Assessment Committee 20 October 2015. 2012 Self Evaluation HAPS is the result of a process that began in 2012, the last Accreditation self- evaluation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ALAMEDA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT Superintendent Search.
Advertisements

PRAC and Integrated Planning October 22, Integrated Planning Model.
State Center Community College District Willow International Community College Center State of the Center Report Deborah J. Ikeda, Campus President January.
Achieving the Dream. Achieving the Dream is a national effort to help more community college students succeed, with a special focus on students of color.
LAVC STRATEGIC PLAN PROGRESS REPORT Presented to LACCD Board of Trustees Institutional Effectiveness Committee July 24, 2013.
A Commitment to Excellence: SUNY Cortland Update on Strategic Planning.
SEM Planning Model.
Dr. Mark Sanchez, Liz Estrella, Tony Anderson, Dr. Romero Jalomo
Professional Development Day Fall 2014 R. Brown, V. Martinez, K. Moberg, A. Ratto.
An initiative of the Research & Planning Group for California Community Colleges Assessing Institutional Effectiveness An RP Group initiative funded by.
Strategic Planning Summit GAP/Committee Chairs/IE December 5,
GROWING LEADERS Opportunity. Engagement. Achievement. SSSP + SEP Steering Committee: August 26, 2014 Kathy Mendelsohn, Mark Sanchez, Brian.
Strategic Priorities for Taking Charge of our Future.
State Center Community College District North Centers Duty Day State of the North Centers Report Terry Kershaw, Vice Chancellor January 5, 2012.
Presentation for Flex Day June 7, 2011 LATTC Accreditation
Educational Master Plan Internal Environmental Scan March 16, Cambridge West Partnership, LLC.
Monitoring Report 2015 – 01 Global Ends Statement.
TODAY AND TOMORROW University of Houston- Downtown Strategic Plan Highlights.
Dr. Marybeth Buechner Dean of Planning, Research & Institutional Effectiveness Sacramento City College Los Rios Community College District.
ANDREW LAMANQUE, PHD SPRING 2014 Status Report: Foothill Reaffirmation of Accreditation.
Successfully Aligning Resources With Planning League of Innovation Conference March 10, 2013 Greg Nelson Vice President of Administrative Services Tammeil.
Accreditation follow-up report. The team recommends that the college further refine its program review, planning, and resource allocation processes so.
College Planning Council 8 June Accreditation Standard 1 Standard 1: The institution demonstrates strong commitment to a mission that emphasizes.
Stephanie Curry-Reedley College James Todd- ASCCC Area A Representative.
Convocation Opening Address College of Sequoias Welcome&Introductions.
A Multi-Campus Model for Program Review & Integrated Institutional Planning Raúl Rodriguez, Ph.D., Chancellor 1.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
Dr. Otto W.K. Lee President August 27, 2015 Celia Parra, Student Speaker, 2015 Commencement.
State Center Community College District 2008 Strategic Plan One-Year Status Report December 2008.
August Priority 7 Review Team 7: Planning Subcommittee R. Hall-Allen, M. DesVignes, J. Moore, R. Romali, R. Tillberg Increase the resources available.
Accreditation 2015 Update: Harbor’s Assessment-based Planning System (HAPS) Integrating Learning Outcomes Assessment, Student Achievement Data and Institution-Set.
Integrated Planning = Reacting, Reflecting, Recharging.
Planning 101 Overview of integrated planning at SCC
External Review Team: Roles and Responsibilities A Very Brief Training! conducted by JoLynn Noe Office of Assessment.
SPC Advisory Committee Training - TAC Fall 2015 Institutional Research President’s Office 1 Abridged from the SPC Advisory Committee Training on October.
Program Review 2.0 Pilot 2 October Self Evaluation HAPS is the result of a process that began in 2012, the last Accreditation self- evaluation.
Student Success  What is it?  How can we assess it?  Whose responsibility is it?  What role do you play?
Strategic Master Planning Revising the Strategic Master Plan
Gordon State College Office of Institutional Effectiveness Faculty Meeting August 5, 2015.
Unit Planning : Integrating Learning Outcomes Assessment, Student Achievement Data and Institution-Set Standards with College Planning and Resource.
Program Review 2.0 Pilot 2 October Self Evaluation HAPS is the result of a process that began in 2012, the last Accreditation self- evaluation.
Unit Planning : Integrating Learning Outcomes Assessment, Student Achievement Data and Institution-Set Standards with College Planning and Resource.
IS GCC MEETING ITS MISSION AND GOALS? MASTER PLANNING COMMITTEE (TEAM A) MAY 8, 2015.
Assessment Committee 20 October Self Evaluation HAPS is the result of a process that began in 2012, the last Accreditation self- evaluation.
Los Angeles Valley College April 21, QUESTION 3: NEW GOALS & OBJECTIVES REFLECTING COLLEGE BASIC SKILLS INITIATIVE “ACTION PLANS”
Integrated Planning Initiatives Dr. Ryan Cornner Associate Vice President, Strategic Planning and Innovation November 17, 2014.
Forward Together: UW Madison’s Framework for Diversity and Inclusive Excellence Ad Hoc Diversity Planning Committee Shared Governance (Faculty, staff,
Strategic Plan: Goals, Objectives & Success Measures Administrative Forum, South Campus June 17,
Lead-Off Batter: Applying New Accjc standards
Committee Orientation
Program Review and Integrated Planning: A Conversation About Data
D Adapted from: Kaplan & Norton The YCCD District Mission, Vision, Values & Goals are Foundational to College Planning. All College EMP work aligns.
LAVC Strategic plan Progress Report
Presented To: SLO Symposium
Presented To: College Planning Council
Academic Affairs Cluster 10 December 2015
Strategic Planning: The External Environment
Accreditation Standard 1: Mission, Academic Quality and Institutional Effectiveness, and Integrity: The College Mission & The 2015 Student Success Scorecard.
Chairs and Managers Retreat 1 February 2016, SSA 219
College Planning Council 8 June 2015
Strategic Planning: The External Environment
Presented To: College Planning Council
Academic Affairs Cluster 28 May 2015
Presented To: College Planning Council
Office of Institutional Effectiveness November 4, 2014
Unit Planning Retreat 1 February 2016, SSA 219
Accreditation follow-up report
Local Goal Setting & SEA Plan Introduction & Overview
College Planning Council 8 June 2015
Presented To: College Planning Council
Presentation transcript:

Assessment Committee 20 October 2015

2012 Self Evaluation HAPS is the result of a process that began in 2012, the last Accreditation self- evaluation. Several results that are significant to the current cycle: Address recommendation on program review and planning Clarity on SLO assessment expectations Notice of new standards with further data and assessment reporting requirements

Accreditation Standard 1 Standard 1: The institution demonstrates strong commitment to a mission that emphasizes student learning and student achievement. Using analysis of quantitative and qualitative data, the institution continuously and systematically evaluates, plans, implements, and improves the quality of its educational programs and services. The institution demonstrates integrity in all policies, actions, and communication. The administration, faculty, staff, and governing board members act honestly, ethically, and fairly in the performance of their duties.

Use of 2012 Self-Evaluation Results As a result, the college engaged in a focused effort to integrate these accreditation requirements with emerging federal and state legislative requirements, including performance reporting expectations as evidenced by: Federal requirements for institution-set standards for student achievement and workforce outcomes State requirements for performance reporting (ARCC, Student Success Scorecard) State requirements for funding based on services for new students (SSSP) State requirements for Student Equity reporting (Equity Plan)

The Student Success Scorecard – CCCCO Office:

Spring 2014 Evaluation The program review and planning cycle of was evaluated and the results were delivered to the college in Spring The college began implementing the recommendations by: Reviewing the college mission and as a result revising the mission to include a measurement component (Fall 2014-Spring 2015) Creating a new college strategic educational master plan (SEMP) Board approved Spring 2015

The New College Mission Los Angeles Harbor College promotes access & student success through associate and transfer degrees, certificates, economic & workforce development, & basic skills instruction. Our educational programs & support services meet the needs of diverse communities as measured by campus institutional learning outcomes.

Why Revise the Mission? To review and re-establish college priorities To create a framework for assessing our priorities To align with the LACCD Mission and Strategic Plan

Q1: Does the new mission meet the Standard? STANDARD: The institution demonstrates strong commitment to a mission that emphasizes student learning and student achievement. OLD: Los Angeles Harbor College fosters learning through comprehensive programs that meet the educational needs of the community as measured by student success, personal and institutional accountability, and integrity NEW: Los Angeles Harbor College promotes access & student success through associate and transfer degrees, certificates, economic & workforce development, & basic skills instruction. Our educational programs & support services meet the needs of diverse communities as measured by campus institutional learning outcomes.

Planning Task Group, 2015 The outcomes of this Task Group were: Revise the college planning process (planning document) Align SEMP with federal and state requirements Identify specific measurements to assess the achievement of the SEMP Make the SEMP the framework for program review, unit planning and resource allocation

Revised Planning Process Assessment-based Planning Model Outcomes Assessment Process Program Outcome: SLO/SAO or SEMP Measure Collect Data: Student Achievement, Learning Outcomes, External Scans Outcomes Assessment/ Analysis: SLO/SAO Evaluation/ Program Review Use Results: Improvement Action/ Resource Allocation

SEMP & Requirements Alignment College Mission Goal 1. Access and Preparation for Success AtD (AA/SS) Community Services (AS) Enroll Mgmt (AA/AS) Equity (AA) SSSP (SS) Student Success Scorecard Goal 2. Teaching and Learning for Success Accreditation Standards AtD (AA/SS) Basic Skills (AA) Enroll Mgmt (AA/AS) Equity (AA) IEPI SSSP (SS) Student Success Scorecard Goal 3. Organizational Effectiveness Accreditation Standards District Strategic Plan Enroll Mgmt (AA/AS) Facilities (AS) Human Resources (AS) IEPI Technology (TAC) Goal 4. Resources and Collaboration Accreditation Standards Enroll Mgmt (AA/AS) Foundation (AA) Technology (TAC)

Revised SEMP & Objectives College Mission Goal 1: Access and Preparation for Success Equitable access to education Matriculation completion Complete Math and English in first year Goal 2: Teaching and Learning for Success Active learning and student engagement Milestone completion Equity in Outcomes Goal 3: Organizational Effectiveness Improve processes and services Improve communications and governance College Infrastructure Employee development Goal 4: Resources Balanced budget Diversify resources Foundation development Business and community support

Revised SEMP Measures Goal 1. Access and Preparation for Success Basic skills first- year enrollment * Completion-based class schedules Equitable Enrollment * Orientation, Assessment and Educational Plan completion rate * Fall to Spring Persistence * Goal 2. Teaching and Learning for Success Achievement gaps * Basic skills completion* Course completion rates ** Gainful Employment** Graduation data ** Licensure Passage rates** Number of transfers * On-time Completion * Program (degree)/certificat e completion ** SLO, PLO, ILO achievement ** Year-to-year persistence * Goal 3. Organization al Effectiveness Accreditation status * Fiscal viability and compliance with state and federal guidelines (IEPI measures)* Institutional plan progress ** Program review, Planning and Assessment participation ** Process review and evaluation ** Resource allocation ** Goal 4. Resources and Collaboration BUDGET GOALS?? Efficiency measures (class size average, fill rate, FTES/FTEF) Number and type of revenue sources and amount generated Funds raised (annual and cumulative) Foundation endowment Amount of scholarships awarded Number and type of community/busin ess partnerships

HAPS Workgroup A workgroup (OIE staff, SLO coordinator, Academic Dean) met during Summer 2015 to develop an integrated SLO assessment, program review, planning and resource allocation system using the SEMP framework: Developed Harbor’s Assessment-based Planning System Documented in SLO Assessment Handbook (draft) and Program Review and Planning Manual (in process) Designed to address 2012 Recommendations, college evaluation results and new Accreditation Standards

SEMP & ILO Alignment Outcomes Assessment → Improvement Action Program Review / Program and Service Outcomes → Unit Plans Annual Cluster Plan → Cluster Priorities District/ Annual College Plan → CPC Annual College Priorities Institution-level MissionSEMP/GoalsObjectiveMeasure Improvement Action ILOsPLOsSLO/SAO Improvement Action

EDUCATION PAYS!