List of Issues for Attainment Demonstrations 1.Which areas are required to do an attainment demonstration? 2.What should be the technical requirements.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
An Update on the Activities of the Western Regional Air Partnership ‘WRAP v2.0’ Robert Kotchenruther, Ph.D. NW-AIRQUEST June, 2011.
Advertisements

Summary of Air Quality Field Survey Eddie Dancausse Air Quality Specialist FHWA NC Division.
EPA PM2.5 Modeling Guidance for Attainment Demonstrations Brian Timin EPA/OAQPS February 20, 2007.
Ozone, PM2.5 and Regional Haze Timeline Dan Johnson Western States Air Resources Council.
Working together for clean air Puget Sound Area Ozone Modeling NW AIRQUEST December 4, 2006 Washington State University Puget Sound Clean Air Agency Washington.
Climate Change Science Program Climate Policy & Voluntary Programs Mercury & Water Quality Pesticides & Other POPs Local & Regional Air Quality Intercontinental.
Department of the Environment The State Implementation Plan Process – Our Next Steps Brian Hug Division Chief, Air Quality Planning and Policy Division.
1 An Update on EPA Attainment Modeling Guidance for the 8- Hour Ozone NAAQS Brian Timin EPA/OAQPS/EMAD/AQMG November 16, 2005.
Issues on Ozone Planning in the Western United States Prepared by the WESTAR Planning Committee for the Fall Business Meeting, Tempe, AZ October 31, 2011.
Ozone Overview John Koswan July 11, OZONE SIP DEVELOPMENT: TASKS COMPLETED TO DATE.
Developing a Workplan for Implementing the Strategic Plan for the WRAP Board October 1, 2008.
Oil and Gas Workgroup Summary October 21-23, 2009 Denver.
PM2.5 Model Performance Evaluation- Purpose and Goals PM Model Evaluation Workshop February 10, 2004 Chapel Hill, NC Brian Timin EPA/OAQPS.
Early Action Compacts Presented by Karen Borel EPA Region 4 March 25, 2003.
An Update on the Colorado Regional Haze SIP Process and Outcomes Presented at: WRAP – Implementation Work Group San Francisco, CA March 2005.
November 7, 2013 WRAP Membership Meeting Denver, CO Tom Moore WRAP Air Quality Program Manager WESTAR Council.
Treatment of Natural Events WESTAR Planning Committee & WESTAR NEP Workgroup March 28, 2006.
Use of Photochemical Grid Modeling to Quantify Ozone Impacts from Fires in Support of Exceptional Event Demonstrations STI-5704 Kenneth Craig, Daniel Alrick,
Preparation of Control Strategies October 18, 2007 NAAQS RIA Workshop Darryl Weatherhead, Kevin Culligan, Serpil Kayin, David Misenheimer, Larry Sorrels.
WRAP Update WESTAR Meeting San Francisco April 25, 2011.
1 PM2.5 Redesignation Request for the Metropolitan Washington,D.C. Region Joan Rohlfs Chief, Air Quality Planning Metropolitan Washington COG.
Conceptual Description – Next Generation of Regional Modeling & Analysis Center Workshop on Regional Emissions & Air Quality Modeling Studies July 30,
A)How is satellite imagery currently used in air quality research and management? a) who are the data users b) what data is used c) how is the data used.
CAAAC Air Quality Management Workgroup Update Anna Garcia OTC.
Final Clean Air Fine Particle Implementation Rule Briefing for NTAA EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards April 17, 2007.
WRAP Workshop July 29-30, 2008 Potential Future Regional Modeling Center Cumulative Analysis Ralph Morris ENVIRON International Corporation Novato, California.
2005 WRAP Work Plan WRAP Board Meeting Salt Lake City, UT November 10, 2004.
Technical Projects Update WRAP Board Meeting Salt Lake City, UT November 10, 2004.
State Implementation Plan for 8-Hour Ozone in San Diego Planning and Technical Support Division May 24, 2007 San Diego.
EPA – Regional Haze Issues IWG Meeting April 17 th Keith Rose and Laurel Dygowski.
Evaluation of the VISTAS 2002 CMAQ/CAMx Annual Simulations T. W. Tesche & Dennis McNally -- Alpine Geophysics, LLC Ralph Morris -- ENVIRON Gail Tonnesen.
WESTAR Technical Committee Report WESTAR Fall Business Meeting 6 – 7 November 2013, Denver, CO Clint Bowman & Phil Allen, Co-Chairs.
1 Status of SO 2 Implementation and Modeling Issues Michael Ling Associate Director, Air Quality Policy Division U.S. EPA, Office of Air Quality Planning.
Exceptional Events and Fire Policy Presented by Don Hodge, U.S. EPA Region 9 Interagency Air and Smoke Council meeting May 2, 2012 Disclaimer: Positions.
WRAP Regional Modeling Center, Attribution of Haze Meeting, Denver CO 7/22/04 Introduction to the the RMC Source Apportionment Modeling Effort Gail Tonnesen,
May 23, 2013 Don Arkell WESTAR Staff WESTAR Council Meeting Tom Moore Air Quality Program Manager Western Governors’ Association.
CHARGE QUESTIONS: ENDPOINTS  anthropogenic emissions   air pollution   climate OK, but can we be more specific?  Intercontinental transport of.
Reasonable Further Progress Policy and Mid-Course Reviews John Summerhays EPA Region 5 June 20, 2007.
Notice: The views expressed here are those of the individual authors and may not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the United States Environmental.
Western Regional Technical Air Quality Studies: support for Ozone and other Air Quality Planning in the West Tom Moore Air Quality Program Manager Western.
1 RPO Data Analysis/Monitoring Grant Guidance Review Extracted from the EPA’s 3/5/02 RPO 4 th Year Policy, Organizational & Technical Guidance.
Houston's One-Hour SIP: Status and Path Forward Matthew L. Kuryla Baker Botts, LLP Houston, Texas October 6, 2004.
CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION 1 Seasonal Modeling Project PI - Nancy Brown, LBNL Nicole Davis CEC Project Manager Kick Off Meeting CCOS Technical Meeting.
Work Items for §309 SIPs WESTAR Fall Technical Conference September 19, 2002 Tom Moore & Brian Finneran.
EPA’s White Paper and Workshop on Background Ozone NASA AQAST 10 th Semiannual Meeting – 1/6/16.
Air Managers and State Caucus support  State Caucus – IWG feedback on Questions  Tribal Caucus Liaison WRAP Workgroups-Ad Hoc  Attribution of Haze 
308 Outline (a) Purpose (b) When are 1st plans due (c) Options for regional planning (d) Core requirements (e) BART requirements (f) Comprehensive periodic.
Key Findings from May & July 2008 WRAP Technical Workshops September 30, 2008 Steve Arnold, Colorado DPHE & Bob Kotchenruther, EPA R10 (Co-Chairs, WRAP.
Presents:/slides/greg/PSAT_ ppt Modeling Options for Proposed BART Rule Two roles for modeling in proposed BART rule > Does a potential BART-eligible.
CENRAP Modeling and Weight of Evidence Approaches
Weight of Evidence for Regional Haze Reasonable Progress
EPA Air Policy Priorities
Daily Screening for Wildfire Impacts on Ozone using a Photochemical Model A Proposal to the Texas Near-Nonattainment Areas Greg Yarwood
WESTAR Increment Recommendations
Timelines — NAAQS, SIP & Regional Haze
Number of Hours Above 1-hour Ozone NAAQS
CAIR Replacement Rule and Regional Haze
Transport Panel Discussion
Bill Harnett USEPA NACAA Membership Meeting October 21, 2008
Updated Oil & Gas Emissions Projections for 2023 and Aug. 11, 2016
Issues on Ozone Planning in the Western United States
Regional Modeling Update
Exceptional and Natural Events Rulemaking
CAIR Update WESTAR October 2, 2008.
Regional Haze SIP Status Report
Workshop on Monitoring & Data for Regional Analysis
Guidance on Attainment Tests for O3 / PM / Regional Haze
Regional Modeling for Stationary Source Control Strategy Evaluation
Status of Preliminary Reasonable Progress Analysis
EPA Region 4 Spring Grants/Planning Meeting
Presentation transcript:

List of Issues for Attainment Demonstrations 1.Which areas are required to do an attainment demonstration? 2.What should be the technical requirements of an attainment demonstration? 3.What additional guidance is needed, if multi-state areas are required to do regional scale modeling? 4.How do we deal with modeling a domain which has different attainment dates? 5.Additional guidance needed if “one-atmosphere” modeling is recommended/required. Is additional guidance needed if a mid-course review is recommended/required? Other issues?

1. Which areas are required to do an attainment demonstration? One option is: Areas with early attainment dates (within three years of designation) would not be required to do an attainment demonstration. –areas would rely solely on EPA’s national modeling and/or emissions inventory assessments. –areas with later attainment dates like 2010 would be required to do an attainment demonstration. –alleviates the burden on areas with early attainment dates. –works well if the national modeling is available and shows attainment for these areas.

2. What should be the technical requirements of an attainment demonstration? All areas need photochemical grid modeling. –provides consistency and allows ongoing/recent modeling to be used. –must consider time/resources needed to model, particular concern for areas with early attainment dates. All areas need photochemical grid modeling, except areas close to the level of the 8-hour NAAQS would perform inventory or contribution assessments or rely on existing regional/national modeling. –avoids time-consuming work for areas close to the standard. –technical limitations.

3. What additional guidance is needed, if multi-state areas are required to do regional scale modeling? Regional scale application with nested grids - (episode selection, number of days to model and subregional model performance). Coordination of technical analyses. Guidance to address transport within and among the multi-state areas. Impacts from international sources. Use of different episode days across multi-state areas.

4. How do we deal with modeling a domain which has different attainment dates? Model all attainment years through regional scale modeling with nested local area grids. –most technically sound, although resource intensive. Model farthest attainment date; make sensitivity runs using emissions levels for earlier years. –Less resource intensive, but provides far less information to develop strategies for intermediate years. EPA performs national modeling to address transport. –EPA models the earliest attainment year and develop national strategy to address transport. –minimizes the burden on individual States but requires coordination among the states involved.

5. Additional guidance needed if “one-atmosphere” modeling is recommended/required. ( Provides optimal controls for O3/PM/regional haze and is needed for integrated.) Episode Selection–ozone and PM may have different episodes. Model Performance (whole year may be modeled for PM). Attainment Test–number of days to be modeled Modeling Domain–grid size Documentation (sensitivity results, model performance, attainment tests, episodes, weight of evidence, etc) Protocol to address both ozone and PM2.5, submitted simultaneously