1 Computational Modeling of Magnetic Intervention D. V. Rose* Voss Scientific, LLC A. E. Robson, J. D. Sethian, and J. L. Giuliani Naval Research Laboratory.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 30. Induction and Inductance
Advertisements

The scaling of LWFA in the ultra-relativistic blowout regime: Generation of Gev to TeV monoenergetic electron beams W.Lu, M.Tzoufras, F.S.Tsung, C. Joshi,
Chapter 22: The Electric Field II: Continuous Charge Distributions
Einzel Lens You can use the heading from the model documentation for the title. © 2012 COMSOL. All rights reserved.
Methods of solving problems in electrostatics Section 3.
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 21 Electric Charge and Electric Field.
PH0101 Unit 2 Lecture 4 Wave guide Basic features
Physics 2112 Unit 6: Electric Potential
1 Design of Gridded-Tube Structures for the 805 MHz RF Cavity Department of Mechanical, Materials, and Aerospace Engineering M. Alsharoa (PhD candidate)
March 21-22, 2006 HAPL meeting, ORNL 1 Status of Chamber and Blanket Effort A. René Raffray UCSD With contributions from: M. Sawan B. Robson G. Sviatoslavsky.
Quadrupole Magnetic Design for an Electron Ion Collider Paul Brindza May 19, 2008.
Update on Self Pinch Transport of Heavy Ion Beams for Chamber Transport D. V. Rose, D. R. Welch, Mission Research Corp. S. S. Yu, Lawrence Berkeley National.
Particle Production of a Carbon/Mercury Target System for the Intensity Frontier X. Ding, UCLA H.G. Kirk, BNL K.T. McDonald, Princeton Univ MAP Spring.
Chapter 22 Electric Potential.
Beamline Design Issues D. R. Welch and D. V. Rose Mission Research Corporation W. M. Sharp and S. S. Yu Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Presented.
Diversion of Plasma in Beam Port with a Vertical Magnetic Field: 3-D Simulations D. V. Rose, D. R. Welch, and S. S. Yu Presented at the ARIES Project Meeting.
Physics of fusion power Lecture 8: Conserved quantities / mirror / tokamak.
EFFECTS OF CHAMBER GEOMETRY AND GAS PROPERTIES ON HYDRODYNAMIC EVOLUTION OF IFE CHAMBERS Zoran Dragojlovic and Farrokh Najmabadi University of California.
IDS-NF Target Studies H. Kirk (BNL) July 8, 2009.
Simulations of Neutralized Drift Compression D. R. Welch, D. V. Rose Mission Research Corporation Albuquerque, NM S. S. Yu Lawrence Berkeley National.
Chamber Dynamic Response Modeling Zoran Dragojlovic.
Modeling of Assisted and Self- Pinch Transport D. V. Rose and D. R. Welch Mission Research Corporation C. L. Olson Sandia National Laboratories S. S. Yu.
Acceleration of a mass limited target by ultra-high intensity laser pulse A.A.Andreev 1, J.Limpouch 2, K.Yu.Platonov 1 J.Psikal 2, Yu.Stolyarov 1 1. ILPh.
Status of Operational Windows for HIF Chamber Transport Modes D. V. Rose, D. R. Welch, C. L. Olson, S. Neff, and S. S. Yu ARIES Project Meeting January.
Diversion of Plasma in Beam Port with a Vertical Magnetic Field D. R. Welch, D. V. Rose, S. S. Yu and W. Sharp Presented at the ARIES Project Meeting April.
1 Chris Rogers MICE Collaboration Meeting 11th Feb 2005 Tracking and Cooling performance of G4MICE.
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Lecture 4 – Electricity & Magnetism b. Electric Potential.
ARIES-IFE Study L. M. Waganer, June 7, 2000 Page 1 Considerations of HI Beam and Vacuum System Arrangement L. Waganer The Boeing Company 7 June 2001 ARIES.
Physics of fusion power Lecture 7: particle motion.
1 Ion Optics Simulations What it is. How it’s useful. The SIMION ion optics software. –How it works. –Limitations and cautions –Demonstrations and examples.
a b c Gauss’ Law … made easy To solve the above equation for E, you have to be able to CHOOSE A CLOSED SURFACE such that the integral is TRIVIAL. (1)
Magnet Options for Magnetic Intervention SC Wire Characteristics (Critical Current Density: Jc) With the advent of cusp geometry for diverting ions into.
Recirculation Concept - Cyclotron Radio frequency alternating voltage Hollow metal drift tubes time t =0 time t =½ RF period D-shaped.
Chapter 22 Electric Field
The Heavy Ion Fusion Virtual National Laboratory UC Berkeley Christophe S. Debonnel Thermal Hydraulics Laboratory Department of Nuclear Engineering University.
ARR/April 8, Magnetic Intervention Dump Concepts A. René Raffray UCSD With contributions from: A. E. Robson, D. Rose and J. Sethian HAPL Meeting.
Electricity and Magnetism Review 1: Units 1-6
Aug 9, 2008S. Kahn -- HCC Magnet Plans1 HCC Magnet Future Plans Steve Kahn Aug 9, 2008 NFMCC Friday Meeting.
30.5 Magnetic flux  30. Fig 30-CO, p.927
ELECTRIC POTENTIAL ENERGY AND ELECTRIC POTENTIAL POTENTIAL ENERGY ELECTRIC POTENTIAL WORK-ENERGY THEOREM CAPACITANCE COMBINATIONS OF CAPACITORS STORED.
IFE Plant Structural Concepts Including Shielding and Optical Stability Requirements Thomas Kozub, Charles Gentile, Irving Zatz - PPPL.
Chapter 22 Gauss’s Law Chapter 22 opener. Gauss’s law is an elegant relation between electric charge and electric field. It is more general than Coulomb’s.
Physics 2112 Unit 4: Gauss’ Law
Motion in a constant uniform magnetic field Section 21.
Magnetic Fields Due to Currents
IMPROVEMENTS TO MAGNETIC INTERVENTION A.E. ROBSON (Consultant, NRL) in collaboration with D. ROSE (Voss Scientific) HAPL 17 (NRL) October 30 –
S. Kahn 5 June 2003NuFact03 Tetra Cooling RingPage 1 Tetra Cooling Ring Steve Kahn For V. Balbekov, R. Fernow, S. Kahn, R. Raja, Z. Usubov.
Magnetic Deflection of Ionized Target Ions D. V. Rose, A. E. Robson, J. D. Sethian, D. R. Welch, and R. E. Clark March 3, 2005 HAPL Meeting, NRL.
October 2005 Qweak Collaboration Meeting Detailed Design of Shield House and Collimators wrt Backgrounds Yongguang Liang Just getting started – will probably.
The Heavy Ion Fusion Virtual National Laboratory Neutralized Transport Experiment (NTX) P. K. Roy, S. S. Yu, S. Eylon, E. Henestroza, A. Anders, F. M.
Midwest Accelerator Physics Meeting. Indiana University, March 15-19, ORBIT Electron Cloud Model Andrei Shishlo, Yoichi Sato, Slava Danilov, Jeff.
1 Computational Modeling in Support of the Magnetic Intervention Concept D. V. Rose,* T. C. Genoni, R. E. Clark, D. R. Welch, and T. P. Hughes Voss Scientific,
Carbon Target Design and Optimization for an Intense Muon Source X. Ding, UCLA H.G. Kirk, BNL K.T. McDonald, Princeton Univ MAP Winter Collaboration.
Design of an Inertial Fusion Energy Target Injection & Tracking System Ronald Petzoldt, Dan Goodin, Mike Hollins, Chuck Gibson, Neil Alexander, and Gottfried.
Forward Tagger Simulations Implementation in GEMC Moller Shield Tracking Studies R. De Vita INFN –Genova Forward Tagger Meeting, CLAS12 Workshop, June.
MEIC Detector and IR Integration Vasiliy Morozov, Charles Hyde, Pawel Nadel-Turonski MEIC Detector and IR Design Mini-Workshop, October 31, 2011.
Review on Coulomb’s Law and the electric field definition Coulomb’s Law: the force between two point charges The electric field is defined as The force.
Review on Coulomb’s Law and the electric field definition
Dark Current in ILC Main Linac N.Solyak, A.Sukhanov, I.Tropin ALCW2015, Apr.23, 2015, KEK LCWS'15, Tsukuba, 04/2015Nikolay Solyak1.
Defect-Defect Interaction in Carbon Nanotubes under Mechanical Loading Topological defects can be formed in carbon nanotubes (CNTs) during processing or.
High efficiency work and MBK development for accelerators
Positron production rate vs incident electron beam energy for a tungsten target
Fundamentals of Applied Electromagnetics
Chamber Dynamic Response Modeling
Numerical Modeling of the Electra Electron-Beam Diode*
Magnet Options Forward dipoles vs. forward solenoids
Dipole Antennas Driven at High Voltages in the Plasmasphere
Progress report on PIC simulations of a neutralized electron beam
Aerosol Production in Lead-protected and Flibe-protected Chambers
IR Beam Transport Status
Presentation transcript:

1 Computational Modeling of Magnetic Intervention D. V. Rose* Voss Scientific, LLC A. E. Robson, J. D. Sethian, and J. L. Giuliani Naval Research Laboratory High Average Power Laser Program Workshop Naval Research Laboratory, Building 226 Auditorium October 30 and 31, 2007 *With a special acknowledgement to Chris Mostrom for continuing work on 3D graphics!

2 Status report on computational modeling for Magnetic Intervention (MI): Electromagnetic analysis of the Pechacek experiment is essentially complete. –We are continuing to use this analysis to explore other computational models suitable for efficient EM analysis of IFE-scale MI physics. Ion orbit analysis of the conventional MI concept has indicated that the escaping ion “beams” in both the ring and point cusps result in very high current densities. –No integrated, feasible solution of this ion-stopping/materials problem is known at this time. Ion orbit analysis of the OCTACUSP MI concept (A. Robson) is underway (and is the main subject of this presentation): –Discussed in the previous presentation by A. Robson.

3 EMHD Simulation of “Pechacek” Experiment Complete: The essential physical character of the experiment reproduced in a 2D, large-scale simulation. This model is NOT directly extendable to IFE chamber- scale problems.

4 To “zeroth-order”, orbit calculations can be used to conduct relevant design studies for ions leaving the chamber: We are continuing to develop new models that should lessen the discrepancies and handle the IFE chamber spatial & temporal scales. The Pechacek experiment will continue to be the test case for all new algorithms. t (  s)

5 EMHD vs Orbit Calculation: Ring cusp width and transverse velocities compared: Ion channel “width” as a function of time at r=29 cm in the escape cusp. Ion channel transverse momentum (v z ) at r=29 cm.

6 Orbit Analysis of the “duckbill” dumps shows a narrow and sharply peaked ion deposition pattern: The duckbill ion dump design does NOT look feasible for the ring cusp. “5 th ” coil designs to spread the escaping ion ring have not been successful. Helium Density at 25  s

7 The resulting time-integrated energy deposition is a little broader than the 4-coil case. 5-coil design used to explore the energy separation of the ring- cusp ions:

8 OCTACUSP Primary Coil Configurations Include: Triangles:Circles:Conformal Triangles:

9 |B| contour levels at z=0 plane illustrating magnetic void at center of trap (left). 3D representation of a single |B| iso-surface also shown (right). |B|~0.1T iso-surfaces The long tube-like extensions away from the center of the chamber at X-type neutral lines.

10 Magnetic topology of a single “tube” or X-type neutral line: Magnetic field at x=200 cm plane: Chamber wall, r=5 m

11 3D view illustrates that the magnetic field lines extend through the eight solenoids: Sample streamlines without conductor boundaries: Sample streamlines with conductor boundaries:

12 View from “inside” the chamber: “outside” view 3D streamlines can aid in the analysis by looking for critical field line intercept points:

13 Sample Ion Orbit Calculation: Oct17.lsp 5-meter radius vacuum chamber Four triangular main “coils” mapped onto a 6-meter radius sphere – each triangle carrys 6 MA –Allows 1-meter for neutral shielding Eight 1.1-meter radius solenoids along ion drift tubes –Drift tubes have an inner diameter of 0.9 meters –Solenoids composed of 11 individual rings, each carrying 100 kA Only 3.0 MeV Helium ions ( 4 He ++ ) followed here.

14 Individual particle and density plots are less helpful here: Particle positions and densities at 5  s:

15 Charge deposition on the chamber surfaces (time- integrated) is being used to optimize the magnetic field topology: All surface cells plotted Here, only surface cells with non-zero charge deposition are plotted.

16 Views of the charge deposition in a single octant illustrate the three-fold symmetry in the escaping ion distribution For this case, about 40% of the ions reach the ends of the drift tubes. About 2% are deposited at the neutral line points, and 58% are in the flower petals radiating out from the entrance to the drift tubes.

17 Target planes along the drift tubes are used to diagnose the escaping ion beams ( time-integrated). Lsp uses combinatorial geometry of basic objects to build physical spaces and material boundaries. Target planes along one drift tube are shown.

18 3D targets in drift tubes indicate a focused ion beam* At r = 10 m: * Additional diagnostics, not shown here, also indicate an expanding ion beam envelope.

19 Issues/Work-in-Progress: Tapered X-type neutral line physics (including diamagnetic effects) needs to be addressed. Full “Perkins” ion spectrum needs to be examined once the current design exercise is completed. Lead vapor dE/dx mass-stopping analysis for the ions (realistic energy loading, radiation, thermal cycles, etc.). The eight-fold symmetry of the OCTACUSP design adds complexity to the plasma/magnetic-field interaction analysis. (A full 3D inertialess-electron dynamic EM model is still being explored.)

20 Summary: Issues with the “conventional” MI chamber (with 2 or 4 coil system with ring and point cusps) are forcing consideration of other magnetic field topologies. Bertie’s OCTACUSP design: –preserves the spherical symmetry inherent in direct- drive systems –minimizes the chamber surface area for ion escape ports (~5%) Other coil configurations are possible (nested triangles, etc.)

21 Backup slides:

22 Oct16.lsp 1-m radius solenoids at each point cusp, 2 kA/cm (11 rings each carrying x MA) 5-meter radius chamber Conformal Triangles on 6-m radius sphere, 3 MA 3 MeV He++ ion orbits followed Show magnetic field topology Ion orbits Sample density plot Energy deposition on surfaces.

23 Cutaway view of an iso-surface of |B| illustrates location of the neutral lines: |B|=0.6 T iso-surfaces. Neutral lines (6) lie along the coordinate axes in this orientation, and terminate near the chamber wall.

24 Plots of the ion charge deposition on conducting surfaces are used to guide the design of the magnetic fields. Ion Energy Delivery: ~20% in 8 tube ends ~4% in 6 neutral line points ~76% in the chamber wall (flower petals)

25 3D targets in drift tubes indicate a focused ion beam* R = 6 m R = 10 m * Additional diagnostics, not shown here, also indicate an oscillating ion beam envelope.

26 Particle escape orbits are complex in the OCTACUSP magnetic field: Sample orbits for 3 MeV  particles launched from the origin at different initial angles. Escape radius is 200 cm (the radius of the conducting spherical boundary).