Statistical Approach to Model Spatial and Temporal Variability of

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SAFER Project - FINAL MEETING Elin Skurtveit & Amir M. Kaynia - NGI
Advertisements

The Effectiveness of Remote Sensing Techniques in Lineament Mapping for Groundwater Exploration in Volcanic Terrains Hard-rock aquifers are only productive.
GIS IN GEOLOGY Miloš Marjanović Lesson
Advantages of Decorrugation of Aeromagnetic Data using the Naudy-Fuller Space Domain Filter Saad Mogren (King Saud University, Saudi Arabia) and Derek.
Matt Crawford 2012 Kentucky GIS Conference. Kentucky landslide locations.
Socio Economic and Spatial Methodologies: a better understanding of socioeconomic assessment in rural area by: Iwan Rudiarto, Aulisa Rahmi, Umrotul Farida.
Study on applying MODIS image into drought indicator analysis in Taiwan Yuh-Lurng Chung, Chaur-Tzuhn Chen Chen-Ni Hsi, Shih-Ming Liu Yuh-Lurng.
The Global Digital Elevation Model (GTOPO30) of Great Basin Location: latitude 38  15’ to 42  N, longitude 118  30’ to 115  30’ W Grid size: 925 m.
Towards a real-time landslide early warning strategy in Hong Kong Qiming Zhou and Junyi Huang.
Models for Predicting Landslide Location (1)
Ground motion simulations and site effect estimation for Istanbul, Turkey Mathilde Bøttger Sørensen 1, Nelson Pulido 2, Sylvette Bonnefoy-Claudet 3, Kuvvet.
EGU General Assembly 2014 May 2nd, 2014, Vienna
University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Geographic Information Science Geography 625 Intermediate Geographic Information Science Instructor: Changshan Wu Department.
Tsao-Ling rockslides, Taiwan 1 Ju-Jiang Hung Department of Civil Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan Chyi-Tyi Lee Ming-Lang Lin Institute.
Prague, March 18, 2005Antonio Emolo1 Seismic Hazard Assessment for a Characteristic Earthquake Scenario: Integrating Probabilistic and Deterministic Approaches.
Application of GIS on Landslide Susceptibility and risk mapping
WFM 6202: Remote Sensing and GIS in Water Management
USING A GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM (GIS) TO MODEL SLOPE INSTABILITY AND DEBRIS FLOW HAZARDS IN THE FRENCH BROAD RIVER WATERSHED, NORTH CAROLINA Anne.
More Raster and Surface Analysis in Spatial Analyst
Lecture 16 Terrain modelling: the basics
Integrated Approach for Assessing the Characteristic of Groundwater Recharge in Basin Scale Hsin-Fu Yeh*, Cheng-Haw Lee, Kuo-Chin Hsu Department of Resources.
Company LOGO National Mapping Initiatives in Sri Lanka by S.M.W.Fernando Surveyor General Survey Department of Sri Lanka Surveyor General Survey Department.
The Global Digital Elevation Model (GTOPO30) of Great Basin Location: latitude 38  15’ to 42  N, longitude 118  30’ to 115  30’ W Grid size: 925 m.
APPLICATION OF REMOTE SENSING ON
IAEG 5-10 th September 2010 Auckland, New Zealand Regional scale landslide susceptibility analysis using different GIS-based approaches Miloš Marjanović.
Remote Sensing and Active Tectonics Barry Parsons and Richard Walker Michaelmas Term 2011 Lecture 4.
Understanding and Interpreting maps
專題討論 2016/5/26 1 授課老師:謝平城教授 指導老師 : 詹勳全副教授 學生:温祐霆 學號:
Matt Crawford KYTC Trans-GIS Conference Frankfort, KY March 29 th, 2012.
Earthquake Vulnerability and Exposure Analysis Session 2 Mr. James Daniell Risk Analysis Earthquake Risk Analysis 1.
Feasibility Level Evaluation of Seismic Stability for Remedy Selection Senda Ozkan, Tetra Tech Inc. Gary Braun, Tetra Tech Inc.
Advanced Topics in GIS. Natural Hazards Landslide Susceptibility.
STRATIFICATION PLOT PLACEMENT CONTROLS Strategy for Monitoring Post-fire Rehabilitation Treatments Troy Wirth and David Pyke USGS – Biological Resources.
Research opportunities using IRIS and other seismic data resources John Taber, Incorporated Research Institutions for Seismology Michael Wysession, Washington.
SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION OF LANDSLIDES TRIGGERED BY THE WENCHUAN EARTHQUAKE, SICHUAN PROVINCE, CHINA Tolga Görüm & Cees J. Van Westen.
Soil Movement in West Virginia Watersheds A GIS Assessment Greg Hamons Dr. Michael Strager Dr. Jingxin Wang.
ANALYSIS ON SLIDING MECHANISM OF TSAOLING ROCKSLIDE IN CHI-CHI EARTHQUAKE EVENT Tien Chien Chen National Pingtung University of Science & Technology Meei.
Jia-Jyun Dong, Yu-Hsiang Tung, Chien-Chih Chen, Jyh-Jong Liao, Yii-Wen Pan 學 生 :陳奕愷 Logistic regression model for predicting the failure probability of.
Role of Spatial Database in Biodiversity Conservation Planning Sham Davande, GIS Expert Arid Communities Technologies, Bhuj 11 September, 2015.
Lecture 3 The Digital Image – Part I - Single Channel Data 12 September
AN ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK APPLICATION TO PRODUCE DEBRIS SOURCE AREAS OF BARLA, BESPARMAK, AND KAPI MOUNTAINS (NW TAURIDS, TURKEY) Prepared by : Lamiya.
Shiann-Jong Lee 1, Dimitri Komatitsch 2,3, Yu-Chang Chan 1, Bor-Shouh Huang 1 and Jeroen Tromp 4 1 Institute of Earth Science, Academia Sinica, Taipei,
指導教授 : 張光宗 林峻德 趙逸幃 Impact of Chi-Chi earthquake on the occurrence of landslides and debris flows: example from the Chenyulan River.
Lg Q Across the Continental US Dan McNamara and Rob Wesson with Dirk Erickson, Arthur Frankel and Harley Benz.
Wetlands Investigation Utilizing GIS and Remote Sensing Technology for Lucas County, Ohio: a hybrid analysis. Nathan Torbick Spring 2003 Update on current.
Epistemic Uncertainty on the Median Ground Motion of Next-Generation Attenuation (NGA) Models Brian Chiou and Robert Youngs The Next Generation of Research.
1 _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________.
Can tilt tests provide correct insight regarding frictional behavior of sandstone under seismic excitation? Can tilt tests provide correct insight regarding.
GROUND MOTION VARIABILITY: COMPARISON OF SURFACE AND DOWNHOLE GROUND MOTIONS Adrian Rodriguez-Marek, Washington State University, USA Fabrice Cotton, LGIT,
MODELING OF SEISMIC SLOPE BEHAVIOR WITH SHAKING TABLE TEST Meei-Ling Lin and Kuo-Lung Wang Department of Civil Engineering, National Taiwan University.
CHYI-TYI LEE, SHANG-YU HSIEH
Chapter 10 Spatial Data Models. Introduction n The Earth: complex, multivariate system n Computer processing of geo-referenced data in GIS n Discretization.
Statistical Surfaces, part II GEOG370 Instructor: Christine Erlien.
Updated Cover Type Map of Cloquet Forestry Center For Continuous Forest Inventory.
The Next Generation of Research on Earthquake-induced Landslides: An International Conference in Commemoration of 10th Anniversary of the Chi-Chi Earthquake,
Repeatable Path Effects on The Standard Deviation for Empirical Ground Motion Models Po-Shen Lin (Institute of geophysics, NCU) Chyi-Tyi Lee (Institute.
Microzonation Study of Soil Liquefaction Potential and Damage Wei F. Lee Taiwan Construction Research Institute Ming-Hung Chen National Center for Research.
Chih-Yu Kuo Chih-Yu Kuo Division of Mechanics,Research Center for Applied Sciences,Academia Sinica, Taiwan Rou-Fei Chen Institute of Earth Sciences, Academia.
LANDSLIDE INVENTORIES THE KEY TO SEISMIC LANDSLIDE HAZARD ANALYSIS.
Probabilistic hazard analysis of earthquake-induced landslides – an example from Kuohsing, Taiwan Liao, Chi-Wen Industrial Technology Research Institute.
A method to map flooding-prone areas in Iran using Landsat satellite images and GIS Ali Bozorgi, Iran Water Resources Management Company,
1 Application of SDI in hydrology for assessment of hydropower potential of small streams Subija IZEIROSKI Bashkim IDRIZI Sotir PANOVSKI Igor NEDELKOVSKI.
Microtremor method Saibi. Dec, 18, 2014.
Site effect characterization of the Ulaanbaatar basin
Non-catastrophic Hongtsaiping Landslide Induced by the 1999 Chi-Chi Earthquake in Central Taiwan Insights from Distinct Element Method 1Chia-Han Tseng.
An Integrated Approach for Subsidence Monitoring and Sinkhole Formation in the Karst Terrain of Dougherty County, Georgia Matthew Cahalan1 and Adam Milewski1.
The Hungtsaiping landslides- from a rock slide to a colluvial slide
11 ISSUES IN EARTHQUAKE -TRIGGERED LANDSLIDES ; THE NEXT GENERATION?
Anjali Singh, SRF, Indian Agricultural Research Institute (IARI)
Liquefaction Hazard Mapping
Presentation transcript:

Statistical Approach to Model Spatial and Temporal Variability of The Next Generation of Research on Earthquake-induced Landslides Statistical Approach to Model Spatial and Temporal Variability of Earthquake-Induced Landslides Chyi-Tyi Lee Institute of Applied Geology, National Central University, Taiwan International Conference in Commemoration of 10th Anniversary of the Chi-Chi Earthquake, 2009 September 21~26, 2009

INTRODUCTION

INTRODUCTION 1/3 ◆ The study of earthquake-induced landslide susceptibility on a regional scale commonly requires the employment of an analytical slope-stability method and the infinite-slope model (Wilson and Keefer, 1985; Jibson and Keefer, 1993; Harp and Wilson, 1995; Jibson et al., 1998, 2000; Liao, 2004). This method requires calculation to determine the limit-equilibrium of the slope stability given the strength parameters, failure depth, and groundwater conditions for every calculation point in the study area. This requirement causes immense problems in terms of data acquisition and control of spatial variability of the variables (Hutchinson, 1995; Guzzetti et al., 1999).

INTRODUCTION 2/3 ◆ In traditional landslide susceptibility analysis, it is most common to use a statistical approach where landslide inventories and causative factors are utilized to build a susceptibility model for the prediction of future landslides. Many different methods and techniques for assessing landslide hazards have been proposed and tested. These have already been systematically compared and their advantages and limitations outlined (Carrara, 1983; Varnes, 1984; Carrara et al., 1995; Hutchinson, 1995; Chung and Fabbri, 1999; Guzzetti et al., 1999; Chung, 2006; van Western et al., 2006). Most of these approaches require multi-temporal landslide inventories so that the susceptibility model can predict landslide occurrence over a given time period (Guzzetti et al., 1999).

INTRODUCTION 3/3 ◆ In the study of earthquake-induced landslides, the landslide inventory is naturally event-based; it is not possible to use a multi-temporal landslide inventory. Therefore, the temporal significance of a susceptibility model should incorporate the use of a triggering factor, like that used in the deterministic method. ◆ Lee et al. (2008) introduced a new approach using statistical method in building an earthquake-induced landslide prediction model. In this study, I demonstrate the new method using an example form the Yinlin quadrangle with two earthquake events, and the results are then cross-validated.

Geology of Taiwan Taiwan orogeny started at Late Miocene and is presently active. The Central Range consists of metamorphic complex and a Paleogene slate belt. Bordering the Central Range is the Western Foothills, consisting of Neogene sedimentary formations, and the Eastern Coastal Range, which is also made of Neogene sedimentary strata. The Longitudinal Valley located between the Central Range and the Eastern Coastal Range is the suture zone between two plates.

Terrain Division & The Study Area For the purpose of producing a set of landslide susceptibility quadrangle maps for Taiwan. We classified whole Taiwan into 13 geomorphological and geological homogeneous zones for further study. Study Area

Topography of the Study Area The study area is divided into two homogeneous region for training the susceptibility model. Hilly Terrain Mountainous Terrain

Geology of the Study Area

METHODOLOGY 1/2 λ ◆ Since multi-temporal landslide inventories are not available for earthquake-induced landslides, I consider using an event-based landslide inventory and an event-based landslide susceptibility analysis (EB-LSA) which was proposed by Lee et al., (2008). ◆ In EB-LSA, an event-based landslide inventory must be constructed firstly. In parallel with this, the causative factors of the landslides are processed and the triggering factors determined. These factors are then statistically tested, and the effective factors selected for susceptibility analysis. Each selected factor is rated, and their weighting analyzed.

METHODOLOGY 2/2 λ ◆ Discriminant analysis allows us to determine the maximum difference for each factor between the landslide group and the non-landslide group, as well as the apparent weights of the factors. ◆ A linear weighted summation of all factors is used to calculate the landslide susceptibility index (LSI) for each grid point. The LSIs are used to establish a landslide ratio to LSI curve and determine the spatial probability of landslide at each grid point. The spatial probability of landslides is then used for landslide susceptibility mapping. For a more detailed description of EB-LSA, please refer to Lee et al. (2008).

Data Sources Multi-spectral (XS) and panchromatic (PAN) SPOT2 images from Satellite Receiving Station of Center for Space and Remote Sensing Research, National Central University. Digital terrain model (DEM) of 40x40m resolution from Aerial Survey Office, Forestry Bureau, Council of Agriculture, Taiwan. Geological map of 1 to 50,000 scaled from Central Geological Survey, Taiwan. Strong-motion data from the Seismological Center, Central Weather Bureau, Taiwan. Road map digitized from 1 to 5,000 scaled topographic maps.

Data Processing 1/2 Both XS and PAN SPOT images were used. They were fused into a higher resolution (6.25m x 6.25m) false-color image for landslide interpretation. XS images taken prior to Jueili and Chi-Chi earthquakes were used for calculation of normalized differential vegetation index (NDVI). Digital terrain model (DEM) of 40x40m resolution was corrected for erroneous data and filtered for noises, and then the DEMs were interpolated to grid cells of 20x20m resolution using cubic spline interpolation. Slope gradient, slope aspect, slope height, etc. which are derived from DEM are also in 20x20m grid data format. Geological map, NDVI, etc. are transferred into 20x20m grid data for further use.

Data Processing 2/2 Strong-motion seismograms in and around the study area were collected by base-line correction and filtered for removing noises according to the standard procedure suggested by the Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center (PEER). The Arias intensity was then calculated from each corrected seismogram. The arithmetical mean of the Arias intensities of the N-S and E-W components were used to represent the earthquake intensity for a strong-motion station site. These values were interpolated on each grid point in the study area using the ordinary Kriging method. Tools used are MapInfo vector GIS and ERDAS Imagine raster GIS.

Event-based Landslide Inventory 1/2 Prior to Jueili After Jueili Landslides triggered by the Jueili earthquake (Blue color indicates cloud or shade in SPOT image)

Event-based Landslide Inventory 2/2 Prior to Chi-Chi After Chi-Chi Landslides triggered by the Chi-Chi earthquake (Blue color indicates cloud or shade in SPOT image)

Preliminary Selection of Factors Lithology Slope gradient Slope aspect NDVI Terrain roughness Slope roughness Total curvature Slope height Total slope height Topographic wetness index Distance to road Distance to fault Distance to river bend Distance to river head Peak ground acceleration (PGA) Peak ground velocity (PGV) Arias intensity (AI)

Selection of Effective Factors Success Rate Curve Non-landslide Probability of Failure Curve Portion of Landslide P-P Plot Exp. Cum. Prob. Prob. of Failure Frequency Landslide AUC=0.767 D=0.790 Slope, % Obs. Cum. Prob. Slpoe, % Portion of Area Visual inspection of frequency distribution of the two groups, and calculation of discriminator D. Test of normal distribution of the factor. Examination of probability of failure curve to see if landslide probability increases with the factor value. Examination of success rate curve to check the ability of interpreting landslides of the factor. Discriminator Dj : , where, j A is average of landslide group, j B is average of non-landslide group, Pj S is pooled standard deviation of two groups, j indicates j th factor.

Effective Factors Selected ► The following factors are tested to be effective in interpreting landslides: Lithology Slope gradient Slope aspect Terrain roughness Slope roughness Total curvature Arias intensity (AI) (triggering factor)

Processing of Landslide Causative Factors SLOPE GRADIENT (Chi-Chi for example) Mountainous Terrain Hilly Terrain % Frequency % 524.55 % % Landslide ratio % Hilly terrain Mountainous terrain Thick line: Landslide group Thin line: Non-landslide group %

Processing of Landslide Causative Factors SLOPE ASPECT (Chi-Chi for example) Hilly Terrain Mountainous Terrain Frequency % 360 o o Landslide ratio % Hilly terrain Mountainous terrain Thick line: Landslide group Thin line: Non-landslide group o

Processing of Landslide Causative Factors TERRAIN ROUGHNESS (Chi-Chi for example) 40% Hilly Terrain Mountainous Terrain m Frequency % 13.84 m m Landslide ratio % Hilly terrain Mountainous terrain Thick line: Landslide group Thin line: Non-landslide group m

Processing of Landslide Causative Factors SLOPE ROUGHNESS (Chi-Chi for example) Hilly Terrain Mountainous Terrain m 162.61 Frequency % m m Landslide ratio % Hilly terrain Mountainous terrain Thick line: Landslide group Thin line: Non-landslide group m

Processing of Landslide Causative Factors TOTAL CURVATURE (Chi-Chi for example) Hilly Terrain Mountainous Terrain Frequency % Log(radius/m) -0.65 Log(radius/m) Log(radius/m) Landslide ratio % -6.00 Hilly terrain Mountainous terrain Thick line: Landslide group Thin line: Non-landslide group Log(radius/m)

Processing of Landslide Causative Factors LITHOLOGIC UNIT (Chi-Chi for example) Hilly Terrain Mountainous Terrain 10 Frequency % 1 Lithologic Unit Lithologic Unit Landslide ratio % Hilly terrain Mountainous terrain 1 Alluvium & Terrace Deposites 2 Lateritic Terrace Deposites 3 Toukoshan Formation (Conglomerate) 4 Toukoshan Formation (Sandstone & Mudstone) 5 Cholan Formation 6 Chinshui Shale 7 Kueichulin Formation (Tawo Sandstone) 8 Kueichulin Formation (Shih Liufen Shale) 9 Kueichulin Formation (Kantaoshan Sandstone) 10 Nanchung Formation Lithologic Unit

Topographic Correction of Arias Intensity Get amplification factor of Ia by using the ratio of Ia from strong-motion data recorded at stations on ridge top and other stations. Establish the relationship between amplification factor and a topographic factor : (Lin and Lee, 2003) where F is amplification factor, h is relative height to riverbed, and Ia’ is Arias intensity after correction.

+ Chi-Chi Earthquake Arias Intensity Original Relative height to riverbed + Frequency % Landslide Ratio % m/s m Chi-Chi Earthquake

Arias Intensity Chi-Chi Earthquake ( After correction) Frequency % m/s Frequency % Landslide Ratio % Chi-Chi Earthquake

Arias Intensity Jueili Earthquake ( After correction) Frequency % m/s Landslide Ratio % m/s m/s

Result of the Discriminant Analysis

Landslide Susceptibility Maps (Jueili) Susceptibility map trained from the Jueili earthquake-induced landslides Susceptibility map with no-triggering factor

Landslide Susceptibility Maps (Chi-Chi) Susceptibility map trained from the Chi-Chi earthquake-induced landslides Susceptibility map with no-triggering factor

RESULTS a b c d e f Event-based landslide susceptibility maps at Yinlin quadrangle. (a) Landslides triggered by 1997 Jueili earthquake, (b) event-based landslide susceptibility map trained by Jueili data set, (c) background landslide susceptibility map for Jueili event. (d) Landslides triggered by 1999 CHI-CHI earthquake, (e) event-based landslide susceptibility map trained by Chi-Chi data set, (f) background landslide susceptibility map for CHI-CHI event.

RESULTS Success rate curve Predict rate curve Hilly Terrain Mountain Terrain Jueili AUC=0.9423 Chi-Chi AUC=0.9099 Jueili AUC=0.7731 Chi-Chi AUC=0.8177 Jueili Earthquake Chi-Chi Earthquake Hilly Terrain Mountain Terrain Predict rate curve Jueili AUC=0.8737 Chi-Chi AUC=0.8661 Jueili AUC=0.8023 Chi-Chi AUC=0.7264 Success rate curve and Predict rate curve in the Yinlin quadrangle

Arias Intensity Hazard Map for Taiwan 475-year Arias Intensity Hazard Map for Taiwan 44 earthquakes and 5109 records are used. Mw=7.0 Mw=7.6

Modeling Spatial Probability Hilly Terrain Mountainous Terrain (Chi-Chi event) 36

Landslide Hazard Map An example of 475-year earthquake-induced landslide hazard map for the Yinlin Quadrangle

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS An event-based landslide susceptibility map reflects landslide distribution for a certain triggering event based on which the susceptibility model was trained. Therefore, there may have many different event-based landslide susceptibility maps for a given region. Spatial probability of landslides can be modeled by a landslide ratio curve, and temporal probability of landslides can be achieved via a probabilistic seismic hazard analysis. And a landslide hazard map may be constructed; similar to those have been done by Jibson et al. 2000. The advantage of this landslide hazard models is capable of predicting shallow landslides induced during an earthquake scenario with similar range of ground shaking, without requiring the use of geotechnical, groundwater or failure depth data.

Thanks for your attention! 謝謝