RIVET Introduction By Mehar Ali Shah PhD Student National Centre for Physics Quaid-I-Azam University Pakistan 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Experimental Particle Physics PHYS6011 Joel Goldstein, RAL 1.Introduction & Accelerators 2.Particle Interactions and Detectors (2) 3.Collider Experiments.
Advertisements

Peter Schleper, Hamburg University SUSY07 Non-SUSY Searches at HERA 1 Non-SUSY Searches at HERA Peter Schleper Hamburg University SUSY07 July 27, 2007.
Interjet Energy Flow. Patrick Ryan, Univ. of Wisconsin Collaboration Meeting, June 6, Patrick Ryan University of Wisconsin Claire Gwenlan Oxford.
Trigger study with CASTOR – Forward and Diffractive Meeting, Antwerpen –October 26, 2007 – Silvia Ocheşanu 1 Silvia Ochesanu Thomas Maes, Hans Van Havermaet.
Recent Electroweak Results from the Tevatron Weak Interactions and Neutrinos Workshop Delphi, Greece, 6-11 June, 2005 Dhiman Chakraborty Northern Illinois.
Peter Loch University of Arizona Tucson, Arizona USA
Data-based background predictions using forward events Victor Pavlunin and David Stuart University of California Santa Barbara July 10, 2008.
Interjet Energy Flow at ZEUS. Patrick Ryan. Univ. of Wisconsin DPF, Aug. 27, Patrick Ryan University of Wisconsin Aug. 27, 2004 Interjet Energy.
November 1999Rick Field - Run 2 Workshop1 We are working on this! “Min-Bias” Physics: Jet Evolution & Event Shapes  Study the CDF “min-bias” data with.
Tev4LHC Workshop, QCD, Emily Nurse, UCL for the CEDAR collaboration (Andy Buckley, Jon Butterworth, James Monk, Ben Waugh, Mike Whalley,
JetWeb on the Grid Ben Waugh (UCL), GridPP6, What is JetWeb? How can JetWeb use the Grid? Progress report The Future Conclusions.
CDF Joint Physics Group June 27, 2003 Rick FieldPage 1 PYTHIA Tune A versus Run 2 Data  Compare PYTHIA Tune A with Run 2 data on the “underlying event”.
Measurements, Model Independence & Monte Carlo Jon Butterworth University College London ICTP/MCnet school São Paulo 27/4/2015.
Marc Sangel Supervisor: Sebastian Johnert DESY Summer Student Programm Hamburg, DESY, 02. September 2011.
W properties AT CDF J. E. Garcia INFN Pisa. Outline Corfu Summer Institute Corfu Summer Institute September 10 th 2 1.CDF detector 2.W cross section measurements.
HERA/LHC Workshop, MC Tools working group, HzTool, JetWeb and CEDAR Tools for validating and tuning MC models Ben Waugh, UCL Workshop on.
Irakli Chakaberia Final Examination April 28, 2014.
1 A Preliminary Model Independent Study of the Reaction pp  qqWW  qq ℓ qq at CMS  Gianluca CERMINARA (SUMMER STUDENT)  MUON group.
Working Group C: Hadronic Final States David Milstead The University of Liverpool Review of Experiments 27 experiment and 11 theory contributions.
Cambridge 19 th April1 Comparisons between Event Generators and Data Peter Richardson IPPP, Durham University.
Andreas Morsch, CERN EP/AIP CHEP 2003 Simulation in ALICE Andreas Morsch For the ALICE Offline Project 2003 Conference for Computing in High Energy and.
W + /W - and l + /l - A Means to investigate PDFs T. Schörner-Sadenius, G. Steinbrück Hamburg University HERA-LHC Workshop, CERN, October 2004.
Top threshold Monte Carlo generator Stewart Boogert John Adams Institute Royal Holloway, University of London Filimon Gournaris (Ph.D student and majority.
Run 2 Monte-Carlo Workshop April 20, 2001 Rick Field - Florida/CDFPage 1 The Underlying Event in Hard Scattering Processes  The underlying event in a.
Fermilab Energy Scaling Workshop April 29, 2009 Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMSPage 1 1 st Workshop on Energy Scaling in Hadron-Hadron Collisions Rick Field.
The centrality dependence of high p T π 0 production in d-Au collisions Abstract Michael Kordell II, Abhijit Majumder Wayne State University, Detroit,
Diffractive Dijet Production Hardeep Bansil University of Birmingham SM Soft QCD topical meeting: Diffraction and Forward Detectors 24/05/2011.
QCD Physics with ATLAS Mike Seymour University of Manchester/CERN PH-TH ATLAS seminar January 25 th / February 22 nd 2005.
Top mass error predictions with variable JES for projected luminosities Joshua Qualls Centre College Mentor: Michael Wang.
Data-based background predictions for new particle searches at the LHC David Stuart Univ. of California, Santa Barbara Texas A&M Seminar March 24, 2010.
St. Andrews, Scotland August 22, 2011 Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMSPage Rick Field University of Florida Outline  Do we need a.
High P T Inclusive Jets Study High P T Inclusive Jets Study Manuk Zubin Mehta, Prof. Manjit kaur Panjab University, Chandigarh India CMS Meeting March,
Update on WH to 3 lepton Analysis And Electron Trigger Efficiencies with Tag And Probe Nishu 1, Suman B. Beri 1, Guillelmo Gomez Ceballos 2 1 Panjab University,
Andrey Korytov, University of Florida ISMD 2003 September 5-11, 2003, Kraków Soft QCD Phenomena in High-E T Jet Events at Tevatron Andrey Korytov for CDF.
Search for High-Mass Resonances in e + e - Jia Liu Madelyne Greene, Lana Muniz, Jane Nachtman Goal for the summer Searching for new particle Z’ --- a massive.
Update on Diffractive Dijet Production Search Hardeep Bansil University of Birmingham Soft QCD WG Meeting 29/04/2013.
First analysis of Long-Range (Forward-Backward) pt and multiplicity correlations in ALICE in pp collisions at 900 GeV G.Feofilov, A.Ivanov, V.Vechernin.
Measurement of inclusive jet and dijet production in pp collisions at √s = 7 TeV using the ATLAS detector Seminar talk by Eduardo Garcia-Valdecasas Tenreiro.
24/08/2009 LOMONOSOV09, MSU, Moscow 1 Study of jet transverse structure with CMS experiment at 10 TeV Natalia Ilina (ITEP, Moscow) for the CMS collaboration.
CDF Paper Seminar Fermilab - March 11, 2010 Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMSPage 1 Sorry to be so slow!! Studying the “Underlying Event” at CDF CDF Run 2 “Leading.
October 2011 David Toback, Texas A&M University Research Topics Seminar1 David Toback Texas A&M University For the CDF Collaboration CIPANP, June 2012.
Charged Particle Multiplicity, Michele Rosin U. WisconsinQCD Meeting May 13, M. Rosin, D. Kçira, and A. Savin University of Wisconsin L. Shcheglova.
1 Measurement of the Mass of the Top Quark in Dilepton Channels at DØ Jeff Temple University of Arizona for the DØ collaboration DPF 2006.
Mayda M. Velasco MBUEWO Sept. 6-7, 2010 Latest CMS Minimum Bias Results.
Model Independent Measurements Jon Butterworth University College London MCnet school Spa, Belgium September 2015.
Higgs in the Large Hadron Collider Joe Mitchell Advisor: Dr. Chung Kao.
Viktor Veszpremi Purdue University, CDF Collaboration Tev4LHC Workshop, Oct , Fermilab ZH->vvbb results from CDF.
Search for Standard Model Higgs in ZH  l + l  bb channel at DØ Shaohua Fu Fermilab For the DØ Collaboration DPF 2006, Oct. 29 – Nov. 3 Honolulu, Hawaii.
Improving ATLAS hard diffraction measurements with the STEP award Hardeep Bansil University of Birmingham 18/10/2013.
W – boson Helicity of top quark decay
CEDAR Combined E-science Data Analysis Resource cedar. ac
More Precision, Less Work
LCG Generator Services project
Observation of Diffractively Produced W- and Z-Bosons
Lake Louise Winter Institute
Inclusive Jet Cross Section Measurement at CDF
Event Shape Analysis in minimum bias pp collisions in ALICE.
Hard Core Protons soft-physics at hadron colliders
Modeling Min-Bias and Pile-Up University of Oregon February 24, 2009
Jessica Leonard Oct. 23, 2006 Physics 835
Predicting “Min-Bias” and the “Underlying Event” at the LHC
“Min-Bias” and the “Underlying Event” in Run 2 at CDF and the LHC
The Next Stretch of the Higgs Magnificent Mile
Observation of Diffractively Produced W- and Z-Bosons
The Underlying Event in Hard Scattering Processes
Perspectives on Physics and on CMS at Very High Luminosity
Experimental and theoretical Group Torino + Moscow
Measurement of b-jet Shapes at CDF
Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS
Presentation transcript:

RIVET Introduction By Mehar Ali Shah PhD Student National Centre for Physics Quaid-I-Azam University Pakistan 1

The Rivet project (Robust Independent Validation of Experiment and Theory) is a generator-agnostic toolkit for validation of Monte Carlo event generators. RIVET emphasizes the avoidance of hard-coding reference data or histogram binnings in the analysis code. Rivet provides functions to extract this information from bundled data files, meaning that it is much easier to keep reference and generated data synchronised. RIVET 2

Rivet is a library and set of programs which produce simulated distributions which can be directly compared to measured data for MC validation and tuning studies. It can also be used without reference data to compare two or more generators to each other for regression testing or tune comparison. The Rivet library contains the tools needed to calculate physical observables from HepMC files or objects, a large set of important experimental analyses, and histogramming tools for data comparison and presentation. RIVET: Software structure 3

RIVET and CMSSW RIVET is interfaced to CMSSW. This means that through CMSSW we can run rivet standard analyses, implement new ones of our own. We can run one or many Rivet analysis with an EDAnalyzer wrapper, that allows us to make full advantage of the CMSSW framework. In other words we can run the generator and the Rivet analyses in a single CMSSW run, for any of the generators interfaced to CMSSW. ( It is used by both phenomenologists/generator developers and by the LHC experiments for generator tuning, analysis prototyping, and MC-data comparisons. ) 4

SETUP Rivet docs: online at – PDF manual, HTML list of existing analyses. Log in to lxplus.cern.ch or use the Rivet VM. On lxplus, if you’re not in a bash shell (echo $SHELL), then run bash to make life more pleasant: the Rivet toolkit provides contextual command line completion with bash. On lxplus:  source ~abuckley/public/setupRivetProf.sh Test commands:  rivet --help 5

Separation of generator steering and event analysis Automated binning of MC histograms from data. A C++-replacement for HZTOOL Data export direct from HepData Generator-independent implementations of standard observable calculators Almost 100 important analyses from LEP, HERA, RHIC, KEK-B, Tevatron Runs I & II, LHC and more User-implemented analyses can be used as "plugins" without modifying the Rivet code. Some features of Rivet: 6

RIVET Projections and Analyses If one want to use Rivet for validation and data/MC comparisons the most important things to understand are RivetProjections which calculate event properties in an efficient and robust way. RivetAnalysis which book histograms from HepData files, apply projections to a HepMC event, and fill new histograms. 7

Projections A projection is an object which calculates a property or properties from an Event. Such properties can be ◮ A number (such as Q2) ◮ A set of final-state Rivet::Particles ◮ Jets They are just observable calculators: given an Event object, they project out physical observables. They also automatically cache themselves, to avoid recomputation: this leads to the most unintuitive code structures in Rivet. 8

FinalState - projection finds all final state particles in a given range of eta and a given pT cutoff. Subclasses: –ChargedFinalState and NeutralFinalState have the predictable effect! –IdentifiedFinalState can be used to find particular particle species. – VetoedFinalState finds particles other than specified. –VisibleFinalState excludes invisible particles like Neutrinos etc. Examples of projections 9

Histogram autobooking This is a means for getting your Rivet histograms binned with the same bin edges as used in the experimental data that you’ll be comparing to. To use autobooking, just call the booking helper function with only the histogram name (check that this matches the name in the reference.aida file), e.g. _hist1 = bookHistogram1D("d01-x01-y01") 10

Sorry experimentalists no ROOT: No Worry !! You can convert the Rivet output with the aida2root script... The plots are written out as dataPointSet objects in AIDA XML format. Aida 11

Central Track Multiplicities and Forward Energy Flow in W/Z Boson Events Summer Student 2011 at CERN With Forward Physics Group 12 My Experience with RIVET

Introduction Study the energy flow in the forward detectors, and the correlations of the forward energy flow with the trackmultiplicity in the central detector using events with centrally produced W and Z bosons, identified with their leptonic decays ( This analysis of W and Z events shows that the underlying event structure and the observed correlations are not described by the available non-diffractive soft hadron production models ) (The analysis of W and Z events shows that the underlying event structure and the observed correlations are not described by the available non-diffractive soft hadron production models) 13

Introduction The analysis of the underlying event structure and energy flow correlation in processes with colorless final states, such as pp → W(Z)X →ℓ(ℓℓ)X can provide new insights into so far unexplored aspects of multi-parton interactions. W(Z) events with high track multiplicities in the central detector indicate a possibly large contribution from multi- parton interactions. 14

Reference Paper and Data Samples “ Forward Energy Flow, Central Track Multiplicities and Large Rapidity Gaps in W and Z Boson Events at 7 TeV pp Collisions” (CMS PAS FWD ) 7 TeV pp collision data sample of about 36 pb-1, recorded during the 2010 LHC operation is used for comparison. Pythia 6 z2 tune (describe the pp -> X interactions at high energies by a perturbative hard interaction of two partons within the protons combined with a non-perturbative multi- parton interaction component, existing in many variations, between the proton remnants) 15

Event Selection measured W/Z with lepton in |η| < 1.4 p T electron > 25 GeV Missing Et > 30 GeV Transverse mass of lepton and neutrino > 60 GeV 16

Peaked at pT = m W /2 = 40 GeV 17 Aida to Root 17 Example plots from RIVET

W → ℓ GeV Central track multiplicity 18

W → ℓ ( GeV Normalized Track Multiplicity Distributions 19

W →e  X 3 < |η| < 4.9 W Energy flow measurement 20

W →e  X 3 < |η| < 4.9 E (each particle) > 0, 2, 4, 6 (GeV) W Energy flow measurement 0, 2, 4,6 GeV 21

Correction factors from detector to hadron level 22 Forward energy flow in the acceptance of HF (CMS AN AN )

Correction factors from detector to hadron level CFs3 < η < < η < < η < 4.9 C1: dijets C2: Minbias C3 = 1.5C C4 = 2C

All Correction Factors with 0 (GeV) Cut 24

All Correction Factors with 2 (GeV) cut 25

All Correction Factors with 4 (GeV) cut 26

All Correction Factors with 6 (GeV) cut 27

HF Energy measurement with all Cfs 28

Energy Distributions in HF+ with cuts in HF- 20 < ∑HF- <

20 < ∑HF- < < ∑HF- < 400 Energy Distributions in HF (GeV) 6GeV 30 RIVET Beauty

Future Plan RIVET people are much cooperative and helpful. They respond immediatly whenever help needed. I am going to start my PhD research. I would love to continue with RIVET. Now I am looking for an interesting topic. One option could be to choose a top paper and get the same results using RIVET and compare it with different generators. There could be performed so many other interesting studies by making use of RIVET. 31

Conclusion Lots of standard analyses built in, including key ones for pQCD and MPI model testing. New analyses can be picked up at runtime: nice API with lots of tools to make this as simple and pleasant as we can. Computations automatically cached. Histograms automatically synchronised. Satisfaction automatically guaranteed Simply RIVET makes life very easy ! 32

Thanks 33INSC