April 8-12 20031TTF, Madison/ 4th ITPA St Petersburg Clarisse Bourdelle Association EURATOM-CEA First results using kinezero because faster, and also not.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Chalkidikhi Summer School Plasma turbulence in tokamaks: some basic facts… W.Fundamenski UKAEA/JET.

Advertisements

1 G.T. Hoang TORE SUPRA Association Euratom-Cea TTF, Madison, Apr 2003 G.T. Hoang, C. Bourdelle, B. Pégourié, J. F. Artaud, J.Bucalossi, F. Clairet, C.

6 th ITPA MHD Topical Group Meeting combined with W60 IEA Workshop on Burning Plasmas Session II MHD Stability and Fast Particle Confinement General scope.

Discussion on application of current hole towards reactor T.Ozeki (JAERI) Current hole plasmas were observed in the large tokamaks of JT-60U and JET. This.

1 G.T. Hoang, 20th IAEA Fusion Energy Conference Euratom Turbulent Particle Transport in Tore Supra G.T. Hoang, J.F. Artaud, C. Bourdelle, X. Garbet and.

Momentum transport and flow shear suppression of turbulence in tokamaks Michael Barnes University of Oxford Culham Centre for Fusion Energy Michael Barnes.

1 Global Gyrokinetic Simulations of Toroidal ETG Mode in Reversed Shear Tokamaks Y. Idomura, S. Tokuda, and Y. Kishimoto Y. Idomura 1), S. Tokuda 1), and.

IAEA - FEC2004 // Vilamoura // // EX/4-5 // A. Staebler – 1 – A. Staebler, A.C.C Sips, M. Brambilla, R. Bilato, R. Dux, O. Gruber, J. Hobirk,

THEORY AND THEORY-BASED MODELS FOR THE PEDESTAL, EDGE STABILITY AND ELMs IN TOKAMAKS P. N. GUZDAR 1, S. M. MAHAJAN 2, Z. YOSHIDA 3 W. DORLAND 1, B. N.

Some results / ideas on the effect of flows D. Strintzi, C. Angioni, A. Bottino, A.G. Peeters.

The Stability of Internal Transport Barriers to MHD Ballooning Modes and Drift Waves: a Formalism for Low Magnetic Shear and for Velocity Shear The Stability.

XP810 and 801 report, Feb 08 slide 1 Buttery, Gerhardt, La Haye, Sabbagh June 2008 reporting meeting – XP810 and 801 experiment: 801: Marginal island width.

Recent Results of Configuration Studies L. P. Ku Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory ARIES-CS Project Meeting, November 17, 2005 UCSD, San Diego, CA.

1 / 12 Association EURATOM-CEA IAEA 20th Fusion Energy Conference presented by Ph. Ghendrih S. Benkadda, P. Beyer M. Bécoulet, G. Falchetto,

D. Borba 1 21 st IAEA Fusion Energy Conference, Chengdu China 21 st October 2006 Excitation of Alfvén eigenmodes with sub-Alfvénic neutral beam ions in.

Anomalous Transport Models Glenn Bateman Lehigh University Physics Department Bethlehem, PA SWIM Workshop Toward an Integrated Fusion Simulation Bloomington,

Computer simulations of fast frequency sweeping mode in JT-60U and fishbone instability Y. Todo (NIFS) Y. Shiozaki (Graduate Univ. Advanced Studies) K.

JT-60U Resistive Wall Mode (RWM) Study on JT-60U Go Matsunaga 松永剛 Japan Atomic Energy Agency, Naka, Japan JSPS-CAS Core University Program 2008 in ASIPP.

Calculations of Gyrokinetic Microturbulence and Transport for NSTX and C-MOD H-modes Martha Redi Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Transport Task Force.

ITPA-Transport TG Particle & impurity workgroup Discussion, future plans Milano,

Microstability analysis of e-ITBs in high density FTU plasmas 1)Associazione EURATOM-ENEA sulla fusione, C.R. Frascati, C.P , Frascati, Italy.

Excitation of ion temperature gradient and trapped electron modes in HL-2A tokamak The 3 th Annual Workshop on Fusion Simulation and Theory, Hefei, March.

Status and Plans Transport Model Validation in ITER-similar Current-Ramp Plasmas D. R. Mikkelsen, PPPL ITPA Transport & Confinement Workshop San Diego.

9th ITPA Confinement Database and Modelling Topical Physics Group meeting in St. Petersburg 1/5 NF paper on H-mode confinement DB3 Darren McDonald.

SMK – ITPA1 Stanley M. Kaye Wayne Solomon PPPL, Princeton University ITPA Naka, Japan October 2007 Rotation & Momentum Confinement Studies in NSTX Supported.

ITPA CDBM Group Meeting, St Petersburg October 2005, update of talk to Pedestal +Transport ITPA groups San Diego September/October 2003, and CDBM in Lisbon.

CCFE is the fusion research arm of the United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority Internal Transport Barriers and Improved Confinement in Tokamaks (Three possible.

Stability Properties of Field-Reversed Configurations (FRC) E. V. Belova PPPL 2003 International Sherwood Fusion Theory Conference Corpus Christi, TX,

Current Drive for FIRE AT-Mode T.K. Mau University of California, San Diego Workshop on Physics Issues for FIRE May 1-3, 2000 Princeton Plasma Physics.

1 Plasma Rotation and Momentum Confinement – DB ITPA - 1 October 2007 by Peter de Vries Plasma Rotation and Momentum Confinement Studies at JET P.C. de.

Comparison of Ion Thermal Transport From GLF23 and Weiland Models Under ITER Conditions A. H. Kritz 1 Christopher M. Wolfe 1 F. Halpern 1, G. Bateman 1,

Tearing Parity Microturbulent Drift Modes on NSTX Martha Redi NSTX Results Review 9/21/04 W. Dorland, U. Maryland, J. Baumgaertel, U. Washington (SULI)

(National Institute for Fusion Science, Japan)

MHD Suppression with Modulated LHW on HT-7 Superconducting Tokamak* Support by National Natural Science Fund of China No J.S.Mao, J.R.Luo, B.Shen,

1Peter de Vries – ITBs and Rotational Shear – 18 February 2010 – Oxford Plasma Theory Group P.C. de Vries JET-EFDA Culham Science Centre Abingdon OX14.

1 13 th ITPA Transport Physics Group Meeting Naka, 1-3 October 2007 V. Mukhovatov ITER Rotation Issues.

Chalmers University of Technology Simulations of the formation of transport barriers including the generation of poloidal spinup due to turbulence J. Weiland.

Beam Voltage Threshold for Excitation of Compressional Alfvén Modes E D Fredrickson, J Menard, N Gorelenkov, S Kubota*, D Smith Princeton Plasma Physics.

JT-60U -1- Access to High  p (advanced inductive) and Reversed Shear (steady state) plasmas in JT-60U S. Ide for the JT-60 Team Japan Atomic Energy Agency.

CCFE is the fusion research arm of the United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority ITB formation and evolution with co- and counter NBI A. R. Field, R. J. Akers,

RFX workshop / /Valentin Igochine Page 1 Control of MHD instabilities. Similarities and differences between tokamak and RFP V. Igochine, T. Bolzonella,

TPB Structure St.. Petersburg NEXT STEPS IN PROCESS Approach identified participants to ensure they are willing/able to participate Section coordinators.

CCFE is the fusion research arm of the United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority Challenges for Fusion Theory and Explosive Behaviour in Plasmas Steve Cowley,

DISCUSSION OF ISSUES, OPPORTUNITIES AND CONCLUSIONS FOR ROTATION AND MOMENTUM TRANSPORT SESSIONS 10th ITPA Transport Physics and CDBM TG Meetings Princeton.

ITPA CDBM/Transport Group Meeting, May 2007, Lausanne 1 C M Roach Euratom/UKAEA Fusion Association, Culham Science Centre, Abingdon, Oxon, OX14 3DB, UK.

SUMMARY OF 4th IPTA TRANSPORT AND ITB PHYSICS TG MEETING St. Petersburg, Russia, April 8-11, 2003 Presented by E.J. Doyle for the TG Note: this summary.

1 Feature of Energy Transport in NSTX plasma Siye Ding under instruction of Stanley Kaye 05/04/09.

Association Euratom-Cea ITPA CDBM group meeting, St Petersburg, October CRONOS simulations of ITER AT scenarios F. Imbeaux, J.F. Artaud, V. Basiuk,

SMK – APS ‘06 1 NSTX Addresses Transport & Turbulence Issues Critical to Both Basic Toroidal Confinement and Future Devices NSTX offers a novel view into.

TTF M. Ottaviani Euratom TORE SUPRA Overview of progress in transport theory and in the understanding of the scaling laws M. Ottaviani EURATOM-CEA,

Scaling experiments of perturbative impurity transport in NSTX D. Stutman, M. Finkenthal Johns Hopkins University J. Menard, E. Synakowski, B. Leblanc,R.

IAEA-TM 02/03/2005 1G. Falchetto DRFC, CEA-Cadarache Association EURATOM-CEA NON-LINEAR FLUID SIMULATIONS of THE EFFECT of ROTATION on ION HEAT TURBULENT.

Status of NSTX/DIII-D/MAST aspect ratio core confinement comparison studies M. Peng, for E.J. Synakowski For the ITPA Transport Physics Working Group Kyota,

Energetic Particles Interaction with the Non-resonant Internal Kink in Spherical Tokamaks Feng Wang*, G.Y. Fu**, J.A. Breslau**, E.D. Fredrickson**, J.Y.

Electron cloud study for ILC damping ring at KEKB and CESR K. Ohmi (KEK) ILC damping ring workshop KEK, Dec , 2007.

Vacuum specifications in Linacs J-B. Jeanneret, G. Rumolo, D. Schulte in CLIC Workshop 09, 15 October 2009 Fast Ion Instability in Linacs and the simulation.

Gyrokinetic Calculations of Microturbulence and Transport for NSTX and Alcator C-MOD H-modes Martha Redi Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory NSTX Physics.

6 th ITPA MHD Topical Group Meeting combined with W60 IEA Workshop on Burning Plasmas Summary Session II MHD Stability and Fast Particle Confinement chaired.

12/15/04Team Meeting Physics Analysis NSTX Team Meeting S.M. Kaye 12/15/04 Publications –Some IAEA papers submitted to Nuc. Fusion –T. Biewer article submitted.

G.Y. Park 1, S.S. Kim 1, T. Rhee 1, H.G. Jhang 1, P.H. Diamond 1,2, I. Cziegler 2, G. Tynan 2, and X.Q. Xu 3 1 National Fusion Research Institute, Korea.

Neoclassical Predictions of ‘Electron Root’ Plasmas at HSX

IAEA Fusion Energy Conference 2012, 8-13 Oct., San Diego, USA

L-H power threshold and ELM control techniques: experiments on MAST and JET Carlos Hidalgo EURATOM-CIEMAT Acknowledgments to: A. Kirk (MAST) European.

Investigation of triggering mechanisms for internal transport barriers in Alcator C-Mod K. Zhurovich C. Fiore, D. Ernst, P. Bonoli, M. Greenwald, A. Hubbard,

T. Morisaki1,3 and the LHD Experiment Group

Ioffe Institute, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation

T. Morisaki1,3 and the LHD Experiment Group

H. Nakano1,3, S. Murakami5, K. Ida1,3, M. Yoshinuma1,3, S. Ohdachi1,3,

D. V. Rose, T. C. Genoni, and D. R. Welch Mission Research Corp.

Presentation transcript:

April TTF, Madison/ 4th ITPA St Petersburg Clarisse Bourdelle Association EURATOM-CEA First results using kinezero because faster, and also not enough time yet to check the input file maker for GS2 Kinezero: –gyrokinetic, local, eigenvalue –ion and electron, passing and trapped –electrostatic, collionless, s-  geometry, linear fast: ~150  in 1 hour on 1 CPU allows to scan extensively parameter fields C. Bourdelle, X. Garbet, G. T. Hoang et al, Nuclear Fusion 42 (2002)

April TTF, Madison/ 4th ITPA St Petersburg Clarisse Bourdelle Association EURATOM-CEA First line of attack: study impact of  in ITBs, in particular ITBs with high gradP Why  is particularly interesting? High  lowers vertical drift, therefore lowers dominant interchange instability As  is increased the confinement improves, the pressure peaks, leading to even higher  : possibility for positive feedback, like for ExB stabilization Unlike ExB stabilization, no need for external momentum input: relevant for reactor scales

April TTF, Madison/ 4th ITPA St Petersburg Clarisse Bourdelle Association EURATOM-CEA JT60-U #39056 at 6.8 s and at the barrier location, gradP is high enough to be at threshold for positive feedback between  and gradP gradP * 16! a high q (high  ) is necessary to have  below ExB but only an increase of  through gradP leads to have a complete stabilization

April TTF, Madison/ 4th ITPA St Petersburg Clarisse Bourdelle Association EURATOM-CEA Growth rates very sensitive to input profiles… Here we see that a slight change of s (from 0.4 to 0.6) leads to  higher than ExB As well for slightly lower or higher gradP (/2 or *2) would lead to lower  So it is very important to put very carefully checked profiles in the database to allow for relevent microstability analysis

April TTF, Madison/ 4th ITPA St Petersburg Clarisse Bourdelle Association EURATOM-CEA In JET ITB,  is stabilizing inside barrier A lower q would be destabilizing at barrier for ITG-TEM and ETG negligible impact of s < 0

April TTF, Madison/ 4th ITPA St Petersburg Clarisse Bourdelle Association EURATOM-CEA JET :  versus  for reversed (#53521) and monotonic (#46664) q-profiles qx2 #53521 at 6s#46664 at 6s

April TTF, Madison/ 4th ITPA St Petersburg Clarisse Bourdelle Association EURATOM-CEA  s stable unstable stable 0 ITB triggered by s < 0 ? For example, a question that would be nice to try further to answer using the ITPA database: Is it possible to sustain ITB without ExB shear, just with  stabilization? ITB triggered by high  (high q) ?

April TTF, Madison/ 4th ITPA St Petersburg Clarisse Bourdelle Association EURATOM-CEA General remarks about the use of the ITPA profile database from C. Bourdelle I regret that the scenarios are not understandable from data in the database, for e.g. DIIID #87031 is only for 500ms, and #95989 for 600ms. Need to include scenarios in comments or with 1D data. Raw data for direct comparison experiments versus modelling (instead of comparing to already smoothed data) and a better understanding of the scenario Miss JT60-U data on the UK web site. Could not access the data despite going through recognised IP # UK site well documented. Should add any «private» tools, as Colin started to do. Colin developed an IDL tool to prepare GS2 input files. I am planning to add a tool to prepare KINEZERO input files and to convert the IDL get_profile in matlab. Different q-profiles obtained by TRANSP ( ITB database) and CRONOS particular JET #53521