Critical state controlled by microscopic flux jumps in superconductors

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Critical Fields and Critical Currents in MgB 2 David Caplin and Judith Driscoll Imperial College, London Work supported by EPSRC Commercial Uses of Magnesium.
Advertisements

P.W. Terry K.W. Smith University of Wisconsin-Madison Outline
Pressure and Kinetic Energy
Two scale modeling of superfluid turbulence Tomasz Lipniacki
Superconductors. Gor’kov and Eliashberg found the time- dependent G-L equations using microscopic theory: These equations are solved numerically Model.
Flux Jumps in Magnetization of HTS Tubes. Nasser S. Alzayed Physics Dept., King Saud University Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
High T c Superconductors in Magnetic Fields T. P. Devereaux.
Probing Superconductors using Point Contact Andreev Reflection Pratap Raychaudhuri Tata Institute of Fundamental Research Mumbai Collaborators: Gap anisotropy.
K. Kaneko Kyushu Sangyo University, Fukuoka, Japan Particle-number conservation for pairing transition in finite systems A. Schiller Michigan State University,
AOSS 321, Winter 2009 Earth System Dynamics Lecture 10 2/10/2008 Christiane Jablonowski Eric Hetland
1 Most of the type II superconductors are anisotropic. In extreme cases of layered high Tc materials like BSCCO the anisotropy is so large that the material.
RF Superconductivity and the Superheating Field H sh James P. Sethna, Gianluigi Catelani, and Mark Transtrum Superconducting RF cavity Lower losses Limited.
GEOMAGNETISM: a dynamo at the centre of the Earth Lecture 1 How the dynamo is powered Lecture 2 How the dynamo works Lecture 3 Interpreting the observations.
Stellar Structure Section 4: Structure of Stars Lecture 7 – Stellar stability Convective instability Derivation of instability criterion … … in terms of.
VORTEX MATTER IN SUPERCONDUCTORS WITH FERROMAGNETIC DOT ARRAYS Margriet J. Van Bael Martin Lange, Victor V. Moshchalkov Laboratorium voor Vaste-Stoffysica.
High Temperature Copper Oxide Superconductors: Properties, Theory and Applications in Society Presented by Thomas Hines in partial fulfillment of Physics.
Vortex Dynamics in Type II Superconductors Yuri V. Artemov Yuri V. Artemov Ph.D. Student in Physics Brian B. Schwartz Mentor: Brian B. Schwartz Professor.
Superconductors: Basic Concepts Daniel Shantsev AMCS group Department of Physics University of Oslo History Superconducting materials Properties Understanding.
Faraday’s law cannot be derived from the other fundamental principles we have studied Formal version of Faraday’s law: Sign: given by right hand rule Faraday’s.
Bose-Einstein Condensate Fundaments, Excitation and Turbulence Vanderlei Salvador Bagnato Instituto de Física de São Carlos – Universidade de São Paulo.
Flux pinning in general Adrian Crisan School of Metallurgy and Materials, University of Birmingham, UK and National Institute of Materials Physics, Bucharest,
Condensed Matter Physics Big Facility Physics26th Jan 2004 Sub Heading “Big Facility” Physics in Grenoble ESRF: X-rays ILL: neutrons.
ENE 311 Lecture 9.
2-D FEM MODELING OF MICROWAVE HEATING OF COAL PARTICLES EGEE 520 SEMESTER PRESENTATION by Ojogbane M. Achimugu May 3 rd 2007.
Lecture 3. Granular superconductors and Josephson Junction arrays Plan of the Lecture 1). Superconductivity in a single grain 2) Granular superconductors:
Superconducting vortex avalanches D. Shantsev Åge A. F. Olsen, D. Denisov, V. Yurchenko, Y. M. Galperin, T. H. Johansen AMCS (COMPLEX) group Department.
Coexistence and Competition of Superconductivity and Magnetism in Ho 1-x Dy x Ni 2 B 2 C Hyeon-Jin Doh, Jae-Hyuk Choi, Heon-Jung Kim, Eun Mi Choi, H. B.
Michael Browne 11/26/2007.
Numerical simulations of thermal counterflow in the presence of solid boundaries Andrew Baggaley Jason Laurie Weizmann Institute Sylvain Laizet Imperial.
Two Level Systems and Kondo-like traps as possible sources of decoherence in superconducting qubits Lara Faoro and Lev Ioffe Rutgers University (USA)
Results Conclusion Methods Samples Peak current limiting properties of SFCL with parallel connected coils using two magnetic paths Objectives Background.
Magneto-optical imaging of Superconductors Satyajit S.Banerjee Dept of Physics, Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur, India.
Dendritic Thermo-magnetic Instability in Superconductors Daniel V. Shantsev AMCS group, Department of Physics, UiO Collaboration: D. V. Denisov, A.A.F.Olsen,
RF breakdown in multilayer coatings: a possibility to break the Nb monopoly Alex Gurevich National High Magnetic Field Laboratory, Florida State University.
MANYBODY PHYSICS Lab Effective Vortex Mass from Microscopic Theory June Seo Kim.
M. Onofri, F. Malara, P. Veltri Compressible magnetohydrodynamics simulations of the RFP with anisotropic thermal conductivity Dipartimento di Fisica,
Fingering, Fronts, and Patterns in Superconductors
Vortex avalanches in superconductors: Size distribution and Mechanism Daniel Shantsev Tom Johansen andYuri Galperin AMCS group Department of Physics, University.
Mass without Mass “PHASING-OUT” of (BARE) MASS FROM PHYSICAL EQUATIONS Newton’s 2 nd law: F=ma Newton’s gravity: F = GMm/r 2 Einstein’s law: E=mc 2 Quantum.
Peak effect in Superconductors - Experimental aspects G. Ravikumar Technical Physics & Prototype Engineering Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Mumbai.
Phonons Packets of sound found present in the lattice as it vibrates … but the lattice vibration cannot be heard. Unlike static lattice model , which.
Monday, April 23, PHYS , Spring 2007 Dr. Andrew Brandt PHYS 1444 – Section 004 Lecture #19 Monday, April 23, 2007 Dr. Andrew Brandt Inductance.
Charge pumping in mesoscopic systems coupled to a superconducting lead
Superconductivity and Superfluidity Flux line motion In principlea Type II superconductor should be “better” than a Type I for most applications - it remains.
SUMMARY Magneto-optical studies of a c-oriented epitaxial MgB 2 film show that below 10K the global penetration of vortices is dominated by complex dendritic.
Global and local flux jumps in MgB2 films: Magneto-optical imaging and theory Daniel Shantsev, Yuri Galperin, Alexaner Bobyl, Tom Johansen Physics Department,
1 Non-uniform superconductivity in superconductor/ferromagnet nanostructures A. Buzdin Institut Universitaire de France, Paris and Condensed Matter Theory.
Why Make Holes in Superconductors? Saturday Morning Physics December 6, 2003 Dr. Sa-Lin Cheng Bernstein.
Pinning Effect on Niobium Superconducting Thin Films with Artificial Pinning Centers. Lance Horng, J. C. Wu, B. H. Lin, P. C. Kang, J. C. Wang, and C.
Global MHD Simulations of State Transitions and QPOs in Black Hole Accretion Flows Machida Mami (NAOJ) Matsumoto Ryoji (Chiba Univ.)
Department of Materials Science and Engineering WAMSDO 2008 Stability in Nb 3 Sn -- Explicit Functional Dependence of J s on d eff and RRR, Local RRR Degradation,
Chapter 7 in the textbook Introduction and Survey Current density:
Case study 5 RF cavities: superconductivity and thin films, local defect… 1 Thin Film Niobium: penetration depth Frequency shift during cooldown. Linear.
ULTIMATE ACCELERATING FIELD AND LOCAL MAGNETOMETRY EUCARD2 WP12.2 THIN FILMS PROSPECTIVE Navneeta KATYAN, CEA, Irfu, SACM, Centre d'Etudes de Saclay,
THE DYNAMIC EVOLUTION OF TWISTED MAGNETIC FLUX TUBES IN A THREE-DIMENSIONALCONVECTING FLOW. II. TURBULENT PUMPING AND THE COHESION OF Ω-LOOPS.
Superconductivity and Superfluidity The Microscopic Origins of Superconductivity The story so far -what do we know about superconductors?: (i) Superconductors.
Folgefonna Glacier, Norway. Finger patterns produced by flux jumps in superconductors Finger patterns produced by flux jumps in superconductors Daniel.
NTNU 2011 Dimer-superfluid phase in the attractive Extended Bose-Hubbard model with three-body constraint Kwai-Kong Ng Department of Physics Tunghai University,
G.Y. Park 1, S.S. Kim 1, T. Rhee 1, H.G. Jhang 1, P.H. Diamond 1,2, I. Cziegler 2, G. Tynan 2, and X.Q. Xu 3 1 National Fusion Research Institute, Korea.
Phonons Packets of sound found present in the lattice as it vibrates … but the lattice vibration cannot be heard. Unlike static lattice model, which deals.
Dipole magnets A dipole magnet gives a constant B-field.
Electrical resistance
Electrical Properties of Materials
Effect of Surface Treatments on the Superconducting Properties of Niobium Presented by A.S.Dhavale Sept. 23, 2010.
Abstract We simulate the twisting of an initially potential coronal flux tube by photospheric vortex motions. The flux tube starts to evolve slowly(quasi-statically)
Ehud Altman Anatoli Polkovnikov Bertrand Halperin Mikhail Lukin
Masaki Suenaga* and Qiang Li
Quasi One-Dimensional Vortex Flow Driven Through Mesoscopic Channels
Ginzburg-Landau theory
Presentation transcript:

Critical state controlled by microscopic flux jumps in superconductors Daniel Shantsev Physics Department, University of Oslo, Norway in collaboration with Vitali Yurchenko, Alexander Bobyl, Yuri Galperin, Tom Johansen Eun-Mi Choi, Sung-Ik Lee Pohang University of Science and Technology, Korea

a superconductor can carry? What determines the maximal current a superconductor can carry?

the critical magnetic field 1. Solsby Rule H Magnetic field created by current, should not exceed the critical magnetic field H = I / 2p R < Hc R Jc(1) = 2Hc / R I

I J < Jc(2)  Hc / l 2. Depairing current density Ginsburg-Landau equations have a solution only if R J < Jc(2)  Hc / l For J>Jc the kinetic energy of Cooper pairs exceeds the superconducting energy gap I

x~10 Å J l  B dA = h/2e = 0 Meissner effect normal core Flux quantum: x~10 Å l J B(r) normal core Vortex lattice

Lorentz force F = j F0 current Ba J Vortices are driven by Lorentz force and their motion creates electric field E ~ dB/dt Lorentz force F = j F0 Ba J pinning force Lorentz force Vortices get pinned by tiny defects and start moving only if Lorentz force > Pinning force current

J < Jc(3) = U / F0 Jc(3) ~ Hc / l U(r) 3. Depinning current density Superconductor remains in the non-resistive state only if Lorentz force < Pinning force, i.e. if U(r) J < Jc(3) = U / F0 Ideal pinning center is a non-SC column of radius ~ x so that U ~ Hc2x2 and similar to the depairing Jc Jc(3) ~ Hc / l

positive feedback J*E velocity current +kT E ~ dB/dt Vortex motion dissipates energy, J*E Local Temperature Increases velocity +kT It is easier for vortices to overcome pinning barriers positive feedback current Vortices move faster

x Hfj  Hfjslab (d/w)1/2 x H Jc(4) = (2C Jc(3) [d Jc(3) /dT]-1)1/2/2w Thermal instability criterion ~ Swartz &Bean, JAP 1968 dQM > dQT - instability starts dQT = C(T) dT dQM = Jc(T) dF = H2/2Jc dJc/dT dT H > Hfj = (2C Jc [dJc/dT]-1)1/2 Jc(4) = (2C Jc(3) [d Jc(3) /dT]-1)1/2/2w j H dF x Hfj  Hfjslab (d/w)1/2 x H j 2w d<<w dF D. S. et al. PRB 2005

List of current-limiting mechanisms Solsby, Jc ~ Hc/R Depairing current Jc ~ Hc / l Depinning current, Jc (U) Thermal instability current, Jc(C,..) Jc(3) < Jc(4) < Jc(1) < Jc(2) We need to know which Jc is the most important i.e. the smallest! Achieved

J >Jc(3) a small finite resistance appears How to distinguish between Jc’s J >Jc(3) a small finite resistance appears J >Jc(4) a catastrophic flux jump occurs (T rises to ~Tc or higher) Brull et al, Annalen der Physik 1992, v.1, p.243 Gaevski et al, APL 1997

Critical state is destroyed Global flux jumps M(H) loop DM ~ M Critical state is destroyed Muller & Andrikidis, PRB-94

Critical state is destroyed locally Dendritic flux jumps MgB2 film DM ~ 0.01 M Critical state is destroyed locally Europhys. Lett. 59, 599-605 (2002) Magneto-optical imaging Zhao et al, PRB 2002

Microscopic flux jumps 5 mm MgB2 film fabricated by S.I. Lee (Pohang, Korea) MgB2 film 100 mm Magneto-optical movie shows that flux penetration proceeds via small jumps

2300F0 1100F0 250F0 Analyzing difference images flux jump 7.15 mT 7.40 mT linear ramp of Ba 15 MO images T=3.6K = MO image (7.165mT) — MO image (7.150mT) local increase of flux density - flux jump 2300F0 1100F0 250F0

Jc(3) OR Jc(4) ? The problem with microscopic jumps 31,000F0 7,500F0 Too small, DM ~ 10-5 M : invisible in M(H) Critical state is not destroyed B-distribution looks as usual x From the standard measurements one can not tell what limits Jc: vortex pinning OR thermal instabilities Jc(3) OR Jc(4) ? edge Flux profiles before and after a flux jump have similar shapes

What can be done One should measure dynamics of flux penetration and look for jumps If any, compare their statistics, B-profiles etc with thermal instability theories If they fit, then Jc=Jc(4) , determined by instability; actions – improve C, heat removal conditions etc, if not, then Jc=Jc(3), determined by pinning; actions – create better pinning centers Jump size (F0) Number of jumps power-law Altshuler et al. PRB 2005 peak (thermal mechanism)

Two Jc’s in one sample 300 mm 70 mm Jcleft  2 Jcright Jc(3) Jc(4)

Dendritic instability can be suppressed by a contact with normal metal Baziljevich et al 2002

Jc(3) Jc(4) MgB2 300 mm 70 mm Two Jc’s in one sample Au 9 mm w 3 mm Au suppresses jumps, Jc is determined by pinning Jc is determined by jumps Jc(3) Jc(4)

A graphical way to determine Jc’s: d-lines

MgB2 3 mm Au Jc1 Jc2 ?

α

α ≈ π/3 β α α ! jc1 ≈ 2jc2 !

Conclusions Thermal avalanches can be truly microscopic as observed by MOI and described by a proposed adiabatic model These avalanches can not be detected either in M(H) loops or in static MO images => “What determines Jc?” - is an open question MO images of MgB2 films partly covered with Au show two distinct Jc’s: - Jc determined by stability with respect to thermal avalanches - a higher Jc determined by pinning http://www.fys.uio.no/super/

Evolution of local flux density 5x5 mm2 Local B grows by small and repeated steps 7.9mT 7.4mT 7mT linear ramp 6 mT/s local flux density calculated from local intensity of MO image; each point on the curve corresponds to one MO image

Jc is determined by Jc depends on stability with respect to thermal avalanches Jc depends on thermal coupling to environment, specific heat, sample dimensions But we need to prove that the observed microscopic avalanches are indeed of thermal origin

Adiabatic critical state for a thin strip In the spirit of Swartz &Bean in 1968 Adiabatic : All energy released by flux motion is absorbed Critical state Biot-Savart for thin film Flux that has passed through “x” during avalanche

Flux jump size Thermal origin of avalanches T=0.1Tc We fit Bfj ~ 2 mT Tth ~ 13 K F(Ba) dependence using only one parameter: Thermal origin of avalanches

Irreproducibility B(r) DB(r) The final pattern is the same T=3.6K Ba = 13.6 mT B(r) the flux pattern almost repeats itself MOI(8.7mT) - MOI(8.5mT) DB(r) DB(r) is irreproducible! The final pattern is the same but the sequences of avalanches are different

Magneto-optical Imaging polarizer P A mirror MO indicator image large small Faraday rotation S N light source Linearly polarized light Faraday-active crystal Magnetic field H q (H) F Square YBaCuO film