Teacher Scores from the State

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 New York State Education Department Interpreting and Using Your New York State-Provided Growth Scores August 2012.
Advertisements

New York State’s Teacher and Principal Evaluation System VOLUME I: NYSED APPR PLAN SUBMISSION “TIPS”
EngageNY.org State-Calculated Growth Measures Overview July 2013 Network Training Institute.
Introduction to the Georgia Student Growth Model Understanding and Using SGPs to Improve Student Performance 1.
Percentiles and the Normal Curve
Exam One Review Quiz Psy302 Quantitative Methods.
Student Growth Percentiles For Classroom Teachers and Contributing Professionals KDE:OAA:3/28/2014:kd:rls 1.
Today’s Question Example: Dave gets a 50 on his Statistics midterm and an 50 on his Calculus midterm. Did he do equally well on these two exams? Big question:
Annual Professional performance review (APPR overview) Wappingers CSD.
Student Learning Objectives NYS District-Wide Growth Goal Setting Process December 1, 2011 EVOLVING.
Teacher Effectiveness
Student Growth Percentile (SGP) Model
Nevada’s Growth Model Richard N. Vineyard, Ph.D. Asst. Dir. Assessment Nevada Dept. of Education.
99th Percentile 1st Percentile 50th Percentile What Do Percentiles Mean? Percentiles express the percentage of students that fall below a certain score.
Dr. Michael Flicek Education Consultant October 8, 2013 Wyoming School Performance Rating Model Report to: Wyoming State Board of Education.
Purpose & Context This work, particularly around MoSL, is very nuanced and complex. There are places where some policy decisions are still being made.
1 New York State Education Department Using Growth Measures for Educator Evaluation August 2012.
As Adopted by Emergency Action June, 2015 Slides updated
DRE Agenda Student Learning Growth – Teacher VAM – School Growth PYG Area Scorecards. PYG, and other Performance Indicators.
Introduction to the Georgia Student Growth Model Understanding and Using SGPs to Improve Student Performance 1.
Student Impact Rating Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System Daviess County Public Schools.
How Can Teacher Evaluation Be Connected to Student Achievement?
EngageNY.org State-Calculated Growth Measures Overview July 2013 Network Training Institute Revised 8/22/2013.
1 New York State Growth Model for Educator Evaluation 2011–12 July 2012 PRESENTATION as of 7/9/12.
Teacher Effectiveness Day 5. Housekeeping Parking Breaks and lunch Emergencies.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) and Accountability Status Determinations.
Using Student Growth Percentiles in Educator Evaluations
NY’s APPR Plans and Review Process.
The APPR Process And BOCES. Sections 3012-c and 3020 of Education Law (as amended)  Annual Professional Performance Review (APPR) based on:  Student.
OCM BOCES SLOs Workshop. Race To The Top: Standards Data Professional Practice Culture APPR.
New York State Scores 2011—2012 School Year. Growth Ratings and Score Ranges Growth RatingDescriptionGrowth Score Range (2011–12) Highly EffectiveWell.
Western Suffolk BOCES Boot Camp Emma Klimek Eastern Suffolk BOCES 2012.
APPR:§3012-d A Preview of the changes from :§3012-c Overview.
FEH BOCES Student Learning Objectives 3012-c.
South Lewis Central School District. Student Outcomes – Percent Meeting Common Core Expectations (District-Wide) ELA - Grade % Levels 3 and 4 BOCES Rank.
NH Commissioner’s Task Force Meeting September 21, 2010 NH DOE 1 Commissioner's Task Force Meeting: September 21, 2010.
Winter, 2012 Teacher Effectivensss Day 5. To download powerpoint:
Student Growth Percentiles Basics Fall Outcomes Share information on the role of Category 1 assessments in evaluations Outline steps for districts.
Student Learning Objectives SLOs April 3, NY State’s Regulations governing teacher evaluation call for a “State-determined District-wide growth.
1 New York State Growth Model for Educator Evaluation 2011–12 July 2012 PRESENTATION as of 7/9/12.
NH Commissioner’s Task Force Meeting August 10, 2010 NH DOE 1 Commissioner's Force Meeting: August 10, 2010.
OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION COSA PRINCIPAL’S CONFERENCE 2015 ODE Update on Educator Effectiveness.
DISTRICT NAME HERE Using Student Growth Percentiles (Option A)
OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION COSA LAW CONFERENCE 2015 ODE Update on Educator Effectiveness.
Student Growth Percentiles For Classroom Teachers and Contributing Professionals 1 October 22, 2014.
Student Learning Objectives NYS District-Wide Growth Goal Setting Process December 1, 2011 EVOLVING.
Student Growth Percentiles (SGPs) MDE - AdvancED Michigan 2014 Fall School Improvement Conference November 18, 2014.
The Normal Distribution Chapter 2 Part 2. Iliana’s Grade After 5 weeks of class Iliana must transfer from a stat class at Lanier to this class. Last week.
October 24, 2012 Jonathan Wiens, PhD Accountability and Reporting Oregon Department of Education.
Ongoing Training Day 1. Welcome Back! [re]Orientation Lead Evaluator Training Agenda Review.
2011 – 2012 School Year. * Walk-Throughs * Observation(s) * Pre-/Post-Evaluation Form * Year-End Evaluation * Summative Score Report.
Florida Department of Education’s Florida Department of Education’s Teacher Evaluation System Student Learning Growth.
Student Growth Measures ODU Leadership Conference June 19, 2014.
APPR Annual Professional Performance Review Legislation: 3012-d Board of Education Work Session November 9, 2015.
Value Added Model Value Added Model. New Standard for Teacher EvaluationsNew Standard for Teacher Evaluations Performance of Students. At least 50% of.
PRINCIPAL STATE GROWTH SCORES / Principal Performance/Visit= 50 Student Performance=50.
EngageNY.org State-Calculated Growth Measures Overview July 2013 Tracy Rowlands & Deb Duffy.
1 New York State Growth Model for Educator Evaluation June 2012 PRESENTATION as of 6/14/12.
EngageNY.org State-Calculated Growth Measures Overview July 2013 Deb Duffy.
Richard Woods, Georgia’s School Superintendent “Educating Georgia’s Future” gadoe.org Overview of the Georgia Student Growth Model 1.
1 Overview of Teacher Evaluation 60% Multiple Measures of Teacher Performance At least 31 points based on “at least 2” observations At least one observation.
NYS Grades 9-12 School Growth Scores: From MGP and GRE to HEDI Ratings and Scores August 2016 Disclaimer If there are any discrepancies between.
1 NYS Grades 4-8 Teacher Growth Scores: From MGP to HEDI Ratings and Scores August 2016 Disclaimer If there are any discrepancies.
Mark Howard, Chief Performance Accountability
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) State Plan: Update
FY17 Evaluation Overview: Student Performance Rating
Ongoing Lead Evaluator
New York State Education Department Using Growth Measures for Educator Evaluation August 2012.
NEWARK CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT APPR OVERVIEW
Presented by Joseph P. Stern
Presentation transcript:

Teacher Scores from the State

Teacher Scores from SED Mostly 4th – 8th grade teachers of ELA and math Some co-teachers or others can be connected to these

Teacher Scores from SED “Like” students are compared from year to year, grouped by: Previous score(s) SWD? ELL? SES?

Teacher Scores from SED “Like” students scores are compared to determine the Student Growth Percentile (SGP)

SGPs combined for MGP Ms. Smith’s Class Enrollment Duration Attendance Enrollment x Attendance Student A 45 80% 90% .72 Student B 40 100% 95% .95 Student C 55 50% N/A Student D 60 .90 Student E 75% .75 To measure teacher performance, we find the mean growth percentile (MGP) for her students, which is the weighted average of the SGPs. In this case: Step 1: (.72*45)+(.95*40)+(.90*60)+(.75*40) = 154.4 Step 2: .72+.95+.90+.75 = 3.32 Step 3. 154.4 / 3.32 = 46.5 Ms. Smith’s mean growth percentile (MGP) is 46.5, meaning on average her students performed as well or better than almost 47 percent of similar students. **Teachers need at least 16 SGPs attributed to them in order for an MGP to be reported

MGPs and Statistical Confidence 87 Confidence Range 90 Upper Limit 84 Lower Limit MGP New York State Education Department (NYSED) provides a 95 percent confidence range, meaning we can be 95 percent confident that an educator’s “true” MGP lies within that range. Upper and lower limits of MGPs will be used when classifying educators into HEDI categories. An educator’s confidence range depends on a number of factors, including the number of student scores included in his or her MGP and the variability of student performance in the class or school.

MGPs for teachers 1 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 99

Distribution of HEDI Labels State-Provided Teacher and Principal Scores SD = 0 SD = +1.5 SD = +2 SD = -1 SD = -1.5 Effective Range (77.4%) Ineffective Range (6.7%) Highly Effective Range (6.7%) Developing Range (9.2%) mean 6% 94% 50% 16% Note: The actual proportion of educators receiving each rating can vary slightly from the distribution in this chart, after the confidence ranges are applied. The final label is based both on what HEDI category an educator’s MGP falls in and the upper and lower limits of their confidence ranges.  

Assigning Points to HEDI Labels

§3012-c to § 3012-d Scoring Bands 3012-c Bands 3012-d Bands HEDI Points Min MGP Max MGP 9 28 22 1 29 31 23 24 2 32 35 25 3 26 4 36 27 5 37 6 38 7 39 30 8 40 41 43 10 44 45 33 11 46 48 34 12 49 50 13 51 52 14 53 55 15 56 57 16 58 60 17 61 69 18 67 68 19 72 20 73 97 KEY Description Ineffective Well-below state average for similar students Developing Below state average for similar students Effective Results meet state average for similar students Highly Effective Well-above state average for similar students *For illustrative purposes only. 3012-d scoring bands were not in place for most teachers during 2014-15. The minimum and maximum MGPs associated with each point range may change in future years based on the MGPs of teachers statewide.

Highly Effective Range (6.7%) SD = 0 SD = +1.5 SD = +2 SD = -1 SD = -1.5 Effective Range (77.4%) Ineffective Range (6.7%) Highly Effective Range (6.7%) Developing Range (9.2%) mean 6% 94% 50% 16% Assigning Points to HEDI Labels Previous Distribution 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

Highly Effective Range (6.7%) SD = 0 SD = +1.5 SD = +2 SD = -1 SD = -1.5 Effective Range (77.4%) Ineffective Range (6.7%) Highly Effective Range (6.7%) Developing Range (9.2%) mean 6% 94% 50% 16% Assigning Points to HEDI Labels Future Distribution 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

Principal Scores from the State

SGPs to MGPs for Principals To measure principal performance, we find the mean growth percentile (MGP) for all her students who were enrolled on BEDS day and assessment day. To find a principal’s mean growth percentile, take the average of SGPs in the school: Step 1: 45+40+70+41 = 196 Step 2. 196/4 = 49. Principal Jensen’s mean growth percentile (MGP) is 49, meaning on average her students performed as well or better than 49 percent of similar students. Principal Jensen’s School SGP BEDS-Assessment Day Enrollment Student Q 45 Yes Student R 40 Student S 70 Student T 60 No Student U 41 Same minimum sample size requirements (16 student scores) for principals as for teachers.

GREs for Principals Simplified Illustrative Example Principal’s score on this metric is 0.2. On average, students at this school are passing 0.2 Regents Exams more than similar students statewide. A zero represents average or effective results. Student Number of Regents Passed This Year For This Student Number of Regents Passed This Year by Similar Students Difference Jessica 1 Tyler 2 Ashley -1 Emily 3 Jacob Total Difference (Sum of Differences) Average Difference (Total Difference/Number of Students) 1/5 = .2 NOTE: 0 means student or school achieved the average (or “effective”) result compared to similar students statewide.