Academic Senate Student Learning Outcomes Why The Controversy? Presentation to the MPC Board of Trustees November 25, 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Special recognition: University of Florida.  Participants will be able to: ◦ Articulate specifications for learning outcomes ◦ Classify learning outcomes.
Advertisements

Student Learning Outcomes Curriculum Change Request Academic Council Presentation Gary Howard Rosemary Hays-Thomas October 22, 2004.
Academic Senate Student Learning Outcomes Why The Controversy? Presentation to the MPC Board of Trustees November 25, 2008.
Program Review: The Foundation for Institutional Planning and Improvement.
An Outcomes-based Assessment Model for General Education Amy Driscoll WASC EDUCATIONAL SEMINAR February 1, 2008.
ELAC SLO RETREAT 2009 Veronica Jaramillo, Ph.D. Mona Panchal Anthony Cadavid ELAC SLO RETREAT 2009.
DEVELOPING DEPARTMENTAL OUTCOMES ASSESSMENT PLANS Jerry Rackoff Lois Huffines Kathy Martin.
Making Assessment Meaningful: Using Assessment Results to Improve Student Learning Dr. Elizabeth Wemlinger
1 KapCC Student Learning Outcomes Assessment Framework Faculty Senate SLO Committee Presented by Kristine Korey-Smith.
Reflective Pathways from Theory to Practice Brewton-Parker College Education Division.
Student Learning Outcomes: Tools for Intentionality.
Spring 2012 Pilot Project Module Nine A New Texas Core Curriculum 1.
Jeanne M. Clerc, Ed.D. Western Illinois University (WIU) October 14, 2011.
TaskStream Training Presented by the Committee on Learning Assessment 2015.
 Description  The unit has a conceptual framework that defines how our programs prepare candidates to be well-rounded educators. Every course in the.
Essential Elements of a Workable Assessment Plan Pat Tinsley McGill, Ph.D. Professor, Strategic Management College of Business Faculty Lead, Assessment.
1. Continue to distinguish and clarify between Student Learning Outcomes (SLOs) and Service Area Outcomes (SAOs) 2. Develop broad SLOs/SAOs in order to.
Standard 5 - Faculty Qualifications, Performance, and Development Kate Steffens St. Cloud State University.
2010 ASCCC Curriculum Institute Santa Clara Marriott July 8-10, 2010 The Basic Map: Course Outlines High quality course outlines are the foundations of.
Writing Student Learning Outcomes Consider the course you teach.
Pierce College CSUN-Pierce Paths Project Outcomes Report 2013.
Accreditation, SLOs and You – What are the patient outcomes? or Will the patient survive? Facilitators: Janet Fulks and Phillip Maynard.
STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES STATE CENTER COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT BOARD REPORT, DECEMBER 7, 2010 SLO Coordinators: Maggie Taylor (FCC) and Eileen Apperson(RC)
Assessing Program-Level SLOs November 2010 Mary Pape Antonio Ramirez 1.
Assessing General Education Workshop for College of the Redwoods Fred Trapp August 18, 2008.
General Education Learning Outcomes: Campus Discussion on Development & Process Sacramento City College LR 105 – 2:00-3:30 April 4 th, 2006 Facilitators:
Updating Curriculum to Support Learning Davidson County Community College May
Assessment Workshop College of San Mateo February 2006.
 This prepares educators to work in P-12 schools (1)  It provides direction (1)  It is knowledge-based, articulated, shared, coherent, consistent with.
Co-Curricular Learning Assessment Academy for Student Centered Learning Fall 2013.
Assessment of Student Learning North American Colleges and Teachers of Agriculture Cia Verschelden June 17, 2009.
Designing for Learning Tools to Help Faculty Design More Inclusive Courses Beth Harrison, PhD University of Dayton.
Technische Universität Berlin 1 Prof. Dr.-Ing. Jörg Steinbach Vice-president of the Technische Universität Berlin Past-President of SEFI Accreditation.
Academic Senate GEOs General Education Outcomes Fred Hochstaedter Academic Senate President SLO Coordinator Monterey Peninsula College Website for more.
Presentation by: Carol Mattson, Dean of Academic Services, Fullerton College Nancy Deutsch, Reading Faculty/Staff Development Coordinator, Cypress College.
Write On! Your Course Outline. Pedagogy Unbound Series Facilitated by: Deborah Richards Florence Daddey.
FACULTY REPORTS JANUARY 16, 2009 GEOFFREY DYER Taft College’s Progress in SLOs.
What the*!?# is an SLO? Train the Trainers Workshop Marcy Alancraig Cabrillo College
A Basic Guide to Academic Assessment Presented by Darby Kaikkonen Director of Institutional Research.
 The teacher is the decision maker and it is her job to decide on what units to include during the year or what tomorrow’s lesson plan will be.  Thought-out.
What the*!?# is an SLO? Workshop on Student Learning Outcomes For De Anza College Faculty.
16 OCTOBER 2015 JOACHIN ARIAS, SLO COORDINATOR EDWARD PAI, DEAN OF INSTITUTIONAL EFFECTIVENESS Program Review 2.0 Training: SLO Assessment Participation.
Programme design and student assessment David Baume 1.
SACS-CASI Accreditation and the Library Media Program in Public Schools Laura B. Page.
MVC – Outcomes Assessment FLEX –Day February 8, 2013.
Introduction to Academic Assessment John Duffield Office of Academic Assessment Georgia State University September 2013.
SLOAC The Skyline Way1 Presented by: Skyline College SLOAC Committee.
Assessment 101: What do you (really) need to know? Melinda Jackson, SJSU Assessment Director October
Criterion 1 Mission A. The institution's mission is broadly understood within the institution and guides its operations. B. The mission is articulated.
CDIO: Overview, Standards, and Processes (Part 2) Doris R. Brodeur, November 2005.
Copyright © May 2014, Montessori Centre International.
Systems Wide Learning at a Community College Developments in the last five years –SACS-COC (Course Outcomes to Program Outcomes) –The Texas Higher Education.
Defining 21st Century Skills: A Frameworks for Norfolk Public Schools NORFOLK BOARD OF EDUCATION Fall 2009.
Integrated Planning Randy Lawson 411 Training April, 2016.
Teaching and Learning with Technology
Lead-Off Batter: Applying New Accjc standards
GOVERNANCE COUNCILS AND HARTNELL’S GOVERNANCE MODEL
Curriculum & Accreditation: You Can Get There from Here
Curriculum and Accreditation
NJCU College of Education
SLOs and Course Objectives
Assessment and Accreditation
ACCJC Standards Adopted june 2014.
Presented by: Skyline College SLOAC Committee Fall 2007
Assessing Academic Programs at IPFW
February 21-22, 2018.
2017: SLOs & Assessment Reboot
SLOs, Curriculum, and Other Things that Shape Your Classroom
CURRICULUM AND ACCREDITATION
Brooklyn College Fall 2019 OFFICE OF Institutional effectiveness August 29th 2019.
Presentation transcript:

Academic Senate Student Learning Outcomes Why The Controversy? Presentation to the MPC Board of Trustees November 25, 2008

Academic Senate First Things First What are SLOs? ACCJC: Knowledge, skills, abilities, and attitudes that a student has attained at the end (or as a result) of his or her engagement in a particular set of collegiate experiences. MPC: An SLO is a measurable or evaluable description of what students are expected to be able to “do” as they successfully complete a course. The word “do,” in this context, could mean “perform,” “paint,” “analyze,” “demonstrate,” “synthesize,” “use the scientific method,” or any number of verbs appropriate for a particular course. But there’s more…..

Academic Senate First Things First What is the SLO-Assessment Model?  Shifts the focus to student learning  Integrates the assessment results into all aspects of institutional planning and resource allocation Expectations of student learning….. Assessment….. Analysis….. Dialog….. Planning

Academic Senate SLOs: So Why the Controversy?  Evaluation  Work Load  Standardization/Academic Freedom  Student Indoctrination?  Bureaucratic waste of time because  We already do it  Doesn’t value the individuality of students  Doesn’t value the complexity of teaching and learning  Can’t possibly be of any value  It’s a fad…Nobody cares  We should spend our time teaching Not suggesting these objections are valid, or that we all agree. Just that they exist.

Academic Senate Evaluation  From the ACCJC Standards, in the HR section: “Faculty and others directly responsible for student progress toward achieving stated student learning outcomes have, as a component of their evaluation, effectiveness in producing those learning outcomes.”  Faculty evaluation is negotiable issue, not a directive of an accrediting agency.  Could lead to low-level learning….Can you spell E-a-r-t-h? SLO Controversy  CTA parent investigating legal action.

Academic Senate Work Load Developing SLOs…..evaluating them…..analyzing the results.. …talking about them……planning what to do next…. How much time will this take? SLO Controversy A lot, to do it well. All take time. It’s why we’re all so busy.

Academic Senate Work Load An un-negotiated addition to our workload. SLO Controversy An over-riding framework for what we already do as faculty. Developing SLOs…..evaluating them…..analyzing the results.. …talking about them……planning what to do next….

Academic Senate Standardization/Academic Freedom Assessment and Dialog:  Where should it lead us?......What should we agree on? -Student Expectations?-Tests? -Assessment Tools? -Assignments? -Identical Syllabi -Daily lectures?  Students’ access to a diversity of views and opinions.  This diversity is intellectual pluralism, the marketplace of ideas, the foundation of our Academic Freedom policy. SLO Controversy  Or a framework for ensuring consistency between courses?

Academic Senate Standardization/Academic Freedom Academic Freedom Intellectual Pluralism SLO Controversy Consistency between sections, alignment of curriculum How should assessment and dialog change our teaching?

Academic Senate Standardization/Academic Freedom SLO Controversy What are SLOs again? This is No Child Left Behind Means to defend against No Child Left Behind CTA State Leadership State Academic Senate Lower academic stds Can you spell E-A-R-T-H? Faculty’s opportunity to set academic stds

Academic Senate Student Indoctrination “The evidence the institution presents should also be about student learning outcomes (mastery of the knowledge, skills, abilities, competencies, attitudes, beliefs, opinions, and values at the course, program, and degree levels in the context of each college’s mission and population)…” [ACCJC Guide to Evaluating Institutions, page 11; emphasis mine]  This is more like brainwashing than education.  Relates to Students’ Academic Freedom SLO Controversy Or is it all up to us to define?

Academic Senate “ mastery of the knowledge, skills, abilities, competencies, attitudes, beliefs, opinions, and values at the course, program, and degree levels in the context of each college’s mission and population…” [ACCJC Guide to Evaluating Institutions, page 11; emphasis mine] SLO Controversy Which beliefs, values, or opinions? ……..Appropriate?

Academic Senate “ mastery of the knowledge, skills, abilities, competencies, attitudes, beliefs, opinions, and values at the course, program, and degree levels in the context of each college’s mission and population…” [ACCJC Guide to Evaluating Institutions, page 11; emphasis mine] SLO Controversy Which beliefs, values, or opinions? ……..Appropriate? Skills, abilities, and competencies are up to us

Academic Senate Bureaucratic Waste of Time Doesn’t value the individuality of students.  Students learn differently  Have chaotic lives  Respond/learn in many different ways to our courses  Not always captured in pithy statements SLO Controversy Doesn’t value the complexity of topics and teaching.  SLOs become overly vague generalizations of what we expect  “Use the Scientific Method to investigate the natural world.”  In what context?  At what complexity?

Academic Senate Bureaucratic Waste of Time Can’t possibly be of any value It’s a fad…..Nobody cares about them We should spend our time teaching  What is it we shouldn’t do, to complete these SLO tasks? SLO Controversy We already do this.  Course Outline of Record  State Mandated through Title 5  Objectives (=ACCJC SLOs)  Assessment Methods  Informally with Colleagues

Academic Senate We already do this SLO Controversy Extra work better directed elsewhere Why don’t we want this again? Bureaucratic Waste of Time

Academic Senate SLOs Controversy  Standardization/Academic Freedom  Evaluation  Work Load  Student Indoctrination?  Bureaucratic waste of time Do ALL faculty worry about these things? But we also believe in accreditation. YES!

Academic Senate SLO Controversy No clarity from ACCJC Why has there been such controversy? Lack of experienced leadership at MPC No agreement on what SLOs represent or should be used for.

Academic Senate SLO Controversy No agreement on what SLOs are. NCLB Prevent NCLB More work What we do now StandardizationConsistency

Academic Senate SLO Controversy No clarity from ACCJC  A recognition of what it means to be an ethical human being and effective citizen….” “General education has comprehensive learning outcomes ……including the following:

Academic Senate SLO Controversy No clarity from ACCJC  A recognition of what it means to be an ethical human being and effective citizen….” “General education has comprehensive learning outcomes ……including the following:  “The willingness to assume civic, political, and social responsibilities locally, nationally, and globally.”

Academic Senate SLO Controversy Lack of experienced leadership at MPC SLOs are new; no agreement on what they represent SLOs are a multi-faceted and complicated Difficult to lead without common definitions

Academic Senate So what are SLOs? On behalf of the Academic Senate, Thank you.