RPC Timing Results with Final Splitters Gianpaolo Carlino INFN Napoli The Napoli RPC Group: M.Alviggi, V. Canale, M. Caprio, G.C., R. de Asmundis, M. Della.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
RPC calibration D. Piccolo INFN Napoli. Calibrations Electronic test –Channels check –Strip pattern for trigger check –Threshold test –Synchronization.
Advertisements

VDC Tracking P.E. Ulmer Old Dominion University Expert … or, nobody else wanted to talk about it; You decide Hall A Analysis Workshop December 11, 2001.
Test beam 2001 Results M.C. Fouz Muon Week, CERN Nov 01.
27/02/2002M.D.P. - ATLAS Muon Week1 First results of Atlas RPC cosmic rays test Massimo Della Pietra Atlas RPC Group Napoli ( M. Alviggi, V. Canale, M.
D. Peterson, “ILC Detector Work”, Cornell Group Meeting, 4-October ILC Detector Work This project is supported by the US National Science Foundation.
RPC Update José Repond Argonne National Laboratory American Working Group On Linear Collider Calorimetry 16 September 2003 What’s new since Cornell…
1 Apr. 28, 2007 Test of the Pulse Height and Time Jitter for the IHEP Full-Size RPC’s with 8-m-Long Readout Strip Planes C. Lu, K. McDonald and W. Sands.
Y. Karadzhov MICE Video Conference Thu April 9 Slide 1 Absolute Time Calibration Method General description of the TOF DAQ setup For the TOF Data Acquisition.
Octal ASD Certification Tests at Michigan J. Chapman, Tiesheng Dai, & Tuan Bui August 30, CERN.
Davide Piccolo - INFN NapoliSIENA maggio 2004 Production and Quality control of RPCs for the CMS muon barrel system Davide Piccolo – INFN Napoli.
Commissioning data are taken with individual chambers TP data autotriggered Cosmic rays data  ( different configuration) Different cosmic track angle.
The Transverse detector is made of an array of 256 scintillating fibers coupled to Avalanche PhotoDiodes (APD). The small size of the fibers (5X5mm) results.
RPC Cosmic Rays Test in Naples Paolo Iengo Atlas RPC Group Napoli ( M. Alviggi, V. Canale, M. Caprio, G. Carlino,R. de Asmundis, M. Della Pietra, D. della.
PERFORMANCE OF THE MACRO LIMITED STREAMER TUBES IN DRIFT MODE FOR MEASUREMENTS OF MUON ENERGY - Use of the MACRO limited streamer tubes in drift mode -Use.
Monte Carlo Comparison of RPCs and Liquid Scintillator R. Ray 5/14/04  RPCs with 1-dimensional readout (generated by RR) and liquid scintillator with.
15 Dec 2010 CERN Sept 2010 beam test: Sensor response study Chris Walmsley and Sam Leveridge (presented by Paul Dauncey) 1Paul Dauncey.
Updates on GEMs characterization with APV electronics K. Gnanvo, N. Liyanage, K. Saenboonruang.
I.Laktineh IPNL/IN2P3/UCBL. I.Laktineh-IPNL2 Aims Test a mini DHCAL with new generation embedded electronics readout in beam conditions.
Barrel RPC Chamber consists of 2 double-gaps, each equipped with a common plane of 96 strips read-out by 6 front-end boards. The two double- gaps have.
Design and development of micro-strip stacked module prototypes for tracking at S-LHC Motivations Tracking detectors at future hadron colliders will operate.
Muon-raying the ATLAS Detector
1 A.Andronic 1, H.Appelshäuser 1, V.Babkin 2, P.Braun-Munzinger 1, S.Chernenko 2, D.Emschernmann 3, C.Garabatos 1, V.Golovatyuk 2, J.Hehner 1, M.Hoppe.
Update on final LAV front-end M. Raggi, T. Spadaro, P. Valente & G. Corradi, C. Paglia, D. Tagnani.
W-DHCAL Analysis Overview José Repond Argonne National Laboratory.
Total Cross Section, Elastic Scattering and Diffraction Dissociation at the LHC January 17, 2003TOTEM plenary meeting -Marco Bozzo1 CSC detectors for T1.
Test beam preliminary results D. Di Filippo, P. Massarotti, T. Spadaro.
3D Event reconstruction in ArgoNeuT Maddalena Antonello and Ornella Palamara 11 gennaio 20161M.Antonello - INFN, LNGS.
Start and Vertex Detector W. Boeglin, A.Klein Current Design: 3300 scintillating fibers 1mm diameter 3 double layers (1 axial, 2 stereo) cylindrical geometry.
Test of the GEM Front Tracker for the SBS Spectrometer at Jefferson Lab F. Mammoliti, V. Bellini, M. Capogni, E. Cisbani, E. Jensen, P. Musico, F. Noto,
Min-DHCAL: Measurements with Pions Benjamin Freund and José Repond Argonne National Laboratory CALICE Collaboration Meeting Max-Planck-Institute, Munich.
Tests of RPCs (Resistive Plate Chambers) for the ARGO experiment at YBJ G. Aielli¹, P.Camarri¹, R. Cardarelli¹, M. Civardi², L. Di Stante¹, B. Liberti¹,
EAS Time Structures with ARGO-YBJ experiment 1 - INFN-CNAF, Bologna, Italy 2 - Università del Salento and INFN Lecce, Italy A.K Calabrese Melcarne 1, G.Marsella.
Radioactive source and cosmic-ray test for the MWPC Davide Pinci on behalf of the Frascati-Roma1 MWPC group.
1 DT Local Reconstruction on CRAFT data Plots for approval CMS- Run meeting, 26/6/09 U.Gasparini, INFN & Univ.Padova on behalf of DT community [ n.b.:
SoLID DAQ A.Camsonne SoLID collaboration meeting November 8 th 2013.
B.Satyanarayana (For INO collaboration) Department of High Energy Physics Tata Institute of Fundamental Research Homi Bhabha Road, Colaba, Mumbai, 400.
1 M2-M5 Efficiency and Timing checks on 7TeV beam data Alessia, Roberta R.Santacesaria, April 23 rd, Muon Operation
Status report - Tracking code - T.Gogami 9/30/2010.
RD51 GEM Telescope: results from June 2010 test beam and work in progress Matteo Alfonsi on behalf of CERN GDD group and Siena/PISA INFN group.
Study of gas mixture containing SF6 for the OPERA RPCs A.Paoloni, A. Mengucci (LNF)
Giuseppe Ruggiero CERN Straw Chamber WG meeting 07/02/2011 Spectrometer Reconstruction: Pattern recognition and Efficiency 07/02/ G.Ruggiero - Spectrometer.
Plots of RPC performance G. Cattani, University of Rome “Tor Vergata” & INFN Roma 2 on behalf of ATLAS Muon Collaboration.
14/02/2008 Michele Bianco 1 G.Chiodini & E.Gorini ATLAS RPC certification with cosmic rays Università del Salento Facoltà di Scienze MM.FF.NN.
MICROMEGAS per l’upgrade delle Muon Chambers di ATLAS per SLHC Arizona, Athens (U, NTU, Demokritos), Brookhaven, CERN, Harvard, Istanbul (Bogaziçi, Doğuş),
W-DHCAL Digitization T. Frisson, C. Grefe (CERN) CALICE Collaboration Meeting at Argonne.
Operation, performance and upgrade of the CMS Resistive Plate Chamber system at LHC Marcello Abbrescia Physics Department - University of Bari & INFN,
Michele Faucci Giannelli
Results with the RPC system of OPERA and perspectives
High Energy Physics experiments.
Tracking results from Au+Au test Beam
CMS muon detectors and muon system performance
The Status of the Data Analysis of the Beam Test at FZJ
GLAST LAT tracker signal simulation and trigger timing study
BNL electronics: first tests
PHENIX RPC R&D EFFORT Beau Meredith
Preliminary Performance of the L2 Chamber (Side A)
A new algorithm for the LVL1muon Trigger simulation
Han Jifeng BESIII MUON GROUP IHEP, CAS
Test Beam Measurements october – november, 2016
Performance of a Multigap RPC prototype for the LHCb Muon System
Niels Tuning (Outer Tracker Group LHCb)
Bringing the ATLAS Muon Spectrometer to Life with Cosmic Rays
DESY drift chambers efficiency and track reconstruction
Cosmic ray test of RPC for the ATLAS experiment
Pre-installation Tests of the LHCb Muon Chambers
MUC simulation and reconstruction
Resistive Plate Chambers performance with Cosmic Rays
The TOTEM T2 Telescope based on triple-GEM chambers
Engineering Design Review
Characterization of Wired-OR prototype board
Presentation transcript:

RPC Timing Results with Final Splitters Gianpaolo Carlino INFN Napoli The Napoli RPC Group: M.Alviggi, V. Canale, M. Caprio, G.C., R. de Asmundis, M. Della Pietra, D. Della Volpe, P.Iengo, S.Patricelli, L. Romano, G. Sekhniaidze

Outline Napoli Test StationNapoli Test Station Efficiency and Multiplicity MeasurementsEfficiency and Multiplicity Measurements RPC Time Distributions with ‘Final Splitters’RPC Time Distributions with ‘Final Splitters’ Comparison between Standard and Wired OR Strip Readout as a function of thresholdComparison between Standard and Wired OR Strip Readout as a function of threshold ConclusionsConclusions The ‘Final Splitter’ in the one designed in Roma 1. It will be used on the experiment but not in the RPC tests

Trigger TOP & BOTTOM layer TOP & BOTTOM layer 2 x 1 m 2 scintillators 2 x 1 m 2 scintillators Tracking system 2 Drift chambers 2 Drift chambers 2 x and 2 y plane per layer 2 x and 2 y plane per layer Resolution in track reconstruction  ~1 mm Resolution in track reconstruction  ~1 mm The 2 modules housing scintillators & tracking chambers are moved by step motors automatically during data taking 4.5 m 1.8 m 3.5 m The Test Station

Each chambers has 2 X layers and 2 Y layers To disentangle the left- right ambiguity, each layer is staggered respect to the other one on the same view Golden Event: Fully Reconstructed Tracks with 1 hit per layer (50% Selection Efficiency) The Drift Chambers

Final Splitter TDC 32  strips RPC type: BOS - B 004 Working Point: HV = V Threshold = 0.59 mV Experimental Setup

Expected strip Some Definitions: Physical Strip: Fired Strip corresponding to the Expected Strip Physical Cluster: Cluster with the Physical Strip Expected Strip: Strip given by the Impact Point of the Track on the RPC surface Efficiency: Event with a Physical Strip

Strip Av. Multi = 1.58 Cluster Av. Multi = 1.08 RPC Multiplicity for Strips and Clusters

Cluster Sizes Physical Clusters Av. Size = 1.57 Other Clusters Av. Size = 1.11

Efficiency = In the definition of the efficiency we use a tolerance of  5 mm Inefficiency RPC Efficiency as a function of Strips We expect to improve the efficiency with a more precise RPC alignment (under study) Spacers

Tracks Impact Points of the RPC Surface for Inefficient Events:Spacers

Peak 1 Peak 2 Peak 3 RPC Times Distribution Multi-hit TDC More than one Pulse could be recorded for each Strip The Trigger Logic could be in trouble because of the presence of more than one pulse from the same strip. Trigger People are able to solve this problem

- RPC Time - Percentage of Peaks presence as a function of the threshold Physical Strip ONLY !! Only Peak 1 Peaks 1+2 All Peaks

- RPC Time - Percentage of Peaks presence as a function of the threshold All other Strips in the Physical Cluster Only Peak 1 Peaks 1+2 All Peaks

RPC Times Pulse Widths Physical Clusters Other Clusters - Peak 1 - Longer Widths could be obtained with a modification of the Front End Electronic

Example of Pulse Widths for 2 Strips Pulse Width Distributions Average pulse width is about 8 ns. Some channels show shorter pulses. Let’s divide strips in two categories: Long and Short Pulse Strips Short Long ShortLongShort

- RPC Times – Time Difference between Physical and Other Strips Physical Clusters Other Clusters The Large Time Difference between strips in the same cluster must be taken into account for the declustering algorithm and the bunchlet identification - Peak 1 -

RPC Times - Peak 1 Time Difference between Physical and neighbor Strips as a function of the Cluster Size Size = 2 Size = 3 Size = 4 Only Physical Cluster Strips

Time Difference between Physical and neighbor Strips as a function of Strip Distance (  ) RPC Times - Peak 1 Only Physical Cluster Strips  = 1  = 1  = 2  = 3

 - Strips Final Splitter TDC Comparison between Standard and Wired OR Strip Readouts as a function of Threshold Final Splitter TDC Wired OR Readout Standard Readout Will be used for  strips

Multiplicities Comparison as a function of the threshold Cluster Sizes Comparison

Wired - OR Efficiency Comparison with Wired - OR as a function of the threshold The efficiency loss in the Wired OR Readout could be reduced with a precise tuning of the threshold

Conclusions The results of a test performed on 32  strips of a BOS RPC have been shown.The results of a test performed on 32  strips of a BOS RPC have been shown. The RPC Efficiency and Multiplicities are in agreement with expectations.The RPC Efficiency and Multiplicities are in agreement with expectations. Timing Results:Timing Results: –The presence of more than one pulse per strip has to be taken into account in the trigger logic. –Some modifications of the Front End Electronics are needed in order to get longer strip pulses. –The difference in the time response of strips belonging to the same cluster needs a more detailed study and an adequate simulation in the Trigger Simulation Program. The analysis will be repeated (and this results confirmed) with larger statistics as soon as we will have in Napoli more chambers and splitters to test.The analysis will be repeated (and this results confirmed) with larger statistics as soon as we will have in Napoli more chambers and splitters to test.