LING 6520: Comparative Topics in Linguistics (from a computational perspective) Martha Palmer Jan 15, 2008 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
FMZ Elaborazione del linguaggio naturale Fabio Massimo Zanzotto.
Advertisements

 Christel Kemke 2007/08 COMP 4060 Natural Language Processing Feature Structures and Unification.
Lexical Functional Grammar : Grammar Formalisms Spring Term 2004.
PM—Propositional Model A Computational Psycholinguistic Model of Language Comprehension Based on a Relational Analysis of Written English Jerry T. Ball,
Syntax and Context-Free Grammars Julia Hirschberg CS 4705 Slides with contributions from Owen Rambow, Kathy McKeown, Dan Jurafsky and James Martin.
Statistical NLP: Lecture 3
GRAMMAR & PARSING (Syntactic Analysis) NLP- WEEK 4.
Syntax 1 Ling400. What is syntax? the study of the internal structure of sentences: how to put together words to form sentencesthe study of the internal.
SYNTAX 1 DAY 30 – NOV 6, 2013 Brain & Language LING NSCI Harry Howard Tulane University.
LING NLP 1 Introduction to Computational Linguistics Martha Palmer April 19, 2006.
Steven Schoonover.  What is VerbNet?  Levin Classification  In-depth look at VerbNet  Evolution of VerbNet  What is FrameNet?  Applications.
Leksička semantika i pragmatika 1. predavanje. Introduction to Semantics and Pragmatics.
LTAG Semantics on the Derivation Tree Presented by Maria I. Tchalakova.
NLP and Speech Course Review. Morphological Analyzer Lexicon Part-of-Speech (POS) Tagging Grammar Rules Parser thethe – determiner Det NP → Det.
Artificial Intelligence 2005/06 From Syntax to Semantics.
Extracting LTAGs from Treebanks Fei Xia 04/26/07.
Matakuliah: G0922/Introduction to Linguistics Tahun: 2008 Session 11 Syntax 2.
Starting With Complex Primitives Pays Off: Complicate Locally, Simplify Globally ARAVIND K. JOSHI Department of Computer and Information Science and Institute.
 Christel Kemke 2007/08 COMP 4060 Natural Language Processing Feature Structures and Unification.
Introduction to Syntax, with Part-of-Speech Tagging Owen Rambow September 17 & 19.
1/15 Synchronous Tree-Adjoining Grammars Authors: Stuart M. Shieber and Yves Schabes Reporter: 江欣倩 Professor: 陳嘉平.
MC-TAG, flexible composition, etc. ARAVIND K. JOSHI March
1 CONTEXT-FREE GRAMMARS. NLE 2 Syntactic analysis (Parsing) S NPVP ATNNSVBD NP AT NNthechildrenate thecake.
Machine Learning in Natural Language Processing Noriko Tomuro November 16, 2006.
Context Free Grammar S -> NP VP NP -> det (adj) N
Sanjukta Ghosh Department of Linguistics Banaras Hindu University.
Probabilistic Parsing Ling 571 Fei Xia Week 5: 10/25-10/27/05.
Syntax Nuha AlWadaani.
March 1, 2009 Dr. Muhammed Al-Mulhem 1 ICS 482 Natural Language Processing INTRODUCTION Muhammed Al-Mulhem March 1, 2009.
BİL711 Natural Language Processing1 Statistical Parse Disambiguation Problem: –How do we disambiguate among a set of parses of a given sentence? –We want.
Lecture 12: 22/6/1435 Natural language processing Lecturer/ Kawther Abas 363CS – Artificial Intelligence.
Tree-adjoining grammar (TAG) is a grammar formalism defined by Aravind Joshi and introduced in Tree-adjoining grammars are somewhat similar to context-free.
Continuous Discontinuity in It-Clefts Introduction Tension between the two approaches Our proposal: TAG analysis Equative it-cleft: It was Ohno who won.
GRAMMARS David Kauchak CS159 – Fall 2014 some slides adapted from Ray Mooney.
Natural Language Processing Artificial Intelligence CMSC February 28, 2002.
A Cascaded Finite-State Parser for German Michael Schiehlen Institut für Maschinelle Sprachverarbeitung Universität Stuttgart
Parsing and Syntax. Syntactic Formalisms: Historic Perspective “Syntax” comes from Greek word “syntaxis”, meaning “setting out together or arrangement”
1 Introduction to Computational Linguistics Eleni Miltsakaki AUTH Fall 2005-Lecture 4.
For Wednesday Read chapter 23 Homework: –Chapter 22, exercises 1,4, 7, and 14.
Linguistic Essentials
Parsing with Context-Free Grammars for ASR Julia Hirschberg CS 4706 Slides with contributions from Owen Rambow, Kathy McKeown, Dan Jurafsky and James Martin.
What you have learned and how you can use it : Grammars and Lexicons Parts I-III.
CPE 480 Natural Language Processing Lecture 4: Syntax Adapted from Owen Rambow’s slides for CSc Fall 2006.
Rules, Movement, Ambiguity
The man bites the dog man bites the dog bites the dog the dog dog Parse Tree NP A N the man bites the dog V N NP S VP A 1. Sentence  noun-phrase verb-phrase.
1 Context Free Grammars October Syntactic Grammaticality Doesn’t depend on Having heard the sentence before The sentence being true –I saw a unicorn.
Supertagging CMSC Natural Language Processing January 31, 2006.
◦ Process of describing the structure of phrases and sentences Chapter 8 - Phrases and sentences: grammar1.
LING/C SC/PSYC 438/538 Lecture 20 Sandiway Fong 1.
Handling Unlike Coordinated Phrases in TAG by Mixing Syntactic Category and Grammatical Function Carlos A. Prolo Faculdade de Informática – PUCRS CELSUL,
September 26, : Grammars and Lexicons Lori Levin.
10/31/00 1 Introduction to Cognitive Science Linguistics Component Topic: Formal Grammars: Generating and Parsing Lecturer: Dr Bodomo.
Roadmap Probabilistic CFGs –Handling ambiguity – more likely analyses –Adding probabilities Grammar Parsing: probabilistic CYK Learning probabilities:
Embedded Clauses in TAG
An Introduction to the Government and Binding Theory
Lecture – VIII Monojit Choudhury RS, CSE, IIT Kharagpur
Statistical NLP: Lecture 3
Basic Parsing with Context Free Grammars Chapter 13
Lexical Functional Grammar
Lecture 4b: Verb Processes
Natural Language Processing
LING/C SC/PSYC 438/538 Lecture 21 Sandiway Fong.
CSC 594 Topics in AI – Applied Natural Language Processing
Machine Learning in Natural Language Processing
CKY Parser 0Book 1 the 2 flight 3 through 4 Houston5 11/16/2018
TREE ADJOINING GRAMMAR
LING/C SC/PSYC 438/538 Lecture 24 Sandiway Fong.
David Kauchak CS159 – Spring 2019
Semantics Going beyond syntax.
Artificial Intelligence 2004 Speech & Natural Language Processing
Presentation transcript:

LING 6520: Comparative Topics in Linguistics (from a computational perspective) Martha Palmer Jan 15,

What does Linguistics offer Computational Lexical Semantics? What does Computational Lexical Semantics offer Linguistics? What can we do together?

Linguistics → CLS Syntactic structure – dependencies Jackendoff – Lexical Conceptual Structures Fillmore, Talmy, Dowty, …. – Case frames, conceptual analyses, proto-roles,…. Levin’s English verb classes – Other languages? Lexicographic sense distinctions Discourse structure Event representations

CLS → Linguistics Quantitative analysis of data – Frequency counts, mutual information, automatic clustering, new & varied classifications – Word co-occurrences, subcat frame distributions, pp attachment preferences, word alignments – tomorrow Grammatical formalisms – TAG’s, LFG’s, CCG’s, HPSG’s – Alternative building blocks for human sentence processing – models of regular sense extensions

Feature-based Lexicalized Tree-Adjoining Grammars Joshi,et al 75, Joshi 85, Elementary trees – Initial trees – Auxiliary trees Two operations – Substitution – Adjunction

Same event - different syntactic frames John broke windows. SUBJ VERB OBJ Windows broke. SUBJ VERB

Syntactic Parses

Elementary Trees

Substitution S V NP↓ VP break NP John NP the N det window

Substitution S V NP↓ VP break NP John NP ↓ the N det window

Derived Tree S V NP↓ VP John the N break det window

Feature-based Substitution S V NP↓ VP+sing +past break NP+sing John NP the N det window

4/1/04 Derived Tree w/ Features S V NP+sing NP ↓ VP +sing +past John the N break det window

4/1/04 Adjunction S V NP↓ VP John the N break det window VP quickly VP * Adv

4/1/04 Adjunction (cont.) S NP↓ John V VP * break NP ↓ the N det window VP quickly Adv

4/1/04 Extending Senses Through Adjunction