The development of a framework to facilitate a collaborative peer learning 2:1 model of practice placement education Ann-Marie Lynam Practice Education.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Manual Evaluation: Are we doing what we think we are doing?
Advertisements

Education in the information society Emerging trends and challenges for education Joke Voogt, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Stage One: Registrant Mentor, (N.M.C., 2006).
Resource for: Stage 1, Stage 2 mentor preparation and ongoing annual Mentor Updates. 10 Chapters: Chapter 1: Mentorship – an overview. Chapters 2 – 9:
School of Medicine FACULTY OF MEDICINE AND HEALTH Does interprofessional education and working have any impact on perceptions of professional identity.
PQF Induction: Small group delivery or 1-1 session.
Students’ experience of the process of practice assessment; a multi-professional case study from Social work, Midwifery and Emergency Care. Tracey Proctor-Childs;
Review of Tomorrow’s Doctors Ben Griffith. The GMC’s role in medical education Promotes high standards Currently covers undergraduate education and the.
1 Interprofessional Education (IPE) “.. Occurs when two or more professions learn with, from, and about each other to improve collaboration and the quality.
A feasibility study to explore patient, clinician and GP decision making of acute recurrent tonsillitis for NATTINA: The NAtional Trial of Tonsillectomy.
Internship Seminar What will be covered: The internship context
Classroom Management in a Concept Based Curriculum Jill Peltzer, PhD, RN, APRN-CNS.
Interprofessional Education and Practice: Creating Leaders and Opportunities for Clinical Learning MODULE 1 Overview of Programme and Participants Overview.
Supervising Students in Social Work Placements in Wales and the U.K. Paula McCreary. Tutor and Placement Coordinator, Dept. of Applied Social Science,
Stage One: Registrant, (N.M.C., 2006). Student Handout. (May, 2008).
Home Economics Teachers’ Readiness for Teaching STEM
Quality evaluation and improvement for Internal Audit
Managing Your Professional Development. Session Purpose  Provide you with the tools and skills to be a self-directed, lifelong learner  Introduce you.
Using a Board game to enhance mentor engagement within nurse education in practice settings Jo Hirdle and Belinda Humphries University Practice Learning.
Underagraduate Program in Dokuz Eylül University School of Nursing Problem-Based Learning Curriculum.
Family Medicine Program By the end of this session, faculty will 1.Understand what is meant by competence and the competence trajectory expected during.
A Brief overview of the Standards to Support Learning and Assessment in Practice. Nursing and Midwifery Council (2006) Standard to Support Learning and.
The Student Experience Project Overview for Kosovo Higher Education visit Mark Wilkinson October 2014.
Managing Your Professional Development. Session Purpose  Provide you with the tools and skills to be a self-directed, lifelong learner  Introduce you.
Oslo 27 th September 2011 Interprofessional Education at UEA Overview of IPL delivery & Lessons learnt.
Mentorship Preparation Programme Week 6 Clinical Assessment processes Queen’s University Belfast Open University University of Ulster.
Outline  The Evidence  Program overview  Local Initiatives.
Educational Solutions for Workforce Development Pharmacy Significant Event Analysis Analysis of an event to change practice Val Reilly SEA Reviewer NHS.
Problem-Based Learning in Professional Education Doris R. Brodeur Massachusetts Institute of Technology AAHE - April 2004.
OUR MODULES A Virtual On-line Institute of Interprofessional Education P. Solomon 1, S. Baptiste 1, P. Hall 2, R. Luke 3, C. Orchard 4, E. Rukholm 5, L.Carter.
B Nurse 2011 Curriculum. Programme Management Team Programme Director Programme Director: Geraldine Lyte Deputy Programme Director: Elizabeth Lee Woolf.
Curriculum planning Proposed Collaborative working modules.
CHILDREN’S PERCEPTIONS OF LEARNING WITH EDUCATIONAL GAMES USING IPOD TOUCHES Yasemin Allsop ICT Coordinator, Wilbury Primary School (UK)
Curriculum Development Update Aims of the Meeting To update academic staff on the developments thus far within the Undergraduate Pre-Registration Nursing.
Professionally Speaking : Qualitative Research and the Professions. Using action research to gauge the quality of feedback given to student teachers while.
Results Student Engagement : Students generally found logbooks easy to use and practical in the hospital setting. Purpose : There appeared to be a perceived.
Managing Your Professional Development. Session Objectives You will know how to:  Identify key steps in the Professional Development Portfolio process.
AN INNOVATIVE & INTEGRATED TESTING FORMAT COMBINING ANATOMY, PRIMARY CARE SKILLS, AND OMM IN A SIMULATED PATIENT ENCOUNTER Gail Dudley, DO, Francine Anderson,
Doing It Differently in Science - An Evaluation of the Process Sharon Fraser and Elizabeth Deane University of Western Sydney, Nepean April, 28th 2000.
Practice Education Facilitators. Quality Standards for Practice Placements (NES 2003)
Developing New Insights Northampton Learning and Teaching Conference May 2014 Sara Simons and Sid Jeewa.
This action-based research study used a descriptive triangulation process, which included quantitative and qualitative methods to analyze nursing students’
Practice-based interprofessional peer-learning between medical and midwifery students – a pilot study Celia Woolf¹ & Adele Hamilton² ¹Institute of Health.
The trauma pathway: Rehabilitation Beth Cordrey 10 th September 2009.
Initial Project Aims To increase the capacity of primary schools in partnership with parents to implement a sustainable health and sexuality education.
Developing Collaborative Practice: Innovations in Allied Health Student Education at SCGH Lindy Hall - Senior Social Worker Delivering a Healthy WA.
Non-Medical Prescribing Practice Based Learning and Assessment.
School practice Dragica Trivic. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FROM TEMPUS MASTS CONFERENCE in Novi Sad Practice should be seen as an integral part of the.
Title of Study : Preliminary findings from “An evaluation of the impact of the inclusion of a "Health and Well Being Module" in the undergraduate curriculum.
Abstract References Methods Introduction Results Conclusions Figures/Graphs Click headings to further view content Click Here to insert brief content.
Exploring Non-Physician Roles in Competency-Based Resident Education April 1, 2016 Nicole McGuire, Education Coordinator, Union Hospital FMR (Terre Haute,
Today’s presentation  Background and context  Rationale  Aim and objectives  Design and method  Impact  Reflective commentary  Transferability.
QSEN National Forum Elaine Mohn-Brown, EdD, RN, CMSRN May 26, 2016.
Curriculum Development: an Overview of 6 Steps MAJ Heather O’Mara, DO, FAAFP Faculty Development Fellow.
Case Study of the TOEFL iBT Preparation Course: Teacher’s perspective Jie Chen UWO.
FOUNDATION PROGRAMME – 2016 CURRICULUM Dr Mike Masding Head of Wessex Foundation School AoMRC Foundation Programme Committee.
Ulster.ac.uk Developing knowledge and skills in risk management for nursing students: The use of simulation and applied drama May 2016 Pat Deeny, Diane.
T HE USE OF ACTORS IN PRACTICE EDUCATION : A NOVEL APPROACH TO PREPARING SPEECH AND LANGUAGE THERAPY STUDENTS FOR CLINICAL PRACTICE Dr. Helen
Title of the Change Project
BSc Hons pre-reg Physiotherapy
Technical Business Consultancy Project
Poster 1. Leadership Development Programme : Leading Cultures of Research and Innovation in Clinical Teams Background The NHS Constitution is explicit.
Transforming Clerkships into an Integrated Longitudinal Learning Module: Model Madres: Maternal, Child and Family Health Adriana Padilla, MD Susan Hughes,
A Path of Learning and Improvement
GETTING ‘EVEN’ BETTER: FIVE LEVELS FOR PD EVALUATION
Physiotherapist Level 6 Integrated Degree Apprenticeship
Improving Student Retention and Wellbeing via Co-production
Physiotherapist Level 6 Integrated Degree Apprenticeship
The impact of small-group EBP education programme: barriers and facilitators for EBP allied health champions to share learning with peers.
A rollercoaster ride through multiple
Presentation transcript:

The development of a framework to facilitate a collaborative peer learning 2:1 model of practice placement education Ann-Marie Lynam Practice Education Coordinator School of Medicine, TCD November 2015

Overview of presentation: Background & Need Development of the framework Research study Findings to date Future Plans

Background & Need Changes in approach to learning Self-directed learning, self-assessment and reflective practice are skills which need to be viewed as outcomes of practice placement education (Bowles, 2008) Traditional didactic learning → integrated approach (Kolb, 1984; Parker & Kersner, 1998) Emphasis on peer learning & reflective practice (Schon, 1987; Boud & Walker, 1998; Fade, 2004; Morris & Moore, 2006)

Background & Need A collaborative peer learning 2:1 model One educator working with two or more students (Zavadak, Konecky-Dolnack et al., 1995) Promotes: Student-directed learning Reflective practice Student-led assessment Continuous professional development Lifelong learning Promoters & barriers reported (Baldry Currens, 2003; Dawes & Lambert, 2010)

Background & Need Further skills promoted by 2:1 model: Communication skills Teamwork skills Clinical skills Observation skills Feedback skills (Lincoln & McAllister, 1993; Morris & Stew, 2007; Baldry Currens, 2003; Triggs, Nemshick & Shepherd, 1996; Lekkas, Larsen et al., 2007; Grundy, 1994) Clinical competence improved: Patient evaluation, programme planning & implementation, communication, management, professionalism & documentation (DeClute & Ladyshewsky, 1993)

Background & Need 2:1 Model - based on peer learning: ‘Umbrella’ term – “to get knowledge through study, experience or teaching of an equal” (Lincoln & McAllister, 1993) Incorporates 3 aspects: Collaborative Learning –”indirect teaching in which the instructor identifies the task and organises the students to work out a solution, independently of the educator” Peer Observation – “involves one student observing the other student and sharing those observations in an objective manner” Peer Feedback – “involves formative feedback from one student to another (not assessment)” (DeClute & Ladyshewsky, 1993; CSP, 2002)

Background & Need BSc (Hons) Human Nutrition & Dietetics (TCD/DIT) Practice Placement Education learning outcomes, performance indicators, staged competency criteria & assessments developed (EFAD, 2009; Bowles, 2008; INDI, 2005) Five competency based learning outcomes – knowledge & practice, professionalism, communication, team working & service delivery. (Crehan, Moloney et al., 2010) Spiral curriculum – practice placement education: Practice Placement A – catering, 140 hours Practice Placement B – primary care/public health, 370 hours Practice Placement C – acute clinical care, 444 hours Assessment forms completed every 1-2 weeks 2:1 model trialled in four sites – outcome was development of ‘The Lynam Framework’ (Lynam, Corish et al., 2014)

Background & Need

Training sessions developed for students & educators Opportunity for role play of practical skills of peer observation, peer feedback & reflective practice based on theories of : Collaborative learning (Parker & Kersner, 1998) Behavioural change (Rapoport & Pearson, 2007) Reflective practice (Fade, 2004) Delivered to students in Year 2 as part of Professional Practice Studies Module. Delivered to Practice Placement B educators (18 locations) Delivered to Practice Placement C educators (11 locations)

Aims & Objectives Research Aim - To introduce a collaborative peer learning 2:1 model and explore perceptions of students & educators via the following objectives: To establish students’ and educators’ opinion on the impact of the three aspects of peer learning, i.e. collaborative learning, peer observation and peer feedback, on the attainment of competence To explore whether a 2:1 model facilitates learning opportunities for the development of desired clinical and learning skills, specifically student-directed learning, student-led assessment, reflective practice, behavioural change skills and clinical reasoning skills To explore experience/benefits/limitations of the 2:1 model for students and educators

Methodology Overview: Longitudinal Study, mixed methods research design (Johnson, Onwuesgbuzie et al., 2007) Sequential explanatory design (Creswell, Plano-Clark et al., 2010) Cohort of students followed over 3 years: 3 Timepoints: Quantitative Data – Timepoints 1, 2 & 3 Qualitative Data – Timepoints 2 & 3

Methodology

Results Results-to-date: Timepoints 1, 2 & 3: September 2013 – April 2015 Initial preliminary analysis – Student perspective High student response rates for both quantitative and qualitative research

Impact of Peer Learning on Learning Outcomes

Impact of collaborative learning, peer observation & peer feedback on learning outcomes

Impact of Peer Learning on Learning & Clinical Skills

Qualitative Analysis Deductive content analysis based on standard interview questions: Learning opportunities /Usefulness/Preparation Inductive content analysis Insight & experience of students & educators Thematic analysis will follow: Inductive and deductive coding and theme development (Fereday & Muir-Cochrane, 2006)

Discussion Preliminary analysis of students’ responses focused on placement quality - attainment of prescribed competences (learning outcomes) & desired learning & clinical skills Peer Learning Prescribed competences (learning outcomes): T1 (‘team work’), T2 (‘communication’), T3 (‘knowledge & practice) Supported by literature – teamwork (Baldry Currens, 2003), communication (Lincoln & McAllister, 1993), clinical skills (Triggs Nemshick & Shepherd, 1996; Lekkas, Larsen et al., 2007) Learning & Clinical Skills T1, T2 & T3 (‘reflective practice’) Supported by literature (Lincoln & McAllister, 1993; Morris & Stew, 2003)

Discussion Differences reported in levels of significance of total means between: Peer Learning vs. Collaborative Learning/Peer Observation/Peer Feedback Specific data for each of the 3 aspects will inform further education – focus on specific learning outcomes for each aspect Trend towards 2:1 model being most useful during Practice Placement B ? Perception not same need for learning opportunities (Baldry Currens, 2003) ? Difference in facilitation skills between Practice Placement B & Practice Placement C educators (Ladyshewsky, 1995) DeClute & Ladyshewsky (1993) – outcome measure was weighted score of clinical competence (only study to do so) This study – student & educator perceptions reported

Future Plans Establish the perceived impact of 2:1 model on attainment of competence & learning and clinical skills  Rationale – outcomes will be used to shape further development of 2:1 model, depending on the impact of each aspect of peer learning on:  - five competency-based learning outcomes  - six learning and clinical skills Student vs. Educator T1 vs. T2 vs. T3 Peer Learning vs. Collaborative learning/Peer observation/Peer feedback

Future Plans Perceived preparedness for & experience of 2:1 model  Rationale: outcomes will be used to inform student & educator training for different clinical settings. Preparedness for 2:1 model: Student preparedness for participation of 2:1 model Educator preparedness for facilitation of 2:1 model Student & educator recommendations for preparation Experience of 2:1 model: Advantages and disadvantages of 2:1 model Promoters & barriers of 2:1 model Practice Placement B vs. Practice Placement C Optimal number of weeks 2:1 before change to 1:1

Publication of Framework

References