1. Visualization and Collaboration and Network Evolution Increasing importance – a continuing and big impact – For example: CarletonU’s Eucalyptus project.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 2 nd Shanghai, 19/02/06 Architecture for Next Generation Grids Kostas Tserpes, NTUA Shanghai, 20th of February 2006.
Advertisements

Workshop goals Promote learning: –exchange info; stimulate ideas for cooperation; add to collective knowledge base Help NDIIPP/JISC plan the future: –Bring.
Survey Responses Challenges and Opportunities Matt Richey St. Olaf College.
Distributed Data Processing
1 © Aberdeen Group 2013 – Not For Distribution ™ Meeting the Rising Challenge of Modern Networks.
The New Face of Enterprise Collaboration Trends, Observations, and Lessons Learned.
Towards a Virtual European Supercomputing Infrastructure Vision & issues Sanzio Bassini
Telefonica I+D Our vision of a joint effort Fernando Fournon (President. Telefónica I+D) May 2011.
Umow Lai engineering sustainable environments Technology…Evolution…Design.
Copyright 2005 Northrop Grumman Corporation 0 Critical Success Factors for system-of-system architecture / engineering 25 October 2006 Neil Siegel Sector.
Networks, Grids and Service Oriented Architectures eInfrastructures Workshop.
The Future of Internet Research Scott Shenker (on behalf of many networking collaborators)
Securing and Auditing Cloud Computing Jason Alexander Chief Information Security Officer.
CANARIE’s Next Mandate The Way Forward Jim Roche, President and CEO June 12, 2012 CANHEIT 2012 | Saskatoon, SK
Network, Operations and Security Area Tony Rimovsky NOS Area Director
Global Connectivity Joint venture of two workshops Kees Neggers & Dany Vandromme e-IRG Workshop Amsterdam, 13 May 2005.
Connect communicate collaborate Campus Best Practices Gunnar Bøe, Section Manager, Campus Networks and Systems, UNINETT Skopje, 15 Sept
IMT-2006 Phoenix 1 Immersive Medical TelePresence 2006 Opening Remarks and the Purpose of the Workshop Marshall Eubanks
National Secondary School Computer Fund (NSSCF)
NORDUnet NORDUnet The Fibre Generation Lars Fischer CTO NORDUnet.
What is CANARIE? CANARIE runs Canada’s only national high-bandwidth network for research & education Connects one million users at 1,100 institutions.
The bigvideo group Bob Riddle – Technologist October 2005 Bob Riddle – Technologist October 2005.
Staff Development and the Change Process
Journey to a Real Time Enterprise
ETICS2 All Hands Meeting VEGA GmbH INFSOM-RI Uwe Mueller-Wilm Palermo, Oct ETICS Service Management Framework Business Objectives and “Best.
Mission and Mission Fulfillment Tom Miller University of Alaska Anchorage.
Introduction to Career Cruising and ccInspire
November 2005 Advanced Research Networks Conference BCNET UVic is Wired Leverage the Power.
Hugs, Handshakes and High-Fives: Challenges of Evaluating Broadband’s Impact on CAIs Dr. Jon Gant Associate Professor Director, Center for Digital Inclusion.
The Brain Project – Building Research Background Part of JISC Virtual Research Environments (Phase 3) Programme Based at Coventry University with Leeds.
Introduction to Technology Use in the Classroom Web 2.0 Tools.
ESnet Site Coordinators Committee (ESCC): IPv6 Activities & Directions Phil DeMar (ESCC Chair) HEPix IPv6 Workshop (CERN) June 22, 2011.
Integrated Institutional Identity Infrastructure: Implications and Impacts RL “Bob” Morgan University of Washington Internet2 Member Meeting, May 2005.
Campus Network Development Network Architecture, Universal Access & Security.
Russ Hobby Program Manager Internet2 Cyberinfrastructure Architect UC Davis.
Connect communicate collaborate GÉANT3 Services Connectivity and Monitoring Services by and for NRENs Ann Harding, SWITCH TNC 2010.
GrangeNet Dr. Greg Wickham APAN NOC 25 August 2005.
A Brief Overview Andrew K. Bjerring President and CEO.
EDUCAUSE 2005 Annual Conference October 19, 2005.
Layer 1,2,3 networking on GrangeNet II Slide Pack Greg Wickham APAN 2006 ver 1.1.
1 Internet2 K20 SEGPs and IP Multicast Joanne Hugi Computing Center University of Oregon.
Cyberinfrastructure What is it? Russ Hobby Internet2 Joint Techs, 18 July 2007.
SCHOOL OF INFORMATION UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN The Connection Project: Supporting Collaboration at The University of Michigan with High Quality Video Links.
3 December 2015 Examples of partnerships and collaborations from the Internet2 experience Interworking2004 Ottawa, Canada Heather Boyles, Internet2
A DVANCE AND I MMEDIATE R ESERVATIONS OF V IRTUALIZED N ETWORK R ESOURCES Laia Ferrao Fundació i2CAT
August 3, March, The AC3 GRID An investment in the future of Atlantic Canadian R&D Infrastructure Dr. Virendra C. Bhavsar UNB, Fredericton.
Evaluation of the Quebec Community Learning Centres: An English minority language initiative Learning Innovations at WestEd May 21, 2008.
Marv Adams Chief Information Officer November 29, 2001.
Federated Identity in Texas Paul Caskey The University of Texas System HEAnet National Conference Kilkenny, Ireland 13 November 2008.
Keeping up with the RONses Mark Johnson Internet2 Member Meeting May 3, 2005.
Why Community-University Partnerships? Partnerships Enhance quality of life in the region Increase relevance of academic programs Add public purposes to.
Cyberinfrastructure Overview Russ Hobby, Internet2 ECSU CI Days 4 January 2008.
The Multilingual Web – Where Are We? Next Generation Localisation Josef van Genabith, CNGL & NCLT, DCU.
Lawrence H. Landweber National Science Foundation SC2003 November 20, 2003
Network, Operations and Security Area Tony Rimovsky NOS Area Director
1 CREATING AND MANAGING CERT. 2 Internet Wonderful and Terrible “The wonderful thing about the Internet is that you’re connected to everyone else. The.
30 November 2001 Advisory Panel on Cyber Infrastructure National Science Foundation Douglas Van Houweling November 30, 2001 National Science Foundation.
Advanced research and education networking in the United States: the Internet2 experience Heather Boyles Director, Member and Partner Relations Internet2.
Services – a perspective on building applications Richard Swale ETSI TIPHON Wg1 chair VoIP Technologist BTexaCT ITU Workshop on IP Networking and Mediacom.
Possible Governance-Policy Framework for Open LightPath Exchanges (GOLEs) and Connecting Networks June 13, 2011.
Southern California Infrastructure Philip Papadopoulos Greg Hidley.
Northwest Indiana Computational Grid Preston Smith Rosen Center for Advanced Computing Purdue University - West Lafayette West Lafayette Calumet.
Use of high speed photonic networks for efective use of very high quality media production Michal Krsek (CESNET) Mirek Sochor (CESNET/UPP)
The Division includes two lines of effort:
The GEANT Perspectives
TelePresence Leading-Edge Technology for Distance Learning
The Role of Europe in Developing Future Internet Technologies, EC Initiatives
Carla Ellis Duke University
International Task Force Meeting – part 2
Curitiba: cities and self organisation
Presentation transcript:

1. Visualization and Collaboration and Network Evolution Increasing importance – a continuing and big impact – For example: CarletonU’s Eucalyptus project for architectural collaborative design that uses UCLP to reconfigure the network based on resources required. 4x1Gbps. Tools include shared high resolution models, uncompressed SD or HD conferencing, HD document camera – McGill’s Shared Spaces -- Multi-screen uncompressed HD real sized VC: 5Gbps – New apps need reconfigurable networks or at least lots of available capacity to make this work – Dedicated lightpaths

2. Role for CineGrid to Improve Content Quality & Interactivity >Biggest challenge is last mile/kilometer – Many campuses and other sites don’t have capable infrastructure – CineGrid provide a key role if it helps stimulate this through funding or even through peer pressure >CineGrid should use its connection to well- established “science” research groups to identify and implement key cross-over applications – Must be clearly superior to existing services for acceptance

3. Artists and Technologists Working Together >We’ve seen such collaborations happen many times (Moveable Feast (next gen Cinema?), SAT in Montreal, Eucalyptus) – Fun! Interesting! Exciting! Can show well – or be obscure. – Results in new approaches but unless there’s a concerted effort to get the results in use they often result only in demos and only peripheral long term effects – critical mass issue? – But some things outside the (traditional) research community can have some significant effects – Azureus (HD YouTube) – perhaps only when community gets large enough – New models/languages for storytelling may emerge – a new immersive cinema – New highly distributed workflow models (modulo latency)

4. New R&E Net Developments >Discipline specific IP networks on optical substrate such as CANARIE with UCLP essential >Huge increase in the numbers of places that can be reached with gigabit or multi-gigabit connections will really push new visualization and cinema, dance, performance, teaching and mentoring apps >Not so much new technical developments but a wider deployment of existing high-end infrastructure such that it reaches a critical size – How much is enough?

5. Network Researchers Learn >Special/defining characteristics of high-bandwidth time critical streams – handle well (but hard too see that this would be too significant) >Justifies the existence of our networks

6. 5 Year CANARIE >Coverage/Access: With renewed funding… will extend direct lightpath connections and capabilities directly to many new and existing facilities that could be CineGrid users >Security/Support: In our model, support and security is a local or consortium responsibility

7. GLIF lessons for CineGrid >Get real world applications happening ASAP >Include the right players ASAP >Get visibility first, then work on regularizing and developing the key processes & services – Use initial experiences to inform that development