GEOGG121: Methods Inversion I: linear approaches Dr. Mathias (Mat) Disney UCL Geography Office: 113, Pearson Building Tel: 7670 0592

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Lumped Parameter Modelling UoL MSc Remote Sensing Dr Lewis
Advertisements

Vegetation Science Lecture 4 Non-Linear Inversion Lewis, Disney & Saich UCL.
Managerial Economics in a Global Economy
NDVI Anomaly, Kenya, January 2009 Vegetation Indices Enhancing green vegetation using mathematical equations and transformations.
Environmental Remote Sensing GEOG 2021 Spectral information in remote sensing.
Mike Barnsley & Tristan Quaife, UWS. GLC2000, Ispra, March Estimating Land Surface Biophysical Properties using SPOT-4 VGT Mike Barnsley and Tristan.
“Using MODIS and POLDER data to develop a generalized approach for correction of the BRDF effect” Eric F. Vermote, Christopher O. Justice Dept of Geography,
The General Linear Model Or, What the Hell’s Going on During Estimation?
L.M. McMillin NOAA/NESDIS/ORA Regression Retrieval Overview Larry McMillin Climate Research and Applications Division National Environmental Satellite,
Improved Estimation of Surface Biophysical Parameters From Kernel- driven BRDF models Upgrading workshop Mathias Disney UCL Geography.
1 Remote Sensing and Image Processing: 5 Dr. Mathias (Mat) Disney UCL Geography Office: 301, 3rd Floor, Chandler House Tel: (x24290)
Vegetation indices and the red-edge index
Multiple Regression [ Cross-Sectional Data ]
Atmospheric effect in the solar spectrum
Lecture 3 Cameron Kaplan
Curve-Fitting Regression
Page 1 1 of 20, EGU General Assembly, Apr 21, 2009 Vijay Natraj (Caltech), Hartmut Bösch (University of Leicester), Rob Spurr (RT Solutions), Yuk Yung.
Data mining and statistical learning, lecture 3 Outline  Ordinary least squares regression  Ridge regression.
Classification and Prediction: Regression Analysis
Digital Imaging and Remote Sensing Laboratory Mixed Pixels and Spectral Unmixing 1 Spectral Mixtures areal aggregate intimate Linear mixing models (areal.
Chapter 12 Spatial Sharpening of Spectral Image Data.
Correlation and Regression
Radiative Transfer Theory at Optical and Microwave wavelengths applied to vegetation canopies: part 2 UoL MSc Remote Sensing course tutors: Dr Lewis
ECE 8443 – Pattern Recognition ECE 8423 – Adaptive Signal Processing Objectives: Introduction SNR Gain Patterns Beam Steering Shading Resources: Wiki:
RADIATIVE TRANSFER MODEL
Stats for Engineers Lecture 9. Summary From Last Time Confidence Intervals for the mean t-tables Q Student t-distribution.
MVP: a model to simulate the spatial patterns of photosynthetically active radiation under discrete forest canopies Conghe Song and Lawrence E. Band Presented.
Curve-Fitting Regression
Multitemporal and angular information Monitoring of biomass burning –using NASA MODIS algorithm developed byRoy and Lewis –consideration of spectral, angular,
Generating fine resolution leaf area index maps for boreal forests of Finland Janne Heiskanen, Miina Rautiainen, Lauri Korhonen,
1 Remote Sensing and Image Processing: 9 Dr. Mathias (Mat) Disney UCL Geography Office: 301, 3rd Floor, Chandler House Tel: (x24290)
BIOPHYS: A Physically-based Algorithm for Inferring Continuous Fields of Vegetative Biophysical and Structural Parameters Forrest Hall 1, Fred Huemmrich.
LAI/ fAPAR. definitions: see: MOD15 Running et al. LAI - one-sided leaf area per unit area of ground - dimensionless fAPAR - fraction of PAR (SW radiation.
GEOGG121: Methods Linear & non-linear models Dr. Mathias (Mat) Disney UCL Geography Office: 113, Pearson Building Tel:
EG2234: Earth Observation Interactions - Land Dr Mark Cresswell.
Remote Sensing and Image Processing: 4 Dr. Hassan J. Eghbali.
14 ARM Science Team Meeting, Albuquerque, NM, March 21-26, 2004 Canada Centre for Remote Sensing - Centre canadien de télédétection Geomatics Canada Natural.
Jeff J. Orchard, M. Stella Atkins School of Computing Science, Simon Fraser University Freire et al. (1) pointed out that least squares based registration.
BIOPHYS A PHYSICALLY-BASED CONTINUOUS FIELDS ALGORITHM and Climate and Carbon Models FORREST G. HALL, FRED HUEMMRICH Joint Center for Earth Systems Technology.
GEOG2021 Environmental Remote Sensing Lecture 3 Spectral Information in Remote Sensing.
Endmember Extraction from Highly Mixed Data Using MVC-NMF Lidan Miao AICIP Group Meeting Apr. 6, 2006 Lidan Miao AICIP Group Meeting Apr. 6, 2006.
Geometric optical (GO) modeling of radiative transfer in plant canopy Xin Xi.
2003 ARM Science Team Meeting, March 31-April 4 Broomfield, Colorado Canada Centre for Remote Sensing - Centre canadien de télédétection Geomatics Canada.
Environmental Remote Sensing GEOG 2021 Lecture 8 Orbits, scale and trade-offs, revision.
Review of Spectral Unmixing for Hyperspectral Imagery Lidan Miao Sept. 29, 2005.
Estimating the uncertainties in the products of inversion algorithms or, how do we set the error bars for our inversion results? Emmanuel Boss, U. of Maine.
Objectives The Li-Sparse reciprocal kernel is based on the geometric optical modeling approach developed by Li and Strahler, in which the angular reflectance.
2004 ARM Science Team Meeting, March Albuquerque, New Mexico Canada Centre for Remote Sensing - Centre canadien de télédétection Geomatics Canada.
Li-Strahler Model Li-Strahler model is the most commonly used model in remote sensing application because it is invertible. The radiative transfer model.
Various Change Detection Analysis Techniques. Broadly Divided in Two Approaches ….. 1.Post Classification Approach. 2.Pre Classification Approach.
Inverse Modeling of Surface Carbon Fluxes Please read Peters et al (2007) and Explore the CarbonTracker website.
Data Processing Flow Chart Start NDVI, EVI2 are calculated and Rank SDS are incorporated Integrity Data Check: Is the data correct? Data: Download a) AVHRR.
Geogg124: Data assimilation P. Lewis. What is Data Assimilation? Optimal merging of models and data Models Expression of current understanding about process.
1 Information Content Tristan L’Ecuyer. 2 Degrees of Freedom Using the expression for the state vector that minimizes the cost function it is relatively.
References: 1)Ganguly, S., Samanta, A., Schull, M. A., Shabanov, N. V., Milesi, C., Nemani, R. R., Knyazikhin, Y., and Myneni, R. B., Generating vegetation.
Electro-optical systems Sensor Resolution
Statistics 350 Lecture 2. Today Last Day: Section Today: Section 1.6 Homework #1: Chapter 1 Problems (page 33-38): 2, 5, 6, 7, 22, 26, 33, 34,
Chapter 11 Linear Regression and Correlation. Explanatory and Response Variables are Numeric Relationship between the mean of the response variable and.
Global predictors of regression fidelity A single number to characterize the overall quality of the surrogate. Equivalence measures –Coefficient of multiple.
GEOG2021 Environmental Remote Sensing
J. C. Stroeve, J. Box, F. Gao, S. Liang, A. Nolin, and C. Schaaf
GEOGG121: Methods Monte Carlo methods, revision
Combining Vicarious Calibrations
Modelling data and curve fitting
Lumped Parameter Modelling
Linear Regression and Correlation
Igor Appel TAG LLC, Washington, USA
Linear Regression and Correlation
Lumped Parameter Modelling
Data Analysis, Version 1 VIP Laboratory May 2011.
Presentation transcript:

GEOGG121: Methods Inversion I: linear approaches Dr. Mathias (Mat) Disney UCL Geography Office: 113, Pearson Building Tel:

Linear models and inversion –Least squares revisited, examples –Parameter estimation, uncertainty –Practical examples Spectral linear mixture models Kernel-driven BRDF models and change detection Lecture outline

Linear models and inversion –Linear modelling notes: Lewis, 2010 –Chapter 2 of Press et al. (1992) Numerical Recipes in C (online version – – Reading

Linear Models For some set of independent variables x = {x 0, x 1, x 2, …, x n } have a model of a dependent variable y which can be expressed as a linear combination of the independent variables.

Linear Models?

Linear Mixture Modelling Spectral mixture modelling: –Proportionate mixture of (n) end-member spectra –First-order model: no interactions between components

Linear Mixture Modelling r = {r , r , … r m, 1.0} –Measured reflectance spectrum (m wavelengths) nx(m+1) matrix:

Linear Mixture Modelling n=(m+1) – square matrix Eg n=2 (wavebands), m=2 (end-members)

Reflectance Band 1 Reflectance Band 2 11 22 33 r

Linear Mixture Modelling as described, is not robust to error in measurement or end-member spectra; Proportions must be constrained to lie in the interval (0,1) –- effectively a convex hull constraint; m+1 end-member spectra can be considered; needs prior definition of end-member spectra; cannot directly take into account any variation in component reflectances –e.g. due to topographic effects

Linear Mixture Modelling in the presence of Noise Define residual vector minimise the sum of the squares of the error e, i.e. Method of Least Squares (MLS)

Error Minimisation Set (partial) derivatives to zero

Error Minimisation Can write as: Solve for P by matrix inversion

e.g. Linear Regression

RMSE

y x xx1x1 x2x2

Weight of Determination (1/w) Calculate uncertainty at y(x)

P0 P1 RMSE

P0 P1 RMSE

Issues Parameter transformation and bounding Weighting of the error function Using additional information Scaling

Parameter transformation and bounding Issue of variable sensitivity –E.g. saturation of LAI effects –Reduce by transformation Approximately linearise parameters Need to consider ‘average’ effects

Weighting of the error function Different wavelengths/angles have different sensitivity to parameters Previously, weighted all equally –Equivalent to assuming ‘noise’ equal for all observations

Weighting of the error function Can ‘target’ sensitivity –E.g. to chlorophyll concentration –Use derivative weighting (Privette 1994)

Using additional information Typically, for Vegetation, use canopy growth model –See Moulin et al. (1998) Provides expectation of (e.g.) LAI –Need: planting date Daily mean temperature Varietal information (?) Use in various ways –Reduce parameter search space –Expectations of coupling between parameters

Scaling Many parameters scale approximately linearly –E.g. cover, albedo, fAPAR Many do not –E.g. LAI Need to (at least) understand impact of scaling

Crop Mosaic LAI 1LAI 4LAI 0

Crop Mosaic 20% of LAI 0, 40% LAI 4, 40% LAI 1. ‘real’ total value of LAI: –0.2x0+0.4x4+0.4x1=2.0. LAI1LAI1 LAI4LAI4 LAI0LAI0 visible: NIR

canopy reflectance over the pixel is 0.15 and 0.60 for the NIR. If assume the model above, this equates to an LAI of 1.4. ‘real’ answer LAI 2.0

Linear Kernel-driven Modelling of Canopy Reflectance Semi-empirical models to deal with BRDF effects –Originally due to Roujean et al (1992) –Also Wanner et al (1995) –Practical use in MODIS products BRDF effects from wide FOV sensors –MODIS, AVHRR, VEGETATION, MERIS

Satellite, Day 1 Satellite, Day 2 X

AVHRR NDVI over Hapex-Sahel, 1992

Linear BRDF Model of form: Model parameters: Isotropic Volumetric Geometric-Optics

Linear BRDF Model of form: Model Kernels: Volumetric Geometric-Optics

Volumetric Scattering Develop from RT theory –Spherical LAD –Lambertian soil –Leaf reflectance = transmittance –First order scattering Multiple scattering assumed isotropic

Volumetric Scattering If LAI small:

Volumetric Scattering Write as: RossThin kernel Similar approach for RossThick

Geometric Optics Consider shadowing/protrusion from spheroid on stick (Li-Strahler 1985)

Geometric Optics Assume ground and crown brightness equal Fix ‘shape’ parameters Linearised model –LiSparse –LiDense

Kernels Retro reflection (‘hot spot’) Volumetric (RossThick) and Geometric (LiSparse) kernels for viewing angle of 45 degrees

Kernel Models Consider proportionate (  ) mixture of two scattering effects

Using Linear BRDF Models for angular normalisation Account for BRDF variation Absolutely vital for compositing samples over time (w. different view/sun angles) BUT BRDF is source of info. too! MODIS NBAR (Nadir-BRDF Adjusted Reflectance MOD43, MCD43)

MODIS NBAR (Nadir-BRDF Adjusted Reflectance MOD43, MCD43)

BRDF Normalisation Fit observations to model Output predicted reflectance at standardised angles –E.g. nadir reflectance, nadir illumination Typically not stable –E.g. nadir reflectance, SZA at local mean And uncertainty via

Linear BRDF Models to track change Examine change due to burn (MODIS) FROM: days of Terra (blue) and Aqua (red) sampling over point in Australia, w. sza (T: orange; A: cyan). Time series of NIR samples from above sampling

MODIS Channel 5 Observation DOY 275

MODIS Channel 5 Observation DOY 277

Detect Change Need to model BRDF effects Define measure of dis-association

MODIS Channel 5 Prediction DOY 277

MODIS Channel 5 Discrepency DOY 277

MODIS Channel 5 Observation DOY 275

MODIS Channel 5 Prediction DOY 277

MODIS Channel 5 Observation DOY 277

So BRDF source of info, not JUST noise! Use model expectation of angular reflectance behaviour to identify subtle changes 54 Dr. Lisa Maria Rebelo, IWMI, CGIAR.

Detect Change Burns are: –negative change in Channel 5 –Of ‘long’ (week’) duration Other changes picked up –E.g. clouds, cloud shadow –Shorter duration –or positive change (in all channels) –or negative change in all channels

Day of burn Roy et al. (2005) Prototyping a global algorithm for systematic fire-affected area mapping using MODIS time series data, RSE 97,