APEX Plasma-Liquid Interaction Tasks are Utilizing and Extending State-Of-The-Art Codes with Comparisons to the Latest Data, and Exploring Exciting Possibilities.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Introduction to Plasma-Surface Interactions Lecture 6 Divertors.
Advertisements

ARIES-Advanced Tokamak Power Plant Study Physics Analysis and Issues Charles Kessel, for the ARIES Physics Team Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory U.S.-Japan.
Ss Hefei, China July 19, 2011 Nuclear, Plasma, and Radiological Engineering Center for Plasma-Material Interactions Contact: Flowing.
First Wall Heat Loads Mike Ulrickson November 15, 2014.
External Convection: Laminar Flat Plate
PhD studies report: "FUSION energy: basic principles, equipment and materials" Birutė Bobrovaitė; Supervisor dr. Liudas Pranevičius.
L I M I T Liquid Metal Illinois Toroidal Test Facility Toroidally Symmetric Liquid Metal J X B Experiments David N. Ruzic, J. Norman, J.P. Allain, M. Boaz,
1 Design of Gridded-Tube Structures for the 805 MHz RF Cavity Department of Mechanical, Materials, and Aerospace Engineering M. Alsharoa (PhD candidate)
Laser Machining of Structural Ceramics: An Integrated Experimental & Numerical Approach for Surface Finish Hitesh D. Vora and Narendra B. Dahotre Laboratory.
Progress on UCLA MTOR Film Flow Experiments for ALIST (Nov April 2003) Presented by Alice Ying M. Abdou, N. Morley, T. Sketchley, J. Burris, M.
Assessment of beam-target interaction of IFMIF A state of the art J. Knaster a, D. Bernardi b, A. García c, F. Groeschel h, R. Heidinger d, M. Ida e, A.
Chamber Technology Goals Used in APEX to Calibrate New Ideas and Measure Progress 1. High Power Density Capability Average/Peak Neutron Wall Load ~ 7 /
1 APEX Task I Progress, Status, and Plan Presented by Alice Ying APEX Meeting Nov. 3, 2003.
1 CLiFF - Convective Liquid Flow Firstwall Liquid Walls: Concepts, Modeling, and Experiments Neil B. Morley University of California, Los Angeles Presented.
First Wall Thermal Hydraulics Analysis El-Sayed Mogahed Fusion Technology Institute The University of Wisconsin With input from S. Malang, M. Sawan, I.
Thermo-fluid Analysis of Helium cooling solutions for the HCCB TBM Presented By: Manmeet Narula Alice Ying, Manmeet Narula, Ryan Hunt and M. Abdou ITER.
April 4-5, 2002 A. R. Raffray, et al., Chamber Clearing Code Development 1 Chamber Dynamics and Clearing Code Development Effort A. R. Raffray, F. Najmabadi,
Characteristics of Commercial Fusion Power Plants Results from ARIES-AT Study Farrokh Najmabadi Fusion Power Associates Annual Meeting & Symposium July.
An Overview of the Fluid Dynamics Aspects of Liquid Protection Schemes for Fusion Reactors S. I. Abdel-Khalik and M. Yoda TOFE-16 Meeting - Madison (September.
Aug. 8-9, 2006 HAPL meeting, GA 1 Advanced Chamber Concept with Magnetic Intervention: - Ion Dump Issues - Status of Blanket Study A. René Raffray UCSD.
Highlights of ARIES-AT Study Farrokh Najmabadi For the ARIES Team VLT Conference call July 12, 2000 ARIES Web Site:
June19-21, 2000Finalizing the ARIES-AT Blanket and Divertor Designs, ARIES Project Meeting/ARR ARIES-AT Blanket and Divertor Design (The Final Stretch)
Thermofluid MHD issues for liquid breeder blankets and first walls Neil B. Morley and Sergey Smolentsev MAE Dept., UCLA APEX/TBM Meeting November 3, 2003.
Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy Neutrino Factory / Muon Collider Collaboration Meeting March 17-19, 2008, FNAL, Batavia, IL Target.
March 20-21, 2000ARIES-AT Blanket and Divertor Design, ARIES Project Meeting/ARR Status ARIES-AT Blanket and Divertor Design The ARIES Team Presented.
KIT – University of the State of Baden-Wuerttemberg and National Research Center of the Helmholtz Association Institute for Nuclear and Energy Technologies.
Computational Modelling of Unsteady Rotor Effects Duncan McNae – PhD candidate Professor J Michael R Graham.
Computational Modeling of Turbulent Asymmetric Jet Flows Prof. Ed Akin Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science Rice University Houston, Texas Jon.
Kaschuck Yu.A., Krasilnikov A.V., Prosvirin D.V., Tsutskikh A.Yu. SRC RF TRINITI, Troitsk, Russia Status of the divertor neutron flux monitor design and.
Falling Liquid Film Flow along Cascade- type First Wall of Laser-Fusion Reactor T. Kunugi, T. Nakai, Z. Kawara Department of Nuclear Engineering Kyoto.
ASIPP Development of a new liquid lithium limiter with a re-filling system in HT-7 G. Z. Zuo, J. S. Hu, Z.S, J. G. Li,HT-7 team July 19-20, 2011 Institute.
Free Surface Flow Phenomena: Effects on MHD flow control and interfacial transport Mohamed Abdou DOE Budget Meeting, Germantown March 13, 2001.
Plasma Processes, Inc. 1 Phase I SBIR: Engineered Surfaces for the Lithium Tokamak eXperiment (LTX) PFC Meeting May 9-11, 2005 Princeton, New Jersey Scott.
Mohamed Abdou Professor, Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering, UCLA 10 th International Symposium on Applied Electromagnetics and Mechanics Tokyo, Japan.
Thermal Model of MEMS Thruster Apurva Varia Propulsion Branch Code 597.
Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy MUTAC Review April , 2004, LBNL Target Simulation Roman Samulyak, in collaboration with.
Steps toward MTOR Experimental Investigations for ALIST Project Where we stand? This Step: Investigation of Conducting Wall Effects on MHD Film Flow:in.
School of Aerospace Engineering MITE Numerical Modeling of Compressor and Combustor Flows Suresh Menon, Lakshmi N. Sankar Won Wook Kim S. Pannala, S.
Neutrino Factory / Muon Collider Target Meeting Numerical Simulations for Jet-Proton Interaction Wurigen Bo, Roman Samulyak Department of Applied Mathematics.
Boiling Heat Transfer Source:
1/9 Session III-B Special Liquid Lithium Technology Session Summary C. H. Skinner, session chair Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory 2 nd International.
DIII-D SHOT #87009 Observes a Plasma Disruption During Neutral Beam Heating At High Plasma Beta Callen et.al, Phys. Plasmas 6, 2963 (1999) Rapid loss of.
1) Disruption heat loading 2) Progress on time-dependent modeling C. Kessel, PPPL ARIES Project Meeting, Bethesda, MD, 4/4/2011.
Stabilizing Shells in ARIES C. E. Kessel Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory ARIES Project Meeting, 5/28-29/2008.
Magnet for ARIES-CS Magnet protection Cooling of magnet structure L. Bromberg J.H. Schultz MIT Plasma Science and Fusion Center ARIES meeting UCSD January.
Compact Stellarator Approach to DEMO J.F. Lyon for the US stellarator community FESAC Subcommittee Aug. 7, 2007.
Validation of the Stability of PbLi Liquid Film and its Possible Application Fumito Okino Graduate School of Energy Science, Kyoto University 1 Japan-US.
STUDIES OF NONLINEAR RESISTIVE AND EXTENDED MHD IN ADVANCED TOKAMAKS USING THE NIMROD CODE D. D. Schnack*, T. A. Gianakon**, S. E. Kruger*, and A. Tarditi*
Introductory Remarks and Highlights of FY02 Plan Mohamed Abdou APEX Meeting, Scottsdale, AZ November 7-9, 2001 APEX Outline Key Points from FY01 FY02 PLAN.
Chapter 2. Physical processes responsible for evolution and downstream breakdown of a subsonic round jet Multimedia files Nos. 2.1 – 2.8 The results of.
Review of Thermofluid / MHD activities for DCLL Sergey Smolentsev & US TBM Thermofluid/MHD Group 2006 US-Japan Workshop on FUSION HIGH POWER DENSITY COMPONENTS.
Some slides on UCLA LM-MHD capabilities and Preliminary Incompressible LM Jet Simulations in Muon Collider Fields Neil Morley and Manmeet Narula Fusion.
Top-Level Technical Issues for FNST #3 MHD Thermofluid Phenomena and Impact on Transport Processes in Electrically Conducting Liquid Coolants/Breeders.
1 NUMERICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES OF THIN-LIQUID-FILM WALL PROTECTION SCHEMES S.I. ABDEL-KHALIK AND M. YODA G. W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering.
Advanced Tokamak Modeling for FIRE C. Kessel, PPPL NSO/PAC Meeting, University of Wisconsin, July 10-11, 2001.
Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy MUTAC Review April , 2004, BNL Target Simulations Roman Samulyak in collaboration with Y.
DESIGN WINDOWS FOR THIN AND THICK LIQUID PROTECTION SCHEMES IN IFE REACTOR CHAMBERS M. Yoda and S. I. Abdel-Khalik G. W. Woodruff School of Mechanical.
1 A Self-Cooled Lithium Blanket Concept for HAPL I. N. Sviatoslavsky Fusion Technology Institute, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI With contributions.
Material System Thermomechanics Interactions (cont’d) International Collaboration: Role / Impact / Recognition - Serves a unique role in IEA program on.
NIMROD Simulations of a DIII-D Plasma Disruption S. Kruger, D. Schnack (SAIC) April 27, 2004 Sherwood Fusion Theory Meeting, Missoula, MT.
Remarkable Progress on Small-Scale Experiments with Science, Education, and Engineering Mission Two flexible free surface flow test stands were planned,
Unstructured Meshing Tools for Fusion Plasma Simulations
T. Kunugi, T. Nakai, Z. Kawara Department of Nuclear Engineering
Turbulence / free surface interaction produces key phenomena - anisotropic near-surface turbulence Turbulent production dominated by the generation of.
Modified Design of Aries T-Tube Divertor Concept
Moving Beyond Prediction to Control
Global Warming Problem
What is Global Warming? Temperature Rise (K) Year
VLT Meeting, Washington DC, August 25, 2005
Aerosol Production in Lead-protected and Flibe-protected Chambers
Presentation transcript:

APEX Plasma-Liquid Interaction Tasks are Utilizing and Extending State-Of-The-Art Codes with Comparisons to the Latest Data, and Exploring Exciting Possibilities Identified in Snowmass Dynamic modeling of plasma equilibria uses the Tokamak Simulation Code (TSC), a PPPL code validated with NSTX data. For example, TSC simulations of NSTX equilibria were used to estimate the magnitude of forces due to eddy currents on the liquid surface test module for NSTX Initial Results: Liquid metals can be used as conducting walls that offer a means for stabilizing plasma MHD modes Physicists are contributing exciting ideas for liquid walls - Electromagnetically Restrained Blanket (Woolley) - Magnetic Propulsion (Zakharov) - Soaker Hose (Kotschenreuther) Studies of Innovative Wall Concepts are providing insight into nature and control of plasma instabilities - Stabilization schemes for resistive wall modes and neoclassical tearing modes are of broad interest to the fusion community - A new resistive MHD Code (WALLCODE) has been developed by IFS/UT to explore the stabilizing properties of various conducting wall geometries

Utilization of Liquid Metals for a Conducting Shell May Allow Higher Power Density Tokamak Plasma Initial results from new WALLCODE resistive MHD code: Stable highly elongated plasmas possible with appropriately shaped conducting shell Liquid metals may be used for the conducting shell Implications for fusion: - High power density plasma (plus power extraction capability) - Overcome physics-engineering conflicting requirements that reactor designers have struggled with for decades Beta Limits for high elongation (example of initial results) **   indentation/minor radius % 11.5% 14% 22% Results from WALLCODE: New IFS/UT resistive MHD code * Instability growth rate depends on conformity of wall to plasma

Progress toward Practical and Attractive Liquid Walls: Many Creative Innovations The APEX Approach to Problems - Understand problems and underlying phenomena and science - Search for Innovative Solutions: Our job is “to make things work” - Modeling, analysis, and experiments to test and improve solutions Examples of Creative Innovations New fluid candidates with low-vapor pressure at high temperatures (SnLi, Sn) “Surface Renewal”: New schemes to promote controlled surface mixing and wave formation to reduce surface thermal boundary layer resistance Flow tailoring schemes to “control” flow around “penetrations” Two-stream flows to resolve conflicting requirements of “low surface temperature” and “high exit bulk temperature” Toroidal Flow (“Soaker Hose”) concept to reduce MHD effects Novel schemes for electromagnetic flow control Creative design with over laid inlet streams to shield nozzles from line-of-sight Innovative design of “bag concept” with “flexible” SiC fabric structure

Fast Flow Cassette Assembly Cut at Mid-plane Clever creative design with overlaid streams shields nozzles from line-of-sight to plasma Inboard Stream Inboard Stream Outboard Auxiliary Stream Outboard Auxiliary Stream

STATE-OF-THE-ART 3-D TIME DEPENDENT FLOW 3-D CALCULATIONS WAS KEY TO UNDERSTANDING PENETRATION PROBLEMS 2-D Velocity Magnitude in Planes Perpendicular to the Flow Direction 3-D View of the Wake Following the Penetration. 3-D CFD Simulation Results Potential Problems Fluid splash Fluid level rise Wake formation

Innovative Solutions Found and Confirmed by FLOW-3D Calculations (experiments also planned) I II III IV I II III IV 3 -DHydrodynamic simulation of penetration accommodation when the back wall topology surrounding the penetration is modified. Modified back wall topology surrounding the penetration. 2-D Velocity magnitude in planes perpendicular to the flow direction

Finding innovative surface renewal methods to improve heat transfer Case Analyzed to Assess Effect Liquid Layer Velocity : 1.5 m/s Liquid Layer Height: 2.0 cm Fin Height: 1.4 cm Fin Width: 0.5 cm Spacing Between Fins: 0.5 cm 1.4 cm 45 o Fin Flow Direction IDEA: Promote streamwise vortex production by “delta-wing” backwall structures Long-lived vortices should renew surface and transport heat to the bulk flow. Technique borrowed from aerospace applications

Free surface temperature distribution of a Flibe flow over a plane wall, without (left) and with (right) vortex promoters 2-D Temperature and Velocity Distribution downstream from vortex promoters - vortex generation and heat transfer enhancement clearly evident. 3D Thermofluid Simulations Confirm Heat Transfer Enhancement without with

 0 Y (V) X (U)   B  g  R TWO-STREAM FLOW HAS THE POTENTIAL TO ACHIEVE BOTH PLASMA COMPATIBILITY AND HIGH THERMAL EFFICIENCY Plasma-facing liquid surface at low temperature (to reduce vaporization; plasma compatibility) while the thick liquid exits at high bulk temperature for high efficiency Good heat transfer capabilities due to the high velocity near-surface jet and Kelvin- Helmholtz instability between the two streams Reduced volumetric flow rate Lower erosion due to slower velocity in the internal stream The fast external stream removes the surface heat flux, while the slow internal stream serves as a blanket:

Downstream development of the two-stream flow produced with the submerged walls. Slow stream: U=7 m/s, h=40 cm. Fast stream: U=10 m/s, h=10 cm. Sketch of the induced current in the cross-sectional area. The submerged walls are slightly conducting: c w =2  Liquid Metal: using “submerged walls”. Non-conducting or slightly conducting walls submerged into the flowing liquid produce MHD drag forming a “slow stream”, while liquid in the near-surface area is accelerated due to the mass conservation. Low Conductivity Fluids: with a step-type initial velocity profile. CFD-MHD Calculations Show the Potential for Practical Realization of the TWO-STREAM Idea

Simulations of Flowing Lithium in NSTX using Newly Developed MHD Free Surface Tools “Center Stack +Inboard Divertor”, 2.5-D model Flow3D code was extended to include MHD effects (Flow3D-M) New 2.5-D model and computer code were developed to calculate MHD free surface flows in a multi-component magnetic field “Inboard Divertor”, Flow3D-M Stable Li film flow can be established over the center stack

Projected NSTX_center stack_heat flux profile (total power = 10 MW) ANSYS Model surface heat flux  Lithium surface temperature increases as flow proceeds downstream as a function of lithium inlet velocity  Two local temperature peaks are related to local maximums in the heat flux profile T about 340 C (if T in = 230 C) Results of Heat Transfer Calculations for NSTX Center Stack Flowing Lithium Film NSTX: Heat flux can be removed with flowing lithium along the center stack with acceptable surface temperature (even with 4-mm film at 2m/s) Height Above Midplane [m]

NSTX Li module HYLIFE-II Liquid Wall Science is being Advanced in Several MFE & IFE Research Programs IFMIF KOH Jacket KOH Twisted- Tape 3D Laser Beams Thin Plastic JUPITER-II APEX CLiFF

Liquid Jet Research for IFE Chambers High-velocity, oscillating jets for liquid “pocket” flow trajectory and jet deformation primary breakup / droplet formation dissembly processes liquid debris interaction / clearance partial head recovery High-velocity, low surface- ripple jets for liquid “grid” surface smoothness control pointing accuracy / vibration primary breakup / droplet ejection Graphics from UCB

Single jet water experiments and numerical simulations demonstrate control of jet trajectory and liquid pocket formation at near prototypic Re Oscillating IFE jet experiments and simulations Experimental Data from UCB Flow Direction Regions flattened by interaction with neighboring jet Simulations from UCLA Flow Direction