Subgrantees’ Monitoring (PRAEP Programmatic and Fiscal Monitoring Guide) Puerto Rico Department of Education Educational Services to the Community Adult.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MONITORING OF SUBGRANTEES
Advertisements

Procedures for ESEA Consolidated Monitoring Effective July 1, 2011 – June 30, 2014 Monitoring For Results.
The Governors Grants Office Presents: Smart Issues for Effective Grants Management Governors Grants Office Higher Education Conference May 22, 2012 Martin.
OMB Circular A133 Audits of States, Local Governments, and Non-Profit Organizations 1 Departmental Research Administrators Training Track.
Massachusetts Department of Elementary & Secondary Education
Audit Requirements  A-133 Gov't, Education and Non-Profit  Thresholds $500K or more expended during the FY - Single Audit required  Audit Report - due.
P ART C M AINTENANCE OF E FFORT Charles Kniseley Slide presentation by Anthony White 5/19/09 RRC IFA S UBGROUP P ART C MOE 1.
4/28/20151 Presented by: Anne Taylor, NECTAC David Steele, OSEP OSEP Part C Fiscal Management Verification: What Is It And How Do I Prepare For It?
Subrecipient Monitoring Webcast Presenters Pat O'Rourke, Irene St. Croix, Bridget Ware Department of Health and Human Services Health Resources and Services.
1 Subgrants vs. Subcontracts TAA-CCCT Grants November 16, 2011.
Compliance Supplement  What is the Compliance Supplement  Important sections of the CS  For what should or should not be used  New Information for.
“The mission of the Sub-recipient Monitoring Section is to monitor, assess, and assist Sub-recipients to successfully implement and complete Grant Program.
MODULE 8 MONITORING INDIANA HPRP Training 1. Role of Independent Financial Monitors 2 IHCDA is retaining an independent accounting firm to monitor its.
Community Services Block Grant (CSBG) Program Federal Monitoring Update James Gray Program Specialist.
2014 AmeriCorps State and National Symposium Updates and Fixed Awards.
Subrecipient Monitoring Under the New Uniform Guidance Steven A. Spillan, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Spring Forum 2015.
School Lunch Internal Controls Ryan Preston W. Tyler Michael Stephanie Jacobs.
Grants.maryland.gov The Governor’s Grants Office Presents Successful Post Award Grants Management For the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Lifecycle.
Financial Management For Project Administrators. How Feds View Themselves.
Auditing Standards IFTA\IRP Audit Guidance Government Auditing Standards (GAO) Generally Accepted Auditing Standards (GAAS) International Standards on.
1 1 Roles and Responsibilities in the CDBG Program For Grant Administrators.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING ADMINISTRATION ARRA GREEN JOB AND HEALTH CARE / EMERGING INDUSTRIES NEW GRANTEE POST AWARD FORUM JUNE.
1 OREGON. The Perkins Act – bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=109_cong_bills&docid=f:s250enr.tx t.pdf Your OMB Circulars
Compliance & Internal Auditing By David N. Ricchiute
Audit and Fiscal Oversight Responsibilities VAVRINEK, TRINE, DAY & CO., LLP December 15,2010.
PREPARING FOR SUPPLEMENTAL MONITORING PERKINS COMPLIANCE Monieca West ADHE Federal Program Manager October 19, 2012.
Erica Cummings Grant Coordinator 1.  The New Mexico Department of Homeland Security and Emergency Management (DHSEM) is responsible for:  Monitoring.
“Establishing Internal Financial Controls” Presented by: Fred Thomas, Bureau Chief of Administration.
Omni Circular Key Area #7: New Responsibilities of the Pass- Through Agency By Michael Brustein, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Spring.
Presented by Raaj Kurapati and Charlene Hart. Introduction  The Single Audit Act Amendments of 1996 was enacted to streamline and improve the effectiveness.
1. The Perkins Act – bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=109_cong_bills&docid=f:s250enr.tx t.pdf Your OMB Circulars
Speed Bumps on the Fiduciary Road Title I Administrative Meeting Timonium Maryland April 14, 2010 Cvieta Jovanovich.
NRS Financial Jeopardy! The Adult Education Community’s Favorite Game Show.
Grant Financial Management U.S. Department of Commerce Officer of the Inspector General 1.
USDOL REGION 3 FISCAL FORUM Introduction to Grants ManagementApril 26 – 29, 2005.
The University Corporation Cost Sharing Sponsored Programs The University Corporation Research, Investments and Commercial Services California State University,
Employment and Training Administration DEPARTMENT OF LABOR ETA Grant Management and Monitoring – Discretionary Grantees Southern California Training and.
1 CDBG Roles and Responsibilities For Local Officials.
1 Considering Assistive Technology in the IEP Process.
Program Monitoring and Management Jacqui Shoholm Deputy Administrator Office of Regional Management, USDOL.
TOM TORLAKSON State Superintendent of Public Instruction CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Preparing.
Award Monitoring Update National Science Foundation Advisory Committee for Business and Operations October 22, 2003 Mary Santonastasso, Director, Division.
PREPARING FOR A COMPLIANCE REVIEW PERKINS COMPLIANCE Monieca West ADHE Federal Program Manager October 19, 2012.
Monitoring & Evaluation. Objective Learn the why, what and how-to approach to monitoring Review monitoring techniques and define the roles monitoring.
June 3, 2007NTIA PSIC Public Meeting1 How to Avoid Audit Problems: Matching Share and Cost Principles National Telecommunications and Information Administration.
Brette Kaplan, Esq. Erin Auerbach, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Spring Forum 2013
Continuous Improvement and Focused Monitoring System US Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Overview of the OSEP Continuous Improvement.
Monitoring Region 3 Discretionary Roundtable May 20 – 23, 2008 Mary Evans And Conyers Garrett EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING ADMINISTRATION UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT.
Presented by: Jan Stanley, State Title I Director Office of Assessment and Accountability June 10, 2008 Monitoring For Results.
OnTrack Financial and Grant Compliance. Welcome The OnTrack Policies and Procedures is a draft and a living document. It may be changed based on UWGC.
Uniform Administrative Requirements 2014 YouthBuild Webinar Series.
Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services United States Department of Education Program Review and Best Practices: Who, What, When, Where,
PUBLIC PROCUREMENT REFORMS IN ALBANIA 10 th PUBLIC PROCUREMENT EXCHANGE PLATFORM May, 27-30, 2014 Istanbul, Turkey 1.
Agency Roundtable Discussion: Subrecipient Monitoring.
Subgrantee Compliance February 27, 2013 Preparing TPPS Subgrantees for Monitoring Shelby County Grants Office presents:
Jaimie Lewis Omnitrans San Bernardino, California SUBRECIPIENT MONITORING.
Internal Control Process at Geneseo. Objectives Understand the objectives of effective internal controls Describe Geneseo’s internal control program Accurately.
What’s your friend up to? Subrecipient Monitoring Issues Tom Egan, MIT OSP Jeannette Gordon, Division of Grants Compliance and Oversight OPERA, OER, NIH.
Division of Adult Education and Literacy U.S. Department of Education Washington, DC.
Sub-recipient Monitoring and Contractor Determination
Subrecipient Monitoring
The Importance of Subrecipient Monitoring
Subrecipient vs. Contractor Determinations
Sponsored Programs at Penn
Research Administration
Roles and Responsibilities
Managing Federal grants
Internal Audit Who? What? When? How? Why? In brief . . .
Uniform Guidance and Grants Accounting
Monitoring and Technical Assistance.
Presentation transcript:

Subgrantees’ Monitoring (PRAEP Programmatic and Fiscal Monitoring Guide) Puerto Rico Department of Education Educational Services to the Community Adult Education Program

Why monitoring?  Assure compliance with applicable federal and state laws and regulations  Assure accomplishment of the goals and objectives established in the State Plan  Achieve significant reduction in audit findings

Objectives  Ascertain that program resources are directed to the expected population  Provide supervision and assistance to subgrantees  Check on compliance with legal and administrative management of funds  Document compliance with federal requirement related to monitoring subgrantees (state level)  Access and document the extent to which state and local providers meet the first, second and third core indicator levels  Verify professional development activities offered during the year

Fiscal Monitoring Instrument  The purpose of this instrument is to provide monitors with a tool to perform an effective and efficient fiscal monitoring of the program at a state and local level.

Procedures Applied in the Fiscal Monitoring  Activities Allowed or Not allowed  Allowable Costs / Costs Principles  Cash Management  Eligibility  Equipment and Property Management  Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking  Procurement

Example

Additional Procedures Applied in the Fiscal Monitoring at State Level  Period of Availability of Funds  Reporting  Subrecipient Monitoring  Special Conditions

Advantages of the Guide  Allows one person to do both programmatic and fiscal monitoring  The instruments can be use individually  Save time and effort Anticipate the finding by taking the corrective action prior to the monitoring

Results of Implementation  Decrease of audit findings From – approximately 28 findings related to Adult Education Program – four findings related to the Adult Education Program  Overall improvement in local programs’ performance