1 Eco 100 Lecture 7-2 Feb18, 2009 Intro to Regulation: Overview, Goals, History.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Antitrust Policy and Regulation Chapter 18 McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Advertisements

Regulation and Antitrust Law
Chapter 10 Market Power: Monopoly. ©2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 102 Review of Perfect Competition P = LMC = LRAC Normal profits or zero economic.
IMPERFECT COMPETITION MONOPOLY. GENERAL DESCRIPTION firm produces differentiated products  firm can set its price by itself, the imperfect competitor.
Lesson 9-1 Market Structure – Market structures are a way to categorize businesses by the amount of competition they face. – Four basic market structures.
Ch. 18: Antitrust Policy and Regulation 1 Graphs and Tables Copyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Understanding Monopoly 10. Natural Barriers to Entry Economies of scale –“Bigger is better” (more cost-efficient) –This is due to the ATC being downward-
ECON 202: Principles of Microeconomics Review Session for Exam 3 Chapters
© 2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Economics R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O’Brien—1 st ed. c h a p t e r fourteen Prepared by: Fernando & Yvonn.
Perfect Competition: 9.1. Market Structure: -In this chapter, you will learn that businesses are categorized by market structure. -Market Structure: amount.
Antitrust policy Ch17. Government roles to support a modern domestic economy 1- maintain efficiency (prevent excessive abuse of market power.) 2- promote.
Monopoly Monopoly and perfect competition. Profit maximization by a monopolist. Inefficiency of a monopoly. Why do monopolies occur? Natural Monopolies.
Chapter 15 Economic Regulation and Antitrust Policy © 2009 South-Western/ Cengage Learning.
© 2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Economics R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O’Brien, 2e. Fernando & Yvonn Quijano Prepared by: Chapter 14 Monopoly.
Antitrust Policy and Regulation Chapter 18 McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
When you have completed your study of this chapter, you will be able to C H A P T E R C H E C K L I S T Explain the effects of regulation of natural monopoly.
Antitrust, Regulation, and Deregulation
The General Rationale for Government Intervention: Deadweight Loss from Monopoly.
Explorations in Economics
More Economics of Competition and Competitive Strategies
1 Antitrust and Regulation Key Concepts Key Concepts Summary Summary ©2005 South-Western College Publishing.
Antitrust, Regulation, and Deregulation
Regulation and Deregulation Today. Promoting Competition The forces of the marketplace generally keep business competitive with on another and attentive.
1 Econ 201 Winter 2011 Market Failure: Anti-Competitive Behavior.
Antitrust, Regulation, and Deregulation. The Government’s Role in Promoting Efficiency What is the role of government in promoting economic efficiency.
Chapter Twelve Antitrust Policy and Regulation. Copyright © by Houghton Mifflin Company, Inc. All rights reserved Antitrust Policy Antitrust Policy:
Antitrust Policy and Regulation ECO 2023 Chapter 18 Fall 2007.
19 McGraw-Hill/IrwinCopyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.. Antitrust Policy and Regulation.
When you have completed your study of this chapter, you will be able to C H A P T E R C H E C K L I S T Explain the effects of regulation of natural monopoly.
 How firms compete Easy as PIE: Presenting in English 09/03/2011.
Chapter 10 Market Power: Monopoly Market Power: Monopoly.
Antitrust Policy and Regulation Chapter 18 McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Antitrust Policy and Regulation Chapter 19 Copyright © 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior.
18. Antitrust Policy and Regulation McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
COMPETITION & REGULATORY AGENCIES Types of Competition Mergers Government Regulation Anti-Trust Legislation Federal Regulatory Agencies.
Antitrust, Regulation, and Deregulation. The Government’s Role in Promoting Efficiency Studied the effects of the various market structures and government.
Chapter 15Copyright ©2009 by South-Western, a division of Cengage Learning. All rights reserved 1 ECON Designed by Amy McGuire, B-books, Ltd. McEachern.
TYPES OF COMPETITION Perfect Competition – a large number of companies all producing essentially the same product. No company has any control over price.
© 2009 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Essentials of Economics Hubbard/O’Brien, 2e. Fernando & Yvonn Quijano Prepared by: Chapter 9 Monopoly and Antitrust.
1 Econ 201 Lecture 7.2 Summer 2009 Regulation: Anit-Competitive Behavior.
1 Econ 201 Lecture 9.2 Intro to Regulation: Overview, Goals, History
ECON 100 Mar 10, 2008 Mergers, Natural Monopolies and Deregulation.
© 2009 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Essentials of Economics Hubbard/O’Brien, 2e. Fernando & Yvonn Quijano Prepared by: Chapter 9 Monopoly and Antitrust.
1 Eco 100 Lecture 7-3 Feb 20, 2009 Regulation: Monopoly, Cartels and Mergers.
Chapter 24 Antitrust Policy and Regulation. Antitrust History Post Civil War “trusts” were formed (oil, railroads) to monopolize. Regulatory agencies.
1 Econ 201 Regulation: Anit-Competitive Behavior.
1 Economic Regulation and Antitrust Policy Chapter 15 © 2006 Thomson/South-Western.
Microeconomics ECON 2302 May 2009 Marilyn Spencer, Ph.D. Professor of Economics Chapter 14.
1 ECONOMICS 200 PRINCIPLES OF MICROECONOMICS Professor Lucia F. Dunn Department of Economics.
1 Econ 201 Lecture 9.2 Intro to Regulation: Overview, Goals, History
Anti-Competitive Behavior Monopolies, Barriers to Entry and How to Construct Them.
Perfect Competition and Monopoly. Alternative Market Structures.
COMPETITION & REGULATORY AGENCIES Types of Competition Mergers Government Regulation Anti-Trust Legislation Federal Regulatory Agencies.
1 Econ 102 Spring 2010 Regulation: Anti-Competitive Behavior.
1 Econ 201 Regulation: Anit-Competitive Behavior.
18. Antitrust Policy and Regulation McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Anti-Competitive Behavior
Chapter 15 Professor Yuna Chen
Unit 3b- Imperfect Competition
Antitrust Policy and Regulation
Time Warner Rules Manhattan
Economic Regulation and Antitrust Policy
Public Policy to Promote Competition
Chapter 13 Antitrust and Regulation
Perfect Competition and Monopoly
Regulation: Anit-Competitive Behavior
COMPETITION & REGULATORY AGENCIES
Economic Regulation and Antitrust Policy
Market Structure.
Monopoly.
Presentation transcript:

1 Eco 100 Lecture 7-2 Feb18, 2009 Intro to Regulation: Overview, Goals, History

2 Government Regulation Major categories –Anti-competitive behavior Price Discrimination Collusion Mergers/acquisitions –Deregulation –Natural Monopolies Regulatory solutions Deregulating where economies of scale no longer exist Managed competition –Externalities Pollution Fishing, forestry, mining, oil drilling

3 Government Regulation Tools available –Statutory Prohibitive –E.g. Price fixing/restricting output, cartels, collusive behavior Fines, breakup (divestiture) –Deregulation Removing regulation –Airlines, Banking Incentive mechanisms –Managed competition –Incentive design –Taxes, subsidies and tradable permits (property rights)

4 Promoting Efficiency Goals of regulation –Efficiency in Production Produce at least cost –Efficiency in Allocation Value consumers place on goods = opportunity costs of resources used –Promote Technological Innovation Regulatory incentives should promote, or at least not discourage, development and adoption of new cost saving technology

5 Efficiency in Production Produce Goods at Least Cost –Firms to operate at the minimum of their Long Run Average Cost Curve

6 Efficiency in Allocation Marginal value consumers place on last (marginal unit) produced to equal the resource “opportunity” costs –MV = MC at the marginal unit

7 Promote Technological Innovation Ensure regulatory design promotes rate of technical change similar to perfect competition –Technologically neutral, e.g. wireless, landline, cable Doesn’t inhibit technological change

8 Government Regulatory Agencies Administrative Agencies Federal Trade Commission (1914) Act –“empowered to pursue abuses of trade that could lessen competition” Department of Justice (DOJ) –Jointly charged with FTC for overseeing and enforcing antitrust policy –Established by the Judiciary Act of 1789 –1870 Act: handle the legal business of the United States. –control over all criminal prosecutions and civil suits in which the United States had an interest Federal Communications Commission (FCC) –established by the Communications Act of 1934Communications Act of 1934 –charged with regulating all non-Federal Government use of the radio spectrum (including radio and television broadcasting), and all interstate telecommunications (wire, satellite and cable) as well as all international communications that originate or terminate in the United States.regulating spectrumradiotelevision telecommunicationswiresatellitecable communications

9 What Happens in Different Markets? Monopoly –Single-price monopolist (price fixing) –Price Discrimination Multi-part tariffs Oligopoly –Cartels –Passive collusion: Stackleberg leader, Sticky prices Monopolistic Competition –Limited price competition (brand name loyalty) Limited market power –Product differentiation Greater variety Perfect Competition –No efficiency loss, incentive to innovate, extensive price competition –No product differentiation

10 Perfect Competition Standard of comparison for all market models (optimal) –Productive efficient Firms operate at min of LRAC or exit –Technological innovate Innovate or die –Allocative efficient Consumers value marginal unit at MV –Equals firm’s cost of producing marginal unit No deadweight loss

11 Monopoly/Cartels Not Efficient in Production –Never operate at min of LRAC –Underutilized capacity and resources Not Technologically Innovative –No incentive to invest in/develop new technology when you’re the only firm Not Efficient in Allocation –P (=MV) > MR = MC –Deadweight loss

12 Monopolistic Competition Not Efficient in Production –Never operate at min of LRAC –Underutilized capacity and resources Technologically Innovative –Competition with other firms provides incentive Not Efficient in Allocation –P (=MV) > MR = MC –Deadweight loss (but not as great as Monopoly)

13 How Has the Government Sought to Regulate Markets? Punishing Anti-Competitive Behavior –Pricing/market tactics Collusion –Price-fixing, restricting output Price Discrimination Predatory Pricing –Impose fines for AC tactics Preventing Anti-competitive Behavior –Mergers and Acquisitions Review by appropriate administrative agency –Divestiture/breakups Regulating Natural Monopolies Deregulation(sic) of Selected Industries

14 Punishing AC Behavior Punishing firms for behaving like a monopoly –Sherman anti-trust Act (1890) “conspiring to fix prices or restrict output” –Clayton Act (1914) More sophisticated price discrimination Tie-in sales – requiring the purchase of 2 nd good Stock purchases/acquisitions –Robinson-Patman(1936) 3 rd degree price discrimination Amendment to Clayton Act

15 Reviewing Mergers Primarily aimed at preventing mergers or acquisitions that reduce competition –FCC regulates communications media (newspapers, tv, telecomm, radio) –FTC and DOJ regulate the rest

16 How do they determine whether a merger reduces competition? Herfindahl-Hirschman Index or HHI, –measure of the size of firms in relationship to the industryfirms industry –Meant to be an indicator of the amount of competition –sum of the squares of the market shares of each individual firm. decreases in the Herfindahl index generally indicate a loss of pricing power and an increase in competition, whereas increases imply the opposite DOJ guidelines –Mergers resulting in HHI > 1800 can be challenged

17 Are All Mergers Equal? Conglomerate –Merger of firms in unrelated industries Vertical Merger –Merger of firms upstream/downstream from each other in production stream FCC: ownership of more than 1 media type Microsoft Horizontal Mergers –Firms in the same industry Telecomm industry –AT&T divestiture –Verizon/GTE merger; RBOC mergers Would the HHI be a valid measure of competitiveness?