Utilitarian Bioethics
What is it? Recommends directing medical resources where they will do the most long-term effect for good Decisions are made based upon an individual’s future productive potential (& happiness) Productivity must supersede expenditure Value is a zero-sum game Value is a zero-sum game $100 example$100 example
To exemplify: Nurse or doctor caring for an Alzheimer’s / or terminal patient is “wasting” resources No chance for productive/happy life No chance for productive/happy life Better spent caring for a sick baby or 20- year-old gunshot victim Again, productivity is the measuring stick Again, productivity is the measuring stick
Benefits Resources are spent where they can be most beneficial to society (as a whole) Overall increase in productivity and happiness Less taxing on limited resources
Potential downsides: What is “happiness”? Doctors play God Bigotry against the “feeble” Retarded, handicapped, generally sick Retarded, handicapped, generally sick Lack of scientific progress Why explore cures for cancer? Why explore cures for cancer?
Futile medical care: Where there is no hope, there should be no course of treatment Different from euthanasia Does not hasten, speed or encourage death Does not hasten, speed or encourage death Laws are currently being explored: Futile Care Law (Texas) Futile Care Law (Texas)