M. S. Tillack IFE Technology Research at UC San Diego MAE Departmental Seminar 6 October 2004

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
HAPL January 11-13, 2005/ARR 1 Overview of the HAPL IFE Dry Wall Chamber Studies in the US Presented by A. René Raffray UCSD With contributions from John.
Advertisements

M. S. Tillack, J. E. Pulsifer, K. L. Sequoia Grazing-Incidence Metal Mirrors for Laser-IFE Third IAEA Technical Meeting on “Physics and Technology of Inertial.
Physics of Fusion Lecture 15: Inertial Confinement Fusion Lecturer: Dirk O. Gericke.
Laser Plasma and Laser-Matter Interactions Laboratory The effect of ionization on condensation in ablation plumes M. S.
April 6-7, 2002 A. R. Raffray, et al., Modeling of Inertial Fusion Chamber 1 Modeling of Inertial Fusion Chamber A. R. Raffray, F. Najmabadi, Z. Dragojlovic,
Background on GIMM studies in HAPL Challenges for a final optic optical requirements environmental threats system integration Design choices Logic pursued.
March 3-4, 2005 HAPL meeting, NRL 1 Target Survival During Injection…The Advantages of Getting Rid of the Buffer Gas Presented by A.R. Raffray Other Contributors:
DAH, RRP, UW - FTI ARIES-IFE, January 2002, 1 Thin liquid Pb wall protection for IFE chambers D. A. Haynes, Jr. and R. R. Peterson Fusion Technology Institute.
Laser Plasma and Laser-Matter Interactions Laboratory Laser ablation plume dynamics and particulate generation M. S. Tillack Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering.
September 3-4, 2003/ARR 1 Liquid Wall Ablation under IFE Photon Energy Deposition at Radius of 0.5 m A. René Raffray and Mofreh Zaghloul University of.
Design Considerations for Beam Port Insulator Rings
The Heavy Ion Fusion Virtual National Laboratory UC Berkeley Christophe S. Debonnel 1,2 (1) Thermal Hydraulics Laboratory Department of Nuclear Engineering.
Progress on Laser Induced Damage Studies of Grazing Incidence Metal Mirrors Mark S. Tillack T. K. Mau Mofreh Zaghloul Laser-IFE Program Workshop May 31-June.
A. R. Raffray, B. R. Christensen and M. S. Tillack Can a Direct-Drive Target Survive Injection into an IFE Chamber? Japan-US Workshop on IFE Target Fabrication,
Advanced Energy Technology Group Mechanisms of Aerosol Generation in Liquid-Protected IFE Chambers M. S. Tillack, A. R. Raffray.
October 27-28, 2004 HAPL meeting, PPPL 1 Target Survival During Injection Presented by A.R. Raffray Other Contributors: K. Boehm, B. Christensen, M. S.
Chamber Dynamic Response, Laser Driver-Chamber Interface and System Integration for Inertial Fusion Energy Mark Tillack Farrokh Najmabadi Rene Raffray.
Overview of Inertial Fusion Energy Technology Activities at UC San Diego Mark S. Tillack Briefing to the Advanced Energy Technology Group June 2001.
April 4-5, 2002 A. R. Raffray, et al., Chamber Clearing Code Development 1 Chamber Dynamics and Clearing Code Development Effort A. R. Raffray, F. Najmabadi,
Chamber Dynamics and Clearing Farrokh Najmabadi, Rene Raffray, Mark Tillack (UCSD) Ahmed Hassanein (ANL) Laser-IFE Program Workshop February 6-7, 2001.
June7-8, 2001 A. R. Raffray, et al., Completion of Assessment of Dry Chamber Wall Option Without Protective Gas, and Initial Planning Activity for Assessment.
John Pulsifer, Mark Tillack S. S. Harilal, Joel Hollingsworth GIMM experimental setup and tests at prototypical pulse length HAPL Project Meeting Princeton,
Aerosol protection of laser optics by Electrostatic Fields (not manetic) L. Bromberg ARIES Meeting Madison WI April 23, 2002.
Chamber Dynamic Response Modeling Zoran Dragojlovic.
M. S. Tillack, Y. Tao, F. Najmabadi Proposed contributions to Jupiter-III by the laser-matter interactions group Briefing to Prof. Yoshio Ueda 20 November.
October 24, Remaining Action Items on Dry Chamber Wall 2. “Overlap” Design Regions 3. Scoping Analysis of Sacrificial Wall A. R. Raffray, J.
ARIES-IFE Assessment of Operational Windows for IFE Power Plants Farrokh Najmabadi and the ARIES Team UC San Diego 16 th ANS Topical Meeting on the Technology.
1 THERMAL LOADING OF A DIRECT DRIVE TARGET IN RAREFIED GAS B. R. Christensen, A. R. Raffray, and M. S. Tillack Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Department.
UV laser-induced damage to grazing- incidence metal mirrors M. S. Tillack, J. Pulsifer, K. Sequoia 4th US-Japan Workshop on Laser-Driven Inertial Fusion.
Laser IFE Program Workshop –5/31/01 1 Output Spectra from Direct Drive ICF Targets Laser IFE Workshop May 31-June 1, 2001 Naval Research Laboratory Robert.
Fusion Technology Institute University of Wisconsin - Madison NRL IFE Concepts Project 9/19/ Output Calculations for Laser Fusion Targets ARIES Meeting.
1 of 16 M. S. Tillack, Y. Tao, J. Pulsifer, F. Najmabadi, L. C. Carlson, K. L. Sequoia, R. A. Burdt, M. Aralis Laser-matter interactions and IFE research.
January 8-10, 2003/ARR 1 1. Pre-Shot Aerosol Parameteric Design Window for Thin Liquid Wall 2. Scoping Liquid Wall Mechanical Response to Thermal Shocks.
Aug. 8-9, 2006 HAPL meeting, GA 1 Advanced Chamber Concept with Magnetic Intervention: - Ion Dump Issues - Status of Blanket Study A. René Raffray UCSD.
Nov 13-14, 2001 A. R. Raffray, et al., Progress Report on Chamber Clearing Code Effort 1 Progress Report on Chamber Clearing Code Development Effort A.
Highlights of ARIES-IFE Study Farrokh Najmabadi VLT Conference Call April 18, 2001 Electronic copy: ARIES Web Site:
Prometheus-L Reactor Building Layout. Two Main Options for the Final Optic (2) Grazing incidence metal mirror (1) SiO 2 or CaF 2 wedges.
ILE, Osaka Concept and preliminary experiment on protection of final optics in wet-wall laser fusion reactor T. Norimatsu, K. Nagai, T. Yamanaka and Y.
Laser Plasma and Laser-Matter Interactions Laboratory Particulate Formation in Laser Plasma M. S. Tillack, S. S. Harilal, C. V. Bindhu and D. Blair Center.
The Heavy Ion Fusion Virtual National Laboratory UC Berkeley Christophe S. Debonnel 1,2 (1) Thermal Hydraulics Laboratory Department of Nuclear Engineering.
1 MODELING DT VAPORIZATION AND MELTING IN A DIRECT DRIVE TARGET B. R. Christensen, A. R. Raffray, and M. S. Tillack Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering.
RRP:10/17/01Aries IFE 1 Liquid Wall Chamber Dynamics Aries Electronic Workshop October 17, 2001 Robert R. Peterson Fusion Technology Institute University.
October 27-28, 2004 HAPL meeting, PPPL 1 Overview of the Components of an IFE Chamber and a Summary of our R&D to Develop Them Presented by: A. René Raffray.
April 9-10, 2003 HAPL Program Meeting, SNL, Albuquerque, N.M. 1 Lowering Target Initial Temperature to Enhance Target Survival Presented by A.R. Raffray.
Mirror damage studies – progress report 4th High Average Power Laser Program Workshop San Diego, CA April 4-5, 2002 M. S. Tillack, T. K. Mau, K. Vecchio,
October 27-28, 2004 HAPL meeting, PPPL 1 Overview of the Components of an IFE Chamber and a Summary of our R&D to Develop Them Presented by: A. René Raffray.
Damage Mechanisms and Limits for Laser IFE Final Optics US/Japan workshop on power plant studies and related advanced technologies with EU participation.
A Plan to Develop Dry Wall Chambers for Inertial Fusion Energy with Lasers Page 1 of 46 DRAFT.
The final laser optic: options, requirements & damage threats Mark S. Tillack ARIES Project Meeting Princeton, NJ September 2000.
Laser Induced Damage of Grazing Incidence Metal Mirrors Mark S. Tillack T. K. Mau Mofreh Zaghloul High Average Power Laser Program Workshop Nov ,
Future of Antiproton Triggered Fusion Propulsion Brice Cassenti & Terry Kammash University of Connecticut & University of Michigan.
Some Thoughts on Phase II for Target fabrication, injection, and tracking presented by Dan Goodin Georgia Institute of Technology February 5th & 6th, 2004.
The Plan to Develop Laser Fusion Energy John Sethian Naval Research Laboratory July 19, 2002.
/15RRP HAPL Dec 6, Robert R. Peterson Los Alamos National Laboratory and University of Wisconsin Calculations of the Response of Inertial Fusion.
WELCOME Fifth Laser IFE (HAPL) Program Workshop Naval Research Laboratory Dec 5 and 6, 2002.
SPARTAN Chamber Dynamics Code Zoran Dragojlovic and Farrokh Najmabadi University of California in San Diego HAPL Meeting, June 20-21, 2005, Lawrence Livermore.
M. S. Tillack Final Optic Research – Progress and Plans HAPL Project Meeting, PPPL October 2004 Z. Dragojlovic, F. Hegeler, E. Hsieh, J. Mar, F.
-Plasma can be produced when a laser ionizes gas molecules in a medium -Normally, ordinary gases are transparent to electromagnetic radiation. Why then.
Optimization of plasma uniformity in laser-irradiated underdense targets M. S. Tillack, K. L. Sequoia, B. O’Shay University of California, San Diego 9500.
Status of Modeling of Damage Effects on Final Optics Mirror Performance T.K. Mau, M.S. Tillack Center for Energy Research Fusion Energy Division University.
1 of 11 John Pulsifer and Mark Tillack with help from Patrick Rye and Matt Aralis HAPL Project Meeting October 2007 Washington DC Progress in fabrication.
Mark Tillack, John Pulsifer, Kevin Sequoia, Akachi Iroezi, Joel Hollingsworth Final Optic Fabrication, Testing and System Integration HAPL Project Meeting.
UV Laser-Induced Damage to Grazing Incidence Metal Mirrors M. S. Tillack, J. E. Pulsifer, K. Sequoia Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Department and.
Liquid Walls Town Meeting May 5, 2003, Livermore, CA Work performed under the auspices of the U. S. Department of Energy by University of California Lawrence.
M. S. Tillack, J. E. Pulsifer, K. Sequoia Final Optic Research – Progress and Plans HAPL Project Meeting, Georgia Tech 5–6 February 2004.
M. S. Tillack, J. E. Pulsifer, K. Sequoia HAPL Project Meeting NRL
Mark S. Tillack T. K. Mau Mofreh Zaghloul
Laser-IFE Final Optics Mini-Workshop
M. S. Tillack and F. Najmabadi
University of California, San Diego
Presentation transcript:

M. S. Tillack IFE Technology Research at UC San Diego MAE Departmental Seminar 6 October

Many people have contributed to this research Faculty and Staff: C. V. Bindhu Z. Dragojlovic A. C. Gaeris S. S. Harilal F. Najmabadi T. K. Mau J. E. Pulsifer, MS’98 A. R. Raffray X. R. Wang M. R. Zaghloul Students: N. Basu, MS’98 D. Blair, PhD’03 L. Carlson S. Chen B. Christensen, MS’04 K. Cockrell M. Mathew J. O’Shay K. Sequoia New kids on the block: K. Boehm J. Hanft J. Mar R. Martin E. Simpson

The inertial confinement fusion concept

The goal of “ ICF ” research is to ignite DT targets in order to explore high energy density physics Indirect Drive Direct Drive Z-pinch Omega “fast ignition” NIF 60 beams/40 kJ 192 beams/2  2 MJ of x-rays Z

The goal of “ IFE ” research is to generate power economically HAPL: Laser driver (DPSSL or KrF) with direct drive targets and dry walls HI-VNL: Ion accelerator, indirect drive targets, liquid chambers Z-IFE: Z-pinch driver In addition to target physics, key issues include efficient rep-rated drivers, target mass production, target injection, reliable chambers and optics

Our IFE research is focused on the key issues for IFE chambers and chamber interfaces Prometheus-L Reactor Building 1. Chamber walls that survive long-term exposure 2. A residual chamber medium which allows propagation of targets and beams through it 3. Final optics that survive long-term exposure 4. Cryogenic targets that survive injection and are properly illuminated

1.Prompt transport of energy through and deposition into materials (ns-  s) 2.Radiation fireball & shock propagation, mass loss from walls (1-100  s) 3.Afterglow plasma & hydrodynamics (1-100 ms) 4.Liquid wall dynamics (ms-s) 5.Long-term changes in materials F ollowing target explosions, several distinct stages of chamber response occur: Wall protection and target/driver propagation depend on the details of target emissions Fireball forms from captured x-ray and ion energy, re-radiates on a slower timescale MJ released per target

Our chamber wall research simulates thermomechanics of armor and energy transport from ablation plumes High-cycle fatigue of tungsten armor –simulations with short-pulse lasers –phenomena similar to optics damage Laser plasma expansion dynamics –modeling of laser plasma –ablation plume experiments – magnetic diversion

We use laser ablation plumes to provide a surrogate plasma to study IFE target emissions 1.5 cm Time-resolved imaging and spectroscopy are performed with 2-ns gated camera and PMT

An aluminum ablation plume is confined by a moderate magnetic field 5 GW/cm 2, 8 ns, Al target 0.64 T RbRb

free expansion velocity v=6x10 6 cm/s 5 GW/cm 2 The plasma beta initially is large, but falls quickly Similar to results without B, the initial ns is ballistic, followed by plume drag The expansion is slowed after the thermal beta falls

Our IFE research is focused on the key issues for IFE chambers and chamber interfaces Prometheus-L Reactor Building 1. Chamber walls that survive long-term exposure 2. A residual chamber medium which allows propagation of targets and beams through it 3. Final optics that survive long-term exposure 4. Cryogenic targets that survive injection and are properly illuminated

We seek to understand the residual chamber medium and the propagation of targets and beams through it Chamber dynamic response modeling and “chamber clearing” Target transport through the perturbed chamber Aerosol generation in liquid- protected walls –explosive phase change (evaporation) – homogeneous nucleation in laser ablation plumes (condensation) Laser propagation in background gas Spartan simulation

Rapid condensation of vapor ejected from liquid- protected IFE chamber walls was modeled numerically and experimentally 0.15 Torr These processes also occur in laser machining, pulsed laser deposition, and other applications Again, lasers are used to simulate ion & x-ray deposition and response

The homogeneous nucleation rate and critical radius depend on saturation ratio & ionization # of atoms Ion jacketing (dielectric behavior of vapor) reduces the energy barrier Without ionizationWith ionization Si, n=10 20 cm –3, T=2000 K High saturation ratios result from rapid cooling during plume expansion Extremely small critical radius and high nucleation rates result Si, n=10 20 cm –3, T=2000 K, Z eff =0.01

The condensate size distribution was measured at stagnation using atomic force microscopy 500 mTorr He 5x10 8 W/cm 2 5x10 9 W/cm 2 5x10 8 W/cm 2 5x10 7 W/cm 2 Correlation between laser intensity and cluster size is observed. Is it due to increasing saturation ratio or the presence of ions?

Plasma temperature and density were measured spectroscopically using Stark broadening and line ratios Saturation ratio and ionization state were computed using these measurements and assuming local thermodynamic equilibrium The saturation ratio is inversely proportional to laser intensity As laser intensity increases, ionization increases but saturation ratio decreases Maximum charge state at 50 ns, 1 mm from Al target, as derived from spectroscopy and assuming LTE. Saturation ratio at 1 mm, derived from spectroscopy and assuming LTE.

Our IFE research is focused on the key issues for IFE chambers and chamber interfaces Prometheus-L Reactor Building 1. Chamber walls that survive long-term exposure 2. A residual chamber medium which allows propagation of targets and beams through it 3. Final optics that survive long-term exposure 4. Cryogenic targets that survive injection and are properly illuminated

The final optic in a laser-IFE plant sees line-of-sight exposure to target emissions Laser-induced damage x-rays ions neutrons and  -rays contaminants Damage threats: 5 J/cm 2 2 yrs, 3x10 8 shots 1% spatial nonuniformity 20  m aiming 1% beam balance Mirror requirements:

We are developing damage-resistant final optics based on grazing-incidence metal mirrors The reference mirror concept consists of a stiff, light-weight, radiation-resistant substrate with a thin metallic coating optimized for high reflectivity (Al for UV, S-polarized, shallow  ) Al reflectivity at 248 nm

Laser damage is thermomechanical in nature: high-cycle fatigue of Al bonded to a substrate S-N curve for Al alloy Basic stability High cycle fatigue Differential thermal stress

Testing is performed at the UCSD laser plasma and laser- matter interactions laboratory 400 mJ, 25 ns, 248 nm

Pure Al can have large grains, resulting in slip plane transport and grain boundary separation (data at 5 J/cm 2, 50 shots)

Several fabrication techniques have been explored to enhance damage resistance Monolithic Al (>99.999% purity) Thin film deposition on polished substrates –sputter coating, e-beam evaporation –Al, SiC, C-SiC and Si-coated substrates Electroplating Surface finishing –polishing, diamond-turning –magnetorheological finishing –friction stir processing Advanced Al alloys –solid solution hardening –nanoprecipitation hardening

Finer-grained electroplated Al withstands higher fluence, but eventually goes unstable At 18.3 J/cm 2 laser fluence:  Grain boundaries still separate  Damage is “gradual” at 18.3 J/cm 2  Mirror survived 10 5 shots At 33 J/cm 2 laser fluence:  Rapid onset (2 shots)  Severe damage (melting)  probably starts with grains

High shot count data extrapolates to acceptable LIDT; end-of-life exposures are still needed In addition, we are continuing to develop improve- ments such as “Al-on-Al”, hardened alloys, etc.

Our IFE research is focused on the key issues for IFE chambers and chamber interfaces Prometheus-L Reactor Building 1. Chamber walls that survive long-term exposure 2. A residual chamber medium which allows propagation of targets and beams through it 3. Final optics that survive long-term exposure 4. Cryogenic targets that survive injection and are properly illuminated

Targets play a central role in many of the critical issues for IFE R 6.5m T ~ 1000C 1. Mass production 500,000/day, $0.25/target, sub-  m uniformity 2. Injection 400 m/s, 1-5 mm accuracy 3. Tracking/steering 20/200  m accuracy, ~64 beams 4. Survival 18˚K target in a 1000˚C turbulent chamber

We collaborate with General Atomics on several target-related tasks 1.Target fabrication indirect drive target layering via external thermal control 2.Target injection sabot transport capsule steering 3.Target tracking/beam steering interface with beam steering system 4.Target survival

Target steering is possible in the chamber using a short-pulse guide laser Use shortest pulse possible for minimum ablation depth: 15 fs Use highest pulse energy to achieve maximum impulse (subject to total power and rep rate constraint) assume 100 kW for 15 ms, 100 kHz – 1 J pulses assuming 1 mm 2 contact, W/cm 2 if the full beam hits W/cm 2 is a more likely value Instead of steering 64 heavy mirrors, why not steer one 4-mg target? Can be accomplished using an annular guide-laser beam in the chamber Biggest concern is amount of ablation needed and degradation of target surface due to that ablation

Analysis of ablation depth and impulse was performed using the 1D Hyades rad-hydro code 850-nm laser pulse, 15 fs FWHM, W/cm nm Au coating, 100  m CH substrate run code until plume heating of surface is negligible and acceleration phase is complete (1 ns) DTCH Au feathered grid 3 nm 16 nodes

Ablation depth and expansion velocity of Au d~2.5 nm total ablation m~2.5  g/cm 2 accelerated to ~2x10 5 cm/s mv~0.5 (g-cm/s)/cm 2 assuming 1 mm 2 contact and 5 mg target, each “kick” results in 1 cm/s correction of the target transverse velocity

For more information on our research and student opportunities,visit our web site