hom; Deborah Porter RN,
Hospital Administration. It is the management of the hospital as a business. The administration is made up of medical and health services managers (sometimes.
Patient Safety Issues in Gynaecology Joanna Thomas & Louise Samworth Saint Mary’s Hospital Manchester.
Medication Reconciliation: Opportunity to Improve Patient Safety Presented to [Insert Group or Committee Name of Front-line Staff] [Date] By [Insert Name]
Using a Novel Two-Pronged Pharmacy Model in a High-Risk Care Management Program to Address Medication Reconciliation and Access Kakoza RM 1, 2, De Leon.
A Team Members Guide to a Culture of Safety
Overview Linkage: Providing Safe and Effective care, Coordinating Care, & The Joint Commission National Patient Safety Goal #8, Reconciling Medications.
MEDICAL SERVICE ADMINISTRATION VIETNAM MINISTRY OF HEALTH
Rediscovering the Art of Healing Connection by Creating the Tree of Life Poster Teri Britt Pipe, PhD, RN Kenneth Mishark, MD Reverend Patrick Hansen, MA,
Patient Safety Culture and Nurse- Reported Adverse Patient Events in Outpatient Hemodialysis Facilities Charlotte Thomas-Hawkins, PhD, RN Linda Flynn,
Implementing Process Redesign Strategies for Improving Hospital Care Shinyi Wu, PhD Assistant Professor, Epstein Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering.
Ms. Christine Loyle, B.A. Program Coordinator/Analyst Tripler Army Medical Center Honolulu, HI Rapid Response Team Training for Activators - Staff, Patient,
Amy Wilson-Stronks 1, Lance Patak 2, John Costello 3 1 The Joint Commission, Oakbrook Terrace, IL 2 University of Michigan Medical Center, 3 Children’s.
Government Agencies. World Health Organization  Sponsored by United Nations  Investigates serious diseases & health issues across the world.
 Staff RN at Mount Carmel East (MCE) for 6 years  Completed this research as part of Graduate school requirements.
The authors would like to acknowledge the families at the Children’s Hospital of Wisconsin Jane P. Pettit Pain and Palliative Care Center. For more information,
The Patient Safety Challenge Charleston Southern University Tara Hulsey, PhD, RN, CNE April DeGuzman, MSN, APRN, BC Anita Korbe, MSN, APRN, BC.
Heather Orth RN, BSN, MBA Allen White, MD, MMM.  Analyze & Prioritize Population Needs  Clinical Practice Guideline Development  Key team members 
When Location Doesn’t Matter: When the Quality of Care is at Stake Johanna Warren MD, Jessica Flynn MD, and Scott Fields MD MHA Oregon Health & Sciences.
Question Are Medical Emergency Team calls effective in reducing cardiopulmonary arrest rates in the general medical surgical setting? Problem The degree.
Malpractice Insurance Incentive for Operating Room Teamwork Training via Simulation Jeffrey B. Cooper, PhD Center for Medical Simulation & Mass. General.
Chapter 33 Introduction to the Nursing Process
Mathematics IN Health Care Analytics
Introduction/Problem Results/Progress to Date
Sunil Kripalani, MD, MSc;1 Christianne L
Detecting Quality and Safety Problems:
Medication Use Pattern Mining for Childhood Pneumonia Using Six Year Inpatient Electronic Medical Records in a Shanghai Hospital, China Chunlei Tang, PhD1,2,3,
The Nursing Process and Pharmacology Jeanelle F. Jimenez RN, BSN, CCRN
September 15, 2009, presented at AHRQ Conference
Study: Outcomes and Evaluation Act: Conclusions and Planning
Evaluation of Patient and Family Outpatient Complaints as a Strategy to Prioritize Efforts to Improve Cancer Care Delivery  Jennifer W. Mack, MD, MPH,
Developing and Evaluating an Automated All-Cause Harm Trigger System
Presentation transcript:

Challenges using Safety Monitoring Systems A review of Integrating Incident Data from Five Reporting Systems to Assess Patient Safety: Making Sense of the Elephant David Peavy Carter Seward Jake Swinton

Reference Osnat Levtzion-Korach, M.D. M.H.A.; Allan Frankel, M.D.; Hanna Alcalai, B.P.T., M.H.A; Carol Keohane B.S.N., R.N.; John Orav, Ph.D.; Erin Graydon-Baker, M.S., R.R.T.; Janet Barnes, R.N, J.D., C.P.H.R.M.; Kathleen Gordon, M.S.N., M.S.; Anne Louise Puopulo, B.S.N, R.N.; Elena Ivanova Tomov, M.B.A.; Luke Sato, M.D.; David W. Bates, M.D., M.Sc. (September 2010). Integrating Incident Data from Five Reporting Systems to Assess Patient Safety: Making Sense of the Elephant. The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety, Vol. 36, No. 9. Retrieved from: PSNet-ID pdf. Accessed February 6, PSNet-ID pdf 2 ETM Peavy, Seward & SwintonSafety Monitoring Systems

Introduction ●The article investigates the various reporting systems and how they correlate to one another o Use different methods of obtaining information o Place results using different categories o Different personnel fill our reports o Prioritize different events ●The article reviewed the quality reporting systems/processes used at Brigham and Women’s Hospital (BWH) located in Boston, MA. o 747-bed tertiary care academic medical center o 52,000 inpatient admissions/950,000 outpatient admissions per year o 12,000 employees; approximately 3000 are doctors 3 ETM Peavy, Seward & SwintonSafety Monitoring Systems

Methods ●BWH uses a total of 5 Quality Reporting Systems: o Incident Reporting o Reports to Risk Management o Patient Complaints o Executive Walk Arounds o Malpractice Claims ●The authors wanted to: o Evaluate what type of information is received by each system o Develop a common framework for representing the identified safety issues o Assess the correlation between types of information collected o Evaluate the overall safety picture 4 ETM Peavy, Seward & SwintonSafety Monitoring Systems

Data ●The data was collected from the source systems over a 22 month period between May 10th, 2004 and February 28th, 2006 ●The 22 month time period had a small number of malpractice claims, so to increase this number, the time period was extended to 10 years. 5 ETM Peavy, Seward & SwintonSafety Monitoring Systems

Assessment Areas ●Incident Reporting System o Commercially available web- based incident reporting system o Usually filled out by nurses o Evaluated by Department Managers ●Hospital Risk Management o Physicians and Nurses call the team to report adverse events and poor patient outcomes o Even split of reporting between Nurses and Physicians o Evaluated by Risk Management staff 6 ETM Peavy, Seward & SwintonSafety Monitoring Systems

Assessment Areas (Cont.) ●Patient Complaints o The Family and Patient Relations Department Responds to patient and family complaints, suggestions, and compliments ●Executive Walk Around o Executive leadership walk arounds occur semiweekly and engage with staff about safety concerns ●Malpractice Claims o The malpractice insurer has a system used for data collection called CMAPS. o This system takes information from potential claim reports risk managers, and formal malpractice claims 7 ETM Peavy, Seward & SwintonSafety Monitoring Systems

Results 8 ETM Peavy, Seward & SwintonSafety Monitoring Systems (Page 404; Levtzion-Korach, M.D. et. al.)

Comparisons ●The five assessment areas did not have overlapping categorization schemes ●The experimenters developed a categorization scheme with 23 major categories to compare the 5 reporting systems. ●Examples: o Staff o Staff Training/Education o Technical Skills o Equipment/Supplies o Medication Errors o Identification Issues o Monitoring of Patient o Clinical Judgement o Medical Records o Test Reconciliation Issues 9 ETM Peavy, Seward & SwintonSafety Monitoring Systems

Analysis ●Data collected by the five reporting systems was analyzed and classified into one of the new categories by a physician reviewer trained in patient safety. ●Investigators calculated the frequencies of each of the events ●Overlap between rankings of frequency of different categories were then assessed and correlations between the detection approaches were calculated 10 ETM Peavy, Seward & SwintonSafety Monitoring Systems

Categorical Analysis ●The leading major categories across the reporting systems were: o Communication (11.6%) o Technical Skills (10.9% o Clinical Judgement (9%) ●However, each system had a different category that was most frequent 11 ETM Peavy, Seward & SwintonSafety Monitoring Systems

Statistical Correlation ●Overall, across the five systems, Cronbach’s standardized alpha was 0.22, suggesting a low level of consistency 12 ETM Peavy, Seward & SwintonSafety Monitoring Systems (Page 408; Levtzion-Korach, M.D. et. al.)

Correlations ●Correlations presented: o Highest correlation observed was between risk management reports and malpractice claims o A high correlation was found between patient complaints and malpractice claims o The incident reporting system has little correlation with the other systems o Executive walk rounds had a negative correlation with all other systems 13 ETM Peavy, Seward & SwintonSafety Monitoring Systems

14 ETM Peavy, Seward & SwintonSafety Monitoring Systems (Page 403; Levtzion-Korach, M.D. et. al.)

15 ETM Peavy, Seward & SwintonSafety Monitoring Systems (Page 403; Levtzion-Korach, M.D. et. al.)

Discussion ●Some things to keep in mind about the study: o Only a single medical center was used. Results shown may not be generalizable to other facilities o Not all possible types of safety data were included. However, BWH allowed the authors to closely examine numerous independent data source 16 ETM Peavy, Seward & SwintonSafety Monitoring Systems

Discussion (cont’d) ●The study allowed for the comparison and evaluation of each reporting system, both individually, and as a whole ●Each system provides a different set of partial conclusions, and there is little correlation between individual systems 17 ETM Peavy, Seward & SwintonSafety Monitoring Systems

Conclusion ●Studies or reports commenting on only one of the reporting systems are incomplete ●Much better, more complete conclusions may be drawn from a complete perspective that utilizes information from multiple reporting systems ●Hospitals should utilize a more broad approach to the classification of adverse events in order to make more informed decisions 18 ETM Peavy, Seward & SwintonSafety Monitoring Systems