Risks & Odds Professor Kate O’Donnell. When talking about the chance of something happening, e.g. death, hip fracture, we can talk about: risk and relative.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

How to assess an abstract

Advertisements

Comparing Two Proportions (p1 vs. p2)

Terminology and Jargon Demystified

Step 3: Critically Appraising the Evidence: Statistics for Harm and Etiology.

Extension Article by Dr Tim Kenny

Understanding real research 3. Assessment of risk.

Measures of Effect: An Introduction Epidemiology Supercourse Astana, July 2012 Philip la Fleur, RPh MSc(Epidem) Deputy Director, Center for Life Sciences.

Introduction to Critical Appraisal : Quantitative Research

Critical Appraisal of Systematic Reviews Douglas Newberry.

CRITICAL APPRAISAL Dr. Cristina Ana Stoian Resident Journal Club

Critical Appraisal of an Article on Therapy. Why critical appraisal? Why therapy?

Interpreting Basic Statistics

Clinical trial The Way We Make Progress Against Disease Prof. Ashry Gad Mohamed Prof. of Epidemiology College of Medicine & KKUH.

Chance Is the association causal? RR = 7 Detectives in the Classroom – Investigation 3-3: Chance.

Mathew J. Reeves BVSc, PhD Associate Professor, Epidemiology

Statistics for Health Care

TREATMENT 1 Evaluation of interventions How best assess treatments /other interventions? RCT (randomised controlled trial)

Understanding study designs through examples Manish Chaudhary MPH (BPKIHS)

The Bahrain Branch of the UK Cochrane Centre In Collaboration with Reyada Training & Management Consultancy, Dubai-UAE Cochrane Collaboration and Systematic.

Absolute, Relative and Attributable Risks. Outcomes or differences that we are interested in:  Differences in means or proportions  Odds ratio (OR)

 Mean: true average  Median: middle number once ranked  Mode: most repetitive  Range : difference between largest and smallest.

Statistics for clinical research An introductory course.

DEB BYNUM, MD AUGUST 2010 Evidence Based Medicine: Review of the basics.

Please turn off cell phones, pagers, etc. The lecture will begin shortly.

Measures of Association

Risk Concepts and Glossary. Cross-sectional study The observation of a defined population at a single point in time or time interval. Exposure and outcome.

Analyzing Randomized Control Trial: ITT vs. PP vs. AT Proceedings from Journal club….. Vikash.

Statistics for nMRCGP Jo Kirkcaldy. Curriculum Condensed Knowledge Incidence and prevalence Specificity and sensitivity Positive and negative predictive.

CBR-1 Benefit/Risk Assessment for Use of Clozaril in the Treatment of Emergent Suicidal Behavior John M. Kane, MD Chairman, Department of Psychiatry The.

Number Needed to Treat. End Points Baseline Risk is the risk associated with a particular condition Baseline Risk is the risk associated with a particular.

How to Analyze Therapy in the Medical Literature (part 2)

Statistics 101. Why statistics ? To understand studies in clinical journals. To design and analyze clinical research studies. To be better able to explain.

Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Acute Ischemic Stroke National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke rt-PA Stroke Study Group.

Understanding real research 4. Randomised controlled trials.

Measures of Association Professor Mobeen Iqbal Shifa College of Medicine.

Appraising Evidence into our Practice. Objectives Deciding the research result into practice in specific context Interpreting/calculating Number Needed.

EBCP. Random vs Systemic error Random error: errors in measurement that lead to measured values being inconsistent when repeated measures are taken. Ie:

O RGANIZING & DISPLAYING DATA Dr. Omar Al Jadaan Assistant Professor – Computer Science & Mathematics.

Quality Education for a Healthier Scotland Pharmacy Critical Appraisal Skills Basic I NHS Education Scotland Produced in collaboration with the Association.

November 5, 2014 Matthew Tuck, MD Hospitalist, Veterans Affairs Medical Center Assistant Professor of Medicine, George Washington University.

Literature Appraisal Effectiveness of Therapy. Measures of treatment effect Statistical significance Odds ratio Relative risk Absolute risk reduction.

Mother and Child Health: Research Methods G.J.Ebrahim Editor Journal of Tropical Pediatrics, Oxford University Press.

Stats Facts Mark Halloran. Diagnostic Stats Disease present Disease absent TOTALS Test positive aba+b Test negative cdc+d TOTALSa+cb+da+b+c+d.

Measuring associations between exposures and outcomes

Stat 100 Feb 11 Read Chapter 12, try 1-9. Problem 14 of Chapter 12 Case control study: 239 lung cancer patients and 429 controls 98 of the lung cancer.

A Simple Method for Evaluating the Clinical Literature “PP-ICONS” approach Based on Robert J. Flaherty - Family Practice Management – 5/2004.

Compliance Original Study Design Randomised Surgical care Medical care.

Vanderbilt Sports Medicine Evidence-Base Medicine How to Practice and Teach EBM Chapter 5 : Therapy.

Silaja Cheruvu, R3.  What’s the BEST way to prevent diabetes in high risk patients?  By doing nothing?  With lifestyle changes?  With medication?

PTP 560 Research Methods Week 12 Thomas Ruediger, PT.

Biostatistics Board Review Parul Chaudhri, DO Family Medicine Faculty Development Fellow, UPMC St Margaret March 5, 2016.

Risk Different ways of assessing it. Objectives Be able to define and calculate: Absolute risk (reduction) Relative risk (reduction) Number needed to.

2 3 انواع مطالعات توصيفي (Descriptive) تحليلي (Analytic) مداخله اي (Interventional) مشاهده اي ( Observational ) كارآزمايي باليني كارآزمايي اجتماعي كارآزمايي.

Number Needed to Treat Alex Djuricich, MD Indiana University School of Medicine Department of Medicine Ambulatory Rotation

GP ST2 Group, 28/9/11 Tom Gamble

HelpDesk Answers Synthesizing the Evidence

CRITICAL NUMBERS LIVING WITH RISK

Journal club Mohammed Al-Garni, MD, FEBO,ABO,SBO

ارائه :مرجان اكبري كامراني

Dabigatran vs Warfarin in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation – Results

remember to round it to whole numbers

Noninvasive Positive-Pressure Ventilation In COPD

1 Information Mastery Skills Calculating RR, RRR, ARR and NNTs A. Bornstein, MD, FACC Assistant Professor of Medicine Weil Cornell Medical College New.

Interpreting Basic Statistics

Measures of risk and association

EBM – therapy Dr. Tina Dewi J , dr., SpOG

Associate Fellow, Centre for Evidence-based Medicine, Oxford

Evidence Based Medicine 2019 A.Bornstein MD FACC Assistant Professor of Medicine Hofstra Northwell School of Medicine Hempstead, Long Island.

Risk Ratio A risk ratio, or relative risk, compares the risk of some health-related event such as disease or death in two groups. The two groups are typically.

Risk ratio (RR) and number needed to treat (NNT) are time-dependent measures. a) When an intervention is associated with constant relative risk reduction.

Presentation transcript:

Risks & Odds Professor Kate O’Donnell

When talking about the chance of something happening, e.g. death, hip fracture, we can talk about: risk and relative risk or odds and odds ratio. Risks and odds

Risks A proportion. Numerator / Denominator. Odds A ratio. Numerator / (Denominator - Numerator).

Two by two table.

Risk Risk is: a proportion. Risk of event in expt. group = a = EER. a+b Risk of event in control group = c = CER. c+d

Relative risk Relative risk (RR) is: a ratio of proportions. RR = EER CER. A measure of the chance of the event occurring in the experimental group relative to it occurring in the control group.

Relative risk - 2 RR <1 if group represented in the numerator is at lower “risk” of the event. Want this if the event is a bad outcome e.g. death. RR >1 if group represented in numerator is at greater “risk” of the event. Want this if the event is a good outcome e.g. smoking cessation.

Relative risk reduction The difference in the risk of the event between the control and experimental groups, relative to the control group. RRR = (CER - EER)/CER. Use this term if the event is bad e.g. death.

Relative risk reduction - 2 An alternative way of calculating the relative risk reduction is to use the relative risk: RRR = (1 - RR). Use this term if the event is bad e.g. death.

Absolute risk reduction The absolute difference between the risk of the event in the control and experimental groups. ARR = CER - EER. ARR can be used to calculate the number needed to treat (NNT). Use this term if the event is bad e.g. death.

Relative benefit increase The difference in the risk of the event between the control and experimental groups, relative to the control group. RBI = (CER - EER)/CER. Use this term if the event is good e.g. smoking cessation.

Relative benefit increase - 2 An alternative way of calculating the relative benefit increase is to use the relative risk: RBI = (1 - RR). Use this term if the event is good e.g. smoking cessation.

Absolute benefit increase The absolute difference between the risk of the event in the control and experimental groups. ABI = CER - EER. ABI can be used to calculate the number needed to treat (NNT). Use this term if the event is good e.g. smoking cessation.

Number needed to treat The number of patients who needed to be treated to prevent the occurrence of one adverse event (e.g. complication, death) or promote the occurrence of one beneficial event (e.g. cessation of smoking). NNT = 1/ARR.

Odds Odds is: a ratio. Odds of event in expt. group = a b Odds of event in control group = c d

Odds ratio (OR) is: a ratio of ratios. OR = ad bc. Odds ratio