Towards a Characterization of Arctic Mixed-Phase Clouds Matthew D. Shupe a, Pavlos Kollias b, Ed Luke b a Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ewan OConnor, Robin Hogan, Anthony Illingworth Drizzle comparisons.
Advertisements

R. Forbes, 17 Nov 09 ECMWF Clouds and Radiation University of Reading ECMWF Cloud and Radiation Parametrization: Recent Activities Richard Forbes, Maike.
Anthony Illingworth, + Robin Hogan, Ewan OConnor, U of Reading, UK and the CloudNET team (F, D, NL, S, Su). Reading: 19 Feb 08 – Meeting with Met office.
Radar/lidar observations of boundary layer clouds
Integrated Profiling at the AMF
Application of Cloudnet data in the validation of SCIAMACHY cloud height products Ping Wang Piet Stammes KNMI, De Bilt, The Netherlands CESAR Science day,
Aerosol-Precipitation Responses Deduced from Ship Tracks as Observed by CloudSat Matthew W. Christensen 1 and Graeme L. Stephens 2 Department of Atmospheric.
Single Frequency Observations of Warm Clouds and Precipitation Edward Luke with Pavlos Kollias, Frederic Tridon, Stefan Kneifel, and Alessandro Battaglia.
By : Kerwyn Texeira. Outline Definitions Introduction Model Description Model Evaluation The effect of dust nuclei on cloud coverage Conclusion Questions.
Matthew Shupe Ola Persson Paul Johnston Cassie Wheeler Michael Tjernstrom Surface-Based Remote-Sensing of Clouds during ASCOS Univ of Colorado, NOAA and.
Applications of satellite measurements on dust-cloud-precipitation interactions over Asia arid/semi-arid region Jianping Huang Key Laboratory for Semi-Arid.
Observed Updraft & Mass Flux in Shallow Cumulus at ARM Southern Great Plains site Preliminary results Yunyan Zhang, Steve Klein & Pavlos Kollias CFMIP/GCSS.
Atmospheric structure from lidar and radar Jens Bösenberg 1.Motivation 2.Layer structure 3.Water vapour profiling 4.Turbulence structure 5.Cloud profiling.
Cirrus Production by a Mesoscale Convective System Sampled During TWP-ICE: Analysis via Water Budget Equations Jasmine Cetrone and Robert Houze University.
Remote sensing of Stratocumulus using radar/lidar synergy Ewan O’Connor, Anthony Illingworth & Robin Hogan University of Reading.
NASA Satellites Help Lift Cloud of Uncertainty on Climate Change 2007 American Geophysical Union Fall Meeting Panelists Dr. Graeme Stephens, principal.
1 Cloud Droplet Size Retrievals from AERONET Cloud Mode Observations Christine Chiu Stefani Huang, Alexander Marshak, Tamas Várnai, Brent Holben, Warren.
1 Radar Displays PPI - Plan position Indicator Maps the received signals on polar coordinates in plan view. The antenna scans 360° at fixed elevation angle.
Cirrus Production by Tropical Mesoscale Convective Systems Jasmine Cetrone and Robert Houze University of Washington Motivation Atmospheric heating by.
The DYMECS project A statistical approach for the evaluation of convective storms in high-resolution models Thorwald Stein, Robin Hogan, John Nicol, Robert.
Observed and modelled long-term water cloud statistics for the Murg Valley Kerstin Ebell, Susanne Crewell, Ulrich Löhnert Institute for Geophysics and.
Cloud Occurrence at Arctic Atmospheric Observatories Matthew Shupe, Taneil Uttal, Daniel Wolfe, David Welsh AMS Polar Meteorology and Oceanography 2007.
Profiling Clouds with Satellite Imager Data and Potential Applications William L. Smith Jr. 1, Douglas A. Spangenberg 2, Cecilia Fleeger 2, Patrick Minnis.
Matthew Shupe Von Walden David Turner U. Colorado/NOAA-ESRL U. Idaho NOAA - NSSL New Cloud Observations at Summit, Greenland: Expanding the IASOA Network.
Lidar algorithms to retrieve cloud distribution, phase and optical depth Y. Morille, M. Haeffelin, B. Cadet, V. Noel Institut Pierre Simon Laplace SYMPOSIUM.
The Arctic Climate Paquita Zuidema, RSMAS/MPO, MSC 118, Feb, 29, 2008.
Remote-sensing of the environment (RSE) ATMOS Analysis of the Composition of Clouds with Extended Polarization Techniques L. Pfitzenmaier, H. Russchenbergs.
Horizontal Distribution of Ice and Water in Arctic Stratus Clouds During MPACE Michael Poellot, David Brown – University of North Dakota Greg McFarquhar,
Gerd-Jan van Zadelhoff & Dave Donovan Comparing ice-cloud microphysical properties using Cloudnet & ARM data.
Characterization of Arctic Mixed-Phase Cloudy Boundary Layers with the Adiabatic Assumption Paquita Zuidema*, Janet Intrieri, Sergey Matrosov, Matthew.
Multi-wavelength Doppler Spectra
Case Study Example 29 August 2008 From the Cloud Radar Perspective 1)Low-level mixed- phase stratocumulus (ice falling from liquid cloud layer) 2)Brief.
, UTC. Supercooled liquid water Moments only from „principal peak“; can change between liquid and ice peak depending on which one is.
Matthew Shupe, Ola Persson, Amy Solomon CIRES – Univ. of Colorado & NOAA/ESRL David Turner NOAA/NSSL Dynamical and Microphysical Characteristics and Interactions.
Vertical Structure, Melting Layer Heights, and Antecedent Upstream Air Trajectories Associated with Precipitation Events in the Central Andes of Peru Eric.
Comparison on Cloud and radiation properties at Barrow between ARM/NSA measurements and GCM outputs Qun Miao and Zhien Wang University of Wyoming 1. Introduction.
Vertical Structure of the Atmosphere within Clouds Revealed by COSMIC Data Xiaolei Zou, Li Lin Florida State University Rick Anthes, Bill Kuo, UCAR Fourth.
Matthew Shupe Ola Persson Paul Johnston Duane Hazen Clouds during ASCOS U. of Colorado and NOAA.
1 Atmospheric profiling to better understand fog and low level cloud life cycle ARM/EU workshop on algorithms, May 2013 J. Delanoe (LATMOS), JC.
New observations of clouds, atmosphere, and precipitation at Summit, Greenland Matthew Shupe, Von Walden, David Turner Ryan Neely, Ben Castellani, Chris.
CBH statistics for the Provisional Review Curtis Seaman, Yoo-Jeong Noh, Steve Miller and Dan Lindsey CIRA/Colorado State University 12/27/2013.
Using Ship Tracks to Characterize the Effects of Haze on Cloud Properties Matthew W. Christensen, James A. Coakley, Jr., Matthew S. Segrin, William R.
Mixed-phase cloud physics and Southern Ocean cloud feedback in climate models. T 5050 Liquid Condensate Fraction (LCF) Correlation between T5050 and ∆LWP.
Regional analysis of multi- year aerosol indirect effects Dr. Thomas Jones University of Alabama in Huntsville January 13, th Annual AMS Conference,
Boundary-layer turbulence, surface processes, and orographic precipitation growth in cold clouds or: The importance of the lower boundary Qun Miao Ningbo.
Shaocheng Xie, Renata McCoy, and Stephen Klein Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Statistical Characteristics of Clouds Observed at the ARM SGP, NSA,
BBHRP Assessment Part 2: Cirrus Radiative Flux Study Using Radar/Lidar/AERI Derived Cloud Properties David Tobin, Lori Borg, David Turner, Robert Holz,
Observed & Simulated Profiles of Cloud Occurrence by Atmospheric State A Comparison of Observed Profiles of Cloud Occurrence with Multiscale Modeling Framework.
Retrieval of Cloud Phase and Ice Crystal Habit From Satellite Data Sally McFarlane, Roger Marchand*, and Thomas Ackerman Pacific Northwest National Laboratory.
Modelling and observations of droplet growth in clouds A Coals 1, A M Blyth 1, J-L Brenguier 2, A M Gadian 1 and W W Grabowski 3 Understanding the detailed.
Ieng Jo, Bruce A. Albrecht and Pavlos Kollias Division of Meteorology and Physical Oceanography Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science (RSMAS),
Intercomparison of model simulations of mixed-phase clouds observed during the ARM Mixed-Phase Arctic Cloud Experiment, Part II: Multi-layered cloud GCSS.
Horizontal Variability In Microphysical Properties of Mixed-Phase Arctic Clouds David Brown, Michael Poellot – University of North Dakota Clouds are strong.
Investigation of Microphysical Parameterizations of Snow and Ice in Arctic Clouds During M-PACE through Model- Observation Comparisons Amy Solomon 12 In.
Cloud property retrieval from hyperspectral IR measurements Jun Li, Peng Zhang, Chian-Yi Liu, Xuebao Wu and CIMSS colleagues Cooperative Institute for.
Comparison between aircraft and A-Train observations of midlevel, mixed-phase clouds from CLEX-10/C3VP Curtis Seaman, Yoo-Jeong Noh, Thomas Vonder Haar.
An Evaluation of Cloud Microphysics and Radiation Calculations at the NSA Matthew D. Shupe a, David D. Turner b, Eli Mlawer c, Timothy Shippert d a CIRES.
UCLA Vector Radiative Transfer Models for Application to Satellite Data Assimilation K. N. Liou, S. C. Ou, Y. Takano and Q. Yue Department of Atmospheric.
Cloudnet meeting Oct Martial Haeffelin SIRTA Cloud and Radiation Observatory M. Haeffelin, A. Armstrong, L. Barthès, O. Bock, C. Boitel, D.
The Lifecyle of a Springtime Arctic Mixed-Phase Cloudy Boundary Layer observed during SHEBA Paquita Zuidema University of Colorado/ NOAA Environmental.
MODIS, AIRS, and Midlevel Cloud Phase Shaima Nasiri CIMSS/SSEC, UW-Madison Brian Kahn Jet Propulsion Laboratory MURI Hyperspectral Workshop 7-9 June, 2005.
High-Resolution Polarimetric Radar Observation of Snow- Generating Cells Karly Reimel May 10, 2016.
UNIVERSITY OF BASILICATA CNR-IMAA (Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche Istituto di Metodologie per l’Analisi Ambientale) Tito Scalo (PZ) Analysis and interpretation.
Toward Continuous Cloud Microphysics and Cloud Radiative Forcing Using Continuous ARM Data: TWP Darwin Analysis Goal: Characterize the physical properties.
Matthew Christensen and Graeme Stephens
Observations of the Arctic boundary layer clouds during ACSE 2014
The DYMECS project A statistical approach for the evaluation of convective storms in high-resolution models Thorwald Stein, Robin Hogan, John Nicol, Robert.
Group interests RICO data required
IOP2b: 2013/12/11.
Group interests RICO data in support of studies
Presentation transcript:

Towards a Characterization of Arctic Mixed-Phase Clouds Matthew D. Shupe a, Pavlos Kollias b, Ed Luke b a Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences – University of Colorado and NOAA/ESRL/PSD and b Brookhaven National Laboratory, Atmospheric Science Division, Upton, NY Mixed-Phase Cloud Properties Cloud Occurrence. Mixed-phase clouds occur 45% +/- 10% of the time per year at the NSA site. There is a marked increase in mixed-phase cloudiness in the spring and fall transition seasons, mostly at heights below about 1 km. All mixed-phase cloud properties presented in this panel were derived from MMCR and MWR measurements at the NSA site for the time period of March 1998 through December The statistics in all plots cover this full time period. Microphysical property retrieval methods are summarized by Shupe et al. (2005, ARM Science Team Meeting and JAM, 44, ). Interesting Microphysics Results  LWP for mixed-phase clouds is on average similar to the LWP for all-liquid clouds at NSA; this is different from SHEBA where mixed-phase clouds had higher LWPs.  Ice particles in mixed-phase clouds are 33% larger than in all-ice clouds, while the IWCs are a factor of two larger (not shown).  Ice particle sizes at NSA are similar to SHEBA, however IWC, IWP, and LWP are significantly larger at NSA than at SHEBA (not shown). Identifying Mixed-Phase Clouds Two new cloud classification methods have been developed and show a promising and exciting level of agreement in a comparison during MPACE: 1)Multi-instrument Method: Uses lidar backscatter and depol ratio, MMCR reflectivity, Doppler velocity, and spectrum width, and temperature soundings to classify all cloud pixels observed by lidar or radar 2)MMCR Doppler Spectra Method: Uses a trained neural network to identify indicators of cloud type from MMCR Doppler spectra alone. The method utilizes wavelet decompositions and statistics of reflectivity, mean spectrum width, mean velocity, skewness, and kurtosis from the primary spectral peak (see Luke et al. poster).  45% occurrence fraction with maxima in transition seasons.  Ice particle mean size:  m  Ice Water Content: g/m 3  Ice Water Path: g/m 2  Liquid Water Path: g/m 2  Ice sizes and LWP are smallest in winter and largest in summer.  IWC and IWP are smallest in spring and largest in fall.  LWP, IWP, and ice particle sizes increase in updrafts  The fraction of ice relative to liquid increases in updrafts Can the Doppler spectrum width help with classification? For radar reflectivities > -15 dBZ (which are typical for mixed-phase clouds due to large ice particles), the mixed-phase clouds occupy a distinct, characteristic region with low lidar depolarization ratio (due to the typical high concentration of liquid droplets) and wide MMCR Doppler spectrum width (due to multiple phases present). This information aids the multi-instrument classification discussed above. Acknowledgments Ed Eloranta – lidar measurements during MPACE ARM Grant DE-FG02-05ER63965 Excellent agreement on liquid-topped, mixed-phase layers with ice/snow below Both methods identify mixed-phase region at top of ice cloud Some discrepancies near the liquid base Black dots are lidar cloud base 75 th percentile 5 th percentile 50 th percentile 25 th percentile Mean 95 th percentile Mixed-phase (star), Single-phase (diamond) Monthly and Annual Microphysics Statistics Liquid properties Ice properties Summary of Typical Arctic Mixed-Phase Cloud Characteristics Mixed-Phase Cloud Occurrence Fraction A Case for Vertical Motions Can Doppler spectra provide information on air motions? Simple Retrieval Method 1)Identify time-height pixels that contain liquid water using methods in panel #1 (small liquid droplets are considered as tracers of clear air motions). 2)Determine the most negative (upward) end of the Doppler spectrum above the noise for each pixel. [Vertical Motion Example] Case Results  W results suggest a net large-scale updraft of 0.7 m/s with small scale circulations of magnitude +/- 0.6 m/s.  All cloud properties and cloud top height are clearly correlated with W; during local updrafts, liquid and ice increase and the cloud top lifts.  During local updrafts, the fraction of cloud ice relative to liquid increases. Fraction with height Data volume Total (line) and year-to-year range (dash) Data volume Layer quantities Particle physical size M-I