1 3766.01 Display 4-1: Therapies that Disqualified Patients as Responders  Phototherapy (PUVA, UVB)  Systemic retinoids  High potency topical corticosteroids.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Moskowitz CH et al. Proc ASH 2014;Abstract 290.
Advertisements

Antoni Ribas, M.D., Ph.D. Professor of Medicine Professor of Surgery
Non-Melanoma Skin Cancer Treated with Electronic Brachytherapy: Results at Two Years Ajay Bhatnagar MD, MBA Cancer Treatment Services Arizona Casa Grande,
Srdan (Serge) Verstovsek M.D., Ph.D. Professor of Medicine Department of Leukemia University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston, Texas, USA JAK.
The Long-Term Intervention with Pravastatin in Ischemic Disease (LIPID) The LIPID Study Group N Engl J Med 1998;339:
Manufacturer: Celgene Corporation FDA Approval Date: 9/23/14
Rituximab (RITUXAN) & Multiple Sclerosis
Phase 2 of new ARVs BMS (maturation inhibitor)
Efficacy of Denileukin Diftitox Retreatment in Patients with Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma Who Relapsed After Initial Response 1 Identification of an Active,
Managing Infection Risk in Primary Systemic Vasculitis Patients Dr Matthew Morgan University of Birmingham.
BADBIR BAD Biologic Interventions Register Dr Kathy McElhone 27 th June 2012.
Biologic License Application STN BL /0: Efalizumab for the Treatment of Chronic Plaque Psoriasis Dermatologic and Ophthalmic Drugs Advisory Committee.
Psoriasis and Skin Cancer Edward Pritchard. Long Cases You could get these! Last year’s finals! - Patient with recurrent SCC, with no symptoms. History.
Improved Survival with Vemurafenib in Melanoma with BRAF V600E Mutation 1 Phase III Randomized, Open-Label, Multicenter Trial (BRIM3) Comparing BRAF Inhibitor.
1Stopeck A et al. Proc SABCS 2010;Abstract P
Rapivab™ - peramivir injection
BAD Biologic Interventions Register (BADBIR ) An update November 2010.
Abatacept (ORENCIA) for Rheumatoid Arthritis Biological License Application Arthritis Advisory Committee September 6, 2005.
Alefacept (Amevive ® ) Dosing Efficacy Compliance Links Patient Profile Introduction Clinical Experience Cost of Treatment PsoriasisGuide Side-Effects,
British Association of Dermatologists’ Biologic Intervention Register (BADBIR) Update November 2007.
A Phase 2 Study of Brentuximab Vedotin in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory CD30-Positive Non-Hodgkin Lymphomas: Interim Results in Patients with DLBCL.
ODAC SCHERING-PLOUGH RESEARCH INSTITUTE 1 Temozolomide Oncology Drug Advisory Committee March 13, 2003 Craig L. Tendler, M.D. Vice President, Oncology.
Long-Term Efficacy of Dapagliflozin in T2DM Patients Receiving High-Dose Insulin John P.H. Wilding, DM, FRCP

Frontline Therapy with Brentuximab Vedotin Combined with ABVD or AVD in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Advanced Stage Hodgkin Lymphoma Younes A et al. Proc.
Design: A randomized, prospective, double-blind cohort followed for 16 weeks RenehaVis Original Study 50 DMW 50 HMW 50 LMW 50 Placebo.
EXPRESS: Response Rates at Week Placebo (n=77) Infliximab 5 mg/kg (n=301) Per cent of patients Per cent of patients with.
1 Agenda  Overview –Burt Adelman MD  Efficacy and Pharmacodynamics –Akshay Vaishnaw MD, PhD  Safety –Gloria Vigliani MD  Alefacept Risk Benefit Profile.
ACAMPROSATE Efficacy Results from Three Pivotal Efficacy Trials Karl F. Mann, M.D. Professor and Chairman Director, Department of Addictive Behavior and.
The Prospective Pravastatin Pooling Project L I P I D CARECARE PPP Project Investigators Am J Cardiol 1995; 76:899–905.
Predicting toxicity for patients with advanced Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GIST) treated with imatinib mesylate : an EORTC/ISG/AGITG randomized trial.
COSMOS SOF + SMV + RBV SOF + SMV Randomisation 2 : 1 : 2 : 1* Open-label * Randomisation was stratified on genotype (1a or 1b) in both cohorts, IL28B in.
1 ALEFACEPT Biogen, Inc. Dermatologic and Ophthalmic Drugs Advisory Committee Meeting 23 May
FDA Case Studies Pediatric Oncology Subcommittee March 4, 2003.
Skin Cancer Overview ; The Challenge of Diagnosing Older Patients Wendy E. Roberts MD.
C-BR- 1 Raptiva ™ (efalizumab) Benefit:Risk Assessment Charles Johnson, MB, ChB Senior Director Head of Specialty Biotherapeutics Genentech, Inc.
Viardot A et al. Proc ASH 2014;Abstract 4460.
Arthritis Advisory Committee March 4, 2003 Update on the Safety of TNF Blockers Li-ching Liang, M.D. FDA / CBER/ OTRR Arthritis Advisory Committee March.
1 Agenda  Overview –Burt Adelman MD  Efficacy and Pharmacodynamics –Akshay Vaishnaw MD, PhD  Safety –Gloria Vigliani MD  Alefacept Risk Benefit Profile.
Int J Clin Pract, December 2013, 67, 12,
Locatelli F et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 4378.
T Cell Low Grade Lymphomas. General Principles General Principles  Usually Primary Skin lymphomas  Typically indolent Course  Conservative management.
SNDA Letrozole (Femara®) Indication: First-line therapy in post- menopausal women with advanced breast cancer. Prior approval: Second-line therapy.
C-SAF- 1 Raptiva ™ (efalizumab) Safety Richard Chin, MD Director of Clinical Research, Specialty Biotherapeutics Genentech, Inc.
 Objective –SVR 12 (HCV RNA < 25 IU/ml), with 95% CI, by ITT, descriptive analysis OBV/PTV/r + DSV + RBV No randomisation Open-label CORAL-I Study cohort.
Alemtuzumab BLA committee CD52 Expression Leukocytes B- lymphocytes T- lymphocytes Monocytes Macrophages Thymocytes Granulocytes (
REGULATORY HISTORY of ZOMETA and AREDIA JAW OSTEONECROSIS (ONJ) Oncologic Drug Advisory Committee March 4, 2005 Nancy S. Scher, M.D.
CON - 1 Conclusions C David R. Parkinson Vice President, Global Head, Clinical Research and Development Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation.
1 Agenda  Overview –Burt Adelman MD  Efficacy and Pharmacodynamics –Akshay Vaishnaw MD, PhD  Safety –Gloria Vigliani MD  Alefacept Risk Benefit Profile.
Safety, Efficacy and Duration of Effect of RT002, a Botulinum Toxin Type A for Injection, to Treat Glabellar Lines: The Phase 2 BELMONT Study Authors:
Date of download: 5/30/2016 Copyright © 2016 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. From: Influence of the Timing of Antiretroviral Therapy.
CHEST 2013; 144(3): R3 김유진 / Prof. 장나은. Introduction 2  Cardiovascular diseases  common, serious comorbid conditions in patients with COPD cardiac.
Everolimus for Advanced Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors N Engl J Med 2011;364: R4. 박선희 / Prof. 동석호.
Copyright © 2003 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.
undetectable (undetectable-6.25)
Long term effectiveness of perampanel: the Leeds experience Jo Geldard, Melissa Maguire, Elizabeth Wright, Peter Goulding Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds.
Shustov AR et al. Proc ASH 2010;Abstract 961.
Neal B, et al. Diabetes Care 2015;38:403–411
CCO Independent Conference Coverage
Intervista a Lucio Crinò
Goals of Therapy for Patients With UC
Rossi A et al. Proc ASCO 2011;Abstract 8008.
Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma
Krop I et al. SABCS 2009;Abstract 5090.
Incidence and importance of antibody responses to infliximab after maintenance or episodic treatment in Crohn’s disease  Stephen B Hanauer, Carrie L Wagner,
WHAT’S NEW WITH THE TREATMENTS FOR HIGH-RISK DYSLIPIDEMIA?
ALT-803 administration increases peripheral blood cell counts of lymphocyte subsets in cynomolgus monkeys. ALT-803 administration increases peripheral.
Guselkumab (an IL-23–specific mAb) demonstrates clinical and molecular response in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis  Howard Sofen, MD, Stacy.
Pimecrolimus Identifies a Common Genomic Anti-inflammatory Profile, is Clinically Highly Effective in Psoriasis and is Well Tolerated  Klemens Rappersberger,
CONCERTO-4 Study: SMV + PEG-IFNa-2b + RBV for genotype 1
PHOENIX I: PASI 75 Response After 12 Weeks
Presentation transcript:

Display 4-1: Therapies that Disqualified Patients as Responders  Phototherapy (PUVA, UVB)  Systemic retinoids  High potency topical corticosteroids  Systemic corticosteroids  Fumarates  Methotrexate, cyclosporine, azathioprine, or other systemic immunosuppressant and immunomodulatory agents  Another investigational drug or approved therapy for investigational use  Inappropriate use of moderate potency topical corticosteroids, keratolytics, coal tar, or vitamin D analogs

2 Display 4-14: Proportions of Patients Responding in Courses 1 and 2 of Study NOTE: Numbers in parentheses are percentages. P-values for comparisons with placebo. (a) From Display 4-5. Placebo IV7.5 mgPlacebo IV7.5 mgAlefacept IVAlefacept IV (Cohort 3)(Cohorts 1 and 2)(Cohort 2)(Cohort 1) Study 711 Course 1 (a)Study 711 Course 2

3 Display 4-15: Study 711 – Proportion of Patients Achieving PASI 75 by Course Placebo IV (Cohort 3) Alefacept 7.5 mg IV (Cohorts 1 and 2) Proportion responding (%) Dosing Period Proportion responding (%) Alefacept/placebo (Cohort 2) Alefacept/alefacept (Cohort 1) Dosing Period Study Week Course 1Course 2

4 Alefacept 7.5 mg IV Weekly x12Follow-Up 16 Weeks Mean Count (cells/µL) Weeks T   X174 Tetanus Toxoid CD4+ Naive CD4+ Memory    T Day 43 Day 1 Day 99Day 106Day 141 Immunizations Coincided With Maximal CD4+ Memory T-Cell Reduction

% of Patients Control Alefacept † Immunization 2nd3rd4th *2 weeks after each immunization. † P= for overall treatment difference (logistic regression model). Percentage of Patients With Anti-  X174 IgG  30% of Total Anti-  X174 Response*

6 Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Skin by Course of Alefacept * Patient also diagnosed with BCC Baseline History Patient IDCourse 1Course 2Course 3Course 4Course 5Total SCCSCCPUVAUVBMTXCyA * Total: XXXX XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXX X X BCC

7 Incidence of Injection Site Reactions Phase 3 IM Study No. of Patients Dosed No. with an injection site reaction No. of injections associated with an injection site reaction Placebo10 mg15 mg 168(100) 14(8) 10 (6) 4 (2) 0 173(100) 22(13) 14 (8) 6 (3) 2 (1) 0 166(100) 31(19) 20 (12) 8 (5) 0 3 (2)

8 Injection Site Reactions by Severity No. with an injection site reaction Maximum severity Mild Moderate Severe Placebo10 mg15 mg 14(100) 13 (93) 1 (7) 0 22(100) 18 (82) 4 (18) 0 31(100) 26 (84) 5 (16) 0 Phase 3 IM Study

Malignancy Rates: Invasive Squamous Cell Cancers Number of tumors per 1000 person years (p-y) exposure Placebo 0/178 p-y Alefacept (Placebo-Controlled Studies) 5/401 p-y Alefacept (Overall) 14/1056 p-y Expected Rates * ** * R. Stern (PUVA registry data, adjusted rates) **Estimated current rates, R. Stern (Personal communication)

10 Phase 3 IM Study PASI 75 at 2 Weeks After Last Dose by Quartiles of Weight Weight (kg) Proportion Responding (%) Placebo 15 mg IM Quartiles of weight are calculated using baseline weights n=46n=55 n=47n=44n=37n=45n=27n=33

11 Baseline Characteristics of Patients Who Developed SCC or BCC No. of Patients Male Age (years) Median Caucasian History of Prior SCC or BCC SCC BCC Prior Treatment of: PUVA UVB Methotrexate Cyclosporine Alefacept Treated Patients Who Developed SCC 8 (100%) 50% % 38% 25% 13% 63% 50% 75% 0% Baseline Characteristics Alefacept Treated Patients Who Developed BCC 6 (100%) 83% 62 67% 33% 17% 50% 0% Alefacept Treated Patients 1357 (100%) 69% 45 89% 3% 1% 2% 38% 45% 30% 11%

12 Mean E AUC CD4+ Memory by Weight Quartile Phase 3 IV Study Weight (kg) Mean EAUC placebo7.5 mg IV

13 Alefacept 7.5 mg IV Alefacept 15 mg IM 2 Weeks After Last Dose Overall Response Rate * P<0.001 † P=0.004 ‡ P=0.006 Efficacy Summary: IV vs IM Phase 3 Studies Alefacept 7.5 mg IV Alefacept 15 mg IM PASI 75 PGA AC/C PASI 50 Proportion Responding (%) 14% 21% 11% 14% 38% 42% * * * * † ‡ PASI 75 PGA AC/C PASI 50 Proportion Responding (%) 28% 33% 23% 24% 56% 57% * * * * * *

14 DTH Response Converting from Positive to Negative AntigenPlacebo0.025 mg/kg0.075 mg/kg0.15 mg/kg Tetanus15/32 (47)13/26 (50)18/28 (64)9/14 (64) Diphtheria4/10 (40)3/6 (50)8/11 (73) Streptococcus5/7 (71)3/3 (100)3/4 (75)5/5 (100) Tuberculin7/9 (78)7/7 (100)12/14 (86)9/11 (82) Candida3/5 (60)6/8 (75)7/8 (88)3/4 (75) Trycophyton3/3 (100)5/7 (71)4/6 (67)2/2 (100) Proteus4/11 (36)8/15 (53)6/13 (46)9/13 (69) Study Less than 30% of patients were reactive at baseline

15 DTH Response Converting from Positive to Negative AntigenPlacebo0.025 mg/kg0.075 mg/kg0.15 mg/kg Tetanus10/32 (31)9/26 (35)13/28 (46)4/14 (29) Diphtheria1/10 (10)2/6 (33)5/11 (45) Streptococcus4/7 (57)2/3 (67)2/4 (50)4/5 (80) Tuberculin5/9 (56)3/7 (43)9/14 (64)7/11 (64) Candida2/5 (40)4/8 (50)6/8 (75)2/4 (50) Trycophyton0/33/7 (43)3/6 (50)1/2 (50) Proteus2/11 (18)4/15 (27)3/13 (23)5/13 (38) Study Less than 30% of patients were reactive at baseline

16 Influence of Concomitant Medications on the Primary Endpoint PASI 75 responders n (%) irrespective of use of disqualifying meds PASI 75 responders n (%) without the use of phototherapy or other systemic therapies (pre-specified) PASI 75 responders n (%) without the use of phototherapy or other systemic therapies (Table 28) Placebo (n=186) 7.5 mg (n=367) Placebo (n=168) 15 mg (n=166) 7 (4%)55 (15%)12 (7%)37 (22%) 53 (14%)9 (5%)35 (21%) 53 (14%)8 (5%)33 (20%) P< (4%) Phase 3 Studies IV StudyIM Study

17 Range of Memory and Naïve T-Cell Counts at Baseline CD4+ Memory Cells (cells/  L) CD4+ Naïve Cells (cells/  L) CD8+ Memory Cells (cells/  L) CD8+ Naïve Cells (cells/  L) Phase 2 IV Study Phase 3 IV Study Phase 3 IM Study 81 to to to to to to to to to to to to 1237

18 Course 1 (n=1357) Course 2 (n=790*) Course 3 (n=422*) Course 4 (n=152*) Course 5 (n=116*) Any SAE** n (%) 67 ( 5) 33 (4) 15 (4) 3 (2) 2 (2) Multiple Course Experience * Number of patients in the 2nd through 5th course is estimated. **The serious adverse events represent all events reported to Biogen through May 20, 2002 Estimated Incidence of Serious Adverse Events

19 Changes in Lesional Skin: Histologic Responders vs Nonresponders Nonresponder (n=5) Responder (n=8) Number of T Cells in Epidermis Lesional NL 50 BWk2Wk6Wk13 Number of T Cells in Lesion NL 100 BWk2Wk6Wk Lesional NL = non-lesional skin at baseline. B = baseline. Epidermal Thickness (µm) NL 100 BWk2Wk6Wk13 Lesional

20 Naïve Memory CD4 CD4 Primary Response Expansion of effector CD4+ cells during active immune response T em T cm Central Memory –16% Long-term memory EffectorMemory –50% –50% *at week 13; N=21 P= Effect of Alefacept on Circulating CD4+ T-Cell Subsets*

21 Incidence of B Cell Lymphoma in Nonhuman Primates