STRAT.AT Report 2012 Second Strategic Report for Austria on the implementation of EU Cohesion Policy 2007-2013 some selected results Alexandra Deimel Federal.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EMPL Committee 15 July 2010 The ESF Committee Opinion on the future of the ESF and the 23/24 June conference Thomas Bender Employment, Social Affairs and.
Advertisements

1 Challenges and risks of new regional and rural programming in the period 2007 – 2013: Case of the Czech Republic Martin PELUCHA, PhD student European.
Territorial cohesion: what scales for policy intervention? Bruxelles Jean Peyrony DG REGIO, Unit C2 (Urban development, territorial cohesion)
1 The Europe 2020 Strategy and the Challenge of an Integrated Territorial Approach Philip McCann University of Groningen Special Adviser to the European.
Planning and Timely Implementation of Structural Funds Interventions Katarína Mathernová Director, DG Regional Policy European Commission 24 November 2005.
Samuele Dossi DG for Regional Policy - Evaluation
1 Final Report Results of the on-line Public Consultation of the Conclusions of the 5th Cohesion Report Peter Berkowitz Head of Unit Conception, forward.
EU COHESION POLICY IN A GLOBAL CONTEXT Recommendations on performance incentives and conditionalities Laura Polverari Conference on the Evidence-based.
Delegation of the European Commission Romania preparing for EU membership European Structural and Cohesion Funds.
Management Response to the Annual Report on the Evaluation Function in UN Women in 2014.
May 16th, 2012 RSA 2012 European Conference, Delft Dr. Karl Peter Schön Federal Office for Building and Regional Planning (BBR) Federal Institute for Research.
EUROPEAN COHESION POLICY AT A GLANCE Introduction to the EU Structural Funds Ctibor Kostal Sergej Muravjov.
1 STRATEGIC REPORT II OF THE CZECH REPUBLIC FOR THE 2007–2013 PROGRAMING PERIOD December 2012.
Financial Engineering – a tool for the implementation of the EUSBSR Sheila Maxwell INTERACT External Expert.
Common Strategic Framework Commission proposal Dominique Bé 3-4 May 2012, Bratislava.
Integrated Growth Pillar 1 of the SEE 2020 Strategy SEEIC Meeting Sarajevo, 19 June 2013.
REGIONAL POLICY EUROPEAN COMMISSION The EU Recovery Plan and the proposal amending the European Regional Development Fund Regulation.
Regional Policy EU Cohesion Policy 2014 – Regional Policy Why change? Cohesion Policy has been changing already for a long time! ✦ EU has been changing:
Management of Structural Funds The Austrian Approach Belgrade, June 23, 2011 Markus Gruber.
Josefine Loriz-Hoffmann DG AGRI/G1 “Consistency of rural development“ “Stimulating regional economies through high speed internet access”, 07/05/2009 EU.
DEVCO Towards a new Strategy for the Thematic Programme on Civil society Organisations and Local Authorities Preliminary core messages from the 3 working.
SECTOR POLICY SUPPORT PROGRAMMES A new methodology for delivery of EC development assistance. 1.
1 European Union Regional Policy – Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion The new architecture for cohesion policy post-2013 High-Level Meeting on the.
The Future of Transnational Cooperation in Central Europe ( ) Claudia Pamperl JTS INTERRREG IIIC East.
Guidance notes on the Intevention Logic and on Building a priority axis 27 September 2013.
Regional Policy Major Projects in Cohesion Policy Major Projects Team, Unit G.1 Smart and Sustainable Growth Competence Centre, DG Regional and Urban Policy.
Northern Periphery Programme: Changing Contexts and New Opportunities Irene McMaster 15 November 2012.
│ 1│ 1 What are we talking about?… Culture: Visual Arts, Performing Arts, Heritage Literature Cultural Industries: Film and Video, Television and radio,
Main elements of the templates for the Partnership Contract and the operational programme.
Regional Policy EU Cohesion Policy 2014 – 2020 Proposals from the European Commission.
EU European Territorial Cooperation Legal Package - State of play Vicente RODRIGUEZ SAEZ, DG Regional Policy, European Commission Deputy Head.
111 Synthesis of Questionnaires. Thematic concentration  Most of the new member states support the suggested principle while maintaining the element.
1 European Territorial Cooperation in legislative proposals Peter Berkowitz Head of Unit Conception, forward studies, impact assessment, DG Regional Policy.
1 Workshop of the Ministry of Finance of the Czech Republic How to use European funds within a PPP project? Jana Maláčová Ministry for Regional Development/
Result Orientation in Interreg CENTRAL EUROPE Annual Meeting, Luxemburg, 15 September 2015 Monika Schönerklee-Grasser, Joint Secretariat.
Dr Elisabeth Helander Director Community Initiatives and Innovative Actions DG Regional Policy European Commission.
Regional Policy Veronica Gaffey Evaluation Unit DG Regional Policy International Monitoring Conference Budapest 11 th November 2011 Budapest 26 th September2013.
1 Cohesion Policy Evaluation Network Meeting: Brussels, September 2009 Ex post evaluation of Cohesion policy programmes co-financed.
The Audit Authority and its role in the supervision of management and control systems for SF Shared responsibility! Mission impossible?
DG Enlargement – Effective Support for Enlargement Conference, Brussels 19 October 2009 Concluding Remarks of the Co-chairs.
E u r o p e a n C o m m i s s i o nCommunity Research Global Change and Ecosystems EU environmental research : Part B Policy objectives  Lisbon strategy.
The Portuguese NSRF Strategic Report th Meeting of the Coordination Committee of the Funds (COCOF) Brussels, 27 February 2013 Joaquim Bernardo Deputy.
1 EUROPEAN FUNDS IN HALF-TIME NEW CHALLENGES Jack Engwegen Head of the Czech Unit European Commission, Directorate General for Regional Policy Prague,
EU A new configuration of European Territorial Cooperation Vicente RODRIGUEZ SAEZ, DG Regional Policy, European Commission Deputy Head of Unit.
Information Overview SF: Planning & Programming Workshops for EC Delegation Patrick Colgan & Ján Krištín PROGRAMMING PROCEDURES in Support of Regional.
"The challenge for Territorial Cohesion 2014 – 2020: delivering results for EU citizens" Veronica Gaffey Acting Director EUROPEAN COMMISSION, DG for Regional.
Interreg IIIB Trans-national cooperation: Budget comparison : 440 million EURO 420 m EURO (Interreg IIC prog.) + 20 m EURO (Pilot Actions)
Core Indicators during Latvia Iruma Kravale Head of Strategic Planning Unit, European Union Funds Strategy Department, Ministry of Finance DG.
Evaluation of Structural Fund Programmes – the Swedish experience Implementation of the mid term evaluation - lessons for the future Maria Eriksson NUTEK.
By Adrian Window, Head of Unit BUDG D3 – Financial Procedures and Control Systems 24 March 2009 Towards an interinstitutional agreement on the concept.
Paris, Accra, Busan. Paris Declaration of 2005 Provides foundation for aid effectiveness agenda. Introduces aid effectiveness principles which remain.
1 Cohesion policy post 2013 Jiri Svarc Head of Unit for Finland, Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia DG Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion.
EU context (networks & initiatives) and expectations EU context (networks & initiatives) and expectations Michel Viaud and/or Ingrid Weiss EPIA, Brussels,
11/06/20161 Transport sector - Preparing for next programming period: SEA as part of ex-ante conditionality and ex-ante evaluation Adina Relicovschi Senior.
European Structural and Investment Funds for railways in Poland November 2015 Wolfgang Munch, Deputy Head of Unit DG Regional and Urban Policy.
1 The urban dimension of cohesion policy 2014 – 2020.
Regional Policy Future of Cohesion Policy and Investments in Health Christopher Todd, Head of Unit, Slovakia European Commission, Directorate General for.
ROUND TABLE “Exchanging Experience in Absorption of the European Funds: Perspectives for Bulgaria and Poland” 1 April 2011, Sofia Tomislav Donchev Minister.
PRIORITIES FOR THE FUTURE
2011 Survey on Monitoring the Paris Declaration
Key Moments and Forthcoming Activities in 2009
Interreg V-A Romania-Bulgaria Programme
Cohesion Policy and Cities
Keeping 16 autonomous parts together – The portuguese national communication network Cláudia Costa | NSRF Observatory, Portugal Communication networks.
S3P Agri-Food Working Committee Meeting
MINISTRY OF REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND PUBLIC WORKS DG “PROGRAMMING OF REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT” Mid-term evaluation of Operational Programme “Regional.
EU Cohesion Policy : legislative proposals
Future of Cohesion Policy
Where do we stand with the Structural Funds?
Environment in Cohesion Policy framework for
Presentation transcript:

STRAT.AT Report 2012 Second Strategic Report for Austria on the implementation of EU Cohesion Policy some selected results Alexandra Deimel Federal Chancellery Division IV/4 – Coordination – Spatial Planning and Regional Policy

2 | Federal State – 9 Länder – 8.2 Mio. Inhabitants GDP per inhabitant (2011): 129 % of EU27 (=100) NSRF and 21 Operational Programs: 1.46 Bill. Euro SF (= 0.4% of EU-Funds) Focus: Strongly committed to Lisbon-Objectives (91% earmarked) Specific focus on networks and local partnerships AT - Framework

3 | Socio-economic development and the economic crises Effects of the crisis: AT proved to be a „resilient“ economic region with excellent problem-solving capacities Due to contraction of investment activities: consequences for the programmes: (i)longer and smaller projects (ii)delays in payments because of the prolongation of the projects (iii)a shift in the focus of the projects from detail engineering to less riskier investments in companies

4 | Ad Indicators: Planning and implementation of the agreed sets of indicators as part of the EU core indicators – in relation to project commitments (ERDF) -Generally good to very good across all programmes - both with respect to financial implementation and attainment of the agreed objective indicators. Implementation Progress

5 | Conclusions for the current programming period STRAT.AT is largely compatible with the EUROPE 2020 strategy -- > current strategies and OPs continue to serve as a reference framework Due to limited amounts  programmes are not suitable as „economic steering elements“ The consequences of the crises are ameliorated by national interventions Challenges for remaining term of the programming period : -Implementation of system adaptations to account for the more stringent requirements for the audit system introduced in the period , but without hindering or slowing down the overall process; -Furthermore, the situation that the management of the current programmes and the complex planning process operate parallel at several levels (national, region) should be solved in the new programming period

6 | Conclusions for the further design of the EU Structural Policy 2014 Good governance principles must be strictly observed by all sides avoidance of an excessive density of regulations, timely and clear definition of the rules and avoidance of any ex-post additions or new interpretations Improve the performance of the system: et.al. sufficient resources Vertical coordination: deepen the relationship to the NRP Harmonisation of the regulations: by the EC as well as in the national financial aid rules – e.g. with EU framework programme Proportionality As regards content: emphasis on research and the related development of locations as well as more on „CO 2 reduction“ What is needed: framework conditions from the EU and MS that permit and/or encourage higher risk tolerance and enable clear, enforceable strategies.