Fiscal Year 2009 3rd Quarter ADR/Investigation Findings (Data Source: I-trak Complaint Management System as of 7/14/2009)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WASHINGTON STATE PROVIDER APPLICATION Supplemental Educational Services.
Advertisements

Office of Workplace Diversity January 2005 Open Meeting.
Regional BIG Briefing on the MD-715 and 462 Reports
1 The Revised PEP Process Presented by… Rick Losemann Director, Employee Relations Division Office of Personnel Services and Benefits.
1 Workplace ADR Evaluation Tracey Therit ADR Manager Department of Veterans Affairs June 18, 2008.
Fiscal Year th Quarter ADR/Investigation Findings (Data Source: I-trak Complaint Management System as of 10/13/2009)
The Revised Federal EEO Complaint Process Prepared by the IHS Equal Employment Opportunity and Civil Rights Office May 16, 2000.
F L O R I D A D E P A R T M E N T O F B U S I N E S S A N D P R O F E S S I O N A L R E G U L A T I O N Division of Regulation Complaint Process Division.
N AVIGATING THE F EDERAL EEO P ROCESS Presentation by: Joseph A. Salazar, Esq.
Conducted by the U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Administration and Management, CIVIL RIGHS CENTER Handling Discrimination.
NASAA ALL-MEMBER CALL November 3, 2011 Investment Adviser Switch Update.
Performance Management DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION (ED) OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT (OM) Human Capital and Client Services (HCCS) ED PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL SYSTEM.
Track the different events in which individuals have participated in throughout the year Track the amount of credits any member has and their eligibility.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2008 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION.
CHAPTER 1 Introduction Copyright © 2010 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Tax Update for Alumni Classes September 29, 2012 Hanover, NH Dartmouth College.
1 Patent Term Extension under 35 U.S.C. § 156 Mary C. Till Legal Advisor Office of Patent Legal Administration.
Chapter Incorporation. Why Incorporate Your Chapter? Identify as an Organization Identify as an Organization Elect officers that will divide the work.
Equal Employment Opportunity Complaint (EEOC) Procedure Know Your Rights USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service WIsconsin.
E qual E mployment O pportunity (EEO), D iversity, D iscrimination and H arassment.
This communication does not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy any securities or a solicitation of any vote or approval.
Grant Maintenance Title I Technical Assistance & Networking Session October 6, 2011.
1 Treasury Offset Program NASC PRESENTATION. 2 What is TOP? TOP = Treasury Offset Program A centralized process that intercepts federal payments of payees.
AT-RISK STUDENT ELIGIBILITY AND REQUIREMENTS State Compensatory Education Resource information from TEA.
1 Workforce Investment Act Methods of Administration Two-Year Recertification Presenters: Julia Mankata-Tamakloe, Chief of the Office of Compliance Assistance.
Western Region CSREES Administrative Officer’s Meeting Monterey, California October 4 – 6, 2005 Janet Downey, Staff Accountant OEP, POFMB, Oversight Section.
FY07 COMMON MEASURES CHANGES FOR REPORTING AND MOSES TRACKING.
James Whitehorne Chief (Acting), Census Redistricting Data Office Briefing for State Data Center Conference June 2nd, Redistricting Data Program.
The Tobacco Buyout Scott Sanford September Outreach 500,000 official signup letters sent to quota holders and producers (6,000 printed in Spanish)
1 Farm Service Agency FY2010 Annual Civil Rights Training “FSA No Fear Act Training Required Every Two Years” and“Understanding/Navigating FSA EEO Complaint/ADR/Mediation.
1 Federal Sector Discrimination Complaints Process for Individuals Incident/Alleged Discrimination (1) Employee Contacts EO Counselor (Rights & Responsibilities)
Federal Human Capital Survey: A Closer Look - FY 2008 The Department of the Treasury Building our Workforce for the Future April 2009.
EO Policy and Procedures
November 15, 2012 Visit us at Agenda 8(a) Program Overview SBA Partnership Agreement SBA Acceptance Contract Award.
E qual E mployment O pportunity (EEO) Module 11 N ational G uard T echnician P ersonnel M anagement C ourse.
Tax Update for Alumni Classes Rachel L. Williamson, CPA Joined Dartmouth College in June.
1 MANDATORY OUTPATIENT TREATMENT Jane D. Hickey Office of the Attorney General June 5, 2008.
Methods of Administration MOA Element 8 Complaint Processing Procedures.
What is REDRESS? REDRESS® mediation is a transformative mediation program for Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) disputes at the informal stage of the.
Georgia Government Transparency & Campaign Finance Commission 29 TH BIENNIAL INSTITUTE FOR GEORGIA LEGISLATORS TUESDAY, DECEMBER 9, 2014.
CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research M. Nonis – ACCU Meeting – 3/12/2008 HOSTEL BOOKING SOFTWARE.
“CONSENT AGREEMENTS:LET US SHOW YOU HOW IT CAN WORK” Rhonda O’Hagan Competence Assurance Coordinator, SASKATCHEWAN REGISTERED NURSES ASSOCIATION Presented.
Satisfactory Academic Progress (SAP) U.S. Department of Education NJASFAA 2011 Sandy Santana a.
Noncompliance and Correction (OSEP Memo 09-02) June 2012.
Presented by: Liz Hayes Take A Look Into: The Virginia Fair Housing Office.
Satisfactory Academic Progress (SAP) Annmarie Weisman U.S. Department of Education WVASFAA Conference Morgantown, WV April 2011.
N A T I O N A L A S S O C I A T I O N O F I N T E R C O L L E G I A T E A T H L E T I C S Academic Eligibility 9 & 24/36 Hour Rules.
1 Management Directive 715 Broad Based Deficiencies and Recommended Actions (Bureau Name) This template is for your use to create your bureau State of.
“Strong Chapters, Strong Association” “Channel Partners” Luis Barcón MBA, CPIM, CIRM, CQM, C.P.M., PMP, CSCP, CPF, CTL, CS&OP APICS Master CPIM and CSCP.
January 2012 Mississippi Department of Education Office of Instructional Enhancement and Internal Operations/Office of Special Education 1 Noncompliance.
Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) Division of Immigration Health Services FY 2010.
1 AIRI STATISTICS: TRENDS IN NIH AWARDS Presented at Association of Independent Research Institutes 49 th Annual Meeting September 29, 2010 Washington,
Other Complaint Processes. Appeal Processes Other presentations this week: Other presentations this week: Grievance (NGP) Grievance (NGP) Negotiations.
Building Division FY2011 Second Quarter Report. 2 nd Quarter Revenues October$93,154 November$53,049 December$50,033 Average Monthly Revenues$65,412 Total.
Washington State Collection Agency Board: Regulatory Process Grace Hamilton, Investigator Department of Licensing – Collection Agency Board Complaint Process.
The Social Security Cost Reimbursement Program: Submitting a Claim For Cost Reimbursement.
TOIG Required Review Approach June 8, 2017
Alleged Incident/Personnel Action
Common Core of Data (CCD)
Virtual Network Meeting: Consolidated Application
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY Federal Sector COMPLAINT ROCESSING
ScHARR Bite Size Research Ethics and GDPR: legal requirements for research - what you need to know.
IComplaints Internet Complaints Tracking Army User Training.
Common Core of Data (CCD)
For more information call the EEO Office at
EEO MODULE 3: DISCRIMINATION COMPLAINT PROCESSING
GDPR – General Data Protection Regulation
Patient disposition, weeks 24–128.
ScHARR Bite Size Research Ethics and GDPR: legal requirements for research - what you need to know.
The Office of Consumer Relations
Presentation transcript:

Fiscal Year rd Quarter ADR/Investigation Findings (Data Source: I-trak Complaint Management System as of 7/14/2009)

Completed EEO Investigations The measure for FY 2009: –50% of investigations will be completed within the regulatory time frames. Regulatory time frames are under 180 days, unless extended by amendment (360 days) or extension (270 days). Definition: A completed Investigation is an investigation where the notice of election is sent to the complainant. Measure is being met with 65% of investigations completed within the regulatory time frames.

Treasury Complaint Center FY rd Quarter Investigation Closure Statistics STATUS OF COMPLETED INVESTIGATIONS MEETING REGULATORY TIMEFRAMES TIMELY COMPLETED INVESTIGATIONS UNTIMELY COMPLETED INVESTIGATIONS TOTAL NUMBER OF COMPLETED INVESTIGATIONS

Informal ADR Measures The measure for FY 2009: –30% of complainants who initiate an EEO contact and are offered ADR will elect to participate in the ADR process. EEO contact refers to when an EEO Counselor or an ADR Intake Officer performs the counseling duties described in Chapter 2 of MD 110. This information is reported in Part One, Section D, of Form 462. All completed counseling closures are included in the calculations of participation and offer rates. Effective June 2009, Treasury will no longer exclude informal EEO contacts that are eligible to participate in ADR from our total completed counseling counts. Measure is being met: 35.2% of EEO contacts offered ADR elected to participate in the ADR process. (Had management not declined, 47% of EEO contacts offered ADR may have elected to participate in the ADR process.)

Completed/Ended Counselings For 3rd Quarter FY 2009 BUREAU EEO CONTACTS ADR OFFERED ADR PARTICIPATION BEP16 6 BPD443 DO761 FMS440 IRS COUNSEL660 IRS MINT13 3 OIG000 OCC540 OTS110 TTB210 TIGTA111 FINCEN222 Treasury Total

TOTAL INFORMAL COMPLETED COUNSELINGS IN 3rd QUARTER FY 2009 TOTAL COMPLETED COUNSELINGSADR OFFEREDADR ACCEPTED ADR Offer Rate of Completed Counselings In The Informal Complaint Process During 3rd Quarter FY 2009 Note: Calculation of offer rate includes completed counselings that did not meet ADR participation criteria. This change in offer rate calculation is effective June 2009 and was done to mirror EEOC’s offer rate calculations.

TOTAL INFORMAL COMPLETED COUNSELINGS IN 3rd QUARTER FY 2009 TOTAL COMPLETED COUNSELINGSADR OFFEREDADR ACCEPTED ADR Participation Rate of Completed Counselings In The Informal Complaint Process During 3rd Quarter FY 2009 Note: Calculation of participation rate includes completed counselings that did not meet ADR participation criteria. This change in participation rate calculation is effective June 2009 and was done to mirror EEOC’s participation rate calculations.

TOTAL INFORMAL COMPLETED COUNSELINGS IN 3rd QUARTER FY 2009 TOTAL COMPLETED COUNSELINGSADR OFFEREDADR ACCEPTED Election Rate of ADR Offers In The Informal Complaint Process During 3rd Quarter FY 2009 Note: In QTR 1 and QTR 2 ADR Stats. Reports, ADR Election Rate was referred to as ADR participation rate.

Declination by Management and Contact Where ADR Was Offered in the Pre-Complaint Process During 3rd Quarter FY 2009 TOTAL ADR DECLINATIONS IN 3rd QUARTER FY 2009 TOTAL ADR DECLINATIONS DECLINED BY CONTACT DECLINED BY MANAGEMENT

Formal ADR Measures The measure for FY 2009: –ADR is offered to 80% of eligible complainants who file complaints, and of those offered, achieve a 30% election rate. –Election rate refers to when both the complainant and management officials agree to enter an ADR process. The measure is not being met. ADR was offered to 56% of eligible complainants who filed complaints, and of those offered, achieved a 20.3% election rate. Of the 74 complainants offered ADR, 35 (47%) declined participation and management declined participation in 24 instances (33%). Only 15 complainants elected ADR (20%). Had management not declined, a total of 39 complainants offered ADR (53%) may have elected ADR.

TOTAL FORMAL COMPLAINT CLOSURES IN 3rd QUARTER FY 2009 TOTAL CLOSURESADR OFFEREDADR ACCEPTED Complaint Closures In The Formal Complaint Process Where ADR Was Offered During 3rd Quarter FY 2009 Note: Calculation of offer rate includes completed counselings that did not meet ADR participation criteria. This change in offer rate calculation is effective June 2009 and was done to mirror EEOC’s offer rate calculations.

ADR Participation Rate of Complaint Closures in Formal Complaint Process During 3rd Quarter FY 2009 TOTAL FORMAL COMPLAINT CLOSURES IN 3rd QUARTER FY 2009 TOTAL CLOSURESADR OFFEREDADR ACCEPTED Note: Calculation of participation rate includes completed counselings that did not meet ADR participation criteria. This change in participation rate calculation is effective June 2009 and was done to mirror EEOC’s participation rate calculations.

Election Rate of ADR Offers in Formal Complaint Process During 3rd Quarter FY 2009 TOTAL FORMAL COMPLAINT CLOSURES IN 3rd QUARTER FY 2009 TOTAL CLOSURESADR OFFEREDADR ACCEPTED Note: In QTR 1 and QTR 2 ADR Stats. Reports, ADR Election Rate was referred to as ADR participation rate.

Declination by Management and Complainant Where ADR Was Offered in the Formal Complaint Process During 3rd Quarter FY 2009 TOTAL ADR DECLINATIONS IN 3rd QUARTER FY 2009 TOTAL ADR DECLINATIONS DECLINED BY COMPLAINANT DECLINED BY MANAGEMENT