“The SIMBOL-X optics”, Bologna, 14 May 2007 SIMBOL-X SIMBOL-X OPTICS SIMBOL-X OPTICS Giovanni Pareschi INAF - Osservatorio Astronomico di Brera Lower Spider.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SVOM MXT Lobster Eye Telescope Breadboard Model Testing Preliminary Results Dick Willingale Adrian Martindale, Jim Pearson, Charly Feldman, Julian Osborne.
Advertisements

CR Workshop – Leiden (H), 14 – 18 / 03 / 2011
November 20, 2003University of Colorado The Off-Plane Option Study Results Potential Capabilities Webster Cash University of Colorado.
Evolving X-ray Polarimetry towards high energy and solar science Sergio Fabiani Università degli Studi di Roma “Tor Vergata” INAF / IAPS I A P S Istituto.
A Narrow Field Lobster Eye Telescope Dick Willingale – AXRO December 2014 A Narrow Field Lobster Eye Telescope (for SVOM and similar) Dick Willingale Adrian.
990901EIS_Opt.1 The Instrument: Optical Design Dr. John T. Mariska Data Coordination Scientist Naval Research Laboratory
Tomsk Polytechnic University1 A.S. Gogolev A. P. Potylitsyn A.M. Taratin.
Paul B. Reid Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics HEAD2013 April 8, 2013 Paul B. Reid Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics HEAD2013 April.
S.Mereghetti - Simbol-X: The hard X-ray Universe in focus - Bologna -15/5/20071 Studying the Galactic Ridge Emission with SIMBOL-X Sandro Mereghetti IASF.
The HEROES Balloon- borne Hard X-ray Telescope Colleen A. Wilson-Hodge, J. Gaskin, S. Christe, A. Shih, K. Kilaru, D.A. Swartz, A. F. Tennant, B. Ramsey.
Multilayer Overview Current application Optimization of Multilayers Model Designs for GRI.
Astro-E2 and Japanese future space programs for high energy astrophysics Astro-E2 NeXT XEUS Small satellite programs Tadayasu Dotani (ISAS)
Pair Spectrometer Design Optimization Pair Spectrometer Design Optimization A. Somov, Jefferson Lab GlueX Collaboration Meeting September
LXO/MagEX Meeting Greenbelt, 24/10/07 Telescope Baseline Configuration: Imaging Capability (Micropore Optic) Telescope Field of View ~ 30° x 30° Angular.
Stefan Hild and Andreas Freise University of Birmingham Advanced Virgo telecon, June 2008 Beam sizes and mirror curvatures for Advanced Virgo.
High energy perspectives (and conclusions) Philippe Ferrando APC Laboratory (UMR 7164) - Service d’Astrophysique CEA/Saclay APC Conference High Energy.
On-Orbit Adjustment Calculation for the Generation-X X-ray mirror Figure D. A. Schwartz, R. J. Brissenden, M. Elvis, G. Fabbiano, D. Jerius, M. Juda, P.
G. Tagliaferri, D. Spiga, G. Pareschi, et al.
Generation-X telescope: Measurement of On-Orbit Adjustment Data Dan Schwartz, R. J. Brissenden, M. Elvis, G. Fabbiano, T. Gaetz, D. Jerius, M. Juda, P.
 Design  Manufacturing  Recent X-Ray tests  Status Vadim Burwitz, Peter Friedrich on behalf of the eROSITA team.
Shu Zhang (on behalf of the HXMT team) Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Science The current status of HXMT and its calibrations.
Optical characteristics of the EUV spectrometer for the normal-incidence region L. Poletto, G. Tondello Istituto Nazionale per la Fisica della Materia.
Grazing-incidence design and others L. Poletto Istituto Nazionale per la Fisica della Materia (INFM) Department of Electronics and Informatics - Padova.
Optical characteristics of the EUV spectrometer (EUS) for SOLO L. Poletto, G. Tondello Istituto Nazionale per la Fisica della Materia (INFM) Department.
Rotating Coils - Giordana Severino – Rotating Coils PACMAN meeting Printed Circuit Coils – Future developments.
X-ray Timing and Polarization mission & instrumentation DONG Yongwei Center for Particle Astrophysics Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy.
Effective lens aperture Deff
WFXT optics: design optimization and development Giovanni Pareschi 1 JKCS041:, z = 1.8, Andreon et al., 2009.
Optics for Wide Field X-ray Imaging
The Hard X-ray Modulation Telescope Mission
Laue lenses for hard X-rays (> 60 keV) F. Frontera and A. Pisa on behalf of a Large Collaboration Rome, 18 March 2005.
Scientific objectives for XEUS: Galaxies Groups and Clusters at z~2 Study of the Evolution of clusters in the mass range kT > 2 keV up to z=2. Dynamics,
1. Two long straight wires carry identical currents in opposite directions, as shown. At the point labeled A, is the direction of the magnetic field left,
SPIE Optics for EUV, X-Ray, and Gamma-Ray Astronomy VI
Gamma-Ray Bursts observed with INTEGRAL and XMM- Newton Sinead McGlynn School of Physics University College Dublin.
Hard X and Gamma-ray Polarization: the ultimate dimension (ESA Cosmic Vision ) or the Compton Scattering polarimetery challenges Ezio Caroli,
X-ray Instruments Development of precision hard X-ray multilayer optics with sub-arcminute performance Optics Assembly Approach Graphite spacers are epoxied.
The GRI Multilayer Telescope and Laue Lens - performance calculations Niels Lund Danish National Space Center.
Hard X-ray Polarimeter for Small Satellite Design, Feasibility Study, and Ground Experiments K. Hayashida (Osaka University), T. Mihara (RIKEN), S. Gunji,
The mission Simbol-X : the hard X-ray universe in focusMay 14, 2007 Simbol-X the hard X–ray Universe in focus 0.5 – 80 keV formation flight Philippe Ferrando.
High resolution X-ray analysis of a proximal human femur with synchrotron radiation and an innovative linear detector M.Bettuzzi, R. Brancaccio, F.Casali,
1 Development of Light Weight Replicated Integral Optics: An Innovative Approach Suzanne Romaine (SAO) R. Bruni, P. Gorenstein, R. Rosati (SAO) B. Ramsey.
CLAS12-RICH Mechanical Design Status-Report CLAS12 RICH Review September 5-6 th 2013 S. Tomassini, D. Orecchini1 D. Orecchini, S. Tomassini.
What does mean neighbours ? At the same epoch –simultaneous (transient phenomenae) –before (can affect the SIMBOL-X observing plan) –after (can complement.
Silicon Optics for Wide Field X-ray Imaging Dick Willingale et al. – SPIE August 2013 Silicon Optics for Wide Field X-ray Imaging Dick Willingale University.
N A S A G O D D A R D S P A C E F L I G H T C E N T E R I n t e g r a t e d D e s i g n C a p a b i l i t y / I n s t r u m e n t S y n t h e s i s & A.
Optical characteristics of the EUV spectrometer for the grazing-incidence region L. Poletto, G. Tondello Istituto Nazionale per la Fisica della Materia.
Simbol X: A New Generation Soft/Hard X-ray Telescope P. Slane, S. Romaine, S.S. Murray, R. Brissenden, M. Elvis, P.Gorenstein, E. Mattison, S. Steel (SAO),
14FEB2005/KWCAE2-UsersGroup Astro-E2 X-Ray Telescopes XRT Setup & Structure Performance Characteristics –Effective Area –Angular Resolution –Optical Axes.
Hard X-ray Telescope for the FFAST project 1. The FFAST project Hironori Matsumoto (Nagoya University) Miyata, Y., Furuzawa, A., Kunieda, H. (Nagoya Univ.),
Finding Black Hole Systems in Nearby Galaxies With Simbol-X Paul Gorenstein Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics.
Jan. 18, 2008 Hall C Meeting L. Yuan/Hampton U.. Outline HKS experimental goals HKS experimental setup Issues on spectrometer system calibration Calibration.
P. Friedrich, H. Bräuninger Extrapolation of the electroforming replication technique as it has been successfully applied to the XMM-Newton mirror systems.
Sorry for not being able to attend!. 2 The NHXM consortium Hardware team Denmark: National Space Institute, Technical University of Denmark Finland: University.
NuSTAR, ITS BACKGROUND AND CLUSTERS OF GALAXIES FABIO GASTALDELLO INAF, IASF-Milano And The Galaxy Clusters NuSTAR Team.
Jason Koglin, APS/HEAD, April 2002 High Energy Focusing Telescope (HEFT) Caltech Space Radiation Laboratory Aleksey Bolotrikov, Hubert Chen, Walter R.
Workshop on X-Ray Mission Concepts Brian Ramsey 1, Kiranmayee Kilaru 2, Carolyn Atkins 3, Mikhail V. Gubarev 1, Jessica A. Gaskin 1, Steve O’Dell 1, Martin.
”Gamma-Ray Imager” - a mission idea for the next ESA call Niels Lund - for the GRI consortium.
Jason Koglin, SPIE, August 2002 Development and production of hard X-ray multilayer optics for HEFT Caltech Space Radiation Laboratory Hubert Chen, Fiona.
Zhanshan Wang Institute of Precision Optical Engineering (IPOE) School of Physics Science and Engineering Tongji University, Shanghai , China Soft.
Considerations on the possibility of Phase Contrast Mammography using ICS sources B. Golosio a, P. Delogu b, I. Zanette b, M. Carpinelli a, G. L. Masala.
DISPERSIVE POWER OF A GRATING Dispersive power of a grating is defined as the ratio of the difference in the angle of diffraction of any two neighbouring.
Workshop on X-ray Mission Architectural Concepts, Dec , 2011 Hard X-Ray Telescope Approved for public release, distribution unlimited A Hard X-Ray.
Søren Brandt & Margarita Hernanz On behalf of the WFM team Wide Field Monitor.
Il programma NHXM sviluppato dall'ASI Ing. Mauro Piermaria New Hard X-Ray Mission Workshop Nazionale 12 e 13 novembre 2009 – ASDC, Frascati.
Zhanshan Wang, Zhenxiang Shen, Qiushi Huang, ZhongZhang, Bin Ma Institute of Precision Optics and Engineering (IPOE), Tongji University Institute of Precision.
The PFA focal plane camera
Testing and Calibration at IHEP for eXTP (current plans and needed facilities) YuSa Wang
Detective Quantum Efficiency Preliminary Design Review
LITHOGRAPHY Lithography is the process of imprinting a geometric pattern from a mask onto a thin layer of material called a resist which is a radiation.
Presentation transcript:

“The SIMBOL-X optics”, Bologna, 14 May 2007 SIMBOL-X SIMBOL-X OPTICS SIMBOL-X OPTICS Giovanni Pareschi INAF - Osservatorio Astronomico di Brera Lower Spider Upper Spider Case Shell

“The SIMBOL-X optics”, Bologna, 14 May 2007 SIMBOL-X Poster presentation related to the SX optics implementation Basso et al., “The relation between the weight and the quality image in a X-ray telescope, with a particular regard to Simbol-X” Vernani, et al., “Feasibility study for the manufacturing of the multilayer x-ray optics for Simbol-X” Cotroneo et al, “Simbol-X mirror module design scientific optimization” Basso et al, “The problem of the calibration of SIMBOL-X X-ray telescope” Spiga et al., “ The scattering caused by microrougnhess in the Simbol-X multilayer coated optics” Romaine, et al, ”Multilayer coated hard X-ray mirrors based on Ni electroformed mirror shells”

“The SIMBOL-X optics”, Bologna, 14 May 2007 SIMBOL-X OUTLINE Designing of the Simbol-X optics The technology for the optics fabrication Remarks on the calibration issue

“The SIMBOL-X optics”, Bologna, 14 May 2007 SIMBOL-X Top-level scientific requirements Energy band:~0.5 – ≥ 80 keV Field of view (at 30 keV): ≥ 12’ (diameter) On-axis effective area: ≥ 100 cm 2 at 0.5 keV ≥ 1000 cm 2 at 2 keV ≥ 600 cm 2 at 8 keV ≥ 300 cm 2 at 30 keV ≥ 100 cm 2 at 70 keV ≥ 50 cm 2 at 80 keV (goal) Detectors background < 2  cts s -1 cm -2 keV -1 HED < 3  cts s -1 cm -2 keV -1 LED On-axis sensitivity ≤ c.g.s.(~0.5 µCrab), keV band, 3  1Ms, Line sensitivity at 68 keV < 3  ph cm -2 s -1 (3  1Ms) Angular resolution ≤ 20”(HPD), E < 30 keV ≤ E = 60 keV (goal) Spectral resolution E/  E = at 6-10 keV E/  E = 50 at 68 keV (goal) Absolute timing accuracy100 µs (50 µs goal) Absolute pointing reconstruction ~ 3  (radius, 90%) (2” goal) Mission duration 3 years including commissioning and calibrations (2 years of scientific program) + provision for a possible 2 year extension Total number of pointings > 1000 (first 3 years, nominal mission) 500 (during the possible 2 year mission extension)

“The SIMBOL-X optics”, Bologna, 14 May 2007 SIMBOL-X SX Flux Sensitivity

“The SIMBOL-X optics”, Bologna, 14 May 2007 SIMBOL-X Advantages of focusing optics versus direct-view detectors Moreover: much better imaging capabilities! B =background flux, T int = integration time,  E = integration bandwidth r HEW = FL * HEW [rad] HEW = Half Energy Width = circle where 50 % of focused photons is contained

“The SIMBOL-X optics”, Bologna, 14 May 2007 SIMBOL-X Angular resolution for past & future Hard X-ray Experiments ExperimentYear “Imaging” technique Angular resolution SAX-PDS1996Rocking collimator > 3600 arcsec (collimator pitch) INTEGRAL-IBIS2002Coded mask720 arcsec (mask pitch) HEFT (baloon)2005Multilayer optics> 90 arcsec HEW NEXT2013?Multilayer Optics arcsec HEW SIMBOL-X2013?Multilayer Optics arcsec HEW

“The SIMBOL-X optics”, Bologna, 14 May 2007 SIMBOL-X IMAGING (I) Osservazione XMM dello stesso campo tra 0.1 e 10 keV

“The SIMBOL-X optics”, Bologna, 14 May 2007 SIMBOL-X IMAGING (II) 1’  50” HPD; eq. 2  Crab 30”HPD  Eq.2  Crab 15”HPD  Eq.0.2  Crab 10’

“The SIMBOL-X optics”, Bologna, 14 May 2007 SIMBOL-X The focusing problem in the hard X-ray region (> 10 keV) but Wolter I geometry F = focal length R = reflectivity L = mirror height  = incidence angle A eff  F 2 x  c 2 x R 2 At photon energies > 10 keV the cut-off angles for total reflection are very small also for heavy metals  the geometrical areas with usual focal lengths (> 10 m) are in general negligible

“The SIMBOL-X optics”, Bologna, 14 May 2007 SIMBOL-X 0.6 o Focal Length Vs. Diameters for SIMBOL-X and other X-ray telescopes Multilayers A eff  F 2 x  c 2 x R 2 The Formation Flight architecture offers the opportunity to implement long FL telescopes!

“The SIMBOL-X optics”, Bologna, 14 May 2007 SIMBOL-X Design Constraints FOCAL LENGTH: ≥ 19 m (due to formation flight parameters) DETECTOR SIZE: 7 +/1 cm (Size of the LED wafer + lateral ditering) NUMBER OF MIRROR SHELLS: ≤ 100 MAXIMUM DIAMETER: 70 cm (i.e. as XMM) MINIMUM DIAMETER: ≥ 25 cm (to allow the multilayer deposition “post facto”) MASS TO AREA RATIO: a reliable number in line with angular resolution of at least 20 arcsec HEW MASS: not larger than 480 (TBD) including structure

“The SIMBOL-X optics”, Bologna, 14 May 2007 SIMBOL-X SIMBOL-X Baseline Design Baseline detector size

“The SIMBOL-X optics”, Bologna, 14 May 2007 SIMBOL-X Optics design Focal length : 20 m Shell diameters : 30 to 70 cm Shell thickness : 0.2 to 0.6 mm Number of shells : 100 Heritage from XMM–Newton : nickel shells obtained by electroforming replication method; low mass obtained via a reduced thickness of shells Coating : multi-layer Pt/C needed for requirement on large FOV and on sensitivity up to > 80 keV N.B. I: The optics module will have both sides covered with thermal blankets N.B. II: a proton diverter will be implemented

“The SIMBOL-X optics”, Bologna, 14 May 2007 SIMBOL-X Mirror shell production by Ni electroforming replication BeppoSAX Jet-X/Swift XMM-Newton ESA credits

“The SIMBOL-X optics”, Bologna, 14 May 2007 SIMBOL-X Existing Coating Facilities at INAF- OAB & Media Lario Techn.

“The SIMBOL-X optics”, Bologna, 14 May 2007 SIMBOL-X HPD = 15 arcsec Year: 1994 HPD = 15 arcsec Year: 1999 Thin JET-X shell : 25 arcsec Thickness Vs. Diameter trend for Ni- replicated optics

“The SIMBOL-X optics”, Bologna, 14 May 2007 SIMBOL-X Wall thickness/diameter trade-off A B XMM f=7.5 m JetX 1shell f=3.5m S M/A col computed rescaling to the correct focal length (20m) HEW M/A col 12” 25” Mass including structure ≈480 kg Radial force for a thin shell. Exponent ‘z’=3 R ww F Edge moment for a thin shell. Exponent ‘z’=1 Thicknesses ~ 2 times less than XMM

“The SIMBOL-X optics”, Bologna, 14 May 2007 SIMBOL-X Lower Spider Upper Spider Case Shell Section of the ring The use of stiffening rings for handling and integration of thin mirror shells

“The SIMBOL-X optics”, Bologna, 14 May 2007 SIMBOL-X Temporary spider must give stiffness to the upper side of the entire set of shells and must be removed after gluing of all the shells on the upper spider. Gluing of first set of DGC. Temporary IS can be used to apply control devises Removing of stiffening rings Positioning of second shell and gluing of second set of DGC Repeated for N shell IS DGC..... Gluing of N shells on the upper spider and removing all DGC Removing temporary IS Temporary spider Double grooves clips (DGC) Internal shaft (IS) Integration procedure

“The SIMBOL-X optics”, Bologna, 14 May 2007 SIMBOL-X Deposition of the multilayer film onto the internal surface of a replicated mirror shell (development activity carried out so far in collaboration with the Harvard-Smithsonian CfA)  particularly well suited for Simbol-X, since based on large diameter optics Pt C Multilayer deposition system

“The SIMBOL-X optics”, Bologna, 14 May 2007 SIMBOL-X Multilayer coated Ni mirror shells tested at Panter CREDITS: Panter/MPE

“The SIMBOL-X optics”, Bologna, 14 May 2007 SIMBOL-X The long focal length calibration issue Possible Simbol-X position in the Panter facility for calibrations * Simbol-X position Fraction of the measured EA in double reflection for different lengths of the X-ray facility (as source- detector distance) for Simbol-X. The PANTER facility case corresponds approximately to the red line case.

“The SIMBOL-X optics”, Bologna, 14 May 2007 SIMBOL-X Test of very long focal length optics ( m) in pencil beam setup with more than 1 shell Horizontal rotation correction Lateral correction FM WM Comparators used to monitor the optic position during the optic spinning Vertical tilt correction Axial spin Scheme of the manipulator: the possible movements/adjustments of the optical module are indicated

“The SIMBOL-X optics”, Bologna, 14 May 2007 SIMBOL-X Programmatic points By the end of the Phase a is planned to develope and calibrate a couple of multi-shell prototypes, caled down of a factor 2 wrt Simbol- X (Focal Length = 10 m, max diameter = 35 cm) It is planned the development of a diamond-turning facility for the madrel fabrication In Phase B a fully representative demonstrator will be developed and calibrated