Beam breakup and emittance growth in CLIC drive beam TW buncher Hamed Shaker School of Particles and Accelerators, IPM.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Accelerator Science and Technology Centre Prospects of Compact Crab Cavities for LHC Peter McIntosh LHC-CC Workshop, CERN 21 st August 2008.
Advertisements

Compact Linear Collider. Overview The aim of the CLIC study is to investigate the feasibility of a high luminosity linear e-/e+ collider with a centre.
Synchrotron Radiation What is it ? Rate of energy loss Longitudinal damping Transverse damping Quantum fluctuations Wigglers Rende Steerenberg (BE/OP)
M. LindroosNUFACT06 School Accelerator Physics Transverse motion Mats Lindroos.
SPACE CHARGE EFFECTS IN PHOTO-INJECTORS Massimo Ferrario INFN-LNF Madison, June 28 - July 2.
Longitudinal motion: The basic synchrotron equations. What is Transition ? RF systems. Motion of low & high energy particles. Acceleration. What are Adiabatic.
ABSTRACT The main accelerating structures for the CLIC are designed to operate at 100 MV/m accelerating gradient. The accelerating frequency has been optimised.
Wakefield suppression in the CLIC main accelerating structures Vasim Khan & Roger Jones.
ERHIC Main Linac Design E. Pozdeyev + eRHIC team BNL.
CLIC Drive Beam Injector Design Update Shahin Sanaye Hajari 1.Institute For Research in Fundamental Sciences (IPM), Tehran, Iran 2.CERN, Geneva, Switzerland.
Chapter 16 Waves (I) What determines the tones of strings on a guitar?
ABSTRACT The main accelerating structures for the CLIC are designed to operate at 100 MV/m accelerating gradient. The accelerating frequency has been optimised.
CLIC Drive Beam Linac Rolf Wegner. Outline Introduction: CLIC Drive Beam Concept Drive Beam Modules (modulator, klystron, accelerating structure) Optimisation.
Sub-Harmonic Buncher design for CLIC Drive Beam Injector Hamed Shaker School of Particles and Accelerators Institute for Research in Fundamental Sciences,
RF particle acceleration Kyrre N. Sjøbæk * FYS 4550 / FYS 9550 – Experimental high energy physics University of Oslo, 26/9/2013 *k.n.sjobak(at)fys.uio.no.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, N.Kazarinov.
Drive Beam Linac Stability Issues Avni AKSOY Ankara University.
Preliminary design of SPPC RF system Jianping DAI 2015/09/11 The CEPC-SppC Study Group Meeting, Sept. 11~12, IHEP.
Alessandra Lombardi BE/ ABP CERN
Update of 3.2 km ILC DR design (DMC3) Dou Wang, Jie Gao, Gang Xu, Yiwei Wang (IHEP) IWLC2010 Monday 18 October - Friday 22 October 2010 Geneva, Switzerland.
CLIC RF manipulation for positron at CLIC Scenarios studies on hybrid source Freddy Poirier 12/08/2010.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, A.Drozhdin, N.Kazarinov.
1 EPIC SIMULATIONS V.S. Morozov, Y.S. Derbenev Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility A. Afanasev Hampton University R.P. Johnson Muons, Inc. Operated.
The CLIC decelerator Instrumentation issues – a first look E. Adli, CERN AB/ABP / UiO October 17, 2007.
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy Containing a.
CLIC Drive Beam Injector Bunching System Sh. Sanaye H. 1,2, S. Doebert 2, S. H. Shaker 1,2 1.Institute For Research in Fundamental Science (IPM), Tehran,
Chapter 16 Waves-I Types of Waves 1.Mechanical waves. These waves have two central features: They are governed by Newton’s laws, and they can exist.
Aaron Farricker 107/07/2014Aaron Farricker Beam Dynamics in the ESS Linac Under the Influence of Monopole and Dipole HOMs.
Module 5 A quick overview of beam dynamics in linear accelerators
POWER REQUIREMENTS FOR THE LHC HARMONIC CAVITIES WITH THE FULL-DETUNING SCHEME P. Baudrenghien, T. Mastoridis, CERN BE-RF 2nd LHC Harmonic Cavity meeting,
P I T Z Photo Injector Test Facility Zeuthen Design consideration of the RF deflector to optimize the photo injector at PITZ S.Korepanov.
July LEReC Review July 2014 Low Energy RHIC electron Cooling Jorg Kewisch, Dmitri Kayran Electron Beam Transport and System specifications.
The Introduction to CSNS Accelerators Oct. 5, 2010 Sheng Wang AP group, Accelerator Centre,IHEP, CAS.
Principals of fast injection and extraction R. Apsimon.
TESLA DAMPING RING RF DEFLECTORS DESIGN F.Marcellini & D. Alesini.
S. Bettoni, R. Corsini, A. Vivoli (CERN) CLIC drive beam injector design.
Marcel Schuh CERN-BE-RF-LR CH-1211 Genève 23, Switzerland 3rd SPL Collaboration Meeting at CERN on November 11-13, 2009 Higher.
Accelerating structure prototypes for 2011 (proposal) A.Grudiev 6/07/11.
Lecture 4 Longitudinal Dynamics I Professor Emmanuel Tsesmelis Directorate Office, CERN Department of Physics, University of Oxford ACAS School for Accelerator.
Parameter scan for the CLIC damping rings July 23rd, 2008 Y. Papaphilippou Thanks to H. Braun, M. Korostelev and D. Schulte.
C/S band RF deflector for post interaction longitudinal phase space optimization (D. Alesini)
Aaron Farricker 107/07/2014Aaron Farricker Beam Dynamics in the ESS Linac Under the Influence of Monopole and Dipole HOMs.
Progress Report on the Ultra-fast Harmonic Kicker Cavity Design and Beam Dynamic Simulation Yulu Huang 1,2 H. Wang 1, R. A. Rimmer 1, S. Wang 1 1.Thomas.
Status of the sub-harmonic bunching system for the CLIC DB injector front end Hamed Shaker School of Particles and Accelerators, Institute for Research.
Injection scheme for ultimate storage ring with double RF system Bocheng Jiang SSRF AP group SINAP. CAS LOWεRING 2014.
One More RFQ Design Renewal ANL Design. Several MHz RFQ Designs ANL-1LBNL-1LBNL-2ANL-2aANL-2b Vane modulation typeSinusoidal Sinusoidal +
A. Aksoy Beam Dynamics Studies for the CLIC Drive Beam Accelerator A. AKSOY CONTENS ● Basic Lattice Sketches ● Accelerating structure ● Short and long.
S.M. Polozov & Ko., NRNU MEPhI
BEAM TRANSFER CHANNELS, INJECTION AND EXTRACTION SYSTEMS
RF-kick in the CLIC accelerating structures
Loss of Landau damping for reactive impedance and a double RF system
CEPC APDR Study Zhenchao LIU
Positron capture section studies for CLIC Hybrid source - baseline
Parametric Resonance Ionization Cooling of Muons
Higher Order Modes and Beam Dynamics at ESS
Primary estimation of CEPC beam dilution and beam halo
Electron Cooling Simulation For JLEIC
Physics design on Injector-1 RFQ
Developments on Proposed
Update of CLIC accelerating structure design
Overview Multi Bunch Beam Dynamics at XFEL
The new 7BA design of BAPS
CEPC Main Ring Cavity Design with HOM Couplers
MEBT1&2 design study for C-ADS
Physics Design on Injector I
PEPX-type BAPS Lattice Design and Beam Dynamics Optimization
CLIC Power Extraction and Transfer structure (PETS)
Evgenij Kot XFEL beam dynamics meeting,
Fanglei Lin JLEIC R&D Meeting, August 4, 2016
3.2 km FODO lattice for 10 Hz operation (DMC4)
Presentation transcript:

Beam breakup and emittance growth in CLIC drive beam TW buncher Hamed Shaker School of Particles and Accelerators, IPM

Drive Beam Front-End layout TW buncher consists of 18 cells including coupler cells. These cells are designed to have the same resonant frequency for the fundamental mode (First monopole mode) at the phase advance of 120 degrees. But because of non-equal cell lengths, beam aperture radius and cell radius, the other modes (monopoles, dipoles, quadrupoles and …) have not the same resonant frequency for the synchronous case – when the phase velocity equals to the beam average velocity- and briefly we say they are detuned.

Cells properties from the beam dynamic study done by Shahin

3.Travelling wave tapered buncher 11 3.Travelling wave tapered buncher 3.1 Longitudinal dynamics in TW buncher Borrowed from Shahin

Phase velocity correction based on the fundamental mode reactive beam loading A correction is required based on the reactive beam loading of the fundamental mode. This effect is emerged because of the off-crest beam bunch traveling the its high current (5A)*. * General Beam Loading Compensation in a Traveling Wave Structure”, H. Shaker et al., IPAC13

First dipole mode For the dipole modes, the first one is dominated and the other dipole modes loss factors are at least two orders less in magnitude. The known effect of beam breakup and transverse emittance growth are due to this mode. This figure shows the first dipole mode dispersion diagram of all cells except coupler cells if we assume we have a periodic structure from each cell and the cross line represents the synchronous modes.

Beam Breakup types Regenerative beam breakup: The separation between different cell modes shows that the induced modes in each cell are stayed mostly in the same cell and don’t propagate in neighbour cells. An important conclusion comes from this result is that we have not the regenerative beam breakup which the induced modes propagate back to add up kicking. Multi structure beam breakup: Multi structure beam breakup is seen in structures that has the order of few hundred meters length and the resonant frequency of first dipole mode is very close to 1.5 times of the fundamental mode and is very close to the bunch harmonic frequency. Then for our structure with about 1.5m length this effect should be so small. Also we have solenoids around the structure and it help us to suppress a small effect of this deflecting.

Calculating the momentum kick The momentum kick is calculated by Panofsky-Wenzel and is proportional to radial gradient of longitudinal electric field with 90 degrees out of the phase. This equation is valid if the relative velocity change during each cell is so small. The last form in above equation shows the momentum kick close to the axis. q is the bunch charge, ω is the angular frequency of the mode, r is the offset, a is the cell beam aperture radius and V max is the maximum efficient voltage of the mode at offset r.

Calculating the momentum kick - 2 There is just one correction by parameters F that is bunch form factor. This correction is showed how far the bunch from the point-like charge is and for our case is close to 1. This equation shows the transverse velocity change and also told us a test bunch just behind a leading bunch experiences a positive deflection because of its induced dipole mode and it becomes maximum when the phase difference is 90 degrees and the leading bunch itself, don’t experience a kick from the induced mode by itself. Cell Number loss factor/r^2 (V/pC/m^2) f d (Ghz)phase velocity/cL(mm) Bunch Form Factor Q0 Imag (V max /V 0 ) Maximum Transverse Velocity change (m/s)

Accumulation of momentum kicks in a bunch train V0V0V0V0 V max δ V lim V 0 is the induced longitudinal voltage by one bunch and is a representative phasor that its imaginary part is proportional to momentum kick. The accumulation started to oscillates between 0 and V max and damps gently to V lim because of power loss on the surface. f d is the resonant frequency of first dipole mode as mentioned in the table and f 0 =999.5 MHz is the frequency of fundamental mode. This equation shows an interesting result that the final kick is half of the maximum kick when Q 0 is large enough and the limiting phasor points to the centre of the circle build from the phasors.

Kick tracking in the bunch train - 1 We assume the initial offset equal to 1mm and the initial transverse velocity equal to zero and we assume there is no solenoid. These two figures shows the final transverse velocity and offset at the end of the structure by time.

Kick tracking in the bunch train - 2 For our case because during a pulse with 140µs length, we have sub-pulses with about 240ns length and 180 degrees phase difference with their neighbours, the steady state doesn’t happen but still the total momentum kick is so small and as the result, no BBU will be happened.

Emittance Growth By looking to the envelope equation terms we found the dipole mode kick is at least one order less than the fundamental mode kicking and also the fundamental mode kicking is so smaller than the space-charge deflecting then the radius could be kept constant by solenoids. To find the emittance growth, we should mention for a zero-length bunch the emittance growth is zero because all bunch kicks together equally. For a finite-length bunch, each part of bunch kicks differently based on its related longitudinal position. The rms emittance is 24.8 mm.mrad at the entrance of the TW buncher. The mentioned tracking code shows the head, tail momentum change is and mrad, respectively. Then by calculating the new emittance, we found the emittance change is less than mm.mrad (-0.04%) that is completely negligible. This figure shows the relative contribution of each defocusing term in the envelope equation for a target beam size of 2 mm. The solid line is the relative contribution of the space-charge term, (K/4x r )/Σ, the dashed line is same for the emittance term, (ε r 2 /x r 3 )/Σ, and the dotted one for the RF defocusing term, (k RF x r )/Σ. Σ is equal to k RF x r + K/4x r + ε r 2 /x r 3.

Thanks for your attention