PERSISTENT SURVEILLANCE FOR PIPELINE PROTECTION AND THREAT INTERDICTION ARIES Pathways Study Kick-off Meeting Ken Schultz 3 April 2007 Determining the.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Tom Mulford John Sheffield Fusion Power Associates Annual Meeting Washington, D.C. December 15, Fusion Energy Assessment – Status Report.
Advertisements

PERMITTING CHALLENGES FOR THE NEW GENERATION OF NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS Ping Wan Bechtel Power Corporation Ninth Nuclear Utility Meteorological Data Users.
FNSF Blanket Testing Mission and Strategy Summary of previous workshops 1 Conclusions Derived Primarily from Previous FNST Workshop, August 12-14, 2008.
Overview of the ARIES “Pathways” Program Farrokh Najmabadi UC San Diego 8 th International Symposium on Fusion Nuclear Technology Heidelberg, Germany 01–
Fusion Development Path: A Roll-Back Approach Based on Conceptual Power Plant Studies Farrokh Najmabadi UC San Diego Fusion Power Associates Annual Meeting.
National Fusion Power Plant Studies Program Achievements and Recent Results Prepared for Bill Dove OFES Headquarters June, 1999.
National Fusion Power Plant Studies Program Achievements and Recent Results Farrokh Najmabadi University of California, San Diego FESAC Meeting March 4-5,
June 14-15, 2007/ARR 1 Trade-Off Studies and Engineering Input to System Code Presented by A. René Raffray University of California, San Diego With contribution.
RECENT RESULTS FROM USA MAGNETIC FUSION POWER PLANTS Farrokh Najmabadi University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States of America German.
The Tokamak "тороидальная камера в магнитных катушках" Invented in the 1950s Leading candidate for fusion energy production Startup Plasma heating –Ohmic.
Contributions of Burning Plasma Physics Experiment to Fusion Energy Goals Farrokh Najmabadi Dept. of Electrical & Computer Eng. And Center for Energy Research.
Page 1 of 14 Reflections on the energy mission and goals of a fusion test reactor ARIES Design Brainstorming Workshop April 2005 M. S. Tillack.
Goals of the “Town Meeting” Mark Tillack ARIES Tritium Town Meeting March 6-7, 2001 Livermore, CA.
March 3-4, 2008/ARR 1 Power Management Technical Working Group: TRL for Heat and Particle Flux Handling A. René Raffray University of California, San Diego.
Impact of Liquid Wall on Fusion Systems Farrokh Najmabadi University of California, San Diego NRC Fusion Science Assessment Committee November 17, 1999.
Status of Advanced Design Studies and Overview of ARIES-AT Study Farrokh Najmabadi US/Japan Workshop on Fusion Power Plant Studies & Advanced Technologies.
Characteristics of Commercial Fusion Power Plants Results from ARIES-AT Study Farrokh Najmabadi Fusion Power Associates Annual Meeting & Symposium July.
Prospect for Attractive Fusion Power (Focus on tokamaks) Farrokh Najmabadi University of California San Diego Mini-Conference on Nuclear Renaissance 48th.
Environmental, Safety, and Economics Studies of Magnetic Fusion, Including Power Plant Design Studies Robert W. Conn Farrokh Najmabadi University of California.
September 6-7, 2007/ARR 1 Power Management Technical Working Group: Status and Documentation A. René Raffray Mark Tillack University of California, San.
Overview of Advanced Design White Paper Farrokh Najmabadi Virtual Laboratory for Technology Meeting June 23, 1998 OFES Headquarters, Germantown.
Summary Report of the Energy Issues Working Group Organizer: Farrokh Najmabadi Covenors:Jeffrey Freidberg, Wayne Meier, Gerald Navaratil, Bill Nevins,
Physics Issues and Trade-offs in Magnetic Fusion Power Plants Farrokh Najmabadi University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA APS April 2002 Meeting.
Fusion Development Path: A Roll-Back Approach Based on Conceptual Power Plant Studies Farrokh Najmabadi UC San Diego 9 th International Symposium on Fusion.
Thoughts on Fusion Nuclear Technology Development and the Role of ITER TBM Farrokh Najmabadi Prof. of Electrical Engineering Director of Center for Energy.
Highlights of ARIES-AT Study Farrokh Najmabadi For the ARIES Team VLT Conference call July 12, 2000 ARIES Web Site:
ARIES Project Meeting, L. M. Waganer, 3-4 April 2007 Page 1 Groundrules, Bases, and Definitions to Scope “The Next Step” L. Waganer The Boeing Company.
Role of ITER in Fusion Development Farrokh Najmabadi University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA FPA Annual Meeting September 27-28, 2006 Washington,
Nuclear Fusion Energy Rishi Gohil ChE 379: Energy Technology and Policy Dr. Thomas Edgar Fall 2007.
Katrina Pielli U.S. Environmental Protection Agency CHP Partnership
Power Extraction Research Using a Full Fusion Nuclear Environment G. L. Yoder, Jr. Y. K. M. Peng Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oak Ridge, TN Presentation.
Quality Assurance Program National Enrichment Facility Warren Dorman September 19, National Energy and Environmental Conference.
Westinghouse Operational Experience and Prospects for New Build
Overview of the ARIES “Pathways” Program Farrokh Najmabadi UC San Diego US-Japan Workshop on Power Plants Study and Related Advanced Technologies with.
Page 1 of 11 An approach for the analysis of R&D needs and facilities for fusion energy ARIES “Next Step” Planning Meeting 3 April 2007 M. S. Tillack ?
ARIES Project Meeting, L. M. Waganer, Dec 2007 Page 1 Restructuring System Cost Accounts and Algorithms L. Waganer December 2007 ARIES Project.
An Expanded View of RAMI Issues 02 March 2009 RAMI Panel Members: Mohamed Abdou (UCLA), Tom Burgess (ORNL), Lee Cadwallader (INL), Wayne Reiersen (PPPL),
An evaluation of fusion energy R&D gaps using Technology Readiness Levels M. S. Tillack and the ARIES Team International High Heat Flux Components Workshop.
* Backup materials can be found at
Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy Stan Milora, ORNL Director Virtual Laboratory for Technology 20 th ANS Topical Meeting on the Technology.
San Diego Workshop, 11 September 2003 Results of the European Power Plant Conceptual Study Presented by Ian Cook on behalf of David Maisonnier (Project.
ARIES “Pathways” Program Farrokh Najmabadi University of California San Diego ARIES brainstorming meeting UC San Diego April 3-4, 2007 Electronic copy:
VUJE, a. s., Okružná 5, Trnava Strengthening the European Union Energy Security Prepared by Peter Líška (Slovak proposal) Brussels, 14th September.
1 Subprojects of IFERC K.Lackner (as Chair of IFERC Project Committee) Garching – 14 Apr 2011.
1 1 by Dr. John Parmentola Senior Vice President Energy and Advanced Concepts Presented at the American Security Project Fusion Event June 5, 2012 The.
Page 1 of 11 Progress developing an evaluation methodology for fusion R&D ARIES Project Meeting March 4, 2008 M. S. Tillack.
03/11/021 Spaceport Vision Team Members. 03/11/022 Systems Definition Spaceport System Spaceport Stakeholder Needs High-Level Trade Study Performance.
Page 1 of 16 ARIES Issues and R&D Needs – Technology Readiness for Fusion Energy – M. S. Tillack ARIES Project Meeting 28 May 2008.
Programmatic issues to be studied in advance for the DEMO planning Date: February 2013 Place:Uji-campus, Kyoto Univ. Shinzaburo MATSUDA Kyoto Univ.
ARIES- Pathways, October 25-26, 2010 Bethesda, MD Page 1 L. Waganer Consultant for The Boeing Company ARIES-Pathways Project Meeting October 2010.
Page 1 of 9 Power Management Technical Working Group Structure and Goals ARIES Project Meeting June 2007 M. S. Tillack and A. R. Raffray.
045-05/rs PERSISTENT SURVEILLANCE FOR PIPELINE PROTECTION AND THREAT INTERDICTION Technical Readiness Level For Control of Plasma Power Flux Distribution.
Assessment of Fusion Development Path: Initial Results of the ARIES “Pathways” Program Farrokh Najmabadi UC San Diego ANS 18 th Topical Meeting on the.
Advanced Design Activities in US Farrokh Najmabadi University of California, San Diego Japan/US Workshop on Fusion Power Plants & Related Technologies.
Approach for a High Performance Fusion Power Source Pathway Dale Meade Fusion Innovation Research and Energy ARIES Team Meeting March 3-4, 2008 UCSD, San.
045-05/rs PERSISTENT SURVEILLANCE FOR PIPELINE PROTECTION AND THREAT INTERDICTION Taming The Physics For Commercial Fusion Power Plants ARIES Team Meeting.
1 Chapter 4. Preliminary System Design It is also known as advance development It extends the translation of system level requirement into design requirements.
Role of Self-Assessment V.C. Agarwal, Director (HR) NPCIL,INDIA.
03/20/021 Spaceport Vision Team Members Organizations that contributed: Air Force NASA NCSS FAA Industry University Etc.
Whither the ARIES Industrial Advisory Committee? ARIES Meeting 21 Januay, 2009 ARIES Meeting 21 Januay, 2009.
Pilot Plant Study Hutch Neilson Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory ARIES Project Meeting 19 May 2010.
Fusion power: Visions and the Development Path in the ITER Era
Operations Technical Working Group
The European Power Plant Conceptual Study Overview
Trade-Off Studies and Engineering Input to System Code
Overview of the ARIES “Pathways” Program
Advanced Design Activities in US
ARIES Pathways Program
US/Japan Workshop on Fusion Power Plant Studies
TWG goals, approach and outputs
Presentation transcript:

PERSISTENT SURVEILLANCE FOR PIPELINE PROTECTION AND THREAT INTERDICTION ARIES Pathways Study Kick-off Meeting Ken Schultz 3 April 2007 Determining the Technology, Physics, Industrial and Organizational Needs of a Fusion Pilot Plant

Advisory Committee Establishing Goals and Objectives (Design Requirements) Determining specific metrics for performance

We will reconstitute an Advisory Committee ARIES Utility Advisory Committee shaped the basic design requirements for fusion power plants in –Focused on commercial fusion power plants –Members from several utilities and EPRI –Many of those utilities and individuals are now gone An Advisory Committee will be reconvened –Broaden the scope of membership to include vendors, architect-engineers, and regulators as well as utilities and EPRI –Focus on Demo and Pilot Plant

Advisory Committee Candidates EPRI –Jack Kaslow Utilities –Entergy - Steve Melançon –Southern California Edison - Loyd Wright –More?? Architect-Engineers –Bechtel - Larry Papay –Washington Group International - Jadu Das –Shaw Stone & Webster - Reiner Kuhr –More? Vendors –Westinghouse - Sam Harkness, Mario Carelli –General Electric - Eric Loewen –Areva - Finis Southworth, Bob Tilly Regulators –NRC - Kent Welter –ACRS – Said Abdel-Khalik

Fundamental Requirements for Fusion Power  Have an economically competitive life-cycle cost of electricity  Gain Public acceptance by having excellent safety and environmental characteristics No disturbance of public’s day-to-day activities No local or global atmospheric impact No need for evacuation plan No high-level waste Ease of licensing  Reliable, available, and stable as an electrical power source Have operational reliability and high availability Closed, on-site fuel cycle High fuel availability Capable of partial load operation Available in a range of unit sizes Fusion physics & technology Low-activation material Blanket and fuel cycle choices

Committee will focus on high level design requirements Review requirements for commercial fusion power plants –ARIES-AT should be example of development goal Define requirements for Fusion DEMO plant –Likely identical or very similar, except economics Help in evaluation of which features must be demonstrated in a fusion pilot plant prior to DEMO –What features must be proven before a utility would invest in a DEMO? –Will test facilities satisfy this requirement? –This will help us define the design requirements of the pilot plant

Demonstration of DEMO features could be done in several facilities ITER will demonstrate many key features Non-nuclear test facilities may be adequate for some demonstrations Fission reactor testing may satisfy some needs A fusion materials test facility may be available – is it needed? A pilot plant will be needed for everything else –Advanced tokamak physics –Power producing breeding blankets –Integration of physics and fusion technology How little could be done in a pilot plant? –Would that be cost effective?

The testing needs will define the design requirements for the pilot plant Plasma performance of the ARIES-AT tokamak –  N –Non-inductive current drive Power and particle management –High temperature heat recovery –Adequate component lifetime Fuel management –Tritium breeding control Plant operations –Plasma control –Reasonable availability that improves quickly

Systems studies will link design requirements to performance metrics for a pilot plant Advanced tokamak physics will be required –  N, current drive Achievement of power performance parameters can be optimized –R, a, B T, Q to achieve needed  –Efficient power conversion is important, but probably not net power

ITER + test facilities + pilot plant must demonstrate the essential features needed for DEMO Waste (class C or less) Reliability and controlability Maintenanability Fuel cycle control Safety Licensibility Partial power operation Thermal efficiency Power density Cost that extrapolates to commercial

The ARIES Pathways study will define and then design a fusion pilot plant Advisory committee will help define what the pilot plant must demonstrate Design requirements to accomplish this will be developed Systems analyses will determine the best way to meet these requirements

Important Task: Pick a good name Fusion Pilot Plant – FPP The Next Study – TNS Experimental Power Reactor – EPR, ExPR Experimental Power Reactor Tokamak - ExPRT …...