Student Learning Objectives 1 SCEE Summit 2013. Student Learning Objectives District Professional Development is the Key 2.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Understanding Student Learning Objectives (S.L.O.s)
Advertisements

Consensus Building Infrastructure Developing Implementation Doing & Refining Guiding Principles of RtI Provide working knowledge & understanding of: -
The Role of the Principal Going Forward. What Leon School District is Required to Do Florida Department of Educations Supports that might impact you What.
Literacy in the middle years of schooling focusing on Aboriginal Students.
Implementation of the PA Core Standards. Effective Communication Guiding Principle 1 Design and establish systems of effective communication among stakeholders.
Annual UMES Summer Institute “Making the Adjustment” Student Learning Objectives :
Title I Schoolwide Providing the Tools for Change Presented by Education Service Center Region XI February 2008.
Academic Alignment CROSBY TURNAROUND COMMITTEE
Student Growth Measures in Teacher Evaluation
Service Agency Accreditation Recognizing Quality Educational Service Agencies Mike Bugenski
Forward Moving Districts Information Summarized by Iowa Support Team as they Study Identified Buildings and Districts Actions in those Buildings and Districts.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Facilitating District-wide Improvement in Instructional Practices and Student Performance.
What should be the basis of
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
Using the T-9 Net This resource describes how schools use the T-9 Net to monitor the literacy and numeracy skills of students in Transition, Year 1 and.
Professional Learning in the Learning Profession Effective Practice  Increased Student Learning Frederick Brown Director of Strategy.
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY13-14 Evaluation Systems Office, HR Dr. Michael Shanahan, CHRO.
Assessment Literacy Series
Developing School-Based Systems of Support: Ohio’s Integrated Systems Model Y.S.U. March 30, 2006.
Student Learning Objectives 1 Implementing High Quality Student Learning Objectives: The Promise and the Challenge Maryland Association of Secondary School.
1 Confidential to Shelby County Schools and Memphis City Schools Reflective Practice Theory of Action.
The Power Of Partnership: Maryland’s Historic Memorandum of Understanding on the Use of Student Learning Objectives Webinar with David Volrath,
An Overview of the New HCPSS Teacher Evaluation Process School-based Professional Learning Module Spring 2013 This presentation contains copyrighted material.
1 Developing an Evaluation Plan _____________________ The Mathematically- Connected Communities MSP Developed for the February, MSP Conference Dr.
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation (AARPE)
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Student Learning Objectives 1 Phase 3 Regional Training April 2013.
Southern Regional Education Board HSTW An Integrated and Embedded Approach to Professional Development and School Improvement Using the Six-Step Process.
Technology Leadership
State Role in Supporting Educators C HRIS M INNICH M AY 2012 | SCEE M EETING.
Leadership: Connecting Vision With Action Presented by: Jan Stanley Spring 2010 Title I Directors’ Meeting.
Planning Focus Workshop Facilitated by: Sandy Sanford.
INSTRUCTIONAL EXCELLENCE INVENTORIES: A PROCESS OF MONITORING FOR CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT Dr. Maria Pitre-Martin Superintendent of Schools.
PRESENTED BY THERESA RICHARDS OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AUGUST 2012 Overview of the Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and.
Elementary & Middle School 2014 ELA MCAS Evaluation & Strategy.
 In Cluster, all teachers will write a clear goal for their IGP (Reflective Journal) that is aligned to the cluster and school goal.
© 2009 American Institutes for Research ® State-wide Systems of Support: Integrating High School Redesign Efforts Joseph Harris, Project Director Jenny.
What is HQPD?. Ohio Standards for PD HQPD is a purposeful, structured and continuous process that occurs over time. HQPD is a purposeful, structured and.
Evidence-Based Observations Training for Observers of Teachers Module 5 Dr. Marijo Pearson Dr. Mike Doughty Mr. John Schiess Spring 2012.
IOWA CORE CURRICULUM LEADERSHIP TRAINING Day Two.
Geelong High School Performance Development & Review Process in 2014.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Designing Local Curriculum Module 5. Objective To assist district leadership facilitate the development of local curricula.
A state-wide effort to improve teaching and learning to ensure that all Iowa students engage in a rigorous & relevant curriculum. The Core Curriculum.
CCSS Road Map: The goal of implementing the Common Core State Standards is to ensure that instruction in our schools is changing dramatically.
AdvancED District Accreditation Process © 2010 AdvancED.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
Common Core State Standards: Supporting Implementation and Moving to Sustainability Based on ASCD’s Fulfilling the Promise of the Common Core State Standards:
1. Administrators will gain a deeper understanding of the connection between arts, engagement, student success, and college and career readiness. 2. Administrators.
March 23, NYSCSS Annual Conference Crossroads of Change: The Common Core in Social Studies.
Ohio Department of Education March 2011 Ohio Educator Evaluation Systems.
Changes in Professional licensure Teacher evaluation system Training at Coastal Carolina University.
Technology Action Plan By: Kaitlyn Sassone. What is Systemic Change? "Systemic change is a cyclical process in which the impact of change on all parts.
SACS/CASI District Accreditation  January 2007  April 2007  May 2007  January – April 2008  Board Approval for Pursuit of District Accreditation.
Welcome to PD Forum FY 11. Professional Development Support Structure SchoolsDistrict Support Department PD Team (Administrator, PD Contact, & PD Team.
Understanding Student Learning Objectives (S.L.O.s)
The Big Rocks: TLC, MTSS, ELI, C4K, and the Iowa Core School Administrators of Iowa July 2014 IOWA Department of Education.
Educator Effectiveness Process Introduction to the Grant and Guide to the Unit Meeting.
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
Using PLCs to Build Expertise Community of Practice October 9, 2013 Tammy Bresnahan & Tammy Ferguson.
1 OBSERVATION CYCLE: CONNECTING DOMAINS 1, 2, AND 3.
© 2012, Community Training and Assistance Center © 2012, Teaching Learning Solutions Linking ISLLC and your Principal Rubrics to a Case.
Instructional Leadership and Application of the Standards Aligned System Act 45 Program Requirements and ITQ Content Review October 14, 2010.
Phyllis Lynch, PhD Director, Instruction, Assessment and Curriculum
A Guaranteed, Viable, and Engaging Curriculum
Gary Carlin, CFN 603 September, 2012
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
Presentation transcript:

Student Learning Objectives 1 SCEE Summit 2013

Student Learning Objectives District Professional Development is the Key 2

Student Learning Objectives Quality Control Components 3 Monitor and Audit Provide Professional Development Develop Two-Way Communication Plan Ensure Accountability Identify High- Quality, Common Measures & Assessments Determine and Score Rigorous Targets Establish Priority of Standard Provide Guidance, Templates, and Tools 3

“Building the skills of teachers and principals to successfully implement SLOs is fundamental to success.” (CTAC) 4

SLO Professional Development “The most effective strategy for training teachers and principals to implement a rigorous, reliable, and valid SLO model is to provide hands-on experience writing an SLO.” “Teachers often find that they do not know the questions to ask until they are actively engaged in the process. The key is providing support, during training and throughout implementation.” (CTAC) 5

SLO Training Modules Add graphic 6

SLO Modules 7 Training Modules – Module 1 - SLO Context & Purpose – Module 2 - SLO Components – Module 3 - The SLO Process – Module 4 - Quality Assurance: Priority of Standard – Module 5 - Quality Assurance: Rigor of Target – Module 6 - Quality Assurance: Quality of Measure & Evidence – Module 7 - Quality Assurance: SLO Action Plan Companion Handbook 7

Module Outcomes After completion of the modules, participants will have completed one SLO and should be prepared to craft additional SLOs and judge their quality using the teacher and principal rubrics. The modules are NOT designed as Inter-rater Reliability (IRR) Training 8

Online Demo com/ Guest Access U: slo.guest P: msdelms 9

SLO Workshop Customization SLO Workshop – State Model District- Customized SLO Workshop SLO PD Workshop designed based on State Model Copy of Workshop in Blackboard will be provided to each district so that district customization may occur 10

Considerations for Use of Modules Face-to-face vs. online training Schedule for training Expertise of facilitators Review of final SLO products Document training Technical requirements Other considerations? 11

Professional Development for SLOs - Promising Practices 12 State Sharing

Lessons Learned Engage broad array of stakeholders in developing district SLO plan Provide models and templates. Our most frequent request was for examples of SLOs. Annotated SLOs were valuable training tools. Establish written guidelines or rules to help teachers and principal set, implement, & measure SLOs 13

Lessons Learned Provide hands-on, no stakes experience writing an SLO early in the professional development process Develop a two-way communication plan Provide support and ensure principals have the skills and knowledge necessary to provide leadership for quality SLO implementation Address assessment literacy needs 14

Lessons Learned Make Connections to Existing Practices Use existing structures and processes to support SLO implementation School Improvement Planning Professional Learning Communities Department Chairs, Team Leaders Student ‘Teaming’ Discussions Classroom Focused Improvement Process (CFIP) SMART Goals Action Research Performance Assessment

16 Lessons Learned: Make Connections to Existing Practices Frame evaluation process as part of the continuous school improvement process Align State – District - School goals with S.L.O. goals Connect S.L.O process with other aspects of good teaching /professional practice Integrate S.L.O. training with Common Core and other curricular training Integrate S.L.O. development with existing data review/analysis processes

Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) Professional Development Learning Cycle  Definition Understand the purpose of SLOs  Validation Understand the importance of SLOs  Assimilation Understand the elements and mechanics of the SLO process  Integration Understand how SLOs are incorporated into every day instructional practice  Transition Understand the relationship of SLOs to student achievement Definition Validation Assimilation Integration Transition

Maryland State Department of Education Website s.org/MSDE/programs/tpe 18