Title I, Part A COMPARABILITY. What is the purpose of Comparability? To ensure that participating Title I schools receive the same level of services from.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NCLB Title I Comparability Paul Williams Principal Consultant ISBE September 2011.
Advertisements

Title IA Fiscal Issues Jackie Godbout Title IA Program Consultant
(Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act) and
Additional flexibility for districts Changes in time and effort reporting.
Coordinating Equitable Services for Private Schools Christine T. Miller Red Clay Consolidated School District December 7, 2010 DSU – Martin Luther King.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction California Department of Education Special Education Self-
1 Title I Comparability Requirement Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction.
Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction  Federal law requires DPI to monitor programming and implementation of the ESEA requirements, Title specific.
1 TITLE I COMPARABILITY – Determinations & Reporting Thomas Chin October 5, 2010.
1 The Federal No Child Left Behind Act and the Financial Impact on Manchester Public Schools Fiscal Year
 Review the various resource materials available for staff and federal program coordinators regarding administering and implementing federal programs.
COMPARABILITY November 5, :00 p.m. Webinar Session Jackie Godbout Maine Department of Education This webinar will be recorded. Enter your.
(Formerly Known as Fiscal Fun) ESEA Odyssey 2014.
1 FY11 Title I Common Program Review Findings Julia Foodman & Matthew Nixon Title I Technical Assistance & Networking Session May 23, 2011.
2014 Corrective Action Matrix for 2014 audit findings January 13, 2015.
ESEA and Private Schools’ Participation Federal Program Directors’ Conference Waterfront Place Hotel, Morgantown March 13, 2013.
Initial Compliance Reviews (ICRs) Didi Garcia Texas Education Agency Division of Federal and State Education Policy.
Maintenance of Effort, Comparability, and Supplement/Supplant PAFPC April 2011.
Title I Technical Assistance Training Federal and State Programs.
Demonstrating Comparability School Year October 2014October 2014.
1 Title IA Coordinator Online Training Targeted Assistance Schools
FY12 Title I Common Program Review Findings Title I Technical Assistance Session May 11, 2012.
COMPARABILITY Monday, November 19, 2012 Webinar Session Jackie Godbout Maine Department of Education This webinar will be recorded. Mute your.
Title I, Part A Fiscal Requirements for Comparability FY Oklahoma State Department of Education Office of Title I, IIA, VI, & X December 2012.
TITLE I FISCAL ISSUES. FEDERAL PROGRAMS FUNDING ISSUES Supplement not Supplant Maintenance of Effort Comparability Time and Effort 100% Certifications.
Tell your story using numbers and words Susan Andre, Title I Coordinator East Baton Rouge Parish School System.
Excess Costs IDEA-B Requirement Texas Education Agency (TEA)
Title Grants Division Illinois State Board of Education 1 NCLB TITLE GRANT MANAGEMENT ISBE Illinois Association of Title I Directors Annual Fall Conference.
Tell your story using numbers and words Susan Andre, Title I Coordinator East Baton Rouge Parish School System.
FISCAL MONITORING OBJECTIVES:  To provide a clearer understanding of the monitoring process;  To provide further guidance for documentation needed for.
Karen Seay PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT 101 – Writing a compliant policy and compact We’re all in this together:  State Department of Education 
Categorical Program Monitoring Los Angeles Unified School District.
TITLE I COMPARABILITY Determinations & Reporting Title I Technical Assistance Session School Improvement Grant Programs October 6, 2011.
Consolidated Funding ApplicationConsolidated Funding Application ESEA Directors InstituteESEA Directors Institute October 6-9, 2014October 6-9, 2014.
Fiscal Considerations Spring 2006 NCLB Regional Workshops.
Title I, Part A Improving Basic Programs Program Requirements and Guidelines.
CIP UPDATES Sec. VI Parental Involvement Paula Reese Division of Federal and Special Programs Mobile County Public School System.
No Child Left Behind Application Title I, Part A Part 2.
TITLE I, PART A ESEA ROLLOUT SPRING 2013 Version Title I, Part A Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction.
Presented by: Jan Stanley, State Title I Director Office of Assessment and Accountability June 10, 2008 Monitoring For Results.
1 Title IA Coordinator Online Training Targeted Assistance Schools
Oklahoma State Department of Education Janet Barresi State Superintendent of Public Instruction Consolidated Schoolwide Funds.
1 Title IA Coordinator Training Preparing for Title IA Monitoring
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
Coordinating Nonpublic School Services Jack Clark Allentown City School District Cindy Rhoads Regional Coordinator, DFP.
ESEA FOR LEAs Cycle 6 Monitoring Arizona Department of Education Revised October 2015.
Title I Part A: Back to Basics ESEA Odyssey Fall 2010.
Presented By WVDE Title I Staff June 10, Fiscal Issues Maintain an updated inventory list, including the following information: description of.
ESEA FOR LEAs Cycle 3 Monitoring Arizona Department of Education Revised October 2015.
SUPPLEMENT, NOT SUPPLANT SUPPLEMENT, NOT SUPPLANT TESTS District Level: Maintenance of Effort School Level: Comparability of Services Child Level: Educational.
Private School Participation Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) Reauthorized by the “No Child Left Behind” Act of Public Law
1 Title I Part A Fiscal Requirements Section 1120A Title I/Federal Programs Spring Conference 2010 Participants, Ohio Department of Education Ed Peltz,
Federal Programs Academy January ……just an fyi  NO WORD on 21 st Century Community Learning Centers Awards!  Keystones to Opportunities pre-application.
Division of Federal Fiscal Compliance and Reporting Title I, Part A – Comparability of Services Training Module Completing the Comparability Computation.
Pat T. Flora, Education Associate Office of Career and Technology Education October 21, 2015.
PAPFC Annual Conference May 3-6, 2015 Presented By: Cindy Rhoads Division of Federal Programs Pennsylvania Department of Education.
Changes to the eGrants system 2017
TITLE I FISCAL ISSUES.
Excess Costs IDEA-B Requirement
The Federal programs department September 26, 2017
Excess Costs IDEA-B Requirement
Changes in time and effort reporting
Title I A Comparability Report
Title I, Part A - Parent & Family Engagement Compliance Monitoring Review Training The Federal Programs Department September 26, 2018.
ESEA Consolidated Monitoring
Supplement Not Supplant Under Essa
Universal Review: Fiscal Requirements
2019 Spring & Fall Timeline May 10, 2019
Maintenance of Effort, Comparability & Supplement, Not Supplant
Presentation transcript:

Title I, Part A COMPARABILITY

What is the purpose of Comparability? To ensure that participating Title I schools receive the same level of services from state and local funds as other non-Title I schools. To ensure that participating Title I schools receive the same level of services from state and local funds as other non-Title I schools.

How often should Comparability be monitored? An LEA must develop and implement procedures for compliance yearly. An LEA must develop and implement procedures for compliance yearly. An LEA must also file with PDE yearly. An LEA must also file with PDE yearly.

Meeting Comparability Requirements An LEA will meet Comparability requirements if it has submitted a written Comparability Assurances Form (PDE 3537) to DFP by November 15 th that verifies one of the following… An LEA will meet Comparability requirements if it has submitted a written Comparability Assurances Form (PDE 3537) to DFP by November 15 th that verifies one of the following…

Option #1 An LEA will meet Comparability requirements if it has indicated on the CAF that it has established and implemented a: An LEA will meet Comparability requirements if it has indicated on the CAF that it has established and implemented a: - District-wide salary schedule - District-wide salary schedule - Policy to ensure equivalence among schools with regard to staff - Policy to ensure equivalence among schools with regard to staff - Policy to ensure equivalence in curriculum materials and instructional supplies - Policy to ensure equivalence in curriculum materials and instructional supplies

Option #2 You may indicate on the Comparability Assurances Form that your LEA is exempt from Comparability requirements because it does not have more than one building per grade span. You may indicate on the Comparability Assurances Form that your LEA is exempt from Comparability requirements because it does not have more than one building per grade span. If you select this option you do not need to complete the Detailed School Data Sheet; but you must submit the CAF to DFP. If you select this option you do not need to complete the Detailed School Data Sheet; but you must submit the CAF to DFP.

Option #3 You may indicate on the CAF that your LEA does not meet the first two criteria and you have documented a comparable staff to pupil ratio in the district. You may indicate on the CAF that your LEA does not meet the first two criteria and you have documented a comparable staff to pupil ratio in the district. You must maintain this documentation at the district level, and you must submit the CAF to DFP. You must maintain this documentation at the district level, and you must submit the CAF to DFP.

Detailed School Data Sheet Detailed School Data Sheet This sheet is used to document equivalency among staff and must be maintained in LEA files, and is required if option #1 or #3 is selected on the CAF. This sheet is used to document equivalency among staff and must be maintained in LEA files, and is required if option #1 or #3 is selected on the CAF. An LEA may determine Comparability on a district-wide basis or on a grade-span basis. An LEA may determine Comparability on a district-wide basis or on a grade-span basis.

Detailed School Data Sheet For Comparability purposes, there are 3 classes of instructional staff… For Comparability purposes, there are 3 classes of instructional staff… - Direct Instruction - Direct Instruction -Administrative/Instructional Support -Administrative/Instructional Support -Auxiliary Staff -Auxiliary Staff Don’t forget…you are including FTE staff that are not federally paid. Don’t forget…you are including FTE staff that are not federally paid. FTE staff – Full-Time Equivalent staff FTE staff – Full-Time Equivalent staff

Detailed School Data Sheet Three comparison methods can be used when completing this form: Three comparison methods can be used when completing this form: 1) Non - Project Schools 1) Non - Project Schools 2)Project Schools 2)Project Schools 3)Size Split 3)Size Split Title I schools are equal to or greater than the staff to pupil ratios in the Non-Title I schools. Title I schools are equal to or greater than the staff to pupil ratios in the Non-Title I schools.

Summary Establish and implement policies that assure both Title I and non-Title I schools are providing comparable services to students. Establish and implement policies that assure both Title I and non-Title I schools are providing comparable services to students. Complete the Detailed School Data Sheet on E-Grants. Complete the Detailed School Data Sheet on E-Grants. Print off the Comparability Assurance Form, signed by the Superintendent, Business Manager, and Title I Coordinator. Send/Fax it to DFP by November 15th of each year. Print off the Comparability Assurance Form, signed by the Superintendent, Business Manager, and Title I Coordinator. Send/Fax it to DFP by November 15th of each year. A copy of this completed form must be maintained in your district files. A copy of this completed form must be maintained in your district files. NCLB Reauthorization: state and local funds for teacher salaries in Title I schools no less than 95% of that in non-Title I schools. NCLB Reauthorization: state and local funds for teacher salaries in Title I schools no less than 95% of that in non-Title I schools.

Additional Resources -USDE Non-Regulatory Guidance Title I Fiscal Issues on Comparability -USDE Non-Regulatory Guidance Title I Fiscal Issues on Comparability -Thompson’s Title I Monitor, March Thompson’s Title I Monitor, March OMB Circular A-133 -OMB Circular A-133