MuCool / Linac Diagnostic Beamline and MTA facility: External Beams Dept. C. Johnstone, + others Review Nov. 30, 2005.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Neutrinos from Stored Muons STORM Target Station Conceptual Design 15-April-2013 Kris Anderson Fermilab/Accelerator Division/Mechanical Support Department.
Advertisements

Electron Model Components and Costing C. Johnstone Summary talk, C. Johnstone FFAG04 Oct 12-16, 2004 KEK, Tsukuba, Japan.
MTA Installation Progress Report June 8, MTA Installation Web Page F.G. Garcia AD/Proton.
Tagger and Vacuum Chamber Design. Outline. Design considerations. Stresses and deformations. Mechanical assembly.
TAGGER MAGNET DESIGN Presented by Tim Whitlatch Hall D Tagger Magnet Design Review July 10,
A. Bross MTA RF WS August 22, Welcome MTA RF Workshop.
FFAG Workshopfermilab April 2005 f Summary: FFAG WORKSHOP nonscaling electron model muon FFAGs C. Johnstone Fermilab.
Re-commissioning the Recycler Storage Ring at Fermilab Martin Murphy, Fermilab Presented August 10, 2012 at SLAC National Laboratory for the Workshop on.
ALPHA Storage Ring Indiana University Xiaoying Pang.
Sergey Antipov, University of Chicago Fermilab Mentor: Sergei Nagaitsev Injection to IOTA ring.
LCLS-II Transverse Tolerances Tor Raubenheimer May 29, 2013.
MCTF C. Johnstone All Exp. Meeting 14 Mar First Beam to Muon Test Area Description and commissioning of beam to MTA Experimental Hall C. Johnstone,
3 GeV,1.2 MW, Booster for Proton Driver G H Rees, RAL.
MCTF C. Johnstone MUTAC Meeting 8-10 April Debut of the MTA beamline Description, status and commissioning plans.
Transfer Line -2 Optics Design For CTF3 Amalendu Sharma, Abdurrahim, A.D.Ghodke, Gurnam Singh and V.C. Sahni Raja Ramanna Centre for Advanced Technology.
Hall C Meeting SHMS Magnets and Support Structure Design and Procurement Status Paul Brindza January 26, 2009.
1 Status of EMMA Shinji Machida CCLRC/RAL/ASTeC 23 April, ffag/machida_ ppt & pdf.
October 31, BDS Group1 ILC Beam Delivery System “Hybrid” Layout 2006e Release Preliminary M. Woodley.
09/28/07Shutdown’07 Week 8 F.G. Garcia1 MTA beam line installation Weekly Report September 28, 2007 Period covered: September 24 th September 28 th (Week.
August 05, Startup 2013 Machine Status:  Proton Source Commissioning and Studies RFQ Injector Line (RIL) Linac Booster  Main Injector Startup.
The Overview of the ILC RTML Bunch Compressor Design Sergei Seletskiy LCWS 13 November, 2012.
Related poster [1] TPAG022: Slow Wave Electrode Structures for the ESS 2.5 MeV Chopper – Michael A. Clarke-Gayther Status Funding bids have been prepared.
Proton Driver: Status and Plans C.R. Prior ASTeC Intense Beams Group, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory.
F Project X Overview Dave McGinnis October 12, 2007.
F Booster Long Straight Corrector Upgrade Technical Status and Schedule for Installation Craig Drennan DOE Tevatron Operations Review March 27, 2007.
1 Flux concentrator for SuperKEKB Kamitani Takuya IWLC October.20.
EBIS ARR Jim Alessi May 4- 7, 2010 Technical Overview.
MICE Status & Plans MICE-UK paul drumm 15 th September 2004.
NUMI NuMI Magnet Power Supply System WBS Power Supply System Level 3 Manager Nancy Grossman FNAL July 11, 2001.
17 th November, 2008 LCWS08/ILC08 1 BDS optics and minimal machine study Deepa Angal-Kalinin ASTeC & The Cockcroft Institute Daresbury Laboratory.
RSVP AGS Upgrade Projects MECO RSVP Preliminary Baseline Review Brookhaven National Lab April 6-8, 2005 D. Phillips.
Project X RD&D Plan Beam Transfer Line and Recycler Injection David Johnson AAC Meeting February 3, 2009.
Proton Plan PMG 9/27/07 E Prebys 1 Proton Plan Status Eric Prebys.
RSVP AGS Upgrade Projects MECO RSVP Preliminary Baseline Review Brookhaven National Lab April 6-8, 2005 D. Phillips.
New Gantry Idea for H + /C 6+ Therapy G H Rees, ASTeC, RAL 4 th September, 2008.
J-PARC Spin Physics Workshop1 Polarized Proton Acceleration in J-PARC M. Bai Brookhaven National Laboratory.
Primary beam production: progress - Extraction from LSS2 - Switching from TT20 at 100 GeV B.Goddard F.Velotti, A.Parfenova, R.Steerenberg, K.Cornelis,
Dave Johnson July 12, 2010 NOvA/ANU Recycler Upgrades Review Optics, Apertures, and Operations Nova-doc 4930.
09/07/07Shutdown’07 Week 5 F.G. Garcia1 MTA beam line installation Weekly Report September 07, 2007 Period covered: August 31 st to September 7 th (Week.
Magnets Technologies for NOνA Transfer Line (& RR30 section) July 21-23, 2009.
The Introduction to CSNS Accelerators Oct. 5, 2010 Sheng Wang AP group, Accelerator Centre,IHEP, CAS.
Dave Johnson July 12, 2010 NOvA/ANU Recycler Upgrades Review Optics, Apertures, and Operations Nova-doc 4930.
Overall Layout 1 IP2 64 m LEReC-I (1.6-2MeV): Gun to dump SRF gun used as a booster cavity Booster Cavity and Gun move (next slide)
Beam collimation in the transfer line from 8 GeV linac to the Main Injector A. Drozhdin The beam transfer line from 8 GeV Linac to the Main Injector is.
August 12, Machine Status: 2013  Proton Source Commissioning and Studies RFQ Injector Line (RIL) Linac : Roof hatch installed Booster : Magnet.
F Project X: Recycler 8.9 GeV/c Extraction D. Johnson, E. Prebys, M. Martens, J. Johnstone Fermilab Accelerator Advisory Committee August 8, 2007 D. Johnson.
Proton Driver Keith Gollwitzer Accelerator Division Fermilab MAP Collaboration Meeting June 20, 2013.
09/21/07Shutdown’07 Week 7 F.G. Garcia1 MTA beam line installation Weekly Report September 21, 2007 Period covered: September 14 th September 21 th (Week.
DDBA magnets Chris Bailey Low emittance rings Sept Frascati.
FFAG 4-Bend Injection Line into EMMA C. Johnstone, Fermilab EMMA phone conference July 24, 2007.
Proton PMG September 3 rd 2015 Cons Gattuso AD Shutdown Manager.
M. Munoz April 2, 2014 Beam Commissioning at ESS.
2/07/2014 EMITTANCE MEASUREMENTS MTA BEAMLINE. PERFORMANCE All stable optics tunes work 4 very different operations have been installed Experimental tune.
Proton PMG May 7 th 2015 Cons Gattuso AD Shutdown Manager.
Some Design Considerations and R &D of CEPCB Dipole Magnet
Bunching system for SPES project
Status of HESR 18th March Gießen Dieter Prasuhn.
Physics design on Injector-1 RFQ
Arc magnet designs Attilio Milanese 13 Oct. 2016
Large Booster and Collider Ring
Coupling Correction at the Australian Synchrotron
CHEN, Fusan KANG, Wen November 5, 2017
Compact and Low Consumption Magnet Design The DESY Experience
LCLS Injector: Introduction D. H
ELENA Extra Low ENergy Antiproton Ring
Collider Ring Optics & Related Issues
K. Tilley, ISIS, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, UK Introduction
Advanced Research Electron Accelerator Laboratory
Laser Heater Integration into XFEL. Update.
Fanglei Lin, Yuhong Zhang JLEIC R&D Meeting, March 10, 2016
Presentation transcript:

MuCool / Linac Diagnostic Beamline and MTA facility: External Beams Dept. C. Johnstone, + others Review Nov. 30, 2005

Purpose: test the basic techniques and components proposed for muon ionization cooling and provide accurate measurements of linac beam properties – important for future, stable high-intensity running of the downstream accelerators.

Description: The new beamline and facility consists of  15 Hz pulsed-magnetic extraction system which diverts an entire Linac macropulse into the new beamline  An ~50 m long beamline which feeds and ends in experiments housed in a 20’ x 40’ hall; the Mucool Test Area (MTA) Using civil construction and resources that remain from the 400-MeV Linac Upgrade; this project is considerably economical. The experimental hall is shielded and separated from the Linac by 12’ of concrete blocks— the beamline penetrates through these shield blocks to the hall  The new facility is capable of: Accepting full Linac beam intensity (1.6 x Hz) to within the radiological limits imposed by the current state of shielding and radiological controls

MTA facility: Plan View

Low-loss Beam Extraction from Linac Extraction to MTA  Begins upstream and continues downstream of 400-MeV chopper to contain H - magnetic stripping losses to level.  Requires 10” movement of Q74 upstream*  The entire Linac macropulse is extracted (the length of the macropulse may be varied from 2-50 by the 750-keV chopper. Pulsed extraction magnets:  Pulsed extraction magnets: two “C” magnets One 3  magnet upstream and one 7.5  magnet downstream; single power supply for both >1” of clearance/no conflicts with 400-MeV line No 400-MeV vacuum interruption for installation/removal Design is complete; bids are in; awaiting final division budgets *kicking beam through Q74 causes a large displacement in the 2” Linac beampipe with accompanying high losses.

400 MeV Linac Enclosure ~2m Extraction Drifts Ramp trajectories Ramp enclosure wall

H - Extraction Requirements Beam entering ramp requires ~30  of bend relative to Linac Dipole field strengths   7kG to avoid stripping H-,  upstream of chopper, ~6kG (Chopper is highly sensitive to electrons and sparking) First component to clear is Q2  Controls beam separation to Booster/diagnostic line  Cannot be moved; tricky to align  Requires 11” to clear manifolding, 13-15” beam center to center relative to transfer line Next element to clear is lambertson  Dipole (CR) conveniently fits next to transfer line between Q2 and lambertson  If CR dipoles are used (10  max) another one is required to avoid enclosure corner, 45  total is required for ramp curvature and align beam parallel with the experimental hall enclosure.

Linac modifications: Q74 moves ~10’ upstream Quad to be moved BLD – will be removed to make space for quad

Two C magnet: 10”, 25” long, 6.2 kG, 3 , 7.5  bends Chopper Pulsed Extraction System: Two C Magnets

Extracted Beam trajectories

Critical Path: C magnets ” ( m) ssssssssssssssss sssssss z z 10” m IRON Tube  2”  ” WALL 304 SS  1.5” Beam Tube  Z 16.75” slot ( m) (17.8” total flange to quad steel) QUADRUPOLE  4.563” ( m) ” ( m) IRON z 4.869” ( m) TUBE 304 SS  3.25” ” WALL R1.625” ( ) 1.949’ ( m) 4.618” ( m) X 2.125” min ( m) See example coil and lamination details in text + tables 2” schedule to pipe 1.850” ( m) Example coil (0.4096” Cu): Gap: 2.000” ~1/16” spacing between beam to magnet Beam tubes in longer magnet

Diagnostic Line Design - New design incorporates  10 m straight for transverse emittance measurements of linac beam  50 cm low beta waist at center of straight  Order of magnitude change in beam size  Access to low beta focus point  Dispersion suppression  Inexpensive straight bore through shield blocks  Simple, stable match to linac based on linac FODO cells (~90  )  High (~7m) dispersion point for momentum-spread measurement

Optical functions

Half-width beam size: MW1 MW2MW3 Experimental Hall Shield blocks

Layout, plan view Shield blocks

Operational details of Diagnostic Tune Minimum beam stay clear –  0.3” (8mm) in upstream 2” chopper mating flange and triplet quadrupoles based on 10  mm-mr linac emitance. Dispersion suppression can be checked and tuned by :  varying linac output energy and varying last CR dipole strength  Beam will be “steered” into hall using trims after the diagnostic straight Low-beta waist can be adjusted and focused onto the second multiwire (just downstream of shield blocks)  Using the quad low-beta triplet Critical Devices:  Pulsed extraction magnets  Beam stop upstream and downstream of shield blocks Occupancy and radiological controls  Beam stops provide unlimited occupancy in experimental hall  Postings, fencing, eberm module will allow us to run at ~1 Hz and full linac intensity Pulsed power supply will be hard-wired to 1 Hz.

Low-loss beam tune for MTA running Beamline can be re-tuned for MTA experiments to achieve the lowest-loss optics. One example is given below with momentum spread included. The peak beam envelope is reduced by 1 cm in the half width (2 cm full width). If a polarity flip of the quadrupole is allowed, even smaller beam envelopes can be achieved.

Component Inventory Description# required#availablePeak power specifications per component Quadrupoles (9 200-MeV quads, 5 Pbar quads to be removed from old 8 GeV line during shutdown) 14 50V x 40 A Pulsed Extraction dipoles (designed, bids are in, contract awaiting budget decisions) 2to be built A (under design) Cooling Ring dipoles (4 with refurbished coils, to be removed from A0 during shutdown) 5>1018V x 711 A Air Core Trim dipoles8 824V x 12A

Power supplies and power requirements Description#Power Supply Requirements Power (potential peak power) kW 200-MeV. Quadrupoles Pbar quadrupoles (many old supplies are available) (50V x 40A)28 Pulsed Extraction dipoles (power supply to be built in house) 2300V x 800A 700V x 800A Cooling Ring dipole string (Trans Rex) 44 (18V x 711A)51 CR dipole, single (Trans Rex or PEI) 118V x 400 A7.2 Trims (need to build bulk supply) 88 (24V x 12A)2.3 Total Power90 kW

Resource Synopsis: M&S Beamline Components With the exception of the C magnet, all beamline components are available quadrupoles and dipoles trim magnets diagnostics beam stops instrumentation and controls such as an eberm system Power Supplies With the exception of the pulsed power supply, all major supplies and a number of smaller ones are available dipole supplies misc quad and trim supplies Vacuum ion pumps are available (30 liters/min) misc vacuum components Water 55  Linac water is available Tevatron sled available

Resource requests: Summary PPD C magnet PPD Machine shop: magnet stand fabrication/modify existing stands spool pieces TD magnet inspection and testing small repairs (hoses) AD (SWF) C magnet power supply labor Installation: vacuum, safety, water, power supplies, beamline, controls Muon Funds C magnet power supply parts electricians cable tray and civil (6” bore through shield blocks)

C magnet specifications: GeneralValue B peak, range kG Repetition Rate15 Hz Pulse Length (half sine wave)8.33 msec Integrated strength, error 1 st magnet T-m,  1% at peak 2 nd magnet 2.5  1 st magnet strength,  1% at peak Good Field Region Width, field error m ( 2.36”), at peak Gap m (2.008”) Beam tube (elliptical) ~width x height m (4.618”), m (2”) Beam tube thickness 1.59  m (0.0625”) 2 nd magnet: Tube diameter, thickness, outside beamline m(3.25”), 1.59  m (0.0625”) Center to center spacing - beam magnet entrance m  m (4.433  0.006”)

C magnet specificatons cont… Physical Dimensions Minimum spacing between coils (top to bottom)  (4.25  0.125”) Maximum slot length 1 st magnet m  (16.75  0.25”) Maximum steel Length 1 st magnet m (10.25”) Required Mechanical Properties Operational flexing or fatiguing of coil+core  0.1 mil Coil or Core temperature rise, at any point <10  C, for Cooling water available ~1 and 95  F Connections, water and powerStandard Fermilab connections

06 Shutdown Tasks - complete Quadrupole move Installation of new chopper flanges and gate valve Further installation can then proceed independent of linac and as time and resources permit

Chopper Modification Drawings

New Chopper Parts: detail

Status of MTA/Linac beamline - summary Line design complete and components identified  Final layouts and full engineering in progress C magnet bids contract awarded to Everson; shipping by Jan, 2007 Q74 move and chopper modifications/gate valve completed ’06 shutdown and A0 CR dipoles pulled from Tevatron enclosure  Further installation can now proceed without vacuum interruption/disruption to Linac or Booster Installation complete in ’07 shutdown