Multiconsult.no The 4th Forum Wood Building Nordic in Växjö, September 24­-25 – 2015 Fire resistance – are we done now? Recent development in Norway Nils.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Building a Cradle-to-Grave Approach with Your Design Documentation and Data Denise D. Dion, EduQuest, Inc. and Gina To, Breathe Technologies, Inc.
Advertisements

During the semester Introductions Basics of earthquakes History and Recording Damaging Earthquakes and Understanding seismic exposure Undertaking loss.
Xiao Li With, Alejandro Medina Prof. George Hadjisophocleous Andrew Harmsworth Christian Dagenais 1 Tall Wood Building Project.
HEMS Mountain Operations TGL 43
Visual 5.1 Search and Rescue Operations  Sizeup  Search involves:  Locating victims.  Documenting location.  Rescue involves procedures and methods.
COST Action FP1404 Fire Safe Use of Bio-based Building Products 1 Sweden Fire safety in regulations, research and future challenges Joachim SCHMID, SP.
Strengthening the Medical Device Clinical Trial Enterprise
Type III Construction Jeff Prokop Ordinary Construction 200.
Establish Verification Procedures (Task 11 / Principle 6)
Vancouver, October 08th 2013 DB Systemtechnik GmbH Marc Geisler The challenge of transforming a rule-based system into a risk-based culture on an example.
Lindy Hughes Fleet Fire Protection Program Engineer Southern Nuclear Operating Company June 4, 2013 Fire Protection.
Reliability Risk Assessment
Prevent False Alarms Eugene A. Cable, P.E., M.S.F.P.E. Life Safety Consultants NEHES Honorary Member 412 Horse Heaven Road Averill Park, New York
Helfried Rybin 1 AUTOMOBILENTWICKLUNG / ENGINEERING Safety Demands for Automotive Hydrogen Storage Systems Helfried Rybin.
Eurocode 1: Actions on structures –
Exceptional Loadings / Robustness June 14, 2002 Volos A.M. (Nol) Gresnigt Delft University of Technology The Netherlands.
Tripartite Meeting Beijing, 1 November 2005 IMO GBS Classification Society’s View about the Scope, Verification Process and Acceptance Criteria Roberto.
National Public Health Performance Standards Local Assessment Instrument Essential Service:5 Develop Policies and Plans that Support Individual and Community.
Injection of Gas and Improved Oil Recovery - the Norwegian Experience By Steinar Njå, Norwegian Petroleum Directorate.
Eurocode 1: Actions on structures – Part 1–2: General actions – Actions on structures exposed to fire Part of the One Stop Shop program Annex E (informative)
QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM ACCORDING TO ISO
Dr Daniel Colbourne 36th Meeting of the Open-ended Working Group of the Parties to the Montreal Protocol – Side Event UNEP.
International trends in codes and standards Affecting high speed lifts
Development Management Objective to promote proper planning and sustainable development and adopt a pro-active approach towards development that accords.
C. Chanson PPT 17 WRBRF, March 23-24, Berlin New development in Lithium batteries packaging.
FIRE PROTECTION TOPICS OF INTEREST Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board.
CLIC CES Webex 12 Nov Summary: – Set of fire safety measures defined in CERN Safety Report – Proposed Structure for CLIC/ILC Fire Safety Report Fabio.
Audit Planning & Audit Evidence
1 Paul Tangey Community Education Coordinator Loddon Mallee Region.
Safety Induction to the Lift & Escalator Industry
Eurocode 1: Actions on structures – Part 1–2: General actions – Actions on structures exposed to fire Part of the One Stop Shop program Annex F (informative)
Railway Safety Commission An Coimisiún Sábháilteachta Iarnróid The Management of Third Party Generated Risk in Ireland International Railway Safety Conference.
hansen – managing safely Risk Assessment - An Appreciation Mark Mallen Health and Safety Manager Fenlock-Hansen Ltd.
Engineering Analysis of NFPA 285 Tested Assemblies
International Atomic Energy Agency Roles and responsibilities for development of disposal facilities Phil Metcalf Workshop on Strategy and Methodologies.
Fire safety in wooden constructions Trustful solutions?
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Methodology and Responsibilities for Periodic Safety Review for Research Reactors William Kennedy Research Reactor.
-1- UNRESTRICTED / ILLIMITÉ Demonstrating the Safety of Long-Term Waste Management Facilities Dave Garrick 2015 September.
Treet – 14 floors in Bergen Växjö, Sweden
International Atomic Energy Agency Regulatory Review of Safety Cases for Radioactive Waste Disposal Facilities David G Bennett 7 April 2014.
Risk and Safety in the Transport Sector (RISIT) - a research programme covering road-, sea-, air- and the railway sector Finn H. Amundsen, Head of programme.
Managing Fire Safety In Common Parts of Flats and Mixed Use Buildings Simon Gibbins Merseyside Fire and Rescue Service.
Equipment Life Optimization Program (ELOP) Doug Hilleman February 10, 2011.
Health & Safety for School Governors Presented by Phil West Health and Safety Advisor RBWM.
Legal framework and policy in the field of environmental protection SIOS-Preparatory Phase Project Kick-off Meeting Clarion Hotel Oslo Airport, 14. October.
Building Construction
© Copyright  People at Work Project - Overview  People at Work Project - Theoretical Underpinnings  People at.
Building The topic ‘Building’ can be divided into three parts: Passive fire protection Fire protection that is built-in in the building (for example fire.
Adaptation to Climate Change and the European standardization Madrid, 18 January 2016 Andrea NAM Programme Manager, CEN-CENELEC © CEN-CENELEC
Aaron Nicholson Beca. by Aaron Nicholson C/VM2 Design vs Non C/VM2 Performance Based Design.
Code of Practice for Fire Safety in New and Existing Community Dwelling Houses Eamon O’ Boyle.
What Makes a Good Fire Risk Assessment?
M. Z. Bezas, Th. N. Nikolaidis, C. C. Baniotopoulos
Imprecise Probabilistic and Interval Approaches Applied to
THE IMPORTANCE OF DEVELOPING A FIRE STRATEGY FOR ANY PROJECT
Decree of the Ministry of Interior 3rd august 2015 the so called italian «Fire Prevention Code» S02 – Fire Resistance Dr. Eng. Luca Ponticelli Italian.
Introduction Basic Requirements for a facade:
Clinical Alarm Systems - NPSG Goal # 6 -
Wildfire Development Permit UPdate
Communication and Consultation with Interested Parties by the RB
Representative Measurements – AQ-Workshop Bucharest, July 2008
Regulatory Oversight of HOF in Finland
Conformity of Production (COP)
Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA)
New Assessment & Test Methods
Behaviour of M2 & M3 general construction in case of Fire Event
Question today imagine tomorrow create for the future
What to look at in fire engineering analysis
Guiding Future Fire Safety Engineering Practice Stephen Grubits
National Legislation in the Pressure Sector and the PED
Presentation transcript:

multiconsult.no The 4th Forum Wood Building Nordic in Växjö, September 24­-25 – 2015 Fire resistance – are we done now? Recent development in Norway Nils E. Forsén

multiconsult.no 2 Themes System of requirements ­ Regulations ­ Guidance ­ Standards Uncontrolled fire – levels/consequences - risks ­ Any reason at all to distinguish between combustible and non- combustible materials? ­ System of safety: Sprinklers/Reaction to fire/Fire brigade – access/Fire resistance Impact of –universal design requirements View back to the nineties …

multiconsult.no 3 Think tanks History, empericalRd>Ed, reliabilitySystem of requirements New interpretationsNew experiencesMain structural systems Modeled fireDesign procedure Fire engineering – structural engineering The road ahead

multiconsult.no 4 Urban Development – Timber! How tall? How dense? How large? Which use?

multiconsult.no 5 System of safety for protection of lives and values Sprinklers? Fire compartments with limited sizes (redundancy)? Access for fire brigade Structural fire resistance - and other fire safety requirements

multiconsult.no Functional requirement: Basic function for all buildings Structural resistance in fire sufficient for safe evacuation and rescue: Fire class 1 and 2

multiconsult.no Special structural considerations on survival Fire class 3 and 4 Tall buildings 10

multiconsult.no Universal design: Elevator required, when 3 storeys or more (dwellings) Sprinkler 8 Elevator Fire class 1 Fire class 2 Fire class 2 Fire class 3, GD: Non- combustible

multiconsult.no Essential height limits - dwellings – RKL 4 9

multiconsult.no 10 R d,fi > E d,fi

multiconsult.no Structural response – in principle Capacity Time Actions in fire, E d,fi Collapse – or… Fire resistance in minutes Capacity development during fire (E d )R d (E d,fi )R d,fi

multiconsult.no System of requirements

multiconsult.no System of requirements

multiconsult.no 14 The distinction between function, performance and verification should be noted: Function: The overall function of the main structural system, i.e. avoid collapse Performance: Measured or calculated fire resistance and material performance according to standard Verification: Use of methods according to standards to verify the performance, or function

multiconsult.no 15 Norwegian regulation TEK 10 § 11.3 (4) For the two higher building classes (3 and 4) the requirement is that the that the main structural system of the building shall be designed to maintain a sufficient structural resistance throughout a complete fire development, appropriately modeled..

multiconsult.no 16 Pre-accepted levels of performance E.g. R90, non-combustible Experienced and intended safety level: Resistance against collapse of tall buildings due to fire alone

multiconsult.no 17 Interpretations in the new age of timber

multiconsult.no 18

multiconsult.no 19

multiconsult.no 20 Challenge Model a complete fire development, including the cooling phase Verify survival of the timber structure Tool: Eurocode 1 part 1-2 parametric fire ­ + probabilistic down-scaling? Effect of sprinklers? Tool thermal analysis FEM – e.g. ANSYS

multiconsult.no Modeled fire

multiconsult.no 22 Source: SP

multiconsult.no In comparison: Timber frame/parametric fire (Nordic Wood 1995) From ”Wood construction behaviour in natural/parametric fires J.König, J. Norén, N.Forsén 1995

multiconsult.no 24 Conclusion 3 layers required – an uneconomical and impractical design to withstand a total fire

multiconsult.no More robust: CLT -?

multiconsult.no 26 Structural engineering vs fire engineering

multiconsult.no 27 Important tasks to clarify between disciplines: Structural engineer: Define main structural system Structural fire design– Tools: Eurocodes 1, 5 Fire engineer: Define combustible structure as a deviation from Guidance Document and give input to a parametric fire model Assess the fire safety strategy in regard to a possible probabilistic down-scaling of the fire energy, refer Eurocode 1 (not pre- accepted in Norway)

multiconsult.no 28 Possible development in pre-acceptance for tall timber buildings in a future Norwegian GD? For apartment buildings up to 8 storeys (23m to highest floor)provided: Fire compartments moderate in size Sprinklers with high reliability Standard fire resistance R90.

multiconsult.no 29 Conclusions A significant market potential for 3-4 storey timber buildings has been there for the past 15 years, the fire regulations represent no obstacle For apartment buildings of 5-8 storeys, an opening in the GD for increased use of timber is possible, given that automatic extinguishing systems are required and that limitations in fire compartment sizes will be defined Beyond this, more spectacular concepts can always be put into life, provided that a comprehensive risk analysis is performed and controlled/approved

multiconsult.no Thank you for your attention!